Counter-Reformation
The Counter-Reformation was a movement within the Catholic Church to reform itself in the wake of the Protestant Reformation. The term, "Counter-Reformation," was still unknown in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and was coined later by non-Catholic historians to denote a Catholic reaction to the Reformation. Thus, it carries a defensive and even negative tone. In the twentieth century, therefore, an alternative term, "Catholic Reformation," was used by scholars such as John C. Olin to assert the independent origins of spiritual and ecclesiastical reform in the pre-Tridentine era as a movement from which emerged two active, much more visible, yet separate, movements: Protestant and Catholic Reformations.[1]
The Counter-Reformation, or the Catholic Reformation, was comprehensive. It involved clarification and reform in the areas of doctrine, ecclesiastical structure, religious orders, spirituality, and politics. Such reforms included the foundation of seminaries for the proper training of priests in the spiritual life and the theological traditions of the Church, the reform of religious life to returning orders to their spiritual foundations, and new spiritual movement's focus on the devotional life and a personal relationship with Christ.
The Counter-Reformation is usually understood to have began from Pope Paul III (1534-1549), who authorized the Society of Jesus in 1540, established the Roman Inquisition in 1542, and initiated the Council of Trent in 1545. It continued until the pontificate of Sixtus V (1585-1590). The Counter-Reformation had a strong political ally in Philip II, king of Spain (1556-1598).
The Counter-Reformation was very successful in building the Church in South America and Asia mainly through the missionary work of Jesuits. But it could not entirely eliminate Protestants in Europe. The Counter-Reformation greatly revived faith and piety, but it also had a negative and suppressive side because of its Inquisition, which lasted until the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, it can generally be noted that the Counter-Reformation, especially if it is called the Catholic Reformation, had some reform objectives similar to those of the Protestant Reformation, even if it took a separate route from the latter, and that any positive accomplishment by the Counter-Reformation would eventually bring the Catholic and Protestant Churches closer.
Historical background
Although the Counter-Reformation is usually understood to have officially started with Pope Paul III (1534-1549) in the middle of the sixteenth century as a response to the Protestant Reformation, a need for Catholic renewal in the areas of the clergy, Christian life, and Church administration had been increasingly felt since the fourteenth century. But, the Great Schism (1378-1417), which made the whole Church preoccupied with politics, prevented any renewal from happening. Also, in the fifteenth century, the papacy was spiritually not healthy enough to lead any reforms. The Renaissance papal court was largely immoral, and many prelates were very secular. The efforts of reformers such as Girolamo Savonarola (1452-1498), a fervent Dominican preacher in Florence, did not bear fruit. Savonarola attempted to establish a kind of theocratic democracy in Florence, but faced strong opposition from the papacy and was executed.
Of course, some reform activities, such as the founding in 1497 of the Oratory of Divine Love, a society of laymen and priests devoted to charity and spiritual sanctification, could be seen. But, the Fifth Lateran Council (1512-1517), convened by Pope Julius II (1503-1513), prevented any palpable reform movement. The worldly excesses of the secular Renaissance Church, epitomized by the era of Alexander VI (1492-1503), became a serious issue under Pope Leo X (1513-1522), who campaigned to raise funds in the German states through high-pressure sale of indulgences to rebuild St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Hadrian VI (1522-1523), who succeeded Leo X but became reform-minded, died too soon to accomplish anything. During the next papacy of Clement VII (1523-1534), the reform party quietly worked on, founding the Theatines (1524), the Capuchins (1525), and the Barnabites (1530), religious orders for evangelism as a counter proposal to the Lutheran threat. Finally, the sack of Rome in 1525, by the troops of Charles V of the Holy Roman Empire, damaged the prestige of the papacy, apparently helping to lead the Catholic Church toward a reform.
Three main instruments
The Counter-Reformation had three main instruments: The Council of Trent, the Roman Inquisition, and the the Society of Jesus.
The Council of Trent
Pope Paul III (1534-1549) initiated the Council of Trent (1545-1547, 1551-1552, 1562-1563), a commission of cardinals tasked with institutional reform, to address contentious issues, such as corrupt bishops and priests, indulgences, and other financial abuses. The Council clearly repudiated specific Protestant positions and upheld the basic structure of the Medieval Church, its sacramental system, religious orders, and doctrine. It rejected all compromise with the Protestants, restating basic tenets of Medieval Catholicism. The Council clearly upheld the dogma of salvation appropriated by faith and works. Transubstantiation, which holds that during communion or the mass the consecrated bread and wine substantially becomes the body and blood of Christ, was upheld, along with the Seven Sacraments. Other Catholic practices that drew the ire of liberal reformers within the Church, such as indulgences, pilgrimages, the veneration of saints and relics, and the veneration of the Virgin Mary, were also strongly reaffirmed as spiritually vital.
However, while the basic structure of the Church was reaffirmed, there were noticeable changes to answer complaints that the Counter-Reformers tacitly were willing to admit were legitimate. This was especially true with respect to the accusation that the Church was too wealthy and too materialistic at the cost of its spirituality. This is why the term "counter-reformation" was coined, since many of the reforms were in response to the criticisms of Luther and other leading Protestant reformists. Among what were addressed by Catholic reformers was the growing divide between the priests and the flock; many members of the clergy in the rural parishes, after all, had been poorly educated. Often, these rural priests did not know Latin and lacked opportunities for proper theological training. Clergy education had long been a subject of discussion. But now, parish priests became better educated, while papal authorities sought to eliminate the distractions of the monastic churches. Notebooks and handbooks thus became common, describing how to be good priests and confessors.
The Council, by virtue of its actions, repudiated the pluralism of the secular Renaissance Church: The organization of religious institutions was tightened, discipline was improved, and the parish was emphasized. The appointment of bishops for political reasons was no longer tolerated. In the past, the large landholdings and institutional rigidity of the Church—a rigidity to which the excessively large ranks of the clergy contributed—forced many bishops to study law instead of theology, relegating many "absent bishops" to the role of property managers trained in administration. Thus, the Council of Trent combated "absenteeism," which was the practice of bishops living in Roman or on landed estates rather than in their dioceses. Secular practices were combated while the papacy clearly moved away from its Renaissance posture as a political Church tantamount to one of the Italian city-states. The Council of Trent also gave bishops greater power to supervise all aspects of religious life. Zealous prelates such as Milan's Archbishop Charles Borromeo (1538-1584), later canonized as a saint, set an example by visiting the remotest parishes and instilling high standards. At the parish level, the seminary-trained clergy who took over in most places during the course of the seventeenth century were generally faithful to the Church's rule of celibacy.
The Roman Inquisition
Paul III established the Roman Inquisition in 1542, because of the suggestion of Cardinal Caraffa, who saw the effective Spanish Inquisition instituted by Ferdinand V and Isabella in 1479. The purpose was to suppress Lutheran heretics in Italy. The group of six Inquisitors in the Holy Office of the Roman Inquisition were independent from bishops in their jurisdiction and could punish anyone except the pope. Cardinal Caraffa, who worked as Inquisitor General and later became Pope Paul IV (1555-1559), decided to punish heretics in high ranks most severely, so that all others beneath them might be saved based on their severe punishment. The Inquisition reached its peak during the papacy of Pius V (1566-1572), extirpating Italian Protestants. The Inquisition also made an "Index of Prohibited Books" (Index Librorum Prohibitorum), practicing censorship. It included not only books considered to be theologically erroneous and harmful but also all translations of the New Testament in the vernacular. Perhaps because of his deep involvement with the Inquisition to eliminate Protestantism, Paul IV is sometimes deemed the first of the Counter-Reformation popes. This Inquisition-based approach reflected the rapid pace toward absolutism that characterized the sixteenth century.
While the aggressive authoritarian approach was arguably destructive of personal religious experience, a new wave of reforms and orders conveyed a strong devotional side. Devotionalism, not subversive mysticism, would provide a strong individual outlet for religious experience, especially through meditation such as the reciting of the Rosary. The devotional side of the Counter-Reformation combined two strategies of Catholic renewal. For one, the emphasis of God as an unknowable absolute ruler—a God to be feared—coincided well with the aggressive absolutism of the Church of Paul IV.
The Society of Jesus
New religious orders were a fundamental part of this trend. Even before the installation of Paul III, orders such as the Capuchins, the Theatines, and the Barnabites were already founded. They strengthened rural parishes, improved popular piety, helped to curb corruption within the Church, and set examples that would be a strong impetus for Catholic renewal. The Capuchins, an offshoot of the Franciscan order notable for their preaching and for their care for the poor and the sick, grew rapidly in both size and popularity. The Capuchin order was based on the imitation of Jesus' life as described by the Gospels. Capuchin-founded confraternities thus took special interest in the poor and lived austere lifestyles. The Theatines were an order of devoted priests who undertook to check the spread of heresy and contribute to a regeneration of the clergy. The Ursulines, founded in 1535, focused on the special task of educating girls. All these orders' devotion to the traditional works of mercy exemplifies the Counter-Reformation's reaffirmation of salvation through faith and works, and firmly repudiated the sola scriptura of the Protestants emphasized by Lutherans and other Protestant sects. Not only did they make the Church more effective, but they also reaffirmed fundamental premises of the Medieval Church.
However, the Jesuits, founded by the Spanish nobleman and ex-soldier Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556), were the most effective of the new Catholic orders. His Societas de Jesus was founded in 1534, and received papal authorization in 1534, under Paul III. An heir to the devotional, observantine, and legalist traditions, the Jesuits organized their order along military lines, strongly reflecting the autocratic zeal of the period. Characterized by careful selection, rigorous training, and iron discipline, the worldliness of the Renaissance Church had no part in the new order. Loyola's masterwork, Spiritual Exercises, reflected the emphasis of handbooks characteristic of the earlier generation of Catholic reformers before the Reformation. The great psychological penetration that it conveyed was strongly reminiscent of devotionalism. However, the Jesuits are really the heirs to the observantine reform tradition, taking strong monastic vows of chastity, obedience, and poverty and setting an example that improved the effectiveness of the entire Church. They became preachers, confessors to monarchs and princes, and educators reminiscent of the humanist reformers, and their efforts are largely credited with stemming Protestantism in Poland, Bohemia, Hungary, southern Germany, France, and the Spanish Netherlands. They also strongly participated in the expansion of the Church in the Americas and Asia, conducting efforts in missionary activity that far outpaced even the aggressive Protestantism of the Calvinists. Even Loyola's biography contributed to the new emphasis on popular piety that had been waning under the eras of politically oriented popes, such as Alexander VI and Leo X. After recovering from a severe battle wound, he took a vow to "serve only God and the Roman pontiff, His vicar on earth." Once again, the emphasis on the pope is a key reaffirmation of the Medieval Church as the Council of Trent firmly defeated all attempts of Conciliarism, the belief that general councils of the church collectively were God's representative on earth, rather than the pope. Firmly legitimizing the new role of the pope as an absolute ruler strongly characteristic of the new age of absolutism ushered in by the sixteenth century, the Jesuits strongly contributed to the reinvigoration of the Counter-Reformation Church.
Religious revival
It should not be forgotten that the Counter-Reformation brought about a genuine revival of Catholic piety. Pius V, in spite of his involvement with the Inquisition, improved popular piety in an effort to firmly stem the appeal of Protestantism. A man of impoverished upbringing taken in by the Dominican Order, he was trained in a solid and austere piety. It is thus no surprise that he began his papacy by giving large alms to the poor, charity, and hospitals rather than focusing on patronage. As pontiff he practiced the virtues of a monk, known for daily meditations on bent knees in presence of the Blessed Sacrament. The exemplary piety of St. Charles Borromeo, Archbishop of Milan, was already mentioned above. St. Philip Neri (1515-1595), an Italian mystic based in Rome, founded the Congregation of the Oratory, whose core rule was love and affection. His spiritual wisdom was sought not only by common people but also by popes and cardinals.
Also notable were Spanish mystics such as St. Teresa of Avila (1515-1582) and St. John of the Cross (1542-1591) and French spiritual leaders, such as St. Francis of Sales (1567-1622). The Spanish mystics stressed the personal nature of faith and saw love as the basis of Christian faith, not obligation or duty. Even though they met with strong opposition, their work bore fruit and was eventually recognized by the popes. The French school of spirituality stressed the Church's role in continuing Jesus' mission, as well as the need for Bible study and personal faith. The Protestant emphasis on the Bible, on the necessity of an inner experience of renewal and on the role of lay-people within the Church led to renewed Catholic interest in the Bible, in spirituality as well as in lay-formation.
Music and science
Polyphony was used in the Church music of Lutheranism. But, the Council of Trent banned it for the sake of simplicity, so that the words might be heard clearly. Through his musical mastery and his skill at word setting, however, Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina (1525/26-1594), composed a six-part polyphonic mass, called the Pope Marcellus Mass (Missa Papae Marcelli) of 1555, and demonstrated that polyphony was compatible with the mandates of the Counter-Reformation. According to legend, he composed this mass in order to persuade the Council of Trent that a ban on polyphony was unnecessary. Recent scholarship, however, shows that this mass was composed before the cardinals convened to discuss the ban (possibly by as much as ten years before). The mass was not, therefore, solely responsible for "saving" Catholic Church music, as is sometimes claimed. Still, his music would become the model for future generations of Catholic composers, and it continues to be held as an exemplar for polyphonic clarity. Like Palestrina, the Netherlandish composer Jacob de Kerle (1531/32-1591) also demonstrated to Council delegates that polyphony was capable of projecting the words in a coherent manner. It is quite possible that Kerle, not Palestrina, should be credited as the first "savior" of polyphony.
The Counter-Reformation was still of the opinion that the Earth was at the center of the universe, and that the Sun and other heavenly bodies rotate around it. This geocentric model had long been accepted with the authority of the philosophy of Aristotle, but it was now opposite to the heliocentric model of Nicholaus Copernicus (1473-1543), according to which the Sun is the center of the universe, and which was supported by Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) and Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Unfortunately, the Roman Inquisition ordered Galilei to stand trial on suspicion of heresy in 1633. The sentence banned all his writings and put him in prison (later commuted to house arrest). Some say that the scientific revolution eventually challenged the Catholic Church in more profound ways than their Protestant opponents ever considered.
Assessment
Sometimes, the simple question of whether the Counter-Reformation was a success or a failure is raised. In terms of Church growth, it was both a success and a failure. It was a success in that it gained a lot of Catholic followers in Asia and South America, mainly through courageous and aggressive Jesuit missionaries. But it was a failure in that it could not regain many "lost souls" from Protestantism especially in Northern Europe, although it was able to keep its foothold in France, Poland, and Southern Germany as well as in Italy and Spain. A more difficult question would be: Did it help people to develop their spirituality? Indeed, it brought about a genuine revival of piety through influential mystics such as St. Philip Neri, St. Teresa of Avila, and St. John of the Cross, inspiring many believers. But, it is also true that the suppressive side of the Counter-Reformation (for example, the Roman Inquisition) had a lasting negative impact in history. The Inquisition lasted until the nineteenth century, and the First Vatican Council (1868), approving papal infallibility and Pope Pius IX's Syllabus of Errors, was basically in continuity with it. It was through the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) that the Catholic Church became more open to the rest of the world.
If, however, it is true that both the Catholic and Protestant Reformations started from their common initial concern about the problematic situation of the Church, it should also be true that their objectives were generally the same, although they took separate routes. It is now generally acknowledged by Protestants and Catholics that today's Catholic Church is no longer the same as the Church against which Martin Luther rebelled. This certainly shows that the Counter-Reformation accomplished something positive. It thus made the Catholic and Protestant Churches closer. In the 1999 "Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification" by the Vatican and the Lutherans (which Methodists have also affirmed), the partners state that in the light of the "consensus on basic truths" that now exists, "the corresponding doctrinal condemnations of the sixteenth century do not apply to today's partner."[2]
Notes
- ↑ John C. Olin, ed., The Catholic Reformation: Savonarola to St. Ignatius Loyola (New York: Harper & Row, 1969).
- ↑ The Vatican, Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
ReferencesISBN links support NWE through referral fees
- Bireley, Robert. The Refashioning of Catholicism, 1450-1700: A Reassesment of the Counter-Reformation. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1999. ISBN 081320951X
- Jones, Martin. The Counter Reformation: Religion and Society in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1995. ISBN 0521439930
- Luebke, David M. The Counter-Reformation: The Essential Eeadings. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. ISBN 0631211047
- Olin, John C., ed. The Catholic Reformation: Savonarola to St. Ignatius Loyola. New York: Harper & Row, 1969. ISBN 0060663669
External Links
All links retrieved January 10, 2024.
- Catholic Encyclopedia, "The Counter-Reformation."
- William Gilbert, "The Counter Reformation."
Credits
New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:
The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:
Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.