Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOMASI v. FRANCE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (victim) Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Violation of Art. 5-3 Questions of procedure accepted Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
Exception préliminaire rejetée (victime) Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Violation de l'Art. 5-3 Questions de procédure retenues Violation de l'Art. 3 Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation ... - juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 13.03.1990 - 12850/87
- EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
Wird zitiert von ... (329) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
D'après le Gouvernement au contraire, le "minimum de gravité" exigé par la jurisprudence de la Cour (arrêt Irlande c. Royaume-Uni précité et arrêt Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni du 25 avril 1978, série A no 26) n'a pas été atteint. - EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86
LETELLIER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
En outre, la Cour rappelle que le danger de fuite ne peut s'apprécier uniquement sur la base de la gravité de la peine; il doit s'analyser en fonction d'un ensemble de données supplémentaires propres soit à en confirmer l'existence, soit à le faire apparaître à ce point réduit qu'il ne peut justifier une détention provisoire (voir notamment l'arrêt Letellier c. France du 26 juin 1991, série A no 207, p. 19, par. 43). - EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87
CLOOTH v. BELGIUM
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
Quand ils se révèlent "pertinents" et "suffisants", elle recherche de surcroît si les autorités nationales compétentes ont apporté une "diligence particulière" à la poursuite de la procédure (voir, en dernier lieu, l'arrêt Clooth c. Belgique du 12 décembre 1991, série A no 225, p. 14, par. 36).
- EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 22978/05
Gäfgen - Folter bei polizeilicher Vernehmung; Kindesentführung; Geständnis trotz …
Der Gerichtshof hat insbesondere festgestellt, dass in Fällen, in denen eine Person in gesundem Zustand in polizeilichen Gewahrsam genommen wird, bei der Entlassung jedoch Verletzungen an ihr festgestellt werden, der Staat eine plausible Erklärung dafür liefern muss, wie es zu diesen Verletzungen gekommen ist, und dass, falls dies unterbleibt, eindeutig eine Frage nach Artikel 3 der Konvention aufgeworfen wird (vgl. Tomasi ./. Frankreich, 27. August 1992, Rdnr. 110, Serie A Bd. 241-A;… Ribitsch ./. Österreich, 4. Dezember 1995, Rdnr. 34, Serie A Bd. 336;… Aksoy, a.a.O., Rdnr. 61;… und Selmouni, a.a.O., Rdnr. 87). - EGMR, 15.11.1996 - 22414/93
CHAHAL c. ROYAUME-UNI
1 and 4 (P1, P4), Article 3 (art. 3) makes no provision for exceptions and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 (art. 15) even in the event of a public emergency threatening the life of the nation (see the Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, para. 163, and also the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, para. 115). - EGMR, 22.09.1993 - 15473/89
KLAAS c. ALLEMAGNE
The Court would distinguish the present case from that of Tomasi v. France (see the judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-42, paras. 108-115) where certain inferences could be made from the fact that Mr Tomasi had sustained unexplained injuries during forty-eight hours spent in police custody.As regards the question whether the force used by Police Constables Bolte and Wildschut against the first applicant for the purpose of her arrest was strictly proportionate, the Commission attaches particular weight to the injuries suffered by the first applicant in the course of her arrest (Eur. Court H. R., Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, opinion of the Commission, pp. 51-52, paras. 92-100, 105).
I cannot therefore accept as a valid distinction the fact that in the case of Tomasi v. France (see the judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A), the applicant had been in custody for many hours.
[ï?ª] Judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A.
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21987/93
AKSOY c. TURQUIE
The Court, having decided to accept the Commission's findings of fact (see paragraphs 39-40 above), considers that where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation as to the causing of the injury, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (art. 3) (see the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, paras. 108-111 and the Ribitsch v. Austria judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, para. 34). - EGMR, 15.12.2016 - 16483/12
Lampedusa-Haft war illegal
On the latter point, the Court has held that where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 92; compare also Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, § 110, Series A no. 241-A; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336; Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 61, Reports 1996-VI; and Selmouni, cited above, § 87). - EGMR, 17.12.1996 - 25964/94
AHMED v. AUSTRIA
1 and 4 (P1, P4), Article 3 (art. 3) makes no provision for exceptions and no derogation from it is permissible under Article 15 (art. 15) even in the event of a public emergency threatening the life of the nation (see the Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, para. 163; the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, para. 115; and the above-mentioned Chahal judgment, p. 1855, para. 79). - EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 10533/83
HERCZEGFALVY c. AUTRICHE
The Court has already stated that the reasons which the Austrian courts regarded as justifying the detention in question were "relevant" and "sufficient"; it therefore remains to be ascertained whether the authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, as the most recent authority, the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, para. 84). - EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99
BALOGH v. HUNGARY
The Government, with reference to the Court's judgments in the cases of Selmouni v. France ([GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V), Ribitsch v. Austria (judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336) and Tomasi v. France (judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A), accepted that where an individual was taken into custody but was found to be injured at the time of his release, it was incumbent on the State under Article 3 to provide a plausible explanation as to the cause of that injury.The requirements of an investigation and the undeniable difficulties inherent in the fight against crime cannot justify placing limits on the protection to be afforded in respect of the physical integrity of individuals (Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 42, § 115).
The majority of my colleagues in the Chamber has rightly pointed out that it is well-established in the case-law of the Court that where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured at the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-111, and the Ribitsch v. Austria judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, pp. 25-26, § 34).
- EGMR, 05.07.2001 - 38321/97
Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Wenn sie sich als "erheblich" und "ausreichend" erweisen, prüft er darüber hinaus, ob die zuständigen nationalen Behörden den Fortgang des Verfahrens "besonders gefördert" haben (siehe insbesondere Urteil vom 27. August 1992 in der Sache Tomasi . /. Frankreich, Serie A, Band 241-A, S. 35, Nr. 84, und Urteil vom 23. September 1998, in der Sache I.A. . /. Frankreich, Urteils- und Entscheidungssammlung des Gerichtshofs , 1998-VII, S. 2978-1979, Nr. 102, und Entscheidung vom 7. September 1999 in der Sache Amiram Bar . /. Frankreich , Nr. 37863/97). - EGMR, 26.01.1993 - 14379/88
W. c. SUISSE
Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also ascertain whether the competent national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see, as the most recent authority, the Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, para. 84).The Court points out that the danger of absconding cannot be gauged solely on the basis of the severity of the possible sentence; it must be assessed with reference to a number of other relevant factors which may either confirm the existence of a danger of absconding or make it appear so slight that it cannot justify pre-trial detention (see, as the most recent authority, the Tomasi judgment cited above, Series A no. 241-A, p. 37, para. 98).
- EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
PEREZ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 14305/17
Selahattin Demirtas
- EGMR, 13.07.2010 - 45661/99
CARABULEA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19874/92
FERRANTELLI AND SANTANGELO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 10921/03
GAVRILITA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 20.07.2000 - 33951/96
CALOC v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 27561/02
SOLMAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.07.2006 - 26853/04
POPOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 59261/00
MENECHEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 22.07.2003 - 24209/94
Y.F. c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 44256/06
TURAN CAKIR c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02
IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 02.08.2005 - 65899/01
TANIS ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.04.2014 - 24439/06
DZHULAY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93
AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.09.2013 - 74010/11
DEMBELE c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 15.07.2003 - 33400/96
ERNST ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94
TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 26.10.1999 - 31801/96
MAINI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 07.08.1996 - 19953/92
HAMER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13191/87
PHAM HOANG c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 12.04.2001 - 39765/98
WARIDEL contre la SUISSE
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 23755/07
BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 23.06.1994 - 16997/90
DE MOOR c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 25.05.1998 - 24276/94
KURT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 57541/09
VALERIY SAMOYLOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 35485/05
HUSEYN AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 15.11.2001 - 25196/94
IWÁNCZUK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 40877/98
CORDOVA c. ITALIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 35589/08
NAGMETOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 65859/01
SHEYDAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.02.2005 - 56271/00
SARDINAS ALBO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 23215/02
ROMANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.10.2020 - 60202/15
I.S. c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 16.10.2018 - 2335/09
TKACHUK c. RUSSIE
- VG Freiburg, 24.04.2018 - A 1 K 4712/16
Haftbedingungen in Gambia als unmenschliche oder erniedrigende Behandlung
- EGMR, 25.02.2014 - 41444/09
ALICAN DEMIR c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 01.03.2001 - 22493/93
BERKTAY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 07.01.2014 - 3363/08
LAKATOS AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 2858/07
CIGERHUN ÖNER c. TURQUIE (n° 2)
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 16563/08
JULIN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 23607/08
HALAT c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 50255/12
SÜVEGES v. HUNGARY
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 36937/06
HAJNAL v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 14.12.2010 - 25153/04
DOBRI c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 44568/98
R.L. ET M.-J.D. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.09.2003 - 36378/02
SHAMAYEV et 12 AUTRES contre la GEORGIE et la RUSSIE
- VG Schwerin, 21.10.2021 - 5 A 138/20
Ukraine: Keine asylrelevante Verfolgung wegen drohender Verurteilung zu einer …
- VG Freiburg, 23.02.2021 - A 14 K 743/18
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 42615/06
VARNAS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 33192/07
KAÇIU AND KOTORRI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 3653/05
ASADBEYLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 42697/05
HRISTOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 1573/02
MEDOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.05.2000 - 20764/92
ERTAK c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.12.2015 - 74820/10
YAROSHOVETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 36410/02
OLEG NIKITIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2002 - 57861/00
ABSANDZE contre la GEORGIE
- VGH Baden-Württemberg, 09.09.1994 - A 16 S 486/94
Zur Gefahr einer Verurteilung nach Art 82 StGB-Vietnam wegen exilpolitischer …
- EGMR, 24.09.1992 - 11613/85
KOLOMPAR c. BELGIQUE
- VG Freiburg, 30.03.2021 - A 14 K 743/18
Gambia; Bodyguard; Putschversuch 2014; Regierungswechsel; Militärgesetz; Zeuge …
- EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 20136/11
ILIEVSKA v.
- EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 30138/12
BOLECH c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 34085/06
VELKHIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.01.2008 - 67797/01
ZUBAYRAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 77845/01
DERECI v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 45649/99
CORDOVA v. ITALY (No. 2)
- EGMR, 31.05.2001 - 23954/94
AKDENIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.01.2023 - 43979/17
ABDULLAH KILIÇ c. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 64418/10
MIHHAILOV v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 24312/10
ANDONOVSKI v.
- EGMR, 18.06.2015 - 59075/09
MEHDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 59334/00
CHITAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.02.2006 - 25324/02
TACIROGLU v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.05.2004 - 42027/98
TOTEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.11.2000 - 24396/94
TAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 37725/15
CEAICOVSCHI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.10.2016 - 629/11
ARA HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 30.04.2015 - 13810/04
SHAMARDAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2015 - 40166/07
Russland muss Tschetschenen Schmerzensgeld zahlen
- EGMR, 31.10.2013 - 20824/09
PERICA OREB v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 29.10.2013 - 42434/06
FEODOROV c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 30812/07
TRÉVALEC c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 11682/03
IGARS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 26872/05
CEKA v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 6644/08
FIRAT CAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 38427/05
ELEFTERIADIS c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 04.11.2010 - 34588/07
DARRAJ c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.10.2010 - 20157/05
KNEBL c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE
- EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 2278/03
LOPATIN AND MEDVEDSKIY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 3179/05
GAKIYEV AND GAKIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.02.2009 - 21080/05
VAGAPOVA AND ZUBIRAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27251/03
SHAKHGIRIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 68294/01
KANDZHOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 3013/04
KHADZHIALIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 12703/02
MUSAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 3947/03
SILIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 22625/02
MIRONOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 74239/01
MUSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.04.2007 - 49234/99
POPESCU c. ROUMANIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 46262/99
SEVGIN AND INCE v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 30.06.2005 - 40159/98
TEMEL ET TASKIN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 22.06.2004 - 39359/98
PAVLETIC v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 04.11.2003 - 48666/99
KUCERA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 25659/94
I. BILGIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 28340/95
BÜYÜKDAG c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 45929/17
IBISHBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 80/17
MURAT AKSOY c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16
YANCHOVICHIN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 21388/15
ALMASI v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 01.10.2019 - 42921/10
MOSCALCIUC v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 20546/16
SECRIERU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 72238/14
COTET v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 44286/12
BADALYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06
KULYK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 81553/12
HILAL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 26211/13
SOS v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 07.05.2015 - 59135/09
EMIN HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 27335/13
SHALYA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 40514/06
RUDYAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 32132/07
JANNATOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.06.2014 - 15397/11
ALBERTI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 10.04.2014 - 22062/07
LAYIJOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 6042/09
NEZIR ADIYAMAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 53248/09
ERDAL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 13.06.2013 - 24402/07
VASYLCHUK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 23.04.2013 - 45046/05
YAZICI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 2)
- EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 20546/07
MAKHASHEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.06.2012 - 12895/06
MURADKHANYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 03.05.2012 - 35389/04
NITSOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 7067/06
ERISEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.03.2012 - 41408/04
KOLPAK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.02.2012 - 30671/04
KLISHYN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 25.01.2011 - 27763/05
LIPENCOV v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 14811/04
Russland wegen brutaler Folter verurteilt
- EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 32181/08
RISTIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 16.09.2010 - 18825/02
DMITRACHKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2220/05
VAKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 16381/05
POLANOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 08.04.2010 - 40523/08
PESA v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 6291/05
YANANER v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.05.2009 - 12417/05
TURLUYEVA AND KHAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 4571/04
ISRAILOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.04.2009 - 28148/03
KHACHUKAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 41498/04
SAYDALIYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 19312/06
VERGELSKYY v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 21519/02
KHADISOV AND TSECHOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 5285/04
NASUKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 14800/04
GANDALOYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 26803/02
SÜLEYMAN ERKAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.01.2008 - 7549/03
MILAN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 16308/02
PECHEUR c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 74240/01
GOYGOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 58643/00
GONCHARUK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 47043/99
MEHMET YAVUZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
DURMUS KURT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 74321/01
KOSTI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 7549/03
MILAN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.01.2007 - 34445/04
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 24.01.2006 - 46412/99
YASAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.12.2005 - 32495/03
BALYEMEZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 5701/02
KARAGÖZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 63993/00
ROMANOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 21179/02
SABRI TAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.09.2005 - 63181/00
KARAYIGIT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27306/95
KISMIR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 75274/01
CALLEJA v. MALTA
- EGMR, 08.02.2005 - 52621/99
SCHWARKMANN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.11.2004 - 30494/96
TUNCER AND DURMUS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 01.04.2004 - 59584/00
RIVAS c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 39324/98
DEMIREL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 40145/98
KILINC, KILINC et ÖZSOY contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 54102/00
ASOCIACIÓN DE VÍCTIMAS DEL TERRORISMO v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 18.12.1996 - 21335/93
SCOTT v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 21.11.1995 - 19248/91
ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 13.07.1995 - 19382/92
VAN DER TANG c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 01.10.2019 - 75524/13
CASU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 52053/15
SIRENCO v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 05.06.2018 - 47022/16
O.L.G. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.02.2017 - 18404/07
DOLGANIN v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 36617/07
AFET SÜREYYA EREN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 46505/08
IGBAL HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 18454/04
APANDIYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 12430/11
VOSGIEN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.07.2013 - 17215/07
HOLODENKO v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 41824/05
MUSTAFA TASTAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 14880/05
KAZANTSEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 7129/03
SKORKIN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 43368/04
ISAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 15579/05
SAMBOR v. POLAND
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 41840/02
SADYKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.02.2010 - 35256/02
DECHKO RAYKOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 63315/00
MUSA KARATAS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.05.2009 - 9258/04
MROZOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.02.2009 - 19616/04
PIENIAK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.01.2009 - 1750/03
ANDREYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 74012/01
GAVRIL YOSIFOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 29958/04
TSUROVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 14526/03
LUPASCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 10778/02
NITA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 61275/00
VLADIMIR GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2008 - 22877/04
KHALIDOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2008 - 23286/04
TAKHAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 22.04.2008 - 43347/04
ZERELLA c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 75520/01
KOZINETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 72976/01
JASINSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 1636/02
TAMAMBOGA AND GÜL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.11.2007 - 6846/02
KHAMILA ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 31553/02
ONAY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 20.09.2007 - 23438/02
MUHAMET AKYOL v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 06.09.2007 - 8607/02
CABALA v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 24.07.2007 - 48545/99
MEHMET SAH ÇELIK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 14.06.2007 - 8610/02
ÖZDEN BILGIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 46702/99
DZWONKOWSKI v. POLAND
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 11468/02
KARATAY AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 15667/03
WOLF v. POLAND
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 6888/03
PRUNEANU v. MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 7649/02
SHCHEGLYUK v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.12.2006 - 61898/00
EMIRHAN YILDIZ AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.10.2006 - 11798/03
TUTAR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 27678/02
GERARD BERNARD c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.08.2006 - 49048/99
HUSEYIN ESEN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 20.06.2006 - 5270/04
DRABEK v. POLAND
- EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 58398/00
HASAN CEYLAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 13797/02
SUYUR v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 15372/02
GOMES PIRES COELHO c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 23560/02
K.-D. J. gegen Deutschland
- EGMR, 21.03.2006 - 44132/98
AYAZ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.09.2005 - 47279/99
YOSIFOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 05.07.2005 - 39244/98
ERDOGAN c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 42272/98
POTIER c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 73936/01
DE JORIO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 20.01.2004 - 73270/01
PIHLAK v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 32578/96
Folterverbot; unmenschliche Behandlung (Anwendung auf den Terrorismus: PKK; …
- EGMR, 04.11.2003 - 68057/01
RABOURDIN contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 09.09.2003 - 27744/95
T., A., J. and S. v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 13.05.2003 - 39753/98
KÖNIG v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 22.01.2002 - 42323/98
SNIEKERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 13.03.2001 - 24737/94
SATIK, CAMLI, SATIK ET MARASLI contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 09.01.2001 - 24933/94
KÜRKÜT contre la TURQUIE
- EGMR, 25.05.2000 - 29870/96
YAVUZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 34994/97
WALTER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 24209/94
FIDAN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 31.08.1999 - 38089/97
GIBBS v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 03.10.1997 - 21592/93
SUR v. TURKEY
- EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 19994/92
THALER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 25.11.1992 - 12728/87
ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 04.04.2023 - 43674/16
RADONJIC AND ROMIC v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 22.12.2020 - 24412/16
BORNET c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 50520/08
HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 70945/10
AKTÜRK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 56765/08
INDERBIYEVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 22150/04
VALYAYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 18.10.2011 - 7039/04
CHERKASOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2011 - 39598/03
KOROBOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.03.2011 - 60846/10
NOWAK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 39855/04
UDOVIK v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 43376/06
PRENCIPE c. MONACO
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 33185/04
MAGAMADOVA AND ISKHANOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 23.10.2008 - 8979/02
MAGOMED MUSAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 60999/00
SATIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)
- EGMR, 03.07.2008 - 12712/02
RUSLAN UMAROV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 17945/02
N.B. v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 58701/00
MAKHAURI v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 14382/04
TONDERYS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 17765/02
DURSUN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 44115/98
WEDLER v. POLAND
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 43925/98
KARAKAS AND YESILIRMAK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 58292/00
STUKALOVA v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 30.01.2003 - 47287/99
PEREZ contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.11.2002 - 73373/01
SALEGI IGOA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 25.06.2002 - 33400/96
ERNST et AUTRES contre la BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 55478/00
ZAR MACHO contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 34947/97
RICHET c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 40375/98
GHAZOUANI contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.01.2001 - 48784/99
SOLHAN v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 29.02.2000 - 37342/97
PIARE v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 06.01.2000 - 34813/97
SONNLEITNER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 12.10.1999 - 37073/97
RICHARD contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 29.06.1999 - 43569/98
ROESCH DESCLEE contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 01.06.1999 - 42036/98
GALLEGO GARCIA contre l'ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 33107/96
TIERNEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 23.03.1999 - 34033/96
DAUGY contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 39357/98
B.D. v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 08.12.1998 - 34971/97
TRUJILLO LOZANO v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 28.10.1998 - 22924/93
AÏT-MOUHOUB v. FRANCE
- EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 30305/96
AIPASSA v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 26.02.1997 - 30059/96
DE KOK v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 28522/95
TOSUNOGLU v. GREECE
- EKMR, 26.06.1996 - 25049/94
LERCHEGGER v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 15.05.1996 - 22439/93
WEIXELBRAUN v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 24.02.1995 - 19976/92
FRANKEL v. SWITZERLAND
- EKMR, 31.08.1994 - 19773/92
PHILIS v. GREECE
- EKMR, 13.04.1994 - 20055/92
MOSER v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 21820/93
K.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 01.12.1993 - 22640/93
HALL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19569/92
E.A. v. AUSTRIA
- EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 18232/91
J.E. v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 12311/06
BORIS IVANOV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 29175/04
DUSHKA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 2563/06
SHENOYEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 05.02.2009 - 41515/04
IDALOVA AND IDALOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 35080/04
ABDURZAKOVA AND ABDURZAKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 14.02.2008 - 16437/04
KOBETS v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 31.07.2007 - 56003/00
ASAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 18207/03
NEVRUZ KOÇ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 61908/00
MEHMET GÜNES v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 21768/02
SELÇUK v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 10.01.2006 - 67137/01
YAVUZ v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 22.09.2005 - 16779/02
KALAY v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 73038/01
ALTIN v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.05.2003 - 39359/98
PAVLETIC v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 17.03.1997 - 21802/93
MULLER v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 13190/87
NAVARRA v. FRANCE
- EGMR, 11.12.2007 - 40593/04
CENGIZ POLAT v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 23.02.1999 - 34966/97
DE GROOT v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 05.09.1994 - 18764/91
HIPPIN c. AUTRICHE
- EKMR, 13.10.1993 - 19791/92
B.H. v. GERMANY