(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Mary Barbour - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Mary Barbour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"First" woman Labour councillor in Glasgow

[edit]

Barbour was elected to Glasgow Town Council in 1920. One other woman was elected as a Labour councillor at the same time, and three others as Moderates.

Agnes Dollan had stood for election in 1919, but failed to win the seat. This made her the first woman to be a Labour candidate in Glasgow.

Patrick Dollan wrote, in 1923, in a book called History of Kinning Park Cooperative Society Limited that Barbour had been "the first Co-operative woman elected to the council" and "the first Labour woman to be elected to Glasgow Town Council" (on p147 of that book). This is cited by Dr Catriona Burness in her book, Remember Mary Barbour (as noted in the article) as the origin of the misconception that Barbour was the first woman to be a Labour councillor in Glasgow. LesleyMitchell (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification, I didn't look very closely into it, just saw a link to Patrick about a statement which seemed to relate to a female, saw Agnes had an article which was only a few years old so thought it was possibly an older link to her through his article, or just the wrong Dollan. The truth is a bit more complex, as you have outlined. Apologies if it was a bit of a waste of your time to sort. Crowsus (talk) 18:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

It is claimed that Barbour became 'the first woman Labour councillor' in 1920. However, the similarly-named Mary Bamber was elected in the Everton area of Liverpool one year earlier, according to her entry. Ad Nauseam

Editathon

[edit]

This article, possibly along with other Red Clydeside articles, is the subject of an editathon in Govan on Saturday 9th January 2016. Please assume that the newbies act in good faith. Thanks. Flourbomb (talk) 07:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mary Barbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Barbour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

multiple references named ":4"

[edit]

There are multiple references to name=":4" in the article and I was not able to work out which source is being cited in each case. Also reference 20 to The Govan Press (1920-11-05) needs a title (and ideally author).— Rod talk 12:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the Govan Press article citation to include a title. No author is stated for the article, as is common in most newspapers, so this information cannot be added.
References using a colon followed by a number are ones that have been automatically named by the citation 're-use' feature. To find the original reference, search the text for the colon and number.
In this case, the reference in question was a news article - https://www.the-gazette.co.uk/news/13969302.cash-pledged-towards-mary-barbour-cairn/
While updating the ref template used (from URL to news), I have also updated the auto-generated citation name from ":4" to ":0". LesleyMitchell (talk) 11:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]