Talk:Q116938950

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
description: no description
Useful links:
Classification of the class surface integral of a vector field (Q116938950)  View with Reasonator View with SQID
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
surface integral of a vector field⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)
Generic queries for classes
See also


Notation

[edit]

Possible notations for a surface integral of a vector field include:

  • ...

Those could be listed here using the proposed property mathematical symbol/notation. Toni 001 (talk) 06:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pint But please note that this is irrelevant to electric flux (Q501267) and magnetic flux (Q177831). I don't know why you are argue about them. You use one of these formula and you don't want to explain all letters in it (what in defining formula (P7235) is specifically intended for). --Infovarius (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note the presence of this statement: The whole expression stands for the surface integral.
My opinion is that only what's listed on the right hand side of this formula actually explains what a surface integral (over a vector field) actually is. The other expressions are just suggestive notation. ("Notation" means that it's just a reference to some [mathematical] entity.) Toni 001 (talk) 06:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]