(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
 Chinese thought and philosophy - Philosophical Daoism (www.chinaknowledge.de)

CHINAKNOWLEDGE - a universal guide for China studies | About
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Location: HOME > Thought and philosophy > Daoism]

Chinese Thought and Philosophy
Philosophical Daoism


Daoism is one of the most imporant ancient philosophies of China. The term Daoism (daojiao 道教どうきょう) refers to both philosophy and religion, yet the word Daoists (daojia 道家どうか) is rather used in a narrow sense, referring to thinkers of the Eastern Zhou あずまあまね (770-221 BCE) and Han periods. The most important concept of the Daoists is dao みち the "Way" which is the basic principle of the whole universe. The most important Daoist thinkers of the Eastern Zhou period are Guan Yin せきいん (Guanyinzi せきいん), Zhuang Zhou そうしゅう (Zhuangzi そう), Peng Meng 彭蒙 and Tian Pian 駢 (Tianzi 田子たつこ). The most important writings are the classical books Laozi 老子ろうし (Laozi daode jing 老子ろうし道德どうとくけい or Daodejing 道德どうとくけい), authorship of which is attributed to the "Old Master" Li Dan ふけ, and the Zhuangzi そう. Some chapters in the books Guanzi かん (Xinshu 心術しんじゅつ, Baixin しろしん, Neiye うちぎょう) and Hanfeizi 韓非子かんぴし (Jie Lao かいおい, Yu Lao 喻老) have a Daoist background. There are also the Han period book Huainanzi 淮南ワイナン, compiled under the patronage of Prince An of Huainan, and the book Liezi れつ from the Jin period すすむ (265-420), written by Lie Yukou れつ禦寇. In 1973 some lost books were discovered in the tomb library of Mawangdui おううずたか near Changsha ちょうすな, Hunan, the "Four Books of the Yellow Emperor" (Huangdi sijing みかどよんけい).
Although Daoism as a religion uses quite similar concepts than these philosophical treatises, the philosophy has always been separated from Daoist religion for reasons of practicality. The watershed between philosophy and religion is mainly fixed in the 5th century, when the "philosophy" of the upper class found its counterpart in the "religion" of the masses. When this religion again was adopted by the upper class of the Southern Dynasties 南朝なんちょう (420~589), the seemingly clear borderline between philosophy and religion was again blurred.
One of the earliest definition of Daoism can be found in Sima Tan's 司馬しばだん description of the six philosophical schools (Lun liujia yaozhi ろんろくいえ要旨ようし), of which, by the way, that of the Yin-Yang thinkers 陰陽いんよう has also the tendency of practicality in the form of divination, astrology and prognostication based on astronomical observation. Sima Tan says that the Daoists believed that the base or "Way" (dao) of the universe is the void (xuwu 虛無きょむ) that is surprisingly able to influence everything that happens on hearth and in the cosm. Even the hardest and strongest matters and affairs are determined by the weak and soft (rouruo 柔弱にゅうじゃく) power of the Way. The soft furthermore prevails over the hard and the strong (yi ruo sheng qiang, yi rou ke gang 以弱かちきょう、以柔かつつよし。). In the sphere of politics, the powerful softness of the Way is expressed in the method of ruling by non-action (wuwei 無爲むい). A different interpretation of the meaning of the Way and the voidness by various thinkers led to the develpment of two main schools, namely the "philosophical" school of Laozi, Zhuangzi and Liezi, and the Huang-Lao school ろう that was more concerned with the adaption of the Way in government. The Huang-Lao school was very influential during the late Warring States 戰國せんごく (5th cent.-221 BCE) and the Han periods.
The Way is not only the metaphysical background of all things, but is the force by which the "ten thousand things" came into being. The book Laozi says that the Dao produced the one (matter), the one produced the two (Yin and Yang), the two produced the three (Heaven, Earth and Man), and the three produced the ten thousand things (Dao sheng yi, yi sheng er, er sheng san, san sheng wan wu 道生どうしょういち一生いっしょうせいさんさんなま万物ばんぶつ。). The dao is impartially included in all things that came into being, and its force and influence is extended to everywhere, without restriction. It has no shape and no extension, it is "void". The Laozi therefore begins with the word "A Way that can be described is not the (true) eternal Way." (Dao ke dao fei chang dao みちどう非常ひじょうどう。), and the Zhuangzi says that "The Way can not be heard. If it can be heard, it is not (the true Way)." (Dao bu ke wen, wen er fei ye みち不可ふか聞,聞而也。). All human words are insufficient to describe the Way, so that it must be said that "it is not the Nothing" (wu wu ).
For Laozi the most important force of the Way was its influence on the constant change of things. Nothing will be stable for ever, but the whole nature as well as human will are subject to a permanent change and a new creation (zaohua 造化ぞうか). Zhuangzi expands this theorem to the assumption that this constant change results in a thorough uncertainty of designations because all ten thousand things are one and the same (wan wu yi qi 萬物ばんぶつ一齊いっせい). The human heart has therefore not to cling to persons or objects. The difference between death and live is irrelevant. It is even not certain whether individual perceptions are objective or are rather the result of a relative standpoint. Men so feel what fish think, and the border between dream and real life is not clear. The Daoist in search for the dao had therefore only to act in accordance with nature (ziran 自然しぜん), because the dao was to be found in all things. In his search for the Way the Daoist was wanding around not only physically, but also in his mind, surpassing the limits of nature and able to "ride on the clouds" and "traveling thousand miles a day". This belief was very popular in Southern China and was reflected in the shamanic impressions in the "Southern Poetry" Chuci すわえやめ, as well as in the later belief in immortality and supernatural forces of Daoist masters.
In the field of politics, this meant that an activist policy was to be avoided. In a radical sense, cultural acheivements were to be discarded to go back to nature. According to Laozi, the best society was that of a small village where no changes took place over thousands of generations. The teachings of the Huang-Lao school were very popular in the early Former Han period, under the emperors Wen 漢文かんぶんみかど (r. 180-157 BCE) and Jing かんけいみかど (r. 157-141). The Huang-Lao school came into being in the Jixia Academy きび in the state of Qi ひとし and was influenced by other philosophies, as Confucianism, legalism, Mohism, and Yin-Yang thought. In the philosophical field, it was believed that the matter of which all things are made are a kind of "essence" (jing せい) of the natural energy (qi ), which is nothing else than the Way. All objects consist of the same matter that was formed by the influence of Yin and Yang.
In many aspects, Daoism is familiar to Buddhism: The only possibility for man to acheive his true position in the world is by giving up knowledge, desire and asking for reasons, making himself free from feelings and reflections.
Daoism was not a direct competitor to Confucianism, the state-sponsered philosophy, but was willingly adoped by scholars that were, because of their status as state officials, more inclined to Confucianism. Daoism was therefore an important supplement to cover aspects of life and the universe that Confucianism did not care for. During the Han period, Huang-Lao Daoism provided a metaphysical guideline for a government style, as an alternative to an over-regulated and hyper-activist state as under the Qin dynasty はた (221-206 BCE). After the downfall of the Han, Daoist thought was popular among unemployed scholars and literati as a source for the "School of the Mystery" (xuanxue げんがく) that flourished under the Wei 曹魏 (220-265) and Jin dynasties. It was expecially during the Song period そう (960-1279) that Daoist thought made important contributions to the development of Neo-Confucianism. During the Song period Daoism was also received as an imperially protected religion and philosophy. The ancient masters and there writings were canonized, and Laozi became officially one of the highest deities in the Daoist pantheon, as Taishang Laojun ふとしじょうろうくん.


Source: Xu Kangsheng もと抗生こうせい (1989). "Daojia 道家どうか", in: Zhongguo da baike quanshu 中國ちゅうごくだい百科全書ひゃっかぜんしょ, Zhexue 哲学てつがく, vol. 1, p. 131. Beijing/Shanghai: Zhongguo da baike quanshu chubanshe.
July 27, 2010 © Ulrich Theobald · Mail