(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v117y2023ics0305048323000099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Jing
  • Yu, Bo
  • Chen, Bintong
  • Liu, Zhuojun

Abstract

Offering lenient returns policies is a common post-sales service strategy that retailers use to ensure customer satisfaction. Some customers, however, abuse these lenient returns policies, which leads to fraudulent returns. In response, retailers take some strategic actions, such as increasing retail prices to offset the loss, or imposing restrictions on otherwise lenient returns policies. This paper argues that customers will have different fairness perceptions to retailers’ strategic actions, which can further influence their shopping behaviors. Our empirical results show that customers preferred more stringent returns policies to counter fraudulent returns and perceived restrictions to be fairer if used. Restrictions targeting perpetrators of fraudulent returns, either monetary or non-monetary, were perceived to be fairer than those applied to all customers. Our findings provide justification and support for retailers to strategically restrict product returns. Managerial insights from our study also help retailers identify effective instruments in the design of customer-friendly returns policies to reduce fraudulent returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Jing & Yu, Bo & Chen, Bintong & Liu, Zhuojun, 2023. "Lenient vs. stringent returns policies in the presence of fraudulent returns: The role of customers’ fairness perceptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0305048323000099
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048323000099
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung, Na Young & Seock, Yoo-Kyoung, 2017. "Effect of service recovery on customers’ perceived justice, satisfaction, and word-of-mouth intentions on online shopping websites," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 23-30.
    2. Falk, Armin & Fehr, Ernst & Fischbacher, Urs, 2008. "Testing theories of fairness--Intentions matter," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 287-303, January.
    3. Oghazi, Pejvak & Karlsson, Stefan & Hellström, Daniel & Hjort, Klas, 2018. "Online purchase return policy leniency and purchase decision: Mediating role of consumer trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 190-200.
    4. Li, Tingting & Xie, Jinxing & Liu, Xin, 2020. "Consumer return policies in presence of a P2P market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Tianxin Zou & Bo Zhou & Baojun Jiang, 2020. "Product-Line Design in the Presence of Consumers’ Anticipated Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5665-5682, December.
    6. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    7. Necati Ertekin & Anupam Agrawal, 2021. "How Does a Return Period Policy Change Affect Multichannel Retailer Profitability?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 210-229, 1-2.
    8. Kelly L. Haws & William O. Bearden, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(3), pages 304-311, October.
    9. Guangzhi Shang & Bikram P. Ghosh & Michael R. Galbreth, 2017. "Optimal Retail Return Policies with Wardrobing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(7), pages 1315-1332, July.
    10. Chen, Bintong & Chen, Jing, 2017. "Compete in Price or Service?—A Study of Personalized Pricing and Money Back Guarantees," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 154-171.
    11. Difrancesco, Rita Maria & Huchzermeier, Arnd & Schröder, David, 2018. "Optimizing the return window for online fashion retailers with closed-loop refurbishment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 205-221.
    12. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Slusarczyk, Witold, 2005. "How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: an empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 664-673, May.
    13. Janakiraman, Narayan & Syrdal, Holly A. & Freling, Ryan, 2016. "The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 226-235.
    14. Olk, Stephan & Lindenmeier, Jörg & Tscheulin, Dieter K. & Zogaj, Adnan, 2021. "Emotional labor in a non-isolated service encounter - The impact of customer observation on perceived authenticity and perceived fairness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Pei, Zhi & Paswan, Audhesh & Yan, Ruiliang, 2014. "E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 249-257.
    16. Lind, E. Allan & Kray, Laura & Thompson, Leigh, 1998. "The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities, , ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2011. "Managing Consumer Returns in a Competitive Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 347-362, February.
    18. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    19. Nguyen, Bang & Klaus, Philipp “Philâ€, 2013. "Retail fairness: Exploring consumer perceptions of fairness towards retailers’ marketing tactics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 311-324.
    20. Xia, Lan & Monroe, Kent B., 2010. "Is a good deal always fair? Examining the concepts of transaction value and price fairness," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 884-894, December.
    21. Harris, Lloyd C., 2008. "Fraudulent Return Proclivity: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 461-476.
    22. Yang, Guangyong & Ji, Guojun, 2022. "The impact of cross-selling on managing consumer returns in omnichannel operations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    23. Bossuyt, Saar & Vermeir, Iris & Slabbinck, Hendrik & De Bock, Tine & Van Kenhove, Patrick, 2017. "The compelling urge to misbehave: Do impulse purchases instigate unethical consumer behavior?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 60-76.
    24. Akturk, M. Serkan & Ketzenberg, Michael & Yıldız, Barış, 2021. "Managing consumer returns with technology-enabled countermeasures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    25. Huang, Ximin & Gu, Jia-Wen & Ching, Wai-Ki & Siu, Tak-Kuen, 2014. "Impact of secondary market on consumer return policies and supply chain coordination," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 57-70.
    26. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    27. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Iyer, Pramod & Harun, Ahasan, 2021. "Return policy, No joke: An investigation into the impact of a retailer's return policy on consumers' decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huixin Liu & Feng Du, 2023. "Research on E-Commerce Platforms’ Return Policies Considering Consumers Abusing Return Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Fan, Huirong & Khouja, Moutaz & Gao, Jie & Zhou, Jing, 2023. "Incorporating social learning into the optimal return and pricing decisions of online retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    2. Akturk, M. Serkan & Ketzenberg, Michael & Yıldız, Barış, 2021. "Managing consumer returns with technology-enabled countermeasures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Khouja, Moutaz & Hammami, Ramzi, 2023. "Optimizing price, order quantity, and return policy in the presence of consumer opportunistic behavior for online retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 683-703.
    4. Rezaei Kalantary, Mina & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing for different return policies in an online marketplace considering appeasement during a post-return out-of-stock," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Chen, Hao-Wei, 2023. "Improving supply quality through the store-initiated returns in wholesale supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Huang, Wen-Hsien & Shen, George C. & Liang, Che-Ling, 2019. "The effect of threshold free shipping policies on online shoppers' willingness to pay for shipping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 105-112.
    7. Ülkü, M. Ali & Gürler, Ülkü, 2018. "The impact of abusing return policies: A newsvendor model with opportunistic consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 124-133.
    8. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Björn Stöcker & Daniel Baier & Benedikt M. Brand, 2021. "New insights in online fashion retail returns from a customers’ perspective and their dynamics," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(8), pages 1149-1187, October.
    10. Zhang, Danni & Frei, Regina & Senyo, P.K. & Bayer, Steffen & Gerding, Enrico & Wills, Gary & Beck, Adrian, 2023. "Understanding fraudulent returns and mitigation strategies in multichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Abumalloh, Rabab Ali & Samad, Sarminah & Alrizq, Mesfer & Alyami, Sultan & Alghamdi, Abdullah, 2023. "Analysis of customers' satisfaction with baby products: The moderating role of brand image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Li, Dan & Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong & Liao, Yi, 2022. "Manufacturer’s contract choice and retailer’s returns management strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    13. Martínez-López, Francisco J. & Feng, Changyuan & Li, Yangchun & López-López, David, 2022. "Using instant refunds to improve online return experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Chang, Hsiu-Hua & Yang, Ting-Shan, 2022. "Consumer rights or unethical behaviors: Exploring the impacts of retailer return policies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Al-Adwan, Ahmad Samed & Al-Debei, Mutaz M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2022. "E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Zhong, Yuyun & Shen, Wenjing & Ceryan, Oben, 2023. "Information provision under showrooming and webrooming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Chen, Jing & Chen, Bintong & Li, Wei, 2018. "Who should be pricing leader in the presence of customer returns?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 735-747.
    18. Cui, Hailong & Rajagopalan, Sampath & Ward, Amy R., 2020. "Predicting product return volume using machine learning methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 612-627.
    19. Pandey, Shweta & Mittal, Sheetal & Chawla, Deepak, 2024. "Tackling consumer information asymmetry and perceived uncertainty for luxury re-commerce through seller signals," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    20. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Iyer, Pramod & Harun, Ahasan, 2021. "Return policy, No joke: An investigation into the impact of a retailer's return policy on consumers' decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:117:y:2023:i:c:s0305048323000099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.