Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IN DUST
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 04:31, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- IN DUST (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not satisfy WP:BAND. I couldn't find much on this band from third-party independent sources (such as reviews or news): only some blog posts and social media sites. I don't think the band's single Peel Session is enough to establish notability. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 18:26, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 18:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion:? While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2019-05 ✍️ create
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.