(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Trismegistos

Coverage for Egypt and the Nile Valley (for the Ancient World in general, click here)

Because of its organic growth and evolving focus since 2005 (see history), Trismegistos Texts has a very different coverage according to region, period and genre. The following tables provide estimations of the current coverage for published documents.

800 BC - AD 800

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Greek papyrology almost 100%
Greek epigraphy almost 100%
Latin papyrology almost 100%
Latin epigraphy almost 100%
Demotic papyrology and epigraphy almost 100%
Hieroglyphic and hieratic papyrology ca. 95% ?
Hieroglyphic and hieratic epigraphy perhaps 40% ? (excluding 'temple texts')
Coptic papyrology almost 100%
Coptic epigraphy perhaps 40% ?
Aramaic papyrology and epigraphy ca. 95% ?
Meroitic epigraphy ca. 95% ?
Old Nubian papyrology and epigraphy perhaps 90% ?
Arabic papyrology perhaps 90% ?

Before 800 BC

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Hieroglyphic and hieratic papyrology only Books of the Dead and documentary material from Deir el-Medina (both almost 100%)
Hieroglyphic and hieratic epigraphy almost completely lacking

After AD 800

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Greek papyrology and epigraphy ca. 90% ?
Old Nubian papyrology and epigraphy ca. 50% ?
Coptic papyrology only documentary material (almost 100%)
Coptic epigraphy limited coverage, only Koptisches Sammelbuch material
Arabic papyrology only documents, ca. 10% ?
Arabic epigraphy completely lacking
Hebrew material (e.g. Geniza) completely lacking

For unpublished documents, the coverage is very problematic to estimate. Our main source of information are the collection-based tools.