Steward requests/Permissions/2019-09

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Turkmen@az.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Thank you!--Turkmen talk 19:18, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 08:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Ashiq Shawon@bn.wiktionary

Status:    Done

One month passed, no objection from anyone. Kindly give this user admin right. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@আফতাবুজ্জামান: Only administrator, or interface administrator as well? Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Ruslik Only administrator. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-01. Ruslik (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Саид Мисарбиев@ce.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

Please assign me administrator rights.--Саид Мисарбиев (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-02. Ruslik (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikilover (WIR)@pawikisource

Status:    Done

Hello, I am requesting admin rights for uploading books for project Heritage GLAM as WIR for the libraries in Punjab. Here is the link for community discussion on Punjabi Wikisource. My other volunteer account is Wikilover90 Thank you Wikilover (WIR) (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Wikilover90: For how long to you need it? Ruslik (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Ruslik0:, I need it for the next 6 months. Thank you Wikilover90 (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-03-02. Ruslik (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Theklan, KRLS and Xabier Cañas @eu.wikisource

Status:    Not done
Status:    Not done
Status:    Not done

Hello! We voted some months ago to have adminship for User:Theklan, User:KRLS and User:Xabier Cañas eta eu.wikisource, but I see now that we didn't ask for it here, as I can't do my regular admin stuff there. The discussion is here. Thanks! -Theklan (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

I only see the previous discussion from 2018. Ruslik (talk) 06:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: You're right! But we didn't vote to have admins for one year and it seems that the decission wasn't implemented, as I need now some permits for deleting items and I can't. -Theklan (talk) 17:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
It was, of course, implemented and your permission has already expired. Ruslik (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
So... there are not admins again on euwikisource? When were the permissions expired and why? I haven't seen any message about this on euwikisource. -Theklan (talk) 23:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
You can look at your userrights log. Ruslik (talk) 12:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Not done Ruslik (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Malikxan@uz.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

Hello! I put my candidate for administration. As a rule, you must collect 5 votes. I got 3 votes. If you make me an administrator here. Bureaucrats are now no active. Malikxan talk 15:13, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

@Malikxan: One bureaucrat is active. Please, ask him. Ruslik (talk) 07:39, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: This bureaucrat has not edited more than a week. Malikxan talk 16:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
This is short time. Ask them on the talk page. Ruslik (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Not done i see local crat responded to the request --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

MJL@sco.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello there. I made a request for adminship on Sco.wiki which received two support votes from community members. Hopefully, it is alright that I made the request myself here. Please, grant me access to the gibbles. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-03-08. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 08:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Thank you; It's an honor to get the chance to be admin! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 02:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Reptilien.19831209BE1@wawiktionary

Status:    Done

Hello. Do I really need (for the third time) a new vote from comunity to extend my adminship for a year, insofar as voters agreed to accord it to me for at least 4 years (vote 2018)? Regards, Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 09:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I think yes. At least a local announcement. Ruslik (talk) 08:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Announcement posted here. Let's wait 7 days. Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 On hold until 8 September 2019 Ruslik (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-08. Ruslik (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Ruslik the announcement is for interface administrator rights as well. Do I need to post another request ? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 06:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
You should have said about the interface admin rights in this request. Ruslik (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Si Gam@ace.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello, could you grant me administrator right in Acehnese Wikipedia? Thanks. -- Si Gam (talk) 10:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Benoit Rochon@atj.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello, I would like to renew sysop adminship on this Wiki, for one year, covering end 2019 + 2020. I've been working with this local community since 2017, and they need a little help with admin tools lately. I'm also planning to give the local sysop a training about admin tools, which they don't understand the operation and the scope. You can see the discussion on the local Village pump. Thank you. Best regards. Benoit Rochon (talk) 09:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-11. Ruslik (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Zenith4237@nywikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, I'd like to get temp admin and interface admin rights on nyWP to outsource some inline css (e.g. Main page) and edit some other stuff in the MediaWiki: namespace. I have good css knowledge and am used to working with the MediaWiki interface from the time I coded my Bot in the German language Wikipedia. I would like to help out a little bit over at nyWP. 6 months should be sufficient to begin with. Greetings, --Zenith4237 (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

If this request is successful, I will need 2FA Tester permissions to enable 2FA before being granted the other permissions. Thanks, --Zenith4237 (talk) 21:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 On hold until 11 September 2019 to give the local community more time to comment, standard for any request. I've assigned you 2FA tester permissions - please read Help:2FA and remember to save your scratch codes. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
I could enable 2FA and have it activated for some days now. Thanks! --Zenith4237 (talk) 08:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-12-13. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Please note that you need to keep your 2FA enabled while you are an interface administrator. — regards, Revi 16:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Nikosgranturismogt@el.wikiquote

Status:    Done

Hello. Greek Wikiquote is a largely inactive project and there aren't active admins (there's very few activity as well). I will to use the admin rights for the maintenance of Greek Wikiquote and so on. Nikosgranturismogt (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

You need to announce your intention to serve as an admin on your wiki's primary discussion board (i.e. Village Pump) and wait for 7 days. On hold waiting for such announcement. — regards, Revi 08:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Nikosgranturismogt announced his candidacy on q:el:Βικιφθέγματα:Βήμα#Ανακοίνωση διαχειριστικής υποψηφιότητας @ 2 September 2019. —Ah3kal (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2020-01-13. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 16:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

WhitePhosphorus@zh.wikiversity

Status:    Done

On hold until 2019-09-12 15:50 (UTC), request for his/her permission. 云うん间守まもり望もち 00:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 05:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

SayantMahato@sa.wikisource

Status:    Done

6/0/0 after 5-week RFA process. Therefore, Please look into my application status. Thanks,--Sayant Mahato talk 12:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

SRP Submission is bit overdue as this is July RfA but I am assuming AGF for RfAs. Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2020-01-13. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 16:37, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Sayonzei@zh.wikibooks

Status:    Done

6/0/0 after 2-week RFA process. Clear community consensus to promote. Thanks, --94rain Talk 15:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Benipal hardarshan@pa.wikisource

Status:    Done

I was previously "Admin" and "Interface-Admin" On Punjabi Wikisource. I imported some new gadgets and also designed a new home page for paws and done other works those I mentioned in my previous requests for rights. This time I am requesting for permanent rights "Admin" as well as "Interface-Admin" Community approved for those. --*•.¸♡ ℍ𝕒𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕒𝕟 𝔹𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕡𝕒𝕝 ♡¸.•*𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜 17:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Zylbath@got.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello, since the main admin from the Gothic Wikipedia is probably taking some time off, he asked me to jump in to take care of the Wikipedia and I am planning on becoming more active since the Gothic scene is in a change and I am taking a bigger role in it. I have been admin there already several times. If you would consider a permanent adminship, that'd be great, but a temporary one would of course be fine, so that I can apply for it again. If you have any questions before giving it a final decision feel free to ask me. Thank you a lot. Zylbath (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 15 September 2019 Ruslik (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I don't want to annoy you or anything, just friendly asking if you've reached a decision. Thanks a lot :) Zylbath (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-17. Ruslik (talk) 05:21, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Bikarhêner@kuwiktionary

Status:    Done
Hi. Could you give me permanent adminstrator, Interface administrator and bureaucrat access. --Bikarhêner (talk) 22:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this request is for an administrator and Interface administrator access , like here: Steward requests/Permissions/2019-03#Bikarhêner@kuwiktionary. A new vote is not necessary. Thanks--Ghybu (talk) 23:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Please make a new local announcement in village pump or similar place and link it here--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, that's new local announcement: https://ku.wiktionary.org/wiki/W%C3%AEk%C3%AEferheng:D%C3%AEwan#Maf%C3%AAn_R%C3%AAvebiriya_Da%C3%AEm%C3%AE_ji_bo_Bikarh%C3%AAner:%22Bikarh%C3%AAner%22 --Bikarhêner (talk) 20:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
And this is the result of new local voting: https://ku.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wîkîferheng:Rêveber/Bikarhêner#Bikarhêner_(g_·_b_·_a)_2
Please give me these rights. --Bikarhêner (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

cgboeree@lfn.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like to be authorized as an administrator for the lfn wikipedia. We are an admittedly small but active wikipedia, and we would like to be able to operate our site without bothering others. I was an administrator of our previous Wikia site. Thank you for your consideration. Cgboeree (talk) 22:06, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Ruthven@nap.source

Status:    Done

Actually, the rights were already granted in August, but apparently the ending date hasn't been modified, so after 1 month the adminship rights ended. Can you please extend the admin + interface admin rights on nap.source? Thanks Ruthven (msg) 11:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2020-01-19. — regards, Revi 11:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Icem4k@nywikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi i hope this finds you well. Could you give me permanent administrator, Interface administrator and bureaucrat access. My community is small you check the discussion page here and also the community village announcement here. Most of the of actions are done by users that are not part of the community set up or a Global sysop you can check the log here. Thank best regards--Isaac Kanguya✌ (talk) 20:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Icem4k: we can only grant temporary admin/interface admin permissions at this point of time as your community is small. Also could you please let us know why do you need interface admin permissions?. --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
@Shanmugamp7: I think it fine if you will not give me permanent admin-ship then don't give me interface admin just grant me the regular admin-ship thank you. I wanted Interface administrator in order to edit Jave Script pages. --Isaac Kanguya✌ (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-19. -- Shanmugamp7 (talk) 02:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Ліцьвін@be-tarask.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello. The community voted to grant administrator rights for one month (the voting took 2 weeks, 6 editors supported and 3 opposed). Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 month to expire on 2019-10-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Mugerganets@lez.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hello! For the first time I became an administrator at Lezgi Wikipedia in 2014. Then my candidacy was supported in 2015. This is my third successful "bid". I ask to give me admin rights on a permanent basis.--Mugerganets (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-19. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

The Living love@ha.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi! Pls could you grant me permanent administrator right in Hausa Wikipedia, I previously served temporary and now we don't have any local admin, and as a growing project we need to have permanent local administrators. The Living love (talk) 21:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

I can give you adminship for 1 year only. Ruslik (talk) 04:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
OK, that's fine.The Living love (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-24. Ruslik (talk) 05:03, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Homo ergaster@lt.wikibooks

Status:    Done

Hi, I'd like to request sysop rights on Lithuanian Wikibooks. Five users have voted in favour and there are no objections. --Homo ergaster (talk) 12:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-12-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 06:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Uostofchuodnego@szl.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Hi, I'd like to request being granted admin rights on Silesian Wikipedia. We have only one active admin there while there's a lot to take care of. Thank you! Uostofchuodnego (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2019-12-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. — regards, Revi 02:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Understood. Thank you! --Uostofchuodnego (talk) 06:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

NGC 54@ro.wikipedia

Status:    Not done

--FonAfon (talk) 18:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done. I see 6 supports, 5 opposes and 1 neutral vote. That makes 54.54 % support which is way below the threshold of the usual 2/3 (75 %) majority consensus required on most projects to promote someone to administrator. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Nitesh Gill@pa.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I am a active contributor on Punjabi Wikipedia. I create one article everyday from more then two years. I'd like to request for administrative rights on Punjabi Wikipedia for more work. Nitesh Gill (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 29 September 2019 Ruslik (talk) 10:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-03-30. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 17:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Sami_At_Ferḥat@kab.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

I'd like to renew my user rights in this wiki. (admin status lost today) Sami At Ferḥat (talk) 15:16, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until 30 September 2019 Ruslik (talk) 05:04, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-09-30. Ruslik (talk) 13:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Moheen@bn.wikivoyage

Status:    Done

Requesting administrator rights. Currently no administrator. Local request was made two weeks ago. 4 supports, 0 opposed. Thanks in advance. ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2020-03-30. -- einsbor talk 08:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Interface administrator access

Kanashimi@zh.wikinews

Status:    Done
Request for permanent interface adminship. After 2-week RFA process. --Xiplus (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kanashimi: Hello, please confirm you have 2FA enabled on your account. Access cannot be granted for those who does not have 2FA enabled. — regards, Revi 08:46, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Sorry that I don't have a mobile phone, and it seem the method shown in Help:Two-factor_authentication need a mobile phone to authenticate. Are there other methods to pass 2FA? --Kanashimi (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I found this on Google. — regards, Revi 13:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you very much!Thank you very much! I have enabled 2fA on my account now. --Kanashimi (talk) 23:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Done. — regards, Revi 03:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Svlioras@el.wiktionary

Status:    Withdrawn

Hi! I would like to request that you give bureaucrat access to User:Svlioras, because our only bureaucrat has been missing since March and we need a new bureaucrat. Thank you in advance! Τυχαίος Χρήστης (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I do not think that the community is large enough to have local bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
We need a bureaucrat so that he can grant bot status and adminships. At the moment there is not a lot of traffic, but we usually have a lot of activity. When can we have a bureaucrat? Τυχαίος Χρήστης (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Bot and admin status can be granted by stewards. You do not need bureaucrats for that. Ruslik (talk) 05:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Just one thing though. When can a community have a bureaucrat? --Τυχαίος Χρήστης (talk) 09:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Update: Our bureaucrat has returned, so everything is fine. Thank you for your help! --Τυχαίος Χρήστης (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Mopza@thwiki

Status:    Not done

Mopza has been elected as the CheckUser for Thai Wikipedia per local policy with 23/0/0 votes (all in favor). He has not yet signed his name in the Confidentiality Agreement, though I have requested him to do so. Thank you. --G(x) (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same. — regards, Revi 16:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
@-revi: The vote does not meet the checkuser policy requirements on having at least 25-30 votes. This cannot be done IMHO. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
What if they reopen the request for a week or two? Trijnsteltalk 23:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
If local policy does allow such a thing then okay. A week ago two users got promoted to CU on thwiki and exceeded the mandatory minimum 25 votes. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
@G(x): Is it an option to reopen this request so you can try to get more votes, required for the CU policy? Trijnsteltalk 19:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
The local policy do not specify the fixed number, but make reference to "appointment by consensus" as per CU policy (which itself requires 25-30 affirmative votes). We are discussing the option whether to keep the vote open for a little bit longer (it has been opening for a month) or to close the nomination and reopen. Since the discussion has not formally been closed, I suggest putting the appointment on hold until the end of the month, after which we will report back whether we can gain enough affirmative votes or that we need to close the nomination and reopen. Thanks. --G(x) (talk) 02:15, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
There are 24 votes in affirmation (one made after the referral of appointment here), which is not likely to satisfy the requirement. Please close the request for now; we are discussing whether to reopen immediately following this or to suspend the new nomination for now (as per adminship renomination practice in Thai Wikipedia), and both options are not likely to result into the outcome in the near future. --G(x) (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Sure, closed as Not done for now. Trijnsteltalk 20:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Oversight access

Y-dash@ja.wikipedia

Status:    Done

User:Y-dash have signed the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation [3].--ぱたごん (talk) 21:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Removal of access

Zoranzoki21@sr.wikipedia

Status:    Withdrawn

Please remove me bureaucrat right. You no need to wait 1 day. Thanks! Zoranzoki21 (talk) 22:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Zoranzoki21: are you sure? You had tremendous community support for this right. Don't withdraw right away. It's not that spirit. Acamicamacaraca (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I am totally sure. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 23:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Oppose Oppose The user Zoranzoki21 is working well and there is no need to remove bureaucrat right.--Soundwaweserb (talk) 23:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I withdrawn this request, There was a problem and I reacted hastily. I apologize to everyone for the harassment, I will do my best to avoid situations like this anymore and not to react this emotionally. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 23:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Deror avi@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

User has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 07:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 11:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Atcovi@global

Status:    Done

Please remove my global sysop rights. Its evident that I'm not as active as I should be in regards to using these rights and I don't percieve to be active in using the gs tools any time soon. Thanks. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 17:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your help and hope to see you soon again. Trijnsteltalk 10:50, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

ValterVB@wikidatawiki

Status:    Done

User has not made the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 07:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 11:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Ks aka 98@jawiki

Status:    Done

This user is inactive for 3 months. Please remove a sysop, bureaucrat,checkuser, oversight rights from this user as per local de-sysop policy for inactivity. Thanks. rxy (talk) 08:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 10:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
@Rxy: Please remove Ks aka 98 from the oversight-ja-wp mailing list as he no longer is one. Trijnsteltalk 10:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, The mailing list is only have one manager as his. Should I request for reset manager password to system admins?--rxy (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Јованвб@sr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove sysop access. The user didn't make any sysop action within last six months. --Serbian Nickmen (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Already done on 15 August 2019. Trijnsteltalk 20:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Исмаил Садуев@ce.wikipedia.org

Status:    Done

The user is not active. According to him, he will no longer participate in Wikipedia. --Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 11:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Camouflaged_Mirage@zhwikiverstity

Status:    Done
Self requested removal. Unable to continue due to personal and private issues.--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
On hold for 24 hours per standard practice --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:09, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

La fée Didier@frwikiquote

Status:    Done

This user is inactive since more than one year. Thanks. Lykos (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Marta Malina Moraczewska@plwikimedia

Status:    Done

As per the linked WMPL Board resolution, upon the termination of Marta's job contract with WMPL, her administrator rights are to be removed. Wojciech Pędzich (WMPL) (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyleft@frwikiquote

Status:    Done

This user is inactive since more than one year. Thanks. Lykos (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Done, with thanks for their past work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Malekhanif@mswiki

Status:    Done

All, request to remove adminship for both users above. Reason due to inactive for more than 1 year. Emails sent also got no reply. Zamwan (talk) 06:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--Jyothis (talk) 11:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Horst Gräbner@dewiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my both flags: sysop and oversight. Thanks! --Horst Gräbner (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 24h, standard for self-resignation of advanced permissions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
removed, einsbor talk 10:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
@Einsbor: the flag of interface administrator of this account was depending on its oversight flag and has to be removed as well; in de:WP there are no interface admins without sysops-flag --Artregor (talk) 10:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
@Artregor: this flag can be removed locally, by Bureaucrats. So it's up to them to do it. einsbor talk 10:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Okay, thx for that information --Artregor (talk) 10:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Avocato@arwiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop flag, please. Thanks--Faisal talk 06:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Only admin, not checkuser as well? @علاء: Can you confirm? Trijnsteltalk 11:04, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
@Trijnstel: Yes, only admin, we already have a policy for checkuser here. Thanks.--Faisal talk 20:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold until finish the local discussion on arwiki --Alaa :)..! 12:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Trijnstel: confirmed. Please remove sysop flag only. Thanks on advance --Alaa :)..! 19:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, although I am not Trijnstel. einsbor talk 10:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello @Einsbor: Thanks --Alaa :)..! 11:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Dschwen@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop, bureaucrat and interface-admin bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

sysop and 'crat flag has been removed, interface admin can be removed locally. einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
@Einsbor: You’re unable to remove it? 1989 (talk) 07:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
@1989: I am able, but per policy if local crat can do it, then I should not do it. einsbor talk 07:31, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Courcelles@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Hystrix@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Kelly@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

KTo288@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Barcex@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 06:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

GifTagger@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 07:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

per request and this comment - removed. einsbor talk 07:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Racso@es.wikipedia

Status:    Done

The user Racso has not registered enough administrative actions to retain sysop access. The local policy establishes a requirement of at least 50 administrative actions over two years. [4] [5] Please remove both the bureaucrat and administrator flags for this user. --Balderai (talk) 23:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 14:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Patricio.lorente@es.wikipedia

Status:    Done

The user Patricio.lorente has not registered enough administrative actions to retain sysop access. The local policy establishes a requirement of at least 50 administrative actions over two years. [6] [7] Please remove both the bureaucrat and administrator flags for this user. --Balderai (talk) 23:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Trijnsteltalk 14:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Courcelles@en.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per his resignation request, please can Courcelles' CU and OS user-rights be removed for the time being. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Worm That Turned (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Red Winged Duck@be-tarask.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Numerous violations of Wikipedia rules and recommendations. In this regard, the community voted for deprivation user administrator privileges (status administrator and bureaucrat). Voting — be-tarask:Вікіпэдыя:Адміністрацыя#Red Winged Duck. --Ліцьвін (talk) 22:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

There was also a previous discussion which was closed by a new editor. be-taraskwiki does not have a policy of voting on such matters. However these rules are used. The voting is required to take at least 2 weeks, minimum 5 votes yes, 50% approval threshold. In current voting 5 editors supported desysopping (including nominator) and 1 opposed. --Jarash 09:31, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 13:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Benoît Prieur@fr.wikipedia

Status:    Done

The user Benoît Prieur has demanded the French sysops to block indef his account. I should have asked it earlier, but I ask for the removal of his access as CU. For the French ArbCom, Cbyd (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@Cbyd: But he is currently not blocked. Doesn't that make a difference? I don't understand why a block means a CU should resign. Trijnsteltalk 19:20, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
He asked himself to be blocked and the French sysops apparently agreed. We are in a phase of renewal of the CU and OS on the fr-wiki and I thought that this user should not keep his access. Why should he keep any CU access if he does not want to do anything on the wiki ? The ArbCom can, in such a phase, decide to destitute a CU, can't he ?--Cbyd (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, but a block doesn't automatically qualify for removal of rights. Besides: the block was also lifted per his request. And is this a request of the arbcom as a whole or individually by you? Trijnsteltalk 19:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Your answer made me check with the sysops : he changed his mind and one week later he received his access. In the meanwhile, I asked him if he still wants to be a CU. The answer is no. And for the last question, this is an official request of the ArbCom. Thank you for your promptitude ! --Cbyd (talk) 19:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
@Cbyd: One final question: you don't happen to have his confirmation on-wiki? Or perhaps he can confirm it here? Trijnsteltalk 20:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
It was via en email, sent with wikipedia. I asked him to confirm here. --Cbyd (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I confirm that I resigned from my CU position on fr.wikipedia.org. I stopped contributing on that wiki. Regards, --Benoît Prieur (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Removed per ^. (Did not wait for additional 24 hours since it has been around 24 hours after the confirmation and waiting for another 24 hours... seems just pointless) @Trijnstel — regards, Revi 16:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, also handled the other part. Trijnsteltalk 18:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

وهراني@ar.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove administrator flag only (don't remove interface administrator). No need to wait 24 hours because we already did that in arwiki. Thanks --Alaa :)..! 11:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done --Wim b 17:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Sir48@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users administrator flag. The user is no a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

HenrikKbh@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users administrator flag. The user is no longer a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

VicVal@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users administrator flag. The user is no longer a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Iliev@bg.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Dear Colleagues,

Please remove my sysop privileges on the Bulgarian Wikipedia. There's a lot of wikistress accumulated around the closing of the Bulgarian Wikinews, and some users on that project have been suggesting that I was acting in bad faith. Accordingly, I feel that I need to step back from the projects for at least some time. This should help me better reflect on the service that I've strived to provide to the Bulgarian wikicommunity for some years, and I've also already asked the community to possibly re-elect me as a sysop on bgwiki. The latter also means there's no need to wait, not to mention that in case of on-wiki emergencies I could still use my sysop bot, PSS 9 (I'll ask separately for its and JSS 9 privileges to also be revoked if the community decides to not entrust me with such responsibilities again). And just to make sure no miscommunication happens: I'm asking to have revoked only for my personal sysop privileges on the Bulgarian Wikipedia; please do keep these on the other projects (for now), as it would be impractical to ask the community to vote there too.

Thank you very much,
— Luchesar • T/C 11:01, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. — regards, Revi 16:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Done, with thanks for the past work.--Wim b 11:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you again so much, Wim b!
— Luchesar • T/C 14:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

palnatoke@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users bureaucrat and administrator flags. The user is no longer a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Kim Bach@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users administrator flag. The user is no longer a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Thomas81@dkwikimedia

Status:    Done

Please remove users administrator flag. The user is no longer a member of the Board and, after the Board's decision, no longer needs permission. --Steenth 08:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Diagramma Della Verita@mswiki

Status:    Not done

All, request to remove adminship for both users above. Reason due to inactive for more than 1 year. Emails sent also got no reply. Zamwan (talk) 06:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

If I am reading the policy right, you probably need to go through a voting for this User since the user did do some actions on Sept 5th? --Jyothis (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Noted with thanks. I will create voting page for this purpose. Zamwan (talk) 08:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Per the above message, declined for now. Please file a new request after the vote if there's consensus to remove. Thank you. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

12345danNL@nl.wikipedia

Status:    Done
Done Ruslik (talk) 13:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Jusjih@zh.wiktionary

Status:    Done

I would like to resign as the importer and remain an administrator.Jusjih (talk) 22:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 02:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Hindustanilanguage@ur.wikipedia

Status:    Done

I would like to surrender my own sysop and bureaucrat rights on Urdu Wikipedia. --Muzammil (talk) 16:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Wim b 17:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Done, Thanks--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 02:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Ombra@it.wikipedia

Status:    Done

"All work and no play makes Ombra a missing sysop". More seriously, changes in RL force me to take a break, for now at least, from wiki. Thanks, Ombra 16:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 02:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Done --Wim b 17:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Katxis@lad.wikipedia

Status:    Done

This user has also gone by the user names Chabi and Chabi1 over time. (I have verified this separately in the past.) For a while, he could not access the Chabi account, and we moved the sysop rights on ladwiki to Katxis. At this point, he is leaving the Katxis account behind, and returning to the Chabi account. Accordingly, we'd like the sysop and 'crat flags removed from "Katxis", after which I will restore them to "Chabi". No delay is needed. Thank you. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@Katxis: Can you confirm? Not doubting StevenJ81, but we'd like confirmation for archiving purposes. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
He might not be able to get in as Katxis, Marco. Would an email thread where it was all discussed explicitly do the trick if I forward it to you? StevenJ81 (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: I don't think he can get in as Katxis right now, Marco. (I don't have any reason to think that the account is compromised, but he's told me he can't get in right now.) So I'm going to forward an email thread to you where it was all discussed explicitly. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
TY. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Timotheus Canens@en.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Please remove CU and OS. Thanks. T. Canens@en.wp (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Alaa :)..! 11:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Done --rxy (talk) 08:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

SilkTork@en.wikipedia

Status:    Done

Per his resignation request, please can SilkTork's CU and OS user-rights be removed for the time being. WormTT 07:48, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Григор Гачев@bg.wikinews

Status:    Done

See Proposals for closing projects/Deletion of Bulgarian Wikinews, SRM#HIGH PRIORITY: Closure of Bulgarian Wikinews and phab:T233322. Bulgarian Wikinews is being closed. As a first step, sysadmins are locking wiki for all but sysops. However, this sysop needs to have those rights removed so that the other sysop on the project can carry out some cleanup. Then the wiki will be locked outright. This deflagging should happen promptly. Thank you. For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 16:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Why do this particular sysop need to be removed? Ruslik (talk) 16:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Details can be found in the three links I provided above. This wiki is now locked to all users except stewards and sysops. It will soon be locked outright, even to sysops, and eventually functionally deleted. However, before that happens, some of the contents of the wiki have to be deleted or marked as possible policy violations. Григор Гачев has opposed the closure and the removal of this information. In order to allow the remaining sysop to take care of this without risk of interference, Григор needs to be deflagged. Please understand that as soon as the other sysop completes his work (one week?), the wiki will be locked to him, too. User:MF-Warburg can confirm. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
“ as soon as the other sysop completes his work (one week?) ”
It may very well be just an hour (I'd be more than happy to be finally relieved from the burden of this project). There are ~1200 articles that have been voted for deletion, but they are in a single category and it should be easy to delete them via the API. Then there's just one more article to be deleted manually. Copyright may be trickier, and probably I would prefer to not even deal with it, but that's something that will likely be discussed on Phabricator.
— Luchesar • T/C 18:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
  • I don't understand. Is this request based on the assumption that one sysop is going to perform some action that another sysop would wheel war on? Nemo 19:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
    Yes. But it's a short-term event; the whole wiki is going to be locked as soon as this cleanup is complete. If you want to leave this for MF-W, or not do it at all, perhaps this cleanup will be completed quickly, and then we can just lock the whole wiki entirely. But we'd prefer not to make Luchesar rush. Please remember, this is not an ordinary situation. This is the first non-trivial project closing in about five years, and there is not a whole lot of precedent to go on. In fact, I devoutly hope we're not really setting any precedents, and that this is simply a one-off. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Just to be absolutely clear on this: if the stewards would prefer doing the cleaning, I'd be even happier. That being said, I think that I still would have the right to close that voting myself, given how I've been elected by the community in accordance with the project rules. And while this is of secondary importance here, I feel it would be right to remind that the project RfA rules do require “7 days [of voting where] there is unanimous agreement on an application, [for] the respective user [to] be granted administrative rights”. Yet the other sysop has never been voted according to these rules—and unlike also the previous applicants, not just me recently. So, at least the way I see, it is not a simple “one sysop versus another sysop” situation.
— Luchesar • T/C 19:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
If the above concerns aren't enough, the sysop have written articles that have infringed BBC articles and copied press releases from other sources (see discussion). Moreover, he created a Meta-wiki RFC in attempt to challenge the consensus made at bg.wn. George Ho (talk) 03:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Done Ruslik (talk) 05:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Iliev@bgwikinews

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop rights on this project per the discussion above. The project will soon be fully locked with only you (i.e. the stewards) and the system admins having further access, anyway, and my rights are going to expire on 11 November, but I feel it would be most appropriate to not postpone revoking my sysop rights too. I definitely don't have anything more to do there after the small cleanup, so there's probably no need as well for the standard 24 hours delay.
Thank you!
— Luchesar • T/C 11:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Done Thank you for your work. Ruslik (talk) 18:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Diagramma Della Verita@ms.wiki

Status:    Done

Request to remove sysop status due to inactivity. Zamwan (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Done --Wim b 17:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Buggia@meta

Status:    Done

Please, remove my global renamer status. --Buggia 08:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. Stryn (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
@Trijnstel please remove Buggia from the mailing list and from IRC channel. Stryn (talk) 08:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Already done. Trijnsteltalk 19:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Hezery99@ms.wiki

Status:    Done

Request to remove sysop status due to inactivity. Zamwan (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Done --Wim b 17:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Jcb@commonswiki

Status:    Done

Remove sysop bit. 1989 (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: Policy at Commons prescribes that such a vote is closed by a bureaucrat, which did not (yet) happen. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 On hold. Waiting for bureaucrat closure/endorsement of the request above. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Oh my Jcb, I like rules as much as you, but are you really going to milk your admin bit for a few more hours? The de-adminship discussion was closed by a Wikipedia administrator (so, trusted user), locked by a Commons administrator (1989) and just for kicks, I recounted the votes and yes, the outcome is correct. There is only one vote that might be questioned due to low edit count (Special:CentralAuth/樂らく號ごう), but even that one seems valid. Wouldn't matter anyway, nearly all voters are autopatrollers or admins. We have the requirement of a bureaucrat closing/endorsing the vote to make sure nobody can lose their bit because of voting fraud with socks. Clearly, no such thing has happened here. What's really poor is that Jcb deleted files after posting here. Jesus Christ Jcb, this is pathetic. Alexis Jazz (ping me) 15:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
@MarcoAurelio: Jcb's statement is factually wrong. Commons policy does not require a bureaucrat to confirm the vote. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:46, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
@Sebari That's correct. Just re-checked to confirm. However the process is the same as an RfA, so I feel a bureaucrat should be certifying this somewhat, even if like I said at EugeneZelenko's talk page at commons everything seems prima facie alright, and as Alexis Jazz mentioned above as well. I checked the last successful de-RfAs at commons and bureaucrat closing is the practice. Krd confirmed me is going to make a comment here soon. Sorry for the apparent bureaucracy. I just want to be sure and avoid issues afterwards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Also now closed by bureaucrat Krd. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Deu@ka.wiktionary

Status:    Not done

Unfortunatelly no edits after 22 march...

https://ka.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E1%83%A1%E1%83%9E%E1%83%94%E1%83%AA%E1%83%98%E1%83%90%E1%83%9A%E1%83%A3%E1%83%A0%E1%83%98:%E1%83%AC%E1%83%95%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98/Deu --ჯეო (talk) 17:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Under which policy or consensus is this removal being requested? —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
No policy-based rationale supplied. — regards, Revi 04:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

All importer@zh.wiktionary

Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done
Status:    Done

Discussion: zh:wikt:Special:PermaLink/5596584#建議けんぎ取消とりけし所有しょゆう匯入者しゃ權限けんげん，改あらため為ため跨またが維基匯入者しゃ (Remove all importer right and grant transwiki right according to Importer).

Alberth2 accepted the removal without granting new right. Others are transwiki or admin already. So no right is need to be granted. Xiplus (talk) 02:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes. Wong128hk said not opposing the proposal and Alberth2 accepted the proposed removal. We may still discuss temporary uploading importers later. Thanks.--Jusjih (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

-import done. Those who have transwiki keeps their transwiki because it was not specified in this request. — regards, Revi 01:59, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Theghaz@dewiki

Status:    Done

Theghaz didn't start a re-election of his checkuser status (re-election modus and timeline, his explanation). Please remove both his checkuser and admin status. Theghaz is not an elected admin, he became the admin bit just for his checkuser job. --Funkruf (talk) 23:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Done, best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Balderai@eswiki

Status:    Done

Please remove my sysop and bureaucrat flags as I did not get ratified in the vote held to maintain them. Thanks.--Balderai (talk) 20:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Done — Defender (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Balderai@eswiki

Status:    Done

This user not approved in the renewal and according to the policy, its sysop and bureaucrat flags must be removed. Thank you. BetoCG (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Done — Defender (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Zhaladshar@enwikisource

Status:    Done

Failed annual confirmation due to inactivity. Please remove both admin and bureaucrat rights. Hesperian 22:05, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Done. — regards, Revi 23:59, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

SimmeD@da.wikiquote

Status:    Done

My 7th time. SimmeD (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold till 22 September. Stryn (talk) 07:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2019-09-22. --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

باسم@arwikiquote

Status:    Done

The community requests permanent adminship (7 supports with no objection- voters considered most active users in ar.wikiquote project). If not, please give sysop flag for 1 year. Thanks if advance --Alaa :)..! 20:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

The current term expires only on 27 March - there is some time left. Ruslik (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
On hold till then! — regards, Revi 11:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: You have preceded me, I think it's better to close it and I'll re-submitting after 9 days --Alaa :)..! 13:51, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
In the past I had similar request like this (submitted too early), in that case it was also on hold, too. — regards, Revi 13:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: As you like, no odds --Alaa :)..! 13:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Per above  On hold until 27 March --Alaa :)..! 18:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
@-revi and Ruslik0: so? --Alaa :)..! 22:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
I do not think arwikiquote community is big enough for new perma-sysop. Done Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2019-09-30. Sorry for the delay. — regards, Revi 03:28, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Permissions/2019-09&oldid=19453262"