(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Heilmittel oder Zankapfel? Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem während der Corona-Krise [Source of healing or bone of contention? Trust in the German healthcare system during the coronavirus crisis]
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cexpps/04de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Heilmittel oder Zankapfel? Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem während der Corona-Krise
[Source of healing or bone of contention? Trust in the German healthcare system during the coronavirus crisis]

Author

Listed:
  • Busemeyer, Marius R.

Abstract

Die andauernde Belastungsprobe durch die Corona-Krise wirft die Frage auf, wie effizient und gerecht das deutsche Gesundheitssystem ist. Die Einschätzung der Bevölkerung zu seiner allgemeinen Leistungsfähigkeit und Fairness wird hier anhand neuer repräsentativer Umfragedaten diskutiert. Der Fähigkeit des Systems, Ungleichbehandlungen verschiedener Bevölkerungsgruppen zu vermeiden, wird großes Vertrauen entgegengebracht. Effizienz und Leistungsfähigkeit in der Krise werden kritischer gesehen, wobei die politische Orientierung eine Rolle spielt: AnhängerInnen der AfD zeigen sich wesentlich skeptischer als diejenigen von CDU/CSU und Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem und politisches Vertrauen, insbesondere in die Wahrheitstreue der Informationspolitik der Bundesregierung, hängen eng zusammen. Gerade der Informationspolitik kommt daher eine besondere Rolle zu, das Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem zu erhalten.

Suggested Citation

  • Busemeyer, Marius R., 2020. "Heilmittel oder Zankapfel? Vertrauen in das Gesundheitssystem während der Corona-Krise [Source of healing or bone of contention? Trust in the German healthcare system during the coronavirus crisis]," Policy Papers 04 (DE), University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cexpps:04de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/232091/1/policy-paper-04de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cexpps:04de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.exc.uni-konstanz.de/en/inequality/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.