In reaction to Afrocentrism’s influence, critics have posed a number of important questions: Do Afrocentric commitments render what is produced more ideology and propaganda than “objective truth”? Is Afrocentric knowledge-work limited by the strictures of racialized epistemology and self-defeating methodological circularity? To answer these challenges, and to address Afrocentrism’s potential weaknesses, a number of scholars have sought to refine the concept.
Heterodox economists also stand in contrast with orthodox economists in proposing policy remedies for fighting inflation. Three questions arise. First, should inflation always be the primary target of economic policy? Second, should the central bank be solely responsible for pursuing anti-inflationary policies, as has become the case in recent years? Finally, how can inflation be tamed?
Surplus-value can, in a developed capitalist economy, be viewed also as an indicator of the level of social productivity that has been reached by the working population, i.e. the net amount of value it can produce with its labour in excess of its own consumption requirements.
(1)英维里说的“the net amount of value it can produce with its labour in excess of its own consumption requirements”意味着,用来比较的是劳动力生产的价值,和劳动者用于满足自身消费的生活资料的价值,是价值和价值在比,或者说劳动时间和劳动时间在比。这是马克思正版的基于劳动价值论的剩余价值理论,没问题。
@三猎:我原来只是想找一下Encyclopedia of Power的替代来源,没有仔细阅读Laycock原文,非常抱歉,感谢指正。刚刚看了一下其中Exploitation条目讲消费的内容:“Especially with regard to natural resources, exploitation tends to refer to consumption only.”这边应该是将英文中“exploitation”作为“消费、利用”之含义解释时的意义,但英维里面把它说成社会理论有点奇怪,因为全文并无太多指涉。我已经修正和补充了部分内容。感谢详细回复和持续贡献!--HNlander(留言) 2021年1月25日 (一) 22:30 (UTC)回复