(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Master of Orion III on PC at Metacritic
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20120122151343/http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/master-of-orion-iii/user-reviews?dist=positive
  • Publisher: Atari
  • Release Date: Feb 25, 2003
User Score
4.6 out of 10

Generally unfavorable- based on 48 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 48
  2. Negative: 27 out of 48

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. derAlu
    Mar 6, 2003
    8
    I cannot understand all of your positions. Well, ok ... there should be some improvements, but the game is a lot of fun (for me).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. BennettM.
    Apr 8, 2003
    7
    A must-have for hard-core strategists. Intriuging and visually stunning, this is a great game. However, the AI seems to have slight problems. Most complaints about this game are based in reality, but WAY exagerrated. If it was really so bad it wouldn't have gotten so many great reviews. If strategy games are not your thing though you'll hate it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. SJ
    Aug 2, 2004
    9
    Brilliant, but not for everyone, it is shall we say an acquired taste.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. NikolaN.
    Apr 13, 2004
    8
    After one year, I can say that this game is more complex that it looks at first glance. If you choose right difficulty level and BIG system, you will see that AI is not that bad as it seems, and automatic micromanagment is real helper after some 200 turns...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Alex
    Mar 2, 2003
    10
    Simply the best, you all must be smoking pot!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. KupKake
    Mar 6, 2003
    9
    Needs better Documentation. other then that its an awesome game.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. CO
    Mar 9, 2003
    9
    It is weird it is complex but it is definitely fun. There is not so many bugs but the AI is really bad. At first it is very hard to play but when you know it you go very quickly. In fact you can leave what you don't like in this kind of game and just focus on what you like fight, developpement, exploration ... The AI can handle the developpment of your planet, it's too bad it does not handle well the combat but nothing a good patch can't change. Visit the infogram forum too you will learn a lot Try it, play and enjoy it is definitely a good game. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. Taamati
    May 19, 2003
    7
    The game is good if you can spend the time building development plans for your planets and go through the Encyclopedia when neccesary. Though the game would be alot better if you could refit/upgrade your ships. Also for once I would like to see a game where the ships and planet etc are in scale other than that it's a good play.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. RedEye
    May 14, 2004
    10
    I really liked it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. BryanW.
    Nov 11, 2004
    10
    This(with the newest patch) is quite possibly the funnest game i have ever played. The patch made the AI challenging which is good, since before the AI would often just declare war for no reason. Without the patch the game is horrible due to faulty AI. Its all in the AI.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Mar 31, 2011
    9
    When i bought this game so many years ago, i was suprised that i could barely find anything about the game over the internet, it was like a ghost game, which must have had some credibility since it was no/3 of the series. Nevertheless, i learned how to play the game myself and grew to love the dynamics, the expanse of the galaxy and the general feel of being a dictator in a galaxy. It was the first TBS Space 4x game i ever played, and for me personally - nothing can ever come close. I realised the hatred, frustration and pure denial of this games existence by MoO fans (1 & 2), and after playing those two myself i can see why it was so terrible compared to the originals. But for me, MoO3 has always been a constant. Im just glad i never played the first two before i played the 3rd, otherwise i would have probably sided with the general consensus of this game. Expand
  12. Nov 2, 2011
    8
    Love the details, depth, and realistic astronomy (the only game to have realistic astronomy). The AI really sucks though, forcing you to micromanage. Gets boring fast once you're over 10 star systems. No eyecandy and earcandy in the battles. Like the alien races. Tech tree is very good.

Recommended Products

    • Release Date: 1996
    • Platform: PC
    Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares Image
    • Release Date: Oct 16, 2006
    • Platform: PC
    Space Empires V Image
  1. Sword of the Stars II: Lords of Winter Image
Metascore

Mixed or average reviews - based on 24 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 24
  2. Negative: 4 out of 24
  1. 20
    MOO3 collapses under the weight of its own ambitious design. We doubt this can be fixed in a patch. Gamers need not apply. Masochists, you're on your own.
  2. Sure, the gameplay is incredibly deep, but I wanted more emphasis on the military aspects of the game. [Apr 2003, p.95]
  3. If only your enemies displayed the same kind of intelligence, the game might be a lot more interesting - but in fact, the enemy AI in MOO3 is terrible, far worse than in the previous game in the series.