Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography

WP:DSPHOTO

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Photography. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Photography|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Photography. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Visual arts.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Photography

Draško Bogdanović

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one source (a blog) in the article which discusses the subject. It says he won an award but that is unsourced. I haven't been able to find any sources that discuss him or his work in any meaningful sense. Nothing that suggests he would pass WP:PHOTOGRAPHER, or even general notability. Griboski (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians, Photography, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Yugoslavia, and Canada. C F A 💬 04:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could only find more self-written profiles from things he's contributed to. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 15:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Most likely self-promo. I see little or no RS. — Sadko (words are wind) 17:30, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sounds like WP:PROMO Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ela Gawin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is mostly based on primary sources, while the secondary sources are mostly unreliable, being as follows:

[1] prawdaoeligawin.blogspot.com is an attack site directed at the article subject, extremely unacceptable for a biography.
[2] celebryci.info is a gossip site, unacceptable for a biography.
[3] dramki.pl is a gossip site, unacceptable for a biography.
[4] vibez.pl is a tabloid, which shouldn't be used for biographies.
[5] Not sure if kobieta.wp.pl is considered reliable. Due to legal reasons the cited article doesn't disclose the subject's last name but only the first letter, so I'm not sure if this is compatible with BLP.
[6] truestory.pl is a tabloid, which shouldn't be used for biographies.
[7] krakow.naszemiasto.pl is a local newspaper. It may be considered reliable, but like some sources above, it doesn't disclose the subject's surname, only the first letter.
[8] wiadomosci.gazeta.pl is, I think, a tabloid, so I doubt it would be considered reliable here. Like the others, it doesn't disclose surname except for the first letter.
[9] pomponik.pl is a gossip site, unacceptable for a biography.
[10] o2.pl is, I think, a tabloid, so I doubt it would be considered reliable here. Like the others, it doesn't disclose surname except for the first letter.

Overall, even if someone can show that WP:GNG is narrowly met, this article is still a glaring WP:BLP violation, so I believe it would be the best to WP:TNT it regardless. NicolausPrime (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Poland. NicolausPrime (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Photography, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Templates

Add templates here using the {{tl|TEMPLATE}} template

Proposed deletion

Add articles whose deletion is proposed (articles that are "prodded") here.

Pixillion Image Converter (via WP:PROD on 10 September 2023)