(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v28y2020i2p186-206_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Muñoz, Jordi
  • Falcó-Gimeno, Albert
  • Hernández, Enrique

Abstract

An increasing number of studies exploit the occurrence of unexpected events during the fieldwork of public opinion surveys to estimate causal effects. In this paper, we discuss the use of this identification strategy based on unforeseen and salient events that split the sample of respondents into treatment and control groups: the Unexpected Event during Survey Design. In particular, we focus on the assumptions under which unexpected events can be exploited to estimate causal effects and we discuss potential threats to identification, paying especial attention to the observable and testable implications of these assumptions. We propose a series of best practices in the form of various estimation strategies and robustness checks that can be used to lend credibility to the causal estimates. Drawing on data from the European Social Survey, we illustrate the discussion of this method with an original study of the impact of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks (Paris, 01/07/2015) on French citizens’ satisfaction with their national government.

Suggested Citation

  • Muñoz, Jordi & Falcó-Gimeno, Albert & Hernández, Enrique, 2020. "Unexpected Event during Survey Design: Promise and Pitfalls for Causal Inference," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 186-206, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:186-206_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198719000275/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:186-206_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.