Advertisement
Research ArticleAgingCell biology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI121297
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Osmanagic-Myers, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Kiss, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Manakanatas, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Hamza, O. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Sedlmayer, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Szabo, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Fischer, I. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Fichtinger, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Podesser, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Eriksson, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Max F. Perutz Laboratories (MFPL), Department of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
3Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research at the Center for Biomedical Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
4Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, NEO, Huddinge, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Find articles by Foisner, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published November 13, 2018 - More info
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a fatal disease characterized by premature aging in which young children fail to thrive and adolescents die from myocardial infarction or stroke. The pathogenesis of HGPS is studied intensively because the mechanisms of premature aging may lead to a better understanding of normal aging. In this issue of the JCI, Osmanagic-Myers and colleagues identify the cellular mechanisms that lead to vascular abnormalities and death in children with HGPS.
Charles J. Lowenstein, J. Allen Bennett
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a premature aging disorder characterized by accelerated cardiovascular disease with extensive fibrosis. It is caused by a mutation in LMNA leading to expression of truncated prelamin A (progerin) in the nucleus. To investigate the contribution of the endothelium to cardiovascular HGPS pathology, we generated an endothelium-specific HGPS mouse model with selective endothelial progerin expression. Transgenic mice develop interstitial myocardial and perivascular fibrosis and left ventricular hypertrophy associated with diastolic dysfunction and premature death. Endothelial cells show impaired shear stress response and reduced levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and NO. On the molecular level, progerin impairs nucleocytoskeletal coupling in endothelial cells through changes in mechanoresponsive components at the nuclear envelope, increased F-actin/G-actin ratios, and deregulation of mechanoresponsive myocardin-related transcription factor-A (MRTFA). MRTFA binds to the Nos3 promoter and reduces eNOS expression, thereby mediating a profibrotic paracrine response in fibroblasts. MRTFA inhibition rescues eNOS levels and ameliorates the profibrotic effect of endothelial cells in vitro. Although this murine model lacks the key anatomical feature of vascular smooth muscle cell loss seen in HGPS patients, our data show that progerin-induced impairment of mechanosignaling in endothelial cells contributes to excessive fibrosis and cardiovascular disease in HGPS patients.
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare, progressive, premature aging disease characterized by growth retardation, alopecia, loss of subcutaneous fat, aged-looking skin, bone abnormalities, and osteoporosis (1–3). A hallmark of HGPS is severe atherosclerosis in childhood characterized by left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction associated with LV hypertrophy (4, 5). Cardiovascular features in HGPS include a spectrum of early- to late-stage collagen-rich plaques with a primary vascular pathology of severe vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) loss in large arteries (4, 6, 7) and massive fibrosis in the adventitial layer (4), hyaluronan accumulation, and calcification of blood vessels (8). These changes increase aortic stiffness and cardiac afterload, presumably causing LV hypertrophy and myocardial infarction in patients at a mean age of 14.6 years (9).
HGPS is caused by mutations in LMNA, encoding lamin A and C. Lamins are major components of the nuclear lamina, a complex protein meshwork underlying the inner nuclear membrane that provides shape and mechanical stability to the nucleus and interacts with heterochromatin (10). Lamin A is expressed as prelamin A and posttranslationally processed in a multistep pathway, including C-terminal farnesylation and carboxymethylation, followed by proteolytic cleavage of the modified C-terminal 15 amino acids, yielding nonfarnesylated and noncarboxymethylated mature lamin A (10). HGPS is predominantly caused by a dominant 1824C>T mutation in LMNA that activates a cryptic splice donor site leading to the formation of an incompletely processed and stably farnesylated prelamin A with a 50–amino acid internal deletion, termed progerin (11, 12).
HGPS-linked cardiovascular features resemble in many aspects those of geriatric cardiovascular disease (CVD) (4, 13–16). Despite the fact that endothelial senescence is a major initiating event in geriatric CVD and atherosclerosis (13, 17), research on CVD in HGPS has mainly focused on VSMCs based on the reports on VSMC depletion in HGPS patients and some murine models (4, 6, 8, 18, 19). The relevance of progerin expression in the endothelium and its contribution to cardiovascular pathologies in HGPS is still unknown. Aging-related changes in the endothelium involve downregulation of atheroprotective pathways such as reduced endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) levels, shear stress insensitivity (20), and activation of proinflammatory molecules ICAM1 and ICAM2 (17) increasing atherosclerosis susceptibility (21, 22). Other key features of aged, dysfunctional arteries include increased stiffening due to structural changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM) within intimal, medial, and adventitial layers (23), which in turn affect actomyosin-mediated cellular contractility and shear stress response (20, 23).
Only a few studies provide potential mechanistic links between progerin expression and CVD (24, 25). Gene expression profiling in HGPS patient fibroblasts revealed prominent misregulation of ECM genes (26, 27). In addition, progerin expression in cultured cells disturbed nucleocytoskeletal connections and affected the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex (28, 29), suggesting that defective mechanotransduction may play a role in HGPS. Various HGPS mouse models were generated, which show phenotypes that range from severe, leading to premature death (18, 30), to relatively mild (19), and several conditional HGPS mouse models have reported various tissue-specific effects of progerin expression (31–33). In regard to CVD, a recently reported mouse model with specific vascular smooth muscle expression of progerin presented VSMC loss and accelerated atherosclerosis (6), but hitherto endothelium-specific HGPS mice have not been reported. Based on the importance of age-related changes of the endothelium in CVD we generated a transgenic mouse model with progerin expression selectively in the endothelium (Prog-Tg). Prog-Tg mice develop LV hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction, and myocardial interstitial and perivascular fibrosis, phenocopying many aspects of the HGPS cardiovascular pathology. Our data suggest that progerin expression in endothelial cells (ECs) causes severe cardiovascular pathology through deregulated antifibrotic pathways but does not cause VSMC loss. Mechanistically, progerin expression impaired nucleocytoskeletal coupling and shear stress response in ECs leading to impaired mechanoresponsive myocardin-related transcription factor A (MRTFA) signaling.
Endothelium-specific expression of progerin leads to cardiovascular pathology. To determine the impact of progerin expression in the endothelium on cardiovascular pathology in HGPS, we established mice expressing progerin exclusively in ECs by crossing transgenic mice carrying tet operon–driven wild-type or HGPS mutant (1824C>T; G608G) lamin A minigenes (32), with transgenic mice expressing a tetracycline-responsive transcriptional activator under the control of the endothelium-specific Cdh5 promoter (34). Bitransgenic mice expressing human progerin and wild-type lamin A in endothelial tissue are referred to as Prog-Tg and LA-Tg mice, respectively, and their corresponding single-transgenic tetop-LAWt and tetop-LAG608G littermates as Wt. To verify endothelium-specific expression, we performed immunoblot analyses of EC and non-EC extracts (see Methods) using human lamin A–specific antibodies that do not detect endogenous mouse lamin A. As previously shown (32), the HGPS minigene in Prog-Tg mice expressed both the ectopic wild-type human lamin A and progerin in ECs but not in non-ECs, while the wild-type lamin A minigene in LA-Tg mice expressed only wild-type lamin A (Figure 1A). Wt mice did not express human ectopic lamin A proteins in ECs, confirming a tight regulation from the tet operon. Immunoblots using an antibody detecting both endogenous and ectopic lamin A indicated a 4- and 4.4-fold increase in total lamin A levels in Prog-Tg and LA-Tg versus Wt animals, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining of a Prog-Tg lung–derived cell mixture using human lamin A antibodies confirmed exclusive expression of transgenes in endothelial, vascular endothelial cadherin–positive (VE-cadherin–positive) cells (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI121297DS1). Mean fluorescence intensity measurement of progerin signals revealed heterogeneous expression levels among individual cells, as reported in HGPS patients (35), with over 75% of nuclei showing clearly detectable progerin staining (Figure 1B). Furthermore, in cardiac coronary vessels, progerin staining was specifically detected in the intimal but not medial and adventitial layers of the artery (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 1B, arrowheads). In cardiac tissue, progerin is only expressed in the PECAM1-positive microvasculature (Figure 1D, arrowheads), but not in cardiomyocytes (arrows). Overall, these data confirmed a tightly controlled, endothelium-specific expression of the transgenes in bitransgenic mice.
Characterization of Prog-Tg mice. (A) Immunoblots of indicated lysates using anti–human lamin A/C (detecting transgenes, upper panel), anti–lamin A/C (recognizing human and mouse lamin A/C, lower panel), and anti-tubulin and anti–VE-cadherin as loading controls. Numbers show ratio of total lamin A levels in transgenic over Wt animals. Endothelial cells (ECs) from Wt (Wt-EC), Prog-Tg (Prog-Tg-EC) and LA-Tg (LA-Tg-EC) animals; EC-depleted cell mixture from Prog-Tg animals (Prog-Tg-non-EC); and HGPS patient fibroblasts (HGPS) were analyzed. (B) Histogram of mean progerin fluorescence intensities in immunofluorescence images of Prog-Tg ECs (see Figure 5C) (n = 5 Prog-Tg mice, 462 cells in total). (C and D) Immunofluorescence images of coronary artery (C) and cardiac tissue (D) from Prog-Tg animals stained with antibodies against progerin, VE-cadherin (note green autofluorescence of elastic lamina), and PECAM1, and Hoechst (representative of n = 3 Prog-Tg animals). Progerin expression is confined to the intimal layer (C, arrowheads) and PECAM1-positive cardiac microvasculature (D, arrowheads). Dashed lines, cardiomyocyte boundaries; arrows, intima (C) and progerin-negative cardiomyocytes (D). Scale bars: 10
Next we analyzed the phenotype of bitransgenic mice. We observed reduced growth of male and female Prog-Tg but not LA-Tg mice (Figure 1E) compared with Wt littermates, and in approximately 40% of Prog-Tg but not LA-Tg mice sudden death occurred at the age approaching 25 weeks (Figure 1F). Since myocardial infarction is the most common cause of death in HGPS patients (4), we examined the hearts of bitransgenic mice. Increased heart weight to body weight ratios in Prog-Tg versus Wt littermates and LA-Tg animals as well as increased heart weight to tibia length ratios in Prog-Tg versus Wt mice (Figure 2, A and B) indicated cardiac hypertrophy in Prog-Tg mice. Histological examination of heart sections showed thickened left ventricles in Prog-Tg versus Wt littermates (Figure 2A) and an increased mean cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes (Figure 2, A and C). Unlike NppA, expression of hypertrophy marker NppB (36, 37) showed a tendential increase in heart and a significant increase in isolated primary Prog-Tg ECs and lung (Supplemental Figure 2A). We next performed transthoracic cardiac echocardiography and subsequent LV pressure characterization to examine cardiac functional parameters in vivo in Prog-Tg and LA-Tg animals in comparison to Wt littermate controls. Assessment of echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters revealed increased end-diastolic septal wall width (EDSW) and end-diastolic posterior wall width normalized to body weight (EDPW), confirming cardiac hypertrophy (Figure 2, D and E, and Supplemental Figure 2, B and C). Cardiac hypertrophy was accompanied by an increase in LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and a mild increase in LV systolic pressure (LVSP) (Figure 2, F and G) with preserved ejection fraction (Supplemental Table 1). Furthermore, an increased diastolic wall stress, a trend toward increased dP/dt, and a reduced isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 2, D and E) in Prog-Tg mice implicated restrictive filling consistent with a restrictive diastolic function in Prog-Tg mice (38). Altogether, our data point toward LV diastolic dysfunction in Prog-Tg mice, which is the most prevalent cardiac abnormality observed in HGPS patients (5).
Cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in Prog-Tg mice. (A) Representative heart images (upper panel) and H&E-stained thin slices of cardiac ventricle cross sections of Wt and Prog-Tg mice at 6 months (n = 3 per genotype). Arrows indicate thickness of left ventricular free wall. Scale bar: 1,000
Since increased LV stiffness is a detrimental factor for LV diastolic function (38), we tested for accumulation of fibrous tissue in the hypertrophic myocardium, using picrosirius red and Masson’s trichrome blue staining in heart sections. Prog-Tg animals showed significantly increased myocardial interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in comparison with both Wt and LA-Tg controls (Figure 3A), which is known to impair coronary blood flow and cardiac function (39). Consistent with perivascular fibrosis, we observed an increased adventitial to medial thickness ratio (Figure 3B), indicating adventitial thickening in Prog-Tg mice similar to that in HGPS patients (4). In contrast to reports on HGPS patients and mice expressing progerin in all tissues or VSMCs (4, 6), we did not observe loss of VSMCs in Prog-Tg mice. Quantification of VSMCs by counting nuclei or by measuring smooth muscle actin–positive (SMA-positive) area in the media showed even a trend toward higher numbers of VSMCs (Figure 3C). Van Gieson staining revealed only subtle elastic tissue distortions, and calcium deposits were absent as tested by von Kossa staining (Figure 3B). Thus, Prog-Tg mice did not present severe pathologies in VSMCs, indicating that VSMC loss in HGPS patients is not caused by a dysfunctional endothelium but may be an intrinsic defect of progerin-expressing VSMCs. The impaired, progerin-expressing endothelium, however, causes a strong profibrotic phenotype in Prog-Tg mice. To further assess the progerin-mediated fibrotic pathology we analyzed collagen expression patterns in cardiac tissue and ECs. Fibroblast-derived collagen 3 (Col3a1) (40) but not endothelium-derived collagen 4 (Col4a5) transcript levels were increased in hearts of Prog-Tg versus Wt littermates (Figure 3D). In ECs, Col1a1 and Col4a5 levels were unaltered and Col3a1 levels were even decreased, indicating that excessive collagen was not primarily derived from the endothelium. Thus, progerin-expressing ECs may mediate a profibrotic response in surrounding tissue. Collectively, transthoracic cardiac echocardiography, histological analyses, and assessment of collagen levels revealed LV hypertrophy and fibrosis of cardiac tissue in Prog-Tg mice, similar to the strong fibrotic phenotype in HGPS patients (4) and during vascular aging (14). These findings suggest that the profibrotic CVD pathology in HGPS may be mediated by progerin-expressing endothelium. Importantly, cardiac fibrosis was observed in Prog-Tg, but absent in LA-Tg mice, suggesting a progerin-specific pathology.
Cardiac fibrosis and adventitial thickening. (A) Representative cardiac cross sections stained with picrosirius red (left) and coronary artery sections stained with Masson’s trichrome (right) in Wt and Prog-Tg mice (representative of littermate pairs analyzed below). Scale bars: 50
Downregulation of the antifibrotic eNOS pathway in Prog-Tg ECs. To obtain insight into potential mechanisms underlying how progerin expression in the endothelium contributes to the profibrotic phenotype, we analyzed endothelium-linked pro- and antifibrotic pathways, such as expression of antifibrotic Nos3 and profibrotic Icam1 and Icam2 genes that have been used as prognostic markers for EC dysfunction (21, 22). The antifibrotic effect of endothelium-specific eNOS is mediated through production and secretion of NO that exerts antifibrotic paracrine effects causing downregulation of collagen 3 in surrounding cells (41). Prog-Tg mice had significantly reduced levels of Nos3 transcript in both lung and heart tissue, and eNOS mRNA and protein levels were reduced in Prog-Tg ECs, although EC numbers were unaltered (as judged by endothelial marker Cdh5; Figure 4, A and B). Accordingly, the total NO metabolite level was significantly reduced in Prog-Tg versus Wt EC extracts (Figure 4C). To test whether reduced levels of eNOS and NO in Prog-Tg ECs affect endothelium-dependent vessel relaxation, we assessed vascular reactivity in isolated aortic segments following administration of endothelium-dependent NO-donor acetylcholine (Ach) or endothelium-independent NO-donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP). Arteries from Prog-Tg animals showed a trend toward delayed response to Ach at lower Ach concentration, but not to SNP, with slightly reduced pEC50 values (Supplemental Figure 3), indicating a prolonged lag phase in endothelium-dependent vessel relaxation in Prog-Tg animals. Therefore, we concluded that the reduced eNOS and NO levels in Prog-Tg ECs may be one of the primary causes for the profibrotic response in surrounding tissue but may not be sufficient to significantly impair vascular reactivity. In addition, expression of proinflammatory markers Icam1 and Icam2 was not significantly increased in Prog-Tg animals (Supplemental Figure 2F).
Downregulation of antifibrotic eNOS. (A) Expression of Nos3 and Cdh5 mRNA in lung, heart, and ECs (n = 6, 5, and 4 littermate pairs, respectively; age ~25 weeks). Values were normalized to Hprt and compared to those from Wt littermate (fold change). *P < 0.05 by paired (littermate tissues) and unpaired (cells) Student’s t test. NS, not significant. (B) Quantitative immunoblot analysis of lysates from Wt and Prog-Tg ECs using eNOS antibodies (n = 6). **P < 0.01 by Mann-Whitney U test. Data presented as median (middle line) with boxes encompassing 25th to 75th percentile, and whiskers, minimum to maximum values. (C) Reduction in total nitric oxide in Prog-Tg and Wt cell extracts. Data are presented in micromolar values of total NOx (nitrite and nitrate) per 2 × 105 cells (n = 4 independent experiments). *P < 0.05 by unpaired Student’s t test. Data presented as mean ± SEM.
ECs in Prog-Tg mice show impaired flow-induced shear stress response and aberrant nucleocytoskeletal connections. Next, we investigated potential mechanisms leading to reduced eNOS levels and activation of profibrotic pathways in Prog-Tg mice. The endothelium of blood vessels is constantly exposed to blood flow–mediated shear stress, upon which the cells undergo a complex set of cytoskeletal rearrangements and activate antifibrotic, shear stress–responsive molecules such as eNOS (42). We investigated cell alignment in endothelial sheets of descending aorta by immunofluorescence analysis to test potential defects in shear stress response. Progerin-expressing ECs in endothelial sheets were frequently misaligned, as normally observed at curvatures and branches of vessels (43), in contrast to cells in Wt aortas that were well aligned in the direction of flow (Figure 5A, arrows). To quantify cell alignment we measured cell aspect ratios and the alignment angle, the angle between the major cell axis and the axis perpendicular to the flow direction (0°, no alignment; 90°, complete alignment) (44). Both, aspect ratios and alignment angles, were significantly lower in Prog-Tg versus Wt aortic sheets (Figure 5B), confirming misalignment of mutant cells. To test whether the misalignment of ECs in situ was caused by the inability of progerin-expressing cells to respond to flow, primary ECs were exposed to flow shear stress grown in flow channels. Whereas 3-hour flow shear stress exposure induced cell alignment with parallel bundling of actin stress fibers in Wt cells, this effect was much less evident in Prog-Tg cells, where merely cortical actin increased and nuclei failed to elongate (Figure 5C). A significantly higher proportion of Wt cells showed actin alignment (direction of actin stress fibers within 0°–30° to the cell long axis as described in ref. 45) compared with Prog-Tg cells after exposure to flow (Figure 5D). Similarly, cell aspect ratios significantly increased in Wt but not in Prog-Tg ECs after exposure to flow (Figure 5D), indicating a severe impairment in flow shear stress response of progerin-expressing ECs. As direct connections of the actin cytoskeleton to the nuclear envelope play a central role in force transmission upon shear stress (46), we tested the localization and expression levels of SUN1 and -2, members of the LINC complex. Immunofluorescence microscopy and fluorescence intensity measurements (Figure 6A), and immunoblotting (Figure 6B) revealed SUN1 upregulation and accumulation at the nuclear rim of Prog-Tg versus Wt ECs, as reported also in HGPS fibroblasts (47). Double immunofluorescence staining and quantification revealed that SUN1 protein levels directly correlated with progerin levels (Figure 6A). A similar accumulation was observed for SUN2 (Supplemental Figure 4). Emerin, a nuclear membrane protein involved in nucleocytoskeletal connections (48) and nuclear mechanoresponse (49), was mislocalized in conspicuous patches in Prog-Tg but not Wt ECs, while emerin protein levels were unaffected (Figure 6C). As emerin promotes actin polymerization (50, 51), we reasoned that changes in emerin may affect actin organization in Prog-Tg ECs. Immunofluorescence microscopy of phalloidin-stained cells revealed abundant actin stress fibers in Prog-Tg ECs with frequent actin “knots,” suggesting disturbances in actin connections (Figure 6D, arrow). We also found increased F-actin to G-actin ratios in Prog-Tg versus Wt cells as determined by fluorophore-labeled phalloidin and DNase I staining (Figure 6D). In addition, actin (Actb) transcript levels were increased in heart tissue as well as in isolated ECs of Prog-Tg animals (Figure 6D). Thus, progerin expression affects the expression and structural organization of actin and impairs nuclear envelope proteins involved in shear stress force transmission.
Impaired mechanical response in Prog-Tg mice. (A) En face view of the endothelial layer in the area of descending aorta isolated from Wt and Prog-Tg mice and stained with indicated antibodies and Hoechst (DNA) dye. Arrows indicate cells with high progerin levels showing misalignment within aortic sheet (images are representative of n = 4 Wt and Prog-Tg littermate pairs). Scale bar: 10
Defective nucleocytoskeletal connections in Prog-Tg cells. (A) ECs from Wt and Prog-Tg mice were immunostained with progerin and SUN1 antibodies and DNA dye (DAPI). Arrowheads, cells with high progerin levels show stronger SUN1 staining (images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments). Scale bar: 10
Impaired MRTFA mechanosignaling leads to reduction of eNOS levels and activation of profibrotic pathways. Given the observed defects in shear stress mechanosensing in Prog-Tg ECs, we sought to identify affected mechanosensitive factors that mediate eNOS expression. The Nos3 promoter harbors a shear stress–responsive element regulated by mechanosensitive transcription factors such as NF-
Impaired MRTFA signaling in Prog-Tg ECs affects eNOS and profibrotic signaling. (A) Immunofluorescence of Wt and Prog-Tg ECs using MRTFA antibody and DAPI (images are representative of n = 3 independent experiments). Scale bar: 10
Overall, our results show that progerin expression in ECs leads to defects in nucleocytoskeletal coupling, in flow stress response, and in MRTFA/eNOS signaling, which in turn induce profibrotic changes, cardiovascular stiffening, and cardiac hypertrophy.
Age-related endothelial dysfunction is a prominent initiating event in geriatric CVD and atherosclerosis (13, 17) and is promoted by external insults such as fatty diet, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and increased serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, of which only a few are present in patients with HGPS (4, 58). The fact that CVD in HGPS occurs in the absence of most of the classical risk factors suggests that progerin expression directly affects intrinsic properties of the endothelium. So far, vascular pathology in HGPS has been reported to include prominent loss of VSMCs (4, 6, 7), but the contribution of the endothelium to HGPS cardiovascular pathology has not been tested. To address this question we generated a HGPS mouse model with endothelium-restricted progerin expression. Here we show profibrotic changes in the endothelium-specific progerin mice, such as adventitial thickening and increased collagen deposition around coronary arteries, and cardiac interstitial fibrosis, associated with LV hypertrophy and LV diastolic dysfunction. Our data demonstrate that Prog-Tg mice phenocopy many aspects of the clinical cardiovascular aberrations in HGPS patients, including the severe profibrotic response and cardiac functional impairment, but they do not present pathologies in the vascular tunica media, such as VSMC loss. Since progerin expression is restricted to the endothelium in Prog-Tg mice, the profibrotic cardiovascular pathology in HGPS may be rooted in EC dysfunction, while loss of VSMCs in HGPS is likely caused by intrinsic defects of progerin-expressing VSMCs.
A hallmark of aging-related changes in the endothelium is the reduced secretion of NO, produced by eNOS (20, 59). Endothelium-derived NO is known to mediate endothelium-dependent vasodilation (21) and to exert an antifibrotic paracrine effect on surrounding tissues (41). eNOS and NO levels were significantly reduced in Prog-Tg mice and ECs, but Prog-Tg aorta showed only a subtle delay in endothelium-dependent relaxation ex vivo. However, other downstream pathways of eNOS/NO, such as the initiation of profibrotic pathways, were clearly affected in Prog-Tg mice, as demonstrated by the strong profibrotic response of Prog-Tg mice and the profibrotic paracrine signaling of Prog-Tg ECs to fibroblasts in cocultures in vitro.
A key feature of healthy atheroprotective blood vessels is their adequate response to shear stress exerted by the blood flow. Thereby a complex set of cytoskeletal rearrangements and nucleocytoskeletal coupling activate atheroprotective and antifibrotic shear stress–responsive pathways such as eNOS (42). Disturbances in flow sensing, which often occurs at branching parts of the arterial tree, impair proper cytoskeletal rearrangements and induce proatherogenic and profibrotic changes including a proinflammatory response, eNOS downregulation, and collagen accumulation. In the present study, we demonstrate a defective cytoskeletal alignment response to shear stress of aortic endothelium and ECs of Prog-Tg mice correlating with eNOS downregulation. Our findings are in line with previous reports in other cell systems, showing impaired response of progerin-expressing cells to mechanical stress (60, 61), but, demonstrated for the first time to our knowledge in ECs in vitro and in vivo, our results provide physiological relevance of these defects in HGPS-linked cardiovascular impairment.
Cytoskeletal connections to the nucleus play a central role in the transmission of mechanical forces such as those mediated by shear stress (46, 62) and thus, mutations or impairments in any of the connector molecules, including LINC family members nesprin and SUN1/2 and emerin, were shown to perturb this process (49, 63, 64). We show here severe emerin aggregation and upregulation of SUN1/2 in progerin-expressing ECs, providing a mechanistic explanation for shear stress defects in these cells through aberrant nucleocytoskeletal coupling. In addition, the observed elevated F-actin/G-actin ratio in Prog-Tg ECs in conjunction with increased Actb transcript levels in tissues and isolated ECs implicates increased cytoskeleton stiffening, expected to hamper the shear stress response. We suggest that actin changes in progerin-expressing cells are rooted in severe aggregation and mislocalization of emerin, which is a key nuclear envelope protein regulating actin polymerization. In line with our hypothesis, recent reports showed that mechanical strain–induced enrichment of emerin at the outer nuclear envelope leads to increased actin polymerization and has a wide range of effects on gene transcription (65). Accordingly, we show aberrant localization of mechanosensitive, F-actin–sensitive, and emerin-regulated transcription factor MRTFA in Prog-Tg cells. Importantly, we show that MRTFA inhibition ameliorated the EC-mediated profibrotic paracrine signaling in cocultures, demonstrating a direct involvement of a deregulated MRTFA pathway in the profibrotic effect of progerin-expressing ECs. At a mechanistic level we show that MRTFA binds to the Nos3 promoter and pharmacological inhibition of MRTFA rescues eNOS levels, suggesting that Nos3 is a direct MRTFA target gene repressed by MRTFA.
We propose a model (Figure 8) in which progerin accumulation at the nuclear lamina causes upregulation of SUN1/2, emerin aggregation, and F-actin increase, leading to the formation of more rigid nucleocytoskeletal links. Since MRTFA is involved in transcriptional regulation of many cytoskeletal genes (66), including SMA (Acta2), it is conceivable that it also exerts a positive feed-back regulation on actin expression. In addition, the MRTFA-mediated downregulation of atheroprotective eNOS results in a decrease of NO secretion by ECs, promoting fibrosis in other, non-endothelial, cell types. In conclusion, we show for the first time to our knowledge that progerin expression in endothelial tissue drives profibrotic changes leading to cardiovascular defects and premature death in mice. Mechanistically, we provide the MRTFA/eNOS axis–rooted mechanosensing defects as the basis for profibrotic changes and vascular insults in HGPS. Our results open new possible intervention strategies for the treatment of progeria and, in view of shear stress insensitivity occurring during normal endothelial aging (20, 23, 67) and of progerin accumulation in arteries of aged individuals (4), our study will also help to elucidate molecular processes of CVD in normal aging and find ways to unwrinkle the aged arteries.
Working model. Progerin accumulation at the nuclear lamina leads to perturbations in F-actin level and actin organization and defects in components involved in nucleocytoskeletal coupling (SUN1/2 and emerin). The defective rigid nucleocytoskeletal links show impaired mechanoresponse and cause MRTFA accumulation at the nuclear periphery. MRTFA or associated complexes exert presumably a positive feedback loop on Actb expression (looped arrow). These changes set off the profibrotic signaling cascade (indicated by pale orange color of the nucleus), such as downregulation of eNOS and reduced secretion of NO. Absence of endothelium-derived atheroprotective NO and presumably other unidentified factors leads to increased collagen production in other cell types as shown for fibroblasts through a switch to myofibroblasts, leading to collagen deposition and cardiac fibrosis.
Generation of bitransgenic mice. Bitransgenic Prog-Tg and LA-Tg mice were generated by crossing tet operon–driven transgenic mice (C57BL/6J background) carrying either the wild-type (tetop-LAWt) or HGPS mutant (1824C>T; G608G; tetop-LAG608G) lamin A minigene (32) with transgenic mice expressing a tetracycline-responsive (TA-responsive) transcriptional activator under the control of the EC-specific VE-cadherin promoter (Cdh5-tTA mice, Jackson Laboratories MGI:4437711, FVB background, originally generated as described in ref. 34). All experiments were performed with bitransgenic mice backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J background for 4 generations and their corresponding single-transgenic tetop-LAwt and tetop-LAG608G littermate mice (N4 generation; ~94%). Mice were kept in the absence of doxycycline, allowing constitutive expression of the corresponding transgenes in bitransgenic animals. For genotyping, DNA was extracted from mouse distal phalanx. The following primers were used: DNA lamin A minigene, forward 5′-GCAACAAGTCCAATGAGGACCA-3′ and reverse 5′-GTCCCAGATTACATGATGC-3′; DNA Cdh5-tTA, forward 5′-CGCTGTGGGGCATTTTACTTTAG-3′ and reverse 5′-CATGTCCAGATCGAAATCGTC-3′. For weight and survival curve analysis the indicated number of littermate pairs was monitored for 35 or 40 weeks.
Cells. In all experiments ECs refer to primary ECs isolated from lung (see below), used at a maximum passage number of 3. Primary HGPS patient–derived dermal fibroblast cell line HGADFN003 (2 yr, 10 population doublings [PDs]) was obtained from the Progeria Research Foundation. For assessing EC-specific progerin expression in Figure 1A, a mixed cell population isolated from lungs of Prog-Tg mice was depleted of ECs (non-EC) by magnetic bead separation (68). Primary fibroblasts were isolated from lungs of newborn Wt (C57BL/6J background) mice by collagenase I treatment (69).
EC isolation and culture. Primary ECs were prepared from lungs of Wt, LA-Tg, and Prog-Tg newborn mice following a protocol adapted from Dong et al. (70). Minced lungs were treated with 200 U/ml collagenase I (MilliporeSigma) for 45 minutes at 37°C and passed through a 19-gauge syringe and a 70-
Cocultures. ECs (maximum passage number 3) were plated in the inserts, and primary fibroblasts (maximum passage 2) at the bottom of 12-well Transwell plates (Costar Corning Incorporated, 3460; pore size 0.4
Immunoblotting and antibodies. For direct lysis, confluent EC cultures were washed twice with PBS, and overlaid with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 100 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromphenol blue, and 10% glycerol. Lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked and incubated with primary antibodies as described previously (69). For protein detection, membranes were incubated with peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (Jackson Laboratories) for 1 hour and processed using the Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent. Protein bands were quantified using ChemiDoc MP Imaging System with Image Lab Software. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) against lamin A/C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, clone E-1, sc-376248), mAb against human lamin A+C (Chemicon, clone JoL2, mab3211, Abcam), goat anti-MRTFA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-21558), mAb against progerin (Alexis Biochemicals, clone 13A4, provided by Egon Ogris, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria), mAb against
Histology. Mice (6–8 months old) were euthanized with isoflurane. Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), embedded in paraffin, and sectioned with a microtome (Leica) at 5
Immunofluorescence microscopy and image analysis. Cells grown in ibidi chambers were fixed in 4% PFA for 10 minutes, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 minutes, and blocked in 3% BSA in PBS. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies (see above) in blocking buffer for 1 hour at room temperature, or in the case of goat antibodies against MRTFA at 4°C overnight. Cells were washed 3 times with PBS and probed with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DyLight Fluor secondary antibodies) in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. All samples were counterstained with Hoechst or DAPI (1:10,000 in PBS) for 5 minutes at room temperature and mounted in ibidi Mounting Medium (catalog 50001). For immunofluorescence staining on paraffin-embedded tissue sections, antigen retrieval using a pressure cooker was performed (32) with subsequent staining using the MOM Basic Kit (Vector Laboratories). Images were acquired on a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 710, Carl Zeiss) using 100×/1.46 alpha, 63×/1.4, and 40×/1.4 Plan-Apochromat oil immersion objectives. Images were processed in ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop CS4 software. For characterization of cell alignment, the cell aspect ratio, alignment angle, and actin stress fiber alignment were calculated as described (44, 45). Briefly, aspect ratio was determined by dividing the cell long axis by the cell short axis, and alignment angle was measured as the angle between the major cell axis and the axis perpendicular to flow direction using ImageJ software. For actin stress fiber alignment, the proportion of cells with aligned stress fibers after exposure to 3-hour shear stress was determined from analysis of 10 different images obtained from 4 biological replicates of Wt and Prog-Tg ECs. Stress fibers were considered aligned if their direction was within 0°–30° between the major cell and flow axis. For quantification of Atto 488–phalloidin and Texas Red–DNase fluorescence intensities, images were captured using identical exposure times for Wt and Prog-Tg cells and unprocessed raw data were used. Digital images for production of printable figures were adjusted for brightness and contrast equally for Wt and Prog-Tg cells and exported to Adobe Illustrator.
F-actin/G-actin assay. Cells were processed as for immunofluorescence except that 4% PFA was prepared in cytoskeleton buffer (10 mM MES, 3 mM MgCl2, 138 mM KCl, 2 mM EGTA, 320 mM sucrose, pH 6.1) (73). For G-actin staining we used Alexa Fluor 594 Deoxyribonuclease I conjugate (Molecular Probes) and for F-actin phalloidin–Atto 488 (MilliporeSigma).
Shear stress assay and en face aortic preparations. Cells (1.5 × 104) were grown on 0.2% gelatin– and 1
RNA isolation and gene expression analysis. Heart and lung tissues were disrupted and homogenized using ceramic beads in RLT buffer (Qiagen Mini Kit) in a Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Bertin Instruments). RNA from tissues and cells was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and total RNA was quantified by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, ND-1000). cDNA was generated using RevertAid reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). qPCR was performed using the primers listed in Supplemental Table 2. All reactions were done in triplicate on an Eppendorf RealPlex 2 Mastercycler with KAPA SYBR Green PCR master mix (Peqlab) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were normalized to expression of Hprt and presented as fold increase relative to Wt littermate animals based on the
NO measurement. Cells plated in 12-well plates were lysed in lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche), sheared with a 27-gauge needle, and cleared at 16,000 g for 15 minutes. Total NO content was determined by measuring nitrite with Griess reagent (Arbor Assays). Briefly, samples were diluted 1:3 in assay buffer (Arbor Assays) and filtered through spin filters (10 kDa cutoff; Corning Spin-X UF 500, 431478) to remove protein. In order to assay for total NO, nitrate was first converted to nitrite with NADH reductase followed by addition of color reagents, sulfanilamide, and n-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine. Absorbance was measured at 550 nm using a microplate reader. Nitrite concentration was determined using nitrite standards provided by the manufacturer.
ChIP. ChIP was performed as previously described (75) with slight modifications. Briefly, chromatin was cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde, cells were incubated in lysis buffer (1% SDS, 0.01 M EDTA, 0.05 M Tris pH 8.1, 0.1 mM PMSF in isopropanol) and DNA was fragmented into approximately 500-bp fragments using a Bioruptor (Diagenode Pico Bioruptor). Aliquots of lysates containing 13
Transthoracic echocardiography. Echocardiography was performed using a Vevo 2100 Imaging System with a 40-MHz linear probe (Visualsonics). The animals were anesthetized by 1%–1.5% isoflurane. ECG monitoring was obtained via limb electrodes. For the LV function and dimension analysis, parasternal long-axis view and short-axis view were obtained. For each parameter, a mean of 3 cardiac cycles in each view was used. Doppler mitral flow profiles were acquired using pulsed-wave Doppler in the apical 4-chamber view. Attention was paid to place the sample volume at the mitral leaflets tip parallel to the blood to record the maximal flow velocities. Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) measurement was performed by simultaneously recording pulsed-wave Doppler of the mitral and aortic flow. IVRT was measured as the time interval between aortic valve closure and mitral valve opening. E′ was obtained by tissue Doppler in a 4-chamber view by placing the velocity sample at the septal mitral annulus. E′ indicated the peak mitral annular velocity during early filling.
Assessment of LV hemodynamic function in vivo. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine and xylazine and analgesic therapy was applied subcutaneously with buprenorphine 0.12 mg/kg body weight. The thorax was opened and a microtip catheter (SPR-1000, Millar Instruments) was inserted into LV chamber. Hemodynamic parameters such as LVSP, LVEDP, heart rate (HR), and LV contractility performance (dP/dt) were continuously registered in a Powerlab 8/30 system with LabChart (v7.3.2) software (both ADInstruments). Systolic and diastolic wall stress were computed accordingly: LVP × LV radius/(2 × wall thickness) (77). The LV radius and LV wall thickness were assessed by echocardiography.
Assessment of vascular reactivity in isolated aortic rings. The thoracic aorta was dissected and placed in cold physiological buffer: 119 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2 × 2H2O, 1.17 mM MgSO4 × 7H2O, 20 mM NaHCO3, 1.18 mM KH2PO4, 0.027 mM EDTA, 10.5 mM glucose; bubbled with a mixture of 95% O2 and 5% CO2, resulting in pH 7.4. Aortic rings (2–3 mm) were mounted onto a multichamber isometric myograph system (Model 620M, Danish Myo Technology) and equilibrated at 37°C. The resting tension was reached by the normalization process using the ADInstuments Normalization module, where the segments of aorta were normalized to their length and diameter. At the beginning of each experiment, the ability of the preparation to develop a contraction was assessed by exposing the aorta segments to a high KCl solution (124 mM). Endothelium-dependent relaxations were determined by administration of cumulatively increasing concentrations of acetylcholine (10–9 to 10–5 M, MilliporeSigma) to aortas precontracted with phenylephrine (10–10 to 10–6 M, MilliporeSigma). The aorta segments were then washed 3 times every 10 minutes for 30 minutes. The endothelium-independent relaxation was tested by sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.1 nM to 10
Statistics. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM or median with minimum and maximum values (whiskers). All experiments using Wt and Prog-Tg ECs were performed at least 3 times using different primary cells isolated from corresponding littermate pairs. Statistical analyses were performed using either SigmaPlot software or GraphPad Prism statistical software. Comparisons of longitudinal data for growth curve analysis were done with 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with subsequent Holm-Sidak post hoc test. If 3 independent groups were evaluated, data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA. Comparison of 2 groups was made by unpaired Student’s 2-tailed t test. A paired t test was used in cases of experiments with littermate pairs. For evaluations of non-normally distributed data, a nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used. Data were considered statistically significantly different if P < 0.05. For comparisons among multiple groups, we used a 1-way ANOVA with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, except where indicated otherwise. Curves in Supplemental Figure 3 were generated using a nonlinear fit model in GraphPad Prism.
Study approval. All mouse experiments were approved by the regional Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animal Experiments at the Medical University of Vienna and the Austrian Ministry of Science Research and Economy (66.009/0321-WF/V/3b/2016), according to Austrian Law BGBI. I Nr.114/2012 (TVG2012) and in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).
SOM conceived of, performed, and analyzed experiments, prepared figures, and cowrote the manuscript. RF conceived of experiments and cowrote the manuscript. OH, AK, and BKP provided advice on in vivo cardiac data. OH and AK performed and evaluated transthoracic echocardiography and left ventricular pressure characterization, and PLS and AK performed ex vivo vessel reactivity assays, within the group of BKP. All above listed authors edited the manuscript. CM, FS, IF, and PF performed experiments. ME generated and tested mice carrying lamin A minigenes.
We acknowledge Johannes Grillari (BOKU) and Laura Isabelle Meszar for providing expertise and assistance, respectively, in the establishment of coculture experiments. We thank Azra Agic, Sabrina Waitz, Nana Naetar-Kerenyi, Philipp Ausserhofer, and Milat Inci for assistance in several experiments. We acknowledge grant support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, T 584-B23, P 29668-B28) to SOM and (P 26492-B20) to RF, Herzfelder’sche Familienstiftung (AP00678OFF/KP00678OFF) to SOM, and from the Progeria Research Foundation (PRF 2016-64) and Carly Cares (http://teamcarlyq.com/) to RF.
Address correspondence to: Roland Foisner, Medical University Vienna, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria, Phone: 43.1.4277.61680; Email: roland.foisner@meduniwien.ac.at. Or to: Selma Osmanagic-Myers, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria. Phone: 43.1.4277.61671; Email: selma.osmanagic-myers@boku.ac.at.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
License: This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(2):531–545.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI121297.
See the related Commentary at New vascular insights into premature aging.