(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
维基百科:给页面标记问题 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书
维基百科

维基百科ひゃっか:给页面めん标记问题

"Tags" are often used to indicate problems. Some Wikipedia editors object to the practice of tagging instead of fixing, but there is value in pointing out an article's problems. Tagging allows editors to specialize, teaches editors and warns readers about subpar or problematic content. It is better if people solve the problems they encounter themselves, but not everyone may be able to. Editors are sometimes obliged to justify inclusion of tags, such as in the case of Template:POV.

Constructive criticism given in a civil, respectful manner is a vital part in a collaborative project like Wikipedia, and it should be welcomed rather than discouraged. Wikipedia values contributions from everyone—novices and experts alike. It is important to listen to readers who find an article biased, confusing or unconvincing. They might not have the expertise to fix those problems, but the fact that they report them probably means that an article needs improvement.

Constructive tagging

编辑
快かい捷とし方式ほうしき

Adding tags for non-obvious problems—without discussion on the talk page which explains the problems—is derided as "drive-by tagging" when done by editors who are not involved in the article's development. When it comes to confusing or ambiguous tags, such as {{npov}} or {{dead end}}, you should explain yourself on the talk page or in an edit summary. It can help to refer to applicable content policies, such as 中立ちゅうりつ的てき观点, 可か供きょう查证, 非ひ原げん创研究けんきゅう, or 生者しょうじゃ传记, though 维基法ほう匠たくみ is discouraged.

By contrast, adding tags for obvious, major flaws is helpful. Aristotle once stated: "When people are friends, they have no need of justice, but when they are just, they need friendship in addition." It is often best to only point out the greatest flaw in an article, and along with this possibly mention something you like about the content.

There is no requirement in Wikipedia policies that an editor must "pay their dues" by working on an article before they can add a tag, so long as they explain the rationale for the tag on the talk page.

移うつり除じょ标记

编辑
快かい捷とし方式ほうしき

Any editor without a conflict of interest who sees a tag, but does not see the purported problem with the article and does not see any detailed complaint on the talk page, may remove the tag. Except in very obvious cases (such as removing {{Uncategorized}} from an article that has been categorized), it is wise to place a note on the talk page explaining the removal and to identify your action in an appropriately detailed edit summary. It is often the case that even after the initial problem causing the tag is fixed, the tag is accidentally left in place. Sometimes problems are solved by inexperienced editors, who incorrectly believe that they must wait for an authority figure to remove the official-looking template. Perhaps the person leaving the tag simply made a bad judgment call, or accidentally linked to the wrong template.

Be wary of removing tags related to sourcing issues, particularly specific ones like {{Citation needed}}. Under the Verifiability policy (see WP:CHALLENGE), any challenged statement should not be restored (in this case, detagged) without a citation to a reliable source. Redundant tagging or overtagging can, however, be a problem. See #Over-tagging below.

If the person placing the tag has explained their concerns on the talk page, then anyone who disagrees should join the discussion and explain why the tag seems inappropriate. If there is no reply within a reasonable amount of time (a few days), the tag can be removed by any editor without a conflict of interest. If there is disagreement, then normal talk page discussion should proceed, per consensus-building.

Adding tags for non-obvious problems without discussion on the talk page which explains where the problems are is arguably not helpful. It can be viewed as disruptive and is derided as "drive-by tagging" when done by editors who are not involved in the article's development. The allegation that "drive-by tagging" is not acceptable is not based on Wikipedia policies; there is no requirement in Wikipedia policies that an editor must "pay their dues" by working on an article before they can add a tag, so long as they explain the rationale for the tag on the talk page. Where there is disagreement, both sides should attempt to discuss the situation.

标记出で现争议

编辑

有ゆう时条目め是ぜ否ひ应当挂上模も板ばん可能かのう会かい产生争そう议。个别编辑挂模板ばん是ぜ在ざい阐释观点或ある扰乱，或ある者もの他た很偏へん执。亦また有ゆう部分ぶぶん编者不ふ解かい决页面めん的てき实质问题就擅自じ摘掉标签，通常つうじょう该类型がた的てき编者有ゆう鉴于以下いか原因げんいん：

  • 认为标签很打脸，中ちゅう伤其本人ほんにん。
  • 爱面子めんつ，认为标签非常ひじょう丢脸。
  • 不ふ想そう让其他た编者对所编辑的てき页面有ゆう所しょ关注。
  • 只ただ是ぜ单纯不ふ喜き欢有标签的てき存在そんざい。

实际上じょう，如标记时出で现争议，请按解かい决程序じょ，前ぜん往讨论页与其他编者冷静れいせい讨论，切きり忌き发生编辑战。

Some tags, such as {{POV}}, often merely indicate the existence of one editor's concern, without taking a stand whether the article complies with Wikipedia policies. It is important to remember that the POV dispute tag does not mean that an article actually violates NPOV. It simply means that there is a current discussion about whether the article complies with the neutral point of view policy. In any NPOV dispute, there will usually be some people who think the article complies with NPOV, and some who disagree. In general, you should not remove the POV dispute tag merely because you personally feel the article complies with NPOV. Rather, the tag should be removed only when there is a consensus among the editors that the NPOV disputes have indeed been resolved or—according to the rules for this specific template—when the discussion has stopped for a significant length of time.

过度标记

编辑
快かい捷とし方式ほうしき

挂标签只是ぜ请他人たにん解かい决你无从下手へた的てき问题，该动作さく本身ほんみ不ふ会かい改善かいぜん条目じょうもく。过多模糊もこ标签无助于改善かいぜん维基百科ひゃっか，只ただ会かい徒と增ぞう混乱こんらん、打だ击编者しゃ。无可否ひ认，滥挂标签是ぜ存そん有ゆう扰乱或ある破やぶ坏之嫌いや。这是一個过度标签的实例。

下しも文ぶん是ぜ常つね见的过度标记问题：

过多标签
挂一两个标签指出最大问题即可，条目じょうもく再さい差さ也不应超过三さん个标签，再さい挂多只ただ会かい被ひ集しゅう体たい无视。
例れい子こ：某ぼう条目じょうもく疑似ぎじ直接ちょくせつ复制自じ外そと站。这种条目じょうもく一般有这类问题：侵犯しんぱん著作ちょさく权嫌疑けんぎ、无来源げん、格式かくしき杂乱、无链接せっ、无分类。此时只ただ需标记最大さいだい的てき问题，即そく疑似ぎじ侵犯しんぱん著作ちょさく权，像ぞう没ぼつ有ゆう链接等とう小しょう节，应待大だい问题解かい决后标记。
冗余标签
若わかA标签包括ほうかつB标签的てき问题，条目じょうもく已やめ挂A时就不ふ应再挂B。挂{{无来源げん}}后きさき无需再さい挂{{无脚注きゃくちゅう}}，断言だんげん也不应同时标记{{来らい源みなもと请求}}和かず{{可か疑うたぐ}}。冗余模も板いた会かい分散ぶんさん读者注意ちゅうい力りょく，还算為ため闡釋觀點かんてん而擾亂じょうらん維基百科ひゃっか。
模糊もこ标签
老ろう编辑尚なお都と困こま扰于泛用标签，新しん编辑就更是ぜ无从下手へた。挂标签应先さき选专用よう标签，只ただ能のう挂泛用よう标签时，则在讨论页留言げん解かい释，或ある在ざい标签后きさき加か<!-- 隐藏注ちゅう释 -->详述问题。
不ふ少しょう标签都と可用かよう于混乱こんらん、文ぶん笔拙劣れつ的てき条目じょうもく，但ただし编辑应贴具体ぐたい的てき标签。很多东西都と应该{{清せい理さとし}}，但ただし具体ぐたい是ぜ{{要よう分段ぶんだん}}、内容ないよう{{自じ相あい矛盾むじゅん}}、语调如{{評論ひょうろん}}，还是{{赘言}}呢？编辑应在Category:清きよし理り模も板ばん中ちゅう选择最さい精せい确的标签。
错误标签
不要ふよう贴和问题不ふ对号的てき标签，没ぼつ合あい适标签时，要よう么亲自じ动手修おさむ改あらため，要よう么在讨论页指出で问题。
例れい子こ：某ぼう条目じょうもく有ゆう27条じょう内うち文ぶん引用いんよう，都と出自しゅつじ同一どういつ来らい源げん，你想指出さしで这一问题。{{无来源げん}}不ふ适用于该条目じょうもく，因いん为条目め并非“有ゆう0条じょう来らい源げん”！虽然挂{{改善かいぜん来らい源げん}}说的过去，但ただし{{单一来らい源げん}}才ざい是ぜ最さい佳けい答案とうあん。现有A、B两个标签，A标签和わ问题有ゆう交集，B标签和わ问题完全かんぜん对应，请挂那な个完全ぜん对应的てきB，不要ふよう两个全ぜん挂。
无用标签
请不要よう只ただ因いん理り论上可か以就挂模板ばん，就算条目じょうもく有ゆう扩充改善かいぜん余地よち，也不ふ一定要挂标签。请用你的智慧ちえ判断はんだん所しょ有事ゆうじ实和状じょう况，挂标签真能のう推动条目じょうもく改善かいぜん，不能ふのう就别挂。
例れい子こ：某ぼう公司こうし条目じょうもく险过关注度ど标准，它没有ゆう或ある只ただ有ゆう一いち篇へん条目じょうもく链入。条目じょうもく{{孤立こりつ}}的てき确是事ごと实，但ただし在ざい挂模板ばん就有用よう吗，它有办法不ふ孤立こりつ么？挂模板ばん是ぜ请人解かい决问题，但ただし请人解かい决无解かい问题很不合あい适。

参まいり见

编辑
检索自じ“https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:给页面めん标记问题&oldid=81358592”