- Solomon, Scott;
- St Martin, Andrew;
- Shah, Nirav;
- Fatobene, Giancarlo;
- Al Malki, Monzr;
- Ballen, Karen;
- Bashey, Asad;
- Bejanyan, Nelli;
- Bolaños Meade, Javier;
- Brunstein, Claudio;
- DeFilipp, Zachariah;
- Champlin, Richard;
- Fuchs, Ephraim;
- Hamadani, Mehdi;
- Hematti, Peiman;
- Kanakry, Christopher;
- McGuirk, Joseph;
- McNiece, Ian;
- Ciurea, Stefan;
- Pasquini, Marcelo;
- Rocha, Vanderson;
- Romee, Rizwan;
- Patel, Sagar;
- Vasu, Sumithira;
- Waller, Edmund;
- Wingard, John;
- Zhang, Mei-Jie;
- Eapen, Mary
In the absence of prospective studies that examine the effect of conditioning regimen intensity after T-cell-replete haploidentical transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Of the 1325 eligible patients (AML, n = 818; ALL, n = 286; and MDS, n = 221), 526 patients received a myeloablative regimen and 799 received a reduced-intensity regimen. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was uniform with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Cox regression models were built to study the effect of conditioning regimen intensity on transplant outcomes. For patients aged 18 to 54 years, disease-free survival was lower (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 42% vs 51%; P = .007) and relapse was higher (HR, 1.51; 44% vs 33%; P = .001) with a reduced-intensity regimen compared with a myeloablative regimen. Nonrelapse mortality did not differ according to regimen intensity. For patients aged 55 to 70 years, disease-free survival (HR, 0.97; 37% vs 43%; P = .83) and relapse (HR, 1.32; 42% vs 31%; P = .11) did not differ according to regimen intensity. Nonrelapse mortality was lower with reduced-intensity regimens (HR, 0.64; 20% vs 31%; P = .02). Myeloablative regimens are preferred for AML, ALL, and MDS; reduced-intensity regimens should be reserved for those unable to tolerate myeloablation.