Property talk:P692
Documentation
image showing the GeneAtlas expression pattern
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P692#Type Q7187, SPARQL
![]() | This entity (P692) is used by Wikimedia's setting of Wikidata. Please contact the development team or file a bug on Phabricator before big changes (renaming, deletion, merging, etc.). |
![]() |
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
How about using full size image instead of small thumbnail?
[edit] Resolved
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/PBB_GE_ACTN3_206891_at_tn.png/220px-PBB_GE_ACTN3_206891_at_tn.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/PBB_GE_ACTN3_206891_at_fs.png/220px-PBB_GE_ACTN3_206891_at_fs.png)
Currently, registered images for this property are small thumbnails. These small thumbnails are shown in Wikipedia infobox (e.g. see en:ACTN3) But small thumbnail image is meaningless by itself, because it has no captions in the diagram. So how about using full size image instead of small thumbnail?
Procedure is very simple. Changing value, to say image name, from ****_tn.png to ****_fs.png as follows.
In ACTN3 (Q17709323) data page
Current value for this property is:
Proposed new value for this property is:
P.S. I suppose this two images strategy was adopted for old Wikipedia image system (when clicking thumbnail, readers directly jumped into image description page). I think this strategy was very nice at that time. But current Wikipedia image system is different from that day (when we clicking thumbnail, we just see close-up version of the small thumbnail in black background.) --Was a bee (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine, image creator User:Andrew Su, and related projects in English Wikipedia (WT:GEN, WT:MCB, Portal:Gene Wiki) --Was a bee (talk) 06:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support change Thumbnails are never intended to be viewed. If a process is leading users to view thumbnails then something is broken. Is there any reason to not change this? Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Support @Was a bee: yes, agreed that this should be changed. You're right that the current system was designed when the behavior was different. I will add that to our to-do list... Cheers, Andrew Su (talk) 23:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Was a bee: It has been updated. There were 13 with errors, where the fs version doesn't exist: Q18026825,Q18039689,Q14878192,Q18035340,Q5401841,Q18033185,Q18041210,Q18030842,Q18035500,Q17855637,Q1242607,Q14876107,Q18041128 Gstupp (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Bluerasberry, Andrew Su:, Thank you for comment and @Gstupp: thank you for quick update. I didn't expect such a quick fixing. Articles became more nice! Thank you very much. --Was a bee (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)