Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions
→NickK@ukWiki: Reply |
|||
Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
: {{ok|Fait}} —[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 17:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
: {{ok|Fait}} —[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 17:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
==== ToprakM@trwikiquote ==== |
|||
{{sr-request |
|||
|status = <!-- bu satırı değiştirmeyin --> |
|||
|domain = tr.wikiquote |
|||
|user name = ToprakM |
|||
|discussion= |
|||
}} |
|||
Please remove my sysop rights at trwikiquote. Thanks --[[User:ToprakM|<span style="font-family: old english text mt;color:blue;font-size:93%">'''''ToprakM'''''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:ToprakM|<span style="color: #bf0023;">✉</span>]]</sup> 04:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE! --> |
== See also ==<!-- DO NOT EDIT UNDER THIS LINE! --> |
Revision as of 04:31, 9 September 2023
This page is for requests to have stewards grant or revoke administrator, bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight rights on Wikimedia projects which do not have a local permissions procedure.
Old sections are archived. The list of archives is below.
- Requests for bot flags are handled at SRB, and requests for global permissions are handled at SRGP.
- If you are requesting adminship or bureaucratship, and your wiki has a local bureaucrat, submit your request to that user or to the relevant local request page (index).
- For urgent requests, such as to combat large-scale vandalism on a small wiki, contact a steward in the #wikimedia-stewardsconnect IRC channel. In emergencies, type
!steward
in the channel to get the attention of stewards. Otherwise, you can type@steward
for non-urgent help.
Other than requests to remove your own access or emergencies, please only make requests here after gaining the on-wiki approval of your local community.
Quick navigation: Administrator | Interface administrator | Bureaucrat | CheckUser | Oversight | Removal of access | Miscellaneous | Global permissions
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Using this page
1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:
==== Username@xxproject ==== {{sr-request |status = <!-- Don't change this line --> |domain = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks --> |user name = |discussion= }} (your remarks) ~~~~
2. Fill in the values:
- domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
- user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case you're requesting access for multiple bots, leave this field blank and give a list of these bots in your remarks
- discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).
3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.
Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement
Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.
Requests
Administrator access
See Administrator for information about this user group.
- If you are requesting adminship to handle one time vandalism incidents or clearing a deletion backlog, please see Steward requests/Miscellaneous.
- MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
- Admins doing cross-wiki work may wish to see IRC/wikimedia-admin for information about joining #wikimedia-adminconnect.
- Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.
Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.
Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.
- Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
- If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.
Aram@ckbwiktionary
- Wiki: ckb.wiktionary.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Aram (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: wiktionary:ckb:ویکیفەرھەنگ:بەڕێوەبەرایەتیی_ویکیفەرھەنگ#بەکارھێنەر:Aram_2
I also need IA flag. Please note that I have already been granted both rights for three months, but it may be better to give them without expiration as I may not be able to do everything quickly. Click here to see my previous requests. Thanks! Aram (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Aram, thanks for the request. I'm sorry, but I can't locate any recent discussion about your interface adminship on that page; I only see requests from April. Am I missing something please? Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec Thank you for your quick reply! No, you’re not wrong, but is it mandatory for me to run again? The community has full confidence in me. Furthermore, if one or two users had asked for these rights, I would not have assumed this responsibility and participating as a regular user would have been enough for me. However, If it is obligatory for me to run again, then it is okay and I will. Thank you! Aram (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the re @Aram. Indeed it is mandatory; the goal is to ensure the community trusts you / has confidence in you (which is hard to verify without a voting). The length of appoingment is generally growing, up to indefinite grant (once the community meets MVR criteria). I'm making this
On hold -- please link the discussion here and we'll proceed from there. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again @Martin Urbanec, since you last comment, I have run again for administrator and interface administrator rights. Today is the seventh day. I want to say that I have asked for these rights permanently because we really may not be able to do everything in a short period of time. Please check these out:
- Administration discussion. 4 Supports, no oppose.
- Interface administrator discussion. 4 Supports, no oppose.
- Thank you for your efforts! Aram (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hi again @Martin Urbanec, since you last comment, I have run again for administrator and interface administrator rights. Today is the seventh day. I want to say that I have asked for these rights permanently because we really may not be able to do everything in a short period of time. Please check these out:
- Thanks for the re @Aram. Indeed it is mandatory; the goal is to ensure the community trusts you / has confidence in you (which is hard to verify without a voting). The length of appoingment is generally growing, up to indefinite grant (once the community meets MVR criteria). I'm making this
- @Martin Urbanec Thank you for your quick reply! No, you’re not wrong, but is it mandatory for me to run again? The community has full confidence in me. Furthermore, if one or two users had asked for these rights, I would not have assumed this responsibility and participating as a regular user would have been enough for me. However, If it is obligatory for me to run again, then it is okay and I will. Thank you! Aram (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
虹色 分子 @zh.wikiquote
- Wiki: zh.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User:
虹色 分子 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) - Discussion: here
Hello. This request is for Administrator only.——
- @
虹色 分子 : Your request appears to be at the wrong place. It is noted at the top of the page you put it on that it is in a different place. Please see zh:wq:Wikiquote:申 请成为管理 员 -- Amanda (she/her) 16:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC) - q:zh:Wikiquote:
申 请成为管理 员/存 档#虹色 分子 is marked as not done. Stang 16:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)- @AmandaNP:A 🆕 apply is already submitted on correct webpage.
虹色 分子 (talk) 00:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)- @AmandaNP:Excuse for disturb again. I wonder if I apply adminship access for only one day, how is the necessary standard should I meet, thx.——
虹色 分子 (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @AmandaNP:Excuse for disturb again. I wonder if I apply adminship access for only one day, how is the necessary standard should I meet, thx.——
- @AmandaNP:A 🆕 apply is already submitted on correct webpage.
- I've separated the applications in accord to community standards. This is the second time in a row that they submitted request for adminship. It was formatted incorrectly, and did not gain enough support either (see here for a summary). —— Eric Liu(Talk) 09:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Formatted incorrectly is not the reason to close the discussion. Nobody gave support vote, nobody gave against vote either.
虹色 分子 (talk) 07:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)- It is not appropriate to consecutively create request, or to bypass the community. And as (one of the) administrator of the wiki, I determined that there was no consensus to promote them. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 06:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- The policy does not stipulate that continuous application for admin is not allowed. No discussion due to low participation, not I'm trying to bypass the community.Zhwikiuqote and other projects like this, with small number of participants, it is very common to have no consensus, in your view, those small projects can never have any admin appointed, right?
虹色 分子 (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)- That is just gaming the system. Additionally, for their inappropriate application format (they even forgot to leave a sign in their first application), lack of counter-vandalism and other administrative experiences (mentioned in their first application), and such uncivilized behavior, I as a normal user believe that they are not yet ready for the adminship. If they waited for a while (as a common practice) after their first unsuccessful application and improved upon it, I would have support their second application to be promoted. But not in the current situation, as they now have attempted to consecutively apply for the third time in a row, clearly ignoring the warning. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 10:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- The policy does not stipulate that continuous application for admin is not allowed. No discussion due to low participation, not I'm trying to bypass the community.Zhwikiuqote and other projects like this, with small number of participants, it is very common to have no consensus, in your view, those small projects can never have any admin appointed, right?
- It is not appropriate to consecutively create request, or to bypass the community. And as (one of the) administrator of the wiki, I determined that there was no consensus to promote them. —— Eric Liu(Talk) 06:18, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Formatted incorrectly is not the reason to close the discussion. Nobody gave support vote, nobody gave against vote either.
Romaine@nl.wikisource
- Wiki: nl.wikisource.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Romaine (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: s:nl:Wikisource:De_kroeg#Aanmelding_moderatorschap_(opnieuw)
(new request after a second vote) Vincent Steenberg (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
BirSar@satwikipedia
- Wiki: sat.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: BirSar (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Local Votes for Adminship on Santali Wikipedia
Hii, I want to admin access because I shall be protect our community to vandalism, So after voting in our community I have applied for the Adminship in the santali wikipedia. BirSar (talk) 07:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Soemthing seems not right here, the username on the page for local voting was changed AFTER the votes were given. Please check in with existing admins and trusted users of the project before granting adminship. --Kritzolina (talk) 13:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I took a look and everything looks fake to me (including the user page, which was created by another user initially who also changed the RfA page). I'm waiting for two more eyes on that, but obviously, no userrights should be changed here. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am not a fake person. BirSar (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- All right ok BirSar (talk) 15:22, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I took a look and everything looks fake to me (including the user page, which was created by another user initially who also changed the RfA page). I'm waiting for two more eyes on that, but obviously, no userrights should be changed here. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I just want to say that I have nothing to do with this account. They just copied my userpage. Terasail[✉️] 14:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Kritzolina for reporting here. The account was created very recently, and I suspect that the user creates multiple accounts to vandalize the Santali Wikipedia and may be doing some serious damage to articles and templates by using some automated tools. They also vandalized some content after creating the account and then apply for an adminship. We tried to contact them, but they never responded. The user is continuing it's non stop routine task. I suspect that the account ᱵᱤᱨᱢᱚᱞ ᱦᱮᱢᱵᱨᱚᱢ(Birbal Hembram) is their duplicate account. Rocky 734 (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- He was also given Interface adminship rights for 3 months Steward requests/Permissions/2022-08 - Meta (wikimedia.org) . Rocky 734 (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Here, an failed attempt: Steward requests/Permissions/2023-04 - Meta (wikimedia.org) Rocky 734 (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think that this is not your real account this is your fake duplicate account. BirSar (talk) 15:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done The local discussion link above does not support this request. — xaosflux Talk 15:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Okay Sir. BirSar (talk) 16:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Saimawnkham@shnwikibooks
- Wiki: shn.wikibooks.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Saimawnkham (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Local Discussion
I would like to request for renewal of the adminrights. Thanks.Saimawnkham (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Saimawnkham@shnwikivoyage
- Wiki: shn.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Saimawnkham (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Local Discussion
I would like to request for renewal of the adminrights. Thanks.Saimawnkham (talk) 02:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Kadı@trwikiquote
- Wiki: tr.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Kadı (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: https://tr.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=Vikisöz:Hizmetlilik_başvurusu/Kadı&curid=44264&diff=221045&oldid=221043
I request sysop access. Regards, Kadı Message 21:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Done.--HakanIST (talk) 09:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Z423x5c6@yuewiktionary
- Wiki: yue.wiktionary.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Z423x5c6 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: wiktionary:yue:維基
辭典 :申請 做管理 員 /Z423x5c6
Applying for the local admin right. The voting is already done. Thank you! Z423x5c6 (talk) 10:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Interface administrator access
See Interface admin for information about this user group.
- If you need to accomplish a one-time, non-recurring task, please request your task at Steward requests/Miscellaneous.
- If you are requesting adminship and the interface admin at the same time, you can file one request in administrator section and state you want interface adminship as well.
- MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request interface administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
- Since the end of 2018, all interface administrators are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. Please, enable it before posting your request here.
- Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.
Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.
Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew interface adminship.
- Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request interface adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
- If you only want interface adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent interface adminship and the duration of interface adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.
Eldarado@tlywikipedia
- Wiki: tly.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Eldarado (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: It just opened today.
The Wikipedia language section of my mother tongue has been opened. I need to perform some technical tasks there, so I require Interface Administrator privileges. Additionally, I hold roles as a sysop and a bureaucrat on the azwiki. eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 20:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Eldarado: you will need to provide a link to the local discussion, which should be open for at least a week. — xaosflux Talk 20:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I know, but wiki opened today. And needs some technical edits, what's your advise? --eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 21:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Eldarado for anything urgently immediate, mock up the change locally and ask over at SRM where a global sysop can action it; for this request, start whatever that project's version of wikidata:Q16503 will be and at least post your intention there. You will likely need to be an admin and an intadmin for certain tasks unless you know you won't need both. Temp grants will likely start at 3 months in duration. — xaosflux Talk 21:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I know, but wiki opened today. And needs some technical edits, what's your advise? --eldarado (talk | contributions | meta page) 21:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Romaine@nl.wikisource
- Wiki: nl.wikisource.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Romaine (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: s:nl:Wikisource:De_kroeg#Aanmelding_moderatorschap_(opnieuw)
(new request after a second vote) Vincent Steenberg (talk) 12:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Rocky_734@satwikipedia
- Wiki: sat.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Rocky_734 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: sat:ᱣᱤᱠᱤᱯᱤᱰᱤᱭᱟ:ᱪᱟᱪᱞᱟᱣᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱛ ᱟᱹᱨᱡᱤ/Rocky 734 (Prolong IA 2)
Hi, I have been enjoying serving Santali Wikipedia. I want to extend my IA period. Discussions have already been completed (started on 25th August) with 3 support. Rocky 734 (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- What is 5E Model In Santali ? BirSar (talk) 15:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Mustafa MVC@trwikiquote
- Wiki: tr.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Mustafa MVC (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
Since I lost my 2FA codes, after several emails with ca@wikimedia.org, I got this authorization and 2FA was removed at the same time. Now I have 2FA again and I think there is no need for a discussion again for this authorization. Mustafa MVC (talk) 16:01, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Saimawnkham@shnwikibooks
- Wiki: shn.wikibooks.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Saimawnkham (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Local Discussion
I would like to request for the renewal of interface adminrights. Thanks.Saimawnkham (talk) 02:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Saimawnkham@shnwikivoyage
- Wiki: shn.wikivoyage.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Saimawnkham (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Local Discussion
I would like to request for the renewal of interface adminrights. Thanks.Saimawnkham (talk) 02:20, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Bureaucrat access
- In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
- A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.
Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.
CheckUser access
- To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
- One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.
- Stewards: Before granting this permission to a user, please check the current policy and make sure that the user has signed the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. An email template is available for requesting new users to identify.
- When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list. Subscription to checkuser-l will be handled by list owners. Make sure new users contact an op for access to #wikimedia-privacyconnect and #wikimedia-checkuserconnect.
RickinBaltimore@enWiki
- Wiki: en.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: RickinBaltimore (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: en:Special:permaLink/1174253897#Change_to_the_Functionary_team_2
- Signature:
diff
Following a request to the English Wikipedia ArbCom we have voted to restore Rick's permissions. Primefac (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Done CU-l needs to be done (i've unblocked the wiki account). FYI Krd --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
NickK@ukWiki
- Wiki: uk.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: NickK (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
Please restore CU access for NickK. Member, for the ukwiki arbcom. Other members of the arbcom support. --Venzz (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Usually we get some sort of link to a local announcement from the local ArbCom, showing that they publicly approve of this. Does this exist? Not that I don't believe you, but for security reasons, I need to ask. -- Amanda (she/her) 22:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Oversight access
- To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
- For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
- Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .
- Stewards: Before granting this permission to a user, please check the current policy and make sure that the user has signed the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation.
- When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.
RickinBaltimore@enWiki
- Wiki: en.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: RickinBaltimore (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: en:Special:permaLink/1174253897#Change_to_the_Functionary_team_2
- Signature:
diff
Following a request to the English Wikipedia ArbCom we have voted to restore Rick's permissions. Primefac (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Miscellaneous requests
Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.
Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:
Removal of access
- If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
- To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
- To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
- See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.
Tuanminh01@vi.wiktionary
- Wiki: vi.wiktionary.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Tuanminh01 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: wiktionary:vi:Wiktionary:Thảo luận#Tuanminh01
He's been inactive for over two years, should be desysopped following the AAR policy. ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 09:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- That is not how AAR works; stewards do this process every year. Leaderboard (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Not done, per Leaderboard. -- Amanda (she/her) 15:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Aca@sr.wikipedia
- Wiki: sr.wikipedia.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Aca (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: local vote
Remove his admin and interface admin rights, per local vote --Milicevic01 (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Removed admin rights. Milicevic01, to remove interface admin rights, contact the local bureaucrats. They have technical ability to do this. --Mykola 19:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing this, it's taken care of now completely. Best regards! Kizule (talk) 01:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Mykola7 Thanks for processing this request! For the recrod and the future, according to Requests for comment/Removal of advanced rights, it would actually be okay to remove interface-admin (and few other rights were they granted) in this case, as a "collateral removal". Personally, I interpret that RfC as a "lex specialis" to the general rule of "do not overstep to local bureaucrat area". Just letting you know, as this ability makes processing those requests easier, quicker and more reliable (as less people are involved). Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
アルトクール@ja.wikipedia
- Wiki: ja.wikipedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy[no automatic approval] • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: アルトクール (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: ja:Wikipedia:
管理 者 の退任 #利用 者 :アルトクール(会話 _/_投稿 記録 )
This user is inactive for 3 months. Please remove sysop right from this user as per local policy.--
Mattho69@frwikinews
- Wiki: fr.wikinews.org (list 'crats •
no standard bot policy• summary • 'crats rights) - User: Mattho69 (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: n:fr:Wikinews:Requête_aux_bureaucrates#Demande_d'application_de_la_procédure_modalités_de_suspension_du_statut_d'administrateur_(9)
Please remove his admin access, according to our procedure of removing permissions for inactive administrators.
Relevant details in accordance with the procedure:
- The procedure has been applied by a bureaucrat (me)
- Admin inactive for over a year (last edit : september 21, 2021)
- Have been warned on his talk page more than 3 months ago (may 14, 2023 ; no answer)
--SleaY (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
ToprakM@trwikiquote
- Wiki: tr.wikiquote.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: ToprakM (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
Please remove my sysop rights at trwikiquote. Thanks --ToprakM ✉ 04:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
See also
- Steward requests
- Log of changes to user rights
- Log of global rights-related changes
- Steward handbook
- Users that have signed confidentiality agreement for nonpublic personal data
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation