Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (5)
- Wolters Kluwer
Anforderungen an die unverzügliche Vorführung der festgenommenen Person i.S.d. Art. 5 Abs. 3 Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (EMRK) - Bestehen der richterlichen Überprüfungspflicht nach Art. 5 Abs. 3 EMRK von Amts wegen und unabhängig von einem entsprechenden Antrag ...
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AQUILINA c. MALTE
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond Exception préliminaire rejetée Violation de l'Art. 5-3 Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure nationale Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AQUILINA v. MALTA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 5-3 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ... - Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte
(englisch)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 25642/94
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94
Papierfundstellen
- NJW 2001, 51
- NVwZ 2001, 181 (Ls.)
Wird zitiert von ... (172)
- EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 61496/08
Überwachung privater Chatnachrichten des Arbeitnehmers durch den Arbeitgeber
As a consequence, one cannot help but note (if only in passing) that, if the respondent Government had raised this as a preliminary objection, there might have been some question as to whether, by applying to the employment courts on the basis he did, the applicant had, in fact, exhausted those domestic remedies "that relate to the breaches alleged and which are at the same time available and sufficient" (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12
Urteil bestätigt Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit …
While promptness has to be assessed according to the special features of each case (see, among other authorities, Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 48, ECHR 1999-III), the strict time constraint imposed by this requirement leaves little flexibility in interpretation; otherwise there would be a serious weakening of a procedural guarantee to the detriment of the individual and a risk of impairing the very essence of the right protected by this provision (see, for example, McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 33, ECHR 2006-X). - EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 48939/99
ÖNERYILDIZ c. TURQUIE
However, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicant, who chose to avail himself of an administrative-law remedy which appears to have been effective and capable of directly redressing the situation of which he complained, cannot be criticised for not having sought redress in the criminal courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, pp. 1359-60, § 33, and Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III), a remedy which, in any event, could not be used if an action for damages was already pending (see paragraph 48 above).
- EGMR, 12.09.2012 - 10593/08
Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Recht auf Beschwerde; Verhältnis zwischen …
Moreover, an applicant who has availed himself of a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see, for example, Aquilina v. Malta (GC), no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III, and Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, 26 September 1996, § 33, Reports 1996-IV). - EGMR, 20.06.2024 - 25344/20
FRIEDRICH AND OTHERS v. POLAND
Regarding situations in which different avenues of redress are available, the Court reiterates that an applicant who has made use of a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot also be required to have tried others that were available but were probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03
McKAY c. ROYAUME-UNI
The automatic nature of the review is necessary to fulfil the purpose of the paragraph, as a person subjected to ill-treatment might be incapable of lodging an application asking for a judge to review their detention; the same might also be true of other vulnerable categories of arrested person, such as the mentally frail or those ignorant of the language of the judicial officer (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 49, ECHR 1999-III).It has stated that the judicial officer must review "the circumstances militating for or against detention" (see Schiesser v. Switzerland, 4 December 1979, § 31, Series A no. 34); "consider the merits of the detention" (see T.W. v. Malta [GC], no. 25644/94, § 41, 29 April 1999, and Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 47, ECHR 1999-III); and, in a recent judgment, "consider whether detention is justified" (see Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, § 231, ECHR 2003-VI).
- EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 77909/01
Polizeigewahrsam und Freiheitsrecht
Wenn eine Frist von zwei Tagen nicht überschritten würde, sei diese in der Regel nicht als unangemessen anzusehen ( Aquilina ./. Malta [GC], Nr. 25642/94, Rdnr. 51, CEDH-1999-III, und Grauzinis ./. Litauen , Nr. 37975/97, Rdnr. 25, 10. Oktober 2000). - EGMR, 25.06.2019 - 41720/13
NICOLAE VIRGILIU TANASE c. ROUMANIE
In other words, when one remedy has been pursued, the use of another remedy which has essentially the same objective is not required (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III; Kozacioglu v. Turkey [GC], no. 2334/03, § 40, 19 February 2009; Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 58, ECHR 2009; and ?žerife Yigit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976/05, § 50, 2 November 2010). - EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 4782/18
Österreich verurteilt: Vorwürfe eines KZ-Überlebenden nicht geprüft
An applicant who has made use of a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97
THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG
Moreover, it is inconsistent with the terms of the Convention, as I explained in detail in my partly dissenting opinion in Aquilina v. Malta ([GC], no. 25642/94, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 34529/10
GUTSANOVI c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 57375/08
Abtreibungsverbot in Polen: Lebensschützer und der "Fall Agata"
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95
SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 08.07.2010 - 42202/07
SITAROPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
- BGH, 31.08.2021 - XIII ZB 82/20
Anordnung der Haft gegen einen russischen Staatsangehörigen wegen illegaler …
- EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99
OKKALI c. TURQUIE
- BGH, 31.08.2021 - XIII ZB 81/20
Verfahren der Anordnung von Abschiebungshaft: Prüfung der Rechtmäßigkeit der …
- EGMR, 17.04.2014 - 41738/10
PAPOSHVILI c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 6228/09
LAGUTIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 56867/15
BUTURUGA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 8595/06
DE DONDER ET DE CLIPPEL c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 23755/07
BUZADJI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
- EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04
NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.09.2000 - 25498/94
MESSINA c. ITALIE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 26289/12
MAGEE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 07.08.2018 - C-310/18
Milev
- EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 9373/15
M.A. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 6492/11
Luzenko ./. Ukraine
- EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 32667/19
DOMENECH ARADILLA AND RODRÍGUEZ GONZÁLEZ v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 4458/10
MIKALAUSKAS v. MALTA
- EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 40119/09
CANALI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 14057/17
SUKACHOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 13128/06
URAZBAYEV c. RUSSIE
- EGMR, 30.06.2009 - 75109/01
VIOREL BURZO c. ROUMANIE
- KG, 22.03.2002 - 25 W 218/01
Feststellung der Rechtswidrigkeit von Abschiebungshaft nach deren Erledigung
- EGMR, 05.12.2023 - 35614/19
ILERDE AND OTHERS v. TÜRKIYE
- EGMR, 17.03.2022 - 24827/14
FU QUAN, S.R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 29335/13
BEHAR AND GUTMAN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 36894/04
ZALYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 23200/10
VESELOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 26.03.2009 - 39298/04
KREJCÍR c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 10.11.2022 - 56425/18
RIMSEVICS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 13.10.2020 - 5113/11
MARIN YOSIFOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.05.2018 - 54335/14
GAFÀ v. MALTA
- EGMR, 07.03.2017 - 29994/02
DÖNER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 18039/11
A.A. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.09.1999 - 29569/95
BUSCEMI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 39107/18
MICKOVSKI v. NORTH MACEDONIA
- EGMR, 16.02.2021 - 12567/13
BUDINOVA AND CHAPRAZOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 51312/16
M.K. c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 17808/19
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 1920/14
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 16.07.2013 - 142/04
BALTEANU v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 28.08.2012 - 552/10
I.B. c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 13703/04
VASILYEV AND KOVTUN v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.02.2010 - 49330/07
ALFANTAKIS c. GRECE
- EGMR, 05.11.2009 - 1108/02
KOLEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 11956/07
STEPHENS v. MALTA (No. 1)
- EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 41603/13
FABRIS ET PARZIALE c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 26.03.2015 - 7614/09
VOLKOV AND ADAMSKIY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 21.01.2014 - 48754/11
PLACÌ v. ITALY
- EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 7974/11
N.K. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 22883/05
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 16563/08
JULIN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 36777/03
IRIBARREN PINILLOS c. ESPAGNE
- EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 35082/04
MAKHMUDOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 11.04.2006 - 2293/03
WIESER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 25.03.2004 - 16870/03
VIKULOV ET AUTRES c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 18.07.2023 - 44033/17
D.H. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
- EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 22386/19
VALVERDE DIGON v. SPAIN
- EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 60010/08
SAGAN c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 66895/10
ALKOVIC v. MONTENEGRO
- EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 42079/12
B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 15.01.2015 - 63362/09
RUMMI v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 15911/08
GEISTERFER v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 43733/09
GELAUDE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 50658/09
SAADOUNI c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 43717/09
MOREELS c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 09.01.2014 - 43663/09
OUKILI c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 4494/07
BELOUSOV v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 05.11.2013 - 19099/04
BRANISTE c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 40939/05
KVASHKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 28.03.2013 - 10195/08
KOROBOV AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 22077/10
SALIH SALMAN KILIÇ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 08.01.2013 - 37576/05
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING S.R.L. c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 23978/06
KHACHATRYAN AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 59577/08
LEAS v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 13.01.2011 - 36794/03
SVETOSLAV HRISTOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 22.07.2010 - 49375/07
EWERT c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 08.10.2009 - 4922/04
LAZOROSKI v.
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 68294/01
KANDZHOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.09.2004 - 9808/02
STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 10794/12
GIULIANO GERMANO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 27903/15
ZUSTOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 16.03.2021 - 78907/16
YANCHOVICHIN v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 60477/12
GROBELNY v. POLAND
- EGMR, 24.09.2019 - 72996/16
MIRENIC-HUZJAK AND JERKOVIC v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 13.12.2018 - 67944/13
CASA DI CURA VALLE FIORITA S.R.L. c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 56367/09
J.R. v. BELGIUM
- EGMR, 10.11.2016 - 70474/11
KIRIL ZLATKOV NIKOLOV c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.06.2016 - 34648/14
R.D. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 6759/11
GAL v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 7233/04
GOBEC v. SLOVENIA
- EGMR, 11.09.2012 - 23473/11
MI.L. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 3627/06
GRIGORYAN v. ARMENIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2011 - 52131/07
HAXHISHABANI c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 20429/07
LILLY FRANCE c. FRANCE (N° 2)
- EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 37217/03
BUJAC c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 47719/07
ZVEZDEV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 3811/02
DENISENKO AND BOGDANCHIKOV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 73957/01
VARGA c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 31.01.2008 - 38851/02
ABDULKADIR AKTAS c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 18642/04
SMATANA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 53820/00
BONEVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 13178/03
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA ET KANIKI MITUNGA c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 16308/02
PECHEUR c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 12.10.2004 - 53037/99
IONESCU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 62740/00
MATHEUS contre la FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.09.2022 - 24738/19
GASI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
- EGMR, 09.03.2021 - 54339/09
ZININ v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 17.12.2020 - 56903/10
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 13919/12
TALALIKHINA v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 48786/09
AVENDI OOD v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 20.01.2015 - 8457/05
BULGARTSVET-VELINGRAD OOD AND KOPPE v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 56566/10
D.J. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 31595/07
ABDULSITAR AKGÜL c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 21706/10
THÉRON c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 28796/04
BIVOLARU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 23.11.2010 - 20271/06
STETIAR AND SUTEK v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 09.09.2010 - 26428/03
MEDVEDEV v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 547/02
JERONOVICS c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 28299/02
ATMACA c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 2196/05
THILGEN ET THONUS c. LUXEMBOURG
- EGMR, 29.05.2008 - 38241/04
BERGMANN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 03.07.2007 - 13829/03
BARRET ET SIRJEAN c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 03.07.2007 - 10271/02
R.P. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 12332/03
CASTELOT c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 13252/02
DZELADINOV AND OTHERS v.
- EGMR, 02.11.2006 - 58971/00
RADOSLAV POPOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.09.2006 - 69875/01
SULEJMANOV v.
- EGMR, 03.07.2006 - 59995/00
DABICH v.
- EGMR, 09.02.2006 - 47927/99
AYDIN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 03.11.2005 - 45980/99
KOSTOV c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 73551/01
METMATI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 09.12.2004 - 45723/99
V.M. c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 24.06.2004 - 19437/02
VIAROPOULOS et AUTRES contre la GRECE
- EGMR - 31946/21 (anhängig)
FERREIRA DA SILVA MACEDO v. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 47247/22
HAMMOUDI c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 50376/13
M.D. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 02.04.2019 - 69446/17
BOYACIKÖY PANAYIA EVANGELISTRA CHURCH AND SCHOOL FOUNDATION v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 6123/11
LOLOV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
- EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 46005/11
FIRAT c. GRÈCE
- EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 18232/11
VAKHITOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 09.07.2015 - 61264/11
R.K. c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 38283/04
SÜLEYMANOGLU c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 17444/04
KORNEV AND KARPENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 33740/06
STEPHENS v. MALTA (no. 2)
- EGMR, 07.04.2009 - 17689/03
TIRON c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 17019/02
IPEK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 4211/02
ERÜKCÜ c. TURQUIE
- EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 29761/02
TASE v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 74785/01
NASTASE-SILIVESTRU c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 01.02.2007 - 76843/01
NAZARENKO c. LETTONIE
- EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 55525/00
HADRI-VIONNET c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 04.12.2018 - 66640/12
STANA v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 13.11.2018 - 64367/14
TIMES NEWSPAPERS LIMITED AND KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 02.04.2015 - 38833/03
KIRPICHENKO v. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 10.06.2008 - 69273/01
GALLIANI v. ROMANIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2008 - 26600/02
KONOLOS c. ROUMANIE
- EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 2192/03
HARKMANN v. ESTONIA
- EGMR, 06.01.2005 - 5379/02
NAKACH v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 35429/10
NACAKIS c. TÜRKIYE
Rechtsprechung
EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 25642/94 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
AQUILINA v. MALTA
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 17.01.1997 - 25642/94
- EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25642/94