(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Progressing Integrated Rural Development: A Framework for Assessing the Integrative Potential of Sectoral Policies
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v34y2000i5p455-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progressing Integrated Rural Development: A Framework for Assessing the Integrative Potential of Sectoral Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Terry Marsden
  • Gillian Bristow

Abstract

MARSDEN T. and BRISTOW G. (2000) Progressing integrated rural development: a framework for assessing the integrative potential of sectoral policies, Reg. Studies 34 , 455-469. This paper reports on the development of a methodology for assessing how sectoral policies work to progress wider rural development objectives. Taking Scotland as a case study, the methodology emerges out of an in-depth analysis of all relevant sectoral policies affecting rural Scotland, and the development of a four-stage method which applies a series of parameters to policy sectors and their specific instruments. This provides a basis for focusing policy debates, and potentially future policy developments, around key trade-offs, gaps and contradictions in policy delivery, and the relative policy sensitivities to differences in rural conditions. Finally, the dynamic utility of the method is assessed. It is argued that with the confluence of both the questioning of rural development objectives(e.g. discourses on integrated rural development), and the devolution process in the UK, it is important to develop more effective and multi-dimensional means of policy evaluation. This is necessary to facilitate the direction and delivery of more integrated and sustainable rural development policy. MARSDEN T. et BRISTOW G. (2000) Avancer le developpement rural integre: un cadre pour evaluer le potentiel d'integration des politiques sectorielles, Reg. Studies 34 , 455-469. Cet article fait un compte-rendu du developpement d'une methodologie pour evaluer comment les politiques sectorielles font avancer les grands objectifs du developpement rural. En employant l'Ecosse comme etude de cas, la methodologie ressort d'une analyse approfondie de toutes les politiques sectorielles qui touchent l'Ecosse rurale et d'une methode a quatre temps qui applique une serie de parametres aux secteurs qu'embrasse la politique et a leurs outils particuliers. Cela fournit un point de depart qui permettra aux debats de politique, et aux futures prises de decision, de mettre l'accent sur les compromis cles, les lacunes et les contradictions dans la mise en application de la politique, et les sensibilites relatives de la politique aux differences des conditions rurales. Pour conclure, on evalue l'utilite dynamique de la methode. On affirme qu'il est important de developper des methodes d'evaluation plus efficaces et multidimensionnelles, etant donne la confluence de la remise en question des objectifs du developpement rural (p.e. les discours a propos du developpement rural integre) et de la regionalisation au R-U. Cela facilitera l'orientation et la mise en application d'une politique de developpement rural plus integre et plus durable. MARSDEN T. und BRISTOW G. (2000) Fortschreitende integrierte landliche Entwicklung: ein Rahmen zur Beurteilung des integrativen Potentials der Bestrebungen einzelner Abteilungen, Reg Studies 34 , 455-469. Dieser Aufsatz berichtet uber die Entwicklung einer Methodik zur Beurteilung inwieweit die Bestrebungen einzelner Abteilungen zum Fortschritt weitreichenderer Ziele landlicher Entwicklung beitragen. Als Beispiel der Fallstudie dient Schottland; die Methodik ergibt sich aus einer eingehenden Analyse aller relevanten Bestrebungen von Abteilungen, die das landliche Schottland betreffen, und die Entwicklung einer vierstufigen Methode, die sich auf eine Folge von Rahmen sektoraler Bestrebungen und ihrer spezifischen Instrumente bezieht. Dies stellt eine Grundlage fur die Ausrichtung der Diskussion einzelner Bestrebungen sowie fur potentielle zukunftige Entwicklung von Bestrebungen dar, bei denen es sich um wesentliche Kompromisse, um Lucken, um Widerspruch bei der Veroffentlichung von Bestrebungen und der relativen Anpassungsfahigkeit der Bestrebungen an Unterschiede in landlichen Verhaltnissen handelt. Abschliessend wird der dynamische Nutzen der Methode beurteilt. Es wird dafur eingetreten, dass es in Anbetracht des Zusammenfliessens der Fragen um landliche Entwicklungsziele (d.h. Diskussionen uber integrierte landliche Entwicklung) und den Dezentralisationsprozess im UK wichtiger ist, wirksamere und mehrdimensionale Mittel der Bewertung der Bestrebungen zu entwickeln. Dies ist notig, um die Ausrichtung und Zustellung einer besser integrierten und nachhaltigen landlichen Entwicklungspolitik zu ermoglichen.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry Marsden & Gillian Bristow, 2000. "Progressing Integrated Rural Development: A Framework for Assessing the Integrative Potential of Sectoral Policies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 455-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:5:p:455-469
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050058701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400050058701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400050058701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Rooyen, Johan & Sigwele, Howard, 1998. "Towards regional food security in southern Africa: a (new) policy framework for the agricultural sector," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 491-504, December.
    2. P. Lowe & N. Ward, 1998. "Regional policy, cap reform and rural development in Britain: The challenge for new labour," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 469-474.
    3. Bernhard Seidel, 1994. "The regional impact of Community policies," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Jørgen Mortensen (ed.), Improving Economic and Social Cohesion in the European Community, chapter 13, pages 211-228, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gore, Tony & Powell, Ryan & Wells, Peter, 2006. "The contribution of rural community businesses to integrated rural development: “Local services for local people”," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 80.
    2. Brian Ilbery & Gunjan Saxena, 2009. "Evaluating ‘Best Practice’ in Integrated Rural Tourism: Case Examples from the England-Wales Border Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(9), pages 2248-2266, September.
    3. Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Aurélie Trouvé, 2012. "Développement des territoires de projet : quels enjeux pour les politiques rurales ? / Territorial development projects: what issues for rural policies ?," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2012/3, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
    4. Tony Gore & Ryan Powell & Peter Wells, 2006. "The contribution of rural community businesses to integrated rural development: “Local services for local people”," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 80, pages 29-52.
    5. Tony Gore & Ryan Powell & Peter Wells, 2006. "The contribution of rural community businesses to integrated rural development: “Local services for local people”," Post-Print hal-01201127, HAL.
    6. Gillian Bristow & John Farrington & Jon Shaw & Tim Richardson, 2009. "Developing an Evaluation for Crosscutting Policy Goals: The Accessibility Policy Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 48-62, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Breitenbach, Marthinus C. & Fenyes, Tamas I., 2000. "Maize and wheat production trends in South Africa in a deregulated environment," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 39(3), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Blacksell Mark, 2010. "Agriculture and landscape in the 21st century Europe: the post-communist transition," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 2(1), pages 13-24, January.
    3. Willem Van Winden, 2001. "The End of Social Exclusion? On Information Technology Policy as a Key to Social Inclusion in Large European Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 861-877.
    4. Götz Uckert & Frieder Graef & Anja Faße & Ludger Herrmann & Harry Hoffmann & Frederick C. Kahimba & Luitfred Kissoly & Hannes J. König & Christine Lambert & Henry Mahoo & Bashir Makoko & Leon Mrosso &, 2018. "ScalA-FS: expert-based ex-ante assessments of local requirements and success potential of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 841-858, August.
    5. Gaigné, Carl & Laroche Dupraz, Cathie & Matthews, Alan, 2015. "Thirty years of European research on international trade in food and agricultural products," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 91-130, March.
    6. Graef, F. & Uckert, G., 2018. "Gender determines scientists’ sustainability assessments of food-securing upgrading strategies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 84-93.
    7. Roose Antti & Sepp Kalev, 2010. "Monitoring framework for assessing changes of the Estonian rural landscape in adopting European agricultural policies," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 2(1), pages 42-59, January.
    8. Dunford, Michael & Louri, Helen & Rosenstock, Manfred, 2001. "Competition, competitiveness, and enterprise policies," MPRA Paper 29971, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Jef Leroy & Johan van Rooyen & Luc D'Haese & Anne-Marie de Winter, 2001. "A quantitative determination of the food security status of rural farming households in the Northern Province of South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 5-17.
    10. K. Yu. Voloshenko & K. A. Morachevskaya & A. A. Novikova & E. A. Lyzhina & L. V. Kalinovskii, 2023. "On the Road to Food Self-Sufficiency after 2014: Case Study of Kaliningrad Oblast," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 239-251, June.
    11. Frieder Graef & Götz Uckert & Jana Schindler & Hannes Jochen König & Hadijah A. Mbwana & Anja Fasse & Lutengano Mwinuka & Henry Mahoo & Laurent N. Kaburire & Paul Saidia & Yusto Mugisha Yustas & Valer, 2017. "Expert-based ex-ante assessments of potential social, ecological, and economic impacts of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania using the ScalA-FS approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1255-1270, December.
    12. Kennedy Ndue & Goda Pál, 2022. "European Green Transition Implications on Africa’s Livestock Sector Development and Resilience to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Naseem, Anwar & Oehmke, James F. & Anderson, Jock & Mbaye, Samba & Pray, Carl & Nagarajan, Latha & Moss, Charles B. & Post, Lori, 2017. "Measuring Agricultural and Structural Transformation," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258549, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Jeremy Phillipson & Matthew Gorton & Marian Raley & Andrew Moxey, 2004. "Treating Farms as Firms? the Evolution of Farm Business Support from Productionist to Entrepreneurial Models," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(1), pages 31-54, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:5:p:455-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.