Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Amynewyork4248

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Amynewyork4248

Final (0/3/0) ending 21:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Amynewyork4248 (talk · contribs) – Amy has been an active Wikipedian for five months, and has been incredibly active in editing New Pages. She's requesting to be an administrator as it's time-consuming to place a "Speedy Deletion" template on pages that require speedy deletion. She would take great care and responsibilty in editing and deleting pages as she relaizes it's an extremely important job to take on in Wikipedia. (She also doesn't mind referring to herself in the third person.)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose too new Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose. Please return when you have more experience. Kusma (討論とうろん) 20:16, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose. Sorry, this candidate has been editing Wikipedia for fewer than 2 months, has less than 150 edits to all namespaces and has a malformed RfA (nomination not accepted, placed in wrong place in RfA list, incorrect information). She's made just two edits to the Kate Winslet article. Gwernol 20:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• See Amynewyork4248's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would definitely be stringent and meticulous with sysops and constantly look for ways to improve Wikipedia. My main tasks would be reverting vandalized articles and delete articles used for self-promotion or others outlined in Speedy Deletions.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I'm most pleased with editing Kate Winslet as there were numerous factual errors. I've also contributed to Wikipedia by changing spelling and grammar errors to make this site look more professional.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I haven't been in a conflict that involved stress, although I have been in a few heated discussions about if certain facts in articles were verifiable or not.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.