User talk:JulesWinnfield-hu

Welcome to Wikidata, JulesWinnfield-hu!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

--ValterVB (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Explanation required

Hello,

might you explain why you reverted my edit here? Thus you linked a commune on en.wikipedia to itssubordinated village on ro.wikipedia, when there is a corresponding commune on ro.wikipedia.

--Mihai (talk) 10:57, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Answer moved from here

Hi! I reverted it because you moved the data item from the locality to the municipality, and left the locality without data item. All localities have data item, and from now on they also have specific properties. If you want to move the site links, please create new data item for the municipality, and move only the site links. Regards, --JulesWinnfield-hu (discuție) 22 martie 2014 19:10 (EET)

But now the item where you reverted my edit contains communes (municipalities) for most wikis, a village for the romanian wikipedia, and census data concerning the village. Most wikipedias have an article concerning the commune but not one concerning the village. So in the state it is now, that wikidata item is simply wrong. Do you agree with me on this one? --Mihai (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I agree, but the items, together with the links, were on the localities, with very few exceptions. Not me put them there. Census data regarding the localities had to be put to the locality data items. If you consider that the site links are wrong, only the site links should be moved to different data item. The item in case was an exception. --JulesWinnfield-hu (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

No, I've actually looked up every wikipedia entrance on the concerned item, and now only the romanian and hungarian links refer to the village, and all the others to the commune. And now the item also contains the village data. I hope you'll solve this problem. Regards, --Mihai (talk) 18:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

I moved the site links. --JulesWinnfield-hu (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Great, thanks a lot. I hope you'll keep an eye open to fixing this problem from now on, since most Romanian articles concerning the eponymous village of a commune link via Wikidata to articles concerning the communes. I try to fix this all the time, but there are hundreds of communes and without admin rights here, it's nerve-wracking to fix this by hand, cause most of the time you can't switch the two in a move, but have to make three moves. Wonder if that might be fixed automatically. Regards, Mihai (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Merging items

Hallo JulesWinnfield-hu,

For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the emptied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.

With regards, - - (Cycn/talk) 11:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

@Cycn: The items are already merged with API. IMHO there is no need for such changes [1], the original label was better. Thank you for deletions. --JulesWinnfield-hu (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Reverting of mistakenly moved items

Szia! Köszi, hogy visszaállítottad a hibás szerkesztéseidet. Arra kérlek, hogy az irányelvnek megfelelően, a jövőben csak a botod számára előzetesen engedélyezett műveleteket végezd el. Thanks for reverting your faulty page moves. I ask you to perform only approved tasks in the future as described in the relevant Wikidata policy. Csigabi (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Summary

I will use as a summary "Added link to [shwiki]" instead of "shwiki" when adding page links to shwiki. --Dcirovic (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem. I will remove the custom summary. --Dcirovic (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Musicbrainz

Thanks for looking into this bot request of mine. Please see my recent response there. JesseW (talk) 08:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

New response. JesseW (talk) 18:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Yet another response. (Let me know if you don't want/need these). JesseW (talk) 19:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Ping. I made a report, in case you missed it. JesseW (talk) 07:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

P459:Q791801

Hali!

Magyarországon a népszámlálások közötti népességadatok megállapításának módszertana nem becslés, hanem továbbvezetés. Ez azt jelenti, hogy az állami népességnyilvántartás által rögzített születések, halálozások és költözések tételes számbavétele alapján megállapított népességszámváltozással korrigálják a népszámlálási adatot.

Nem tudom, létezik-e továbbvezetett népesség fogalom a Wikidatában. Ha van, azt kell itt használni. De ha nincs, akkor sem helyes a becslést (Q791801) megjelölni. Már rengeteg helyre bekerült, hogyan lehetne kiirtani?

Csatlakozó kérdés: a QuickStatements segítségével már képes vagyok a nagyméretű adatbázisaim feltöltésére. De nem tudom, hogyan lehet tévesen megadott, oda nem tartozó tulajdonságot törölni vele.

Peyerk (talk) 19:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Revert

[2] Why? --Succu (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

hiba

Szia! Szalánta településnél jelentkezett a hiba, a terület szakaszban ±1-t ír be a rendszer, hogyan lehet kivenni? Szajci (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

köszi! a problémám az, hogy a többi településnél is előjön. Be kell állítani valamit? Nem értem mi lehet a gond :S Szajci (talk) 17:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

közben rájöttem. Köszönöm azért :) Szajci (talk) 17:53, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Körülbelül gadget

Szia! I saw your contributions to local gadgets and just want to let you know about other things in which you may be interested: [3][4][5][6]. Regards. --XXN, 19:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

JWbot

Your bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts 2 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards--GZWDer (talk) 17:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

JWbot duplicated almost all cities in Romania

Q100188/Q16898189, Q16898582/Q83404, Q2716722/Q16426101 --Sifalot (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sifalot: It's not duplication. Different administrative entities. Look at SIRUTA, Romanian authority ID. 84.236.58.117 10:38, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

There are hundreds of places with the exact same name / population count / location / photos etc, and they're all an administrative territorial entity. I'm sorry if I made a mistake, it looked like duplications. It's one of the only country where things are this confusing. Sifalot (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)