(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Examining the Potential for Cross-South Pacific Trade: ASEAN and Latin America
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unt/wpaper/swp210.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Examining the Potential for Cross-South Pacific Trade: ASEAN and Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Mia Mikic
  • Elias Jakobson

    (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP))

Abstract

This paper discusses the potential for cross-South Pacific trade between selected Southeast Asian and Latin American economies. The objective of this discussion is to identify obstales for more intensive trade between the observed countries. Firstly, the paper reviews trends in trade flows and trade patterns between the selected economies, and by using several trade performance indicators it finds the level of trade still relatively low. It then discusses the possible reasons for this state of affairs. It focuses on a review of tariffs, trading costs and other possible reasons for this state of affairs. It focuses on a review of tariffs, trading costs and other possible impediments to trade. Paper also considers how trade relations among these countries could be improved. It provides a background into the features of the trade agreements that have been signed among the countries belonging to these two sub-regions in an attempt to identify if any of them could be used as a "driver" for future integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Mia Mikic & Elias Jakobson, 2010. "Examining the Potential for Cross-South Pacific Trade: ASEAN and Latin America," Working Paper Series 210, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    • Handle: RePEc:unt:wpaper:swp210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unescap.org/tid/publication/swp210.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mia Mikic & John Gilbert, 2007. "Trade Statistics In Policymaking - A Handbook Of Commonly Used Trade Indices And Indicators," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number tipub2491, April.
    2. Mia Mikic & Martin Wermelinger (ed.), 2010. "Rising Non-Tariff Protectionism and Crisis Recovery," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr5.
    3. Antoni Estevadeordal & Kati Suominen & Jeremy Harris & Matthew Shearer, 2009. "Bridging Regional Trade Agreements in the Americas: Special Report on Integration and Trade," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 20098, February.
    4. repec:idb:brikps:20098 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mia Mikic (ed.), 2010. "Rising Non-Tariff Protectionism and Crisis Recovery," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number tipub2587, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Farhad, 2011. "The global economic crisis, contemporary protectionism, and least developed countries," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: United Nations ESCAP (ed.), Trade beyond Doha: Prospects for Asia-Pacific Least Developed Countries, Studies in Trade and Investment 76, chapter 3, pages 38-59, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    2. Low, Patrick, 2014. "Preferentialism in Trade Relations: Challenges for the World Trade Organization," ADBI Working Papers 478, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    3. Dimitar Hadjinikolov & Paskal Zhelev, 2018. "Expected Impact of EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement on Bulgaria’s Exports," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 467-479, December.
    4. Bhubanesh Pant, Ph.D. & Rajan Krishna Panta, 2009. "Export Diversification and Competitiveness: Nepal’s Experiences," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Economic Research Department, vol. 21, pages 1-3, April.
    5. Sauvé, Pierre, 2013. "The Road to Bali: ERIA Perspectives on the WTO Ministerial and Asian Integration," Papers 645, World Trade Institute.
    6. Schor Adriana, 2014. "South–South Cooperation and IBSA: More Trade in Politics," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 183-201, July.
    7. Chalise, Lekhnath & Jones, Keithly G., 2018. "Exploring Intra-Industry Trade Tendencies of the U.S. Beef Over Two Decades," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274263, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. United Nations ESCAP, 2012. "Dealing with protectionist pressures," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2012: Recent Trends and Developments, chapter 5, pages 79-101, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    9. United Nations ESCAP (ed.), 2011. "Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2011: Post-crisis trade and investment opportunities," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number aptir2596, April.
    10. DJEMMO FOTSO, Arnaud, 2014. "The potential effects of the ECCAS Free Trade Area on Trade Flows," MPRA Paper 59863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2011. "Climate Change, Trade, and Competitiveness: Climate Trade Performance of India, SAARC and Asia Pacific Region," MPRA Paper 59423, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Aug 2014.
    12. Christina Ruth Elisabeth, . "Classification of Non-tariff Measures in Brunei Darussalam," Chapters, in: Lili Yan Ing & Santiago Fernandez de Cordoba & Olivier Cadot (ed.), Non-Tariff Measures in ASEAN, chapter 3, pages 37-49, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    13. John Gilbert, 2011. "Trade reforms under Doha and income distribution in South Asia," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia, chapter 12, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    14. Olivier CADOT & Ernawati MUNADI & Lili Yan ING, 2013. "Streamlining NTMs in ASEAN: The Way Forward," Working Papers DP-2013-24, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    15. Durán Lima, José E. & Finot, Alfonso & LaFleur, Marcelo, 2011. "Analysis of the effects of trade opening on household welfare: an application to Chile 1999-2006," Conference papers 332041, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Simon Lacey, . "Life After Doha: Reflections in the run up to MC9," Chapters, in: Yoshifumi Fukunaga & John Riady, Pierre Sauve (ed.), The Road To Bali: ERIA Perspectives on the WTO Ministerial and Asian Integration, chapter 16, pages 195-219, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    17. Prabir De, 2009. "Global economic and financial crisis: India’s trade potential and future prospects," Working Papers 6409, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), an initiative of UNESCAP and IDRC, Canada..
    18. Shimu Afroza Ahammed & Islam Md. Shahidul, 2018. "Impacts of Macro Economic Variables on the RMG Export Growth of Bangladesh," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 112-125, June.
    19. A. A. Alikhanov & V. Yu. Skryabina & E. V. Tarasyuk, 0. "Liberalization Trade Relationship Between The Countries: Assessment And Consequences," International Trade and Trade Policy, ФГБОУ ВО "Ð Ð¾Ñ Ñ Ð¸Ð¹Ñ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸Ñ‡ÐµÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ ÑƒÐ½Ð¸Ð²ÐµÑ€Ñ Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑ‚ им. Г.Ð’. Плеханова", issue 3.
    20. Natos, Dimitrios & Staboulis, Christos & Tsakiridou, Efthimia, 2014. "Agricultural Trade Integration in Western Balkans: Orientation and Complementarity," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ASEAN; Latin America; trade entropy; complementarity; trade agreements; cross-Pacific trade; noodle bowl;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:wpaper:swp210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mia Mikic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.