The Dual Noble Gas Maser
We developed a dual (or two-species) noble gas maser [1-3], the first device to sustain simultaneous active maser oscillations on distinct transitions in two co-located atomic species: the noble gases 3He and 129Xe. The dual noble gas maser (DNGM) allows sensitive differential measurements of the 3He and 129Xe nuclear spin 1/2 Zeeman transition frequencies, and thus may be useful for symmetry tests and precision measurements such as a search for a permanent electric dipole moment (EDM) of the 129Xe atom. The advantage of differential measurements is that they are insensitive to common-mode systematic effects such as uniform magnetic field variations [4]. In the DNGM, one noble gas species serves as a precision magnetometer to stabilize the system's static magnetic field, while the other species is used as a sensitive probe for new physics such as an EDM. The DNGM has an additional important feature: active maser oscillation permits long coherent measurements of the noble gas Zeeman frequencies (on timescales of a few hours). A coherent frequency measurement can achieve greater precision than the incoherent average of a set of shorter measurements made during an equivalent period of time [1].The DNGM contains dense, co-located ensembles of 3He and 129Xe atoms performing active maser oscillations on their nuclear spin 1/2 Zeeman transitions at ~ 4.9
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the dual noble gas maser.Figure 2 shows measurements of the frequency stability currently provided by the DNGM when using a two-chamber maser cell without electric field plates installed. These measurements demonstrate a sensitivity to changes in the 129Xe Zeeman frequency of approximately 40 nHz in 6,000 s of data acquisition (i.e., the free-running 3He maser stability shown in Fig. 2 divided by ~ 2.7, the ratio of 3He and 129Xe magnetic moments). Fig. 2 also shows that the DNGM's frequency stability has been significantly improved over the last two years through system re-design and engineering: e.g., better temperature control, mechanical stability, and electronic shielding; also active regulation of the Rb magnetization in the pump bulb. Shown on the right ordinate axis of Fig. 2 is the one standard deviation statistical sensitivity to a 129Xe EDM that would result from: (i) the free-running 3He maser frequency stability given on Fig. 2's left ordinate axis; and (ii) the application of ± 5 kV/cm electric fields across the maser bulb, alternating the field direction every t seconds.
Fig. 2. Comparison of frequency stabilities (Allan deviations) for the current [3] and 1996 versions [2] of the DNGM. The free-running 3He Allan deviation of the upgraded current system decreases to ~ 100 nHz for measurement intervals of 6,000 s. The right ordinate axis shows the EDM sensitivity that would result from this frequency stability in the presence of ± 5 kV/cm electric fields.Recently, we began using an EDM cell: i.e., a two-chamber maser cell with electric field plates installed (see Fig. 3). These measurements indicate a modest degradation of short-term maser frequency stability with application of ± 3.5 kV/cm electric fields, due to excessive audio noise near the maser frequency (~ 5
Fig. 3. Recent measurements of free-running 3He maser frequency stability using a prototype EDM cell. Data is shown with and without application of a 3.5 kV/cm electric field across the maser bulb. The "field-on"; maser frequency stability is degraded by audio noise generated by a sub-standard high voltage source.Note: Our DNGM investigations have been performed in collaboration with Prof. Timothy Chupp and his group at the University of Michigan.
References:
[1] T.E. Chupp, R.J. Hoare, R.L. Walsworth, and Bo Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2363 (1994).
[2] R.E. Stoner, M.A. Rosenberry, J.T. Wright, T.E. Chupp, E.R. Oteiza, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3971 (1996).
[3] D. Bear, T.E. Chupp, K. Cooper, S. DeDeo, M.A. Rosenberry, R.E. Stoner, and R.L. Walsworth, Phys. Rev. A 57, 5006 (1998).
[4] T.E. Chupp, E.R. Oteiza, J.M. Richardson, and T.R. White, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3998 (1988).
[5] G.D. Cates, R.J. Fitzgerald, A.S. Barton, P. Bogorad, M. Gatzke, N.R. Newbury, and B. Saam, Phys. Rev. A 45, 4631 (1992).