Democracy Wall
| Democracy Wall Movement | |
|---|---|
| Part of Beijing Spring, Reform and Opening Up and the Chinese Democracy Movement | |
| Date | 1978 November 1978 – Spring 1981 |
| Location | |
| Caused by | Death of Zhou Enlai, cessation of the Cultural Revolution post death of Mao Zedong |
| Goals |
|
| Resulted in |
|
| Lead figures | |
Wei Jingsheng (Activist, writer) | |
| This article is part of a series on |
| Liberalism in China |
|---|
 |
From November 1978 to December 1979, thousands of people put up "big character posters" on a long brick wall of Xidan Street, Xicheng District of Beijing, to protest about the political and social issues of China; the wall became known as the Democracy Wall (Chinese:
Background
[edit]The Cultural Revolution
[edit]In 1966, when Mao Zedong launched the Cultural Revolution, millions of middle school, high school, and college students answered Mao's call, being organized as the "Red Guards" to rebel and root out the "capitalist roaders" from within the Chinese Communist Party. But, in 1969, after using students in restoring the social order, Mao launched the "Down to the Countryside Movement" to exile the student "Red Guards" to rural areas. This movement caused a lot of red guards to feel purposely abandoned by Mao. In 1971, Lin Biao's attempted coup and death deeply shook the collective peoples' faith on Mao and the Cultural Revolution's ideology. On November 19, 1974, Li Yizhe's paper appeared on a wall in Guangdong Province. The 67 pages of the paper focused on: (1) Damage to the citizens caused by bureaucratic corruptions of the Chinese Communist Party during the Cultural Revolution; and (2) the need to practice democracy and a legal system in China.[2][3] This big character poster proved that people started to re-evaluate the Cultural Revolution and political system of China.
The core of the Democracy Movement was composed of former Red Guards.[4]
The Tiananmen Incident of 1976
[edit]Premier Zhou Enlai, a widely respected senior CCP leader, died on January 8, 1976. On April 5, at the Qingming Festival, thousands of Beijing's residents gathered in Tiananmen Square. They wrote poems and put up big character posters in Tiananmen Square to mourn for Zhou and express their anger towards the impious Gang of Four and the destructive Cultural Revolution. In response, Mao ordered the police and the PLA to disperse the people, and around four thousand were arrested. This incident was also called the April 5th Movement. Deng Xiaoping was announced as the "black hand" of the movement. On April 7, Mao Zedong proposed that the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CCP denounce Deng Xiaoping's official positions and that Hua Guofeng would assume Deng's positions as Prime Minister of the State Council and the Vice-Chairman of the CCP. The committee adopted both proposals.[3]
The Discussion on Criteria of Truth
[edit]After Mao Zedong's death occurred on September 9, 1976, with Hua Guofeng as Mao's successor, he felt threatened by the politically domineering Gang of Four. On October 6, under the support of Ye Jianying, Li Xiannian, and other members of the Politburo, Hua Guofeng arrested the Gang of Four. On the following day, Hua was voted in as chairman of the CCP and chairman of the Central Military Committee by a joint meeting of the First Secretaries of the Provincial Party Committees and the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CCP.[5] For proving his legitimacy, Hua instructed Wang Dongxing to let the People's Daily, People's Liberation Army Daily, and Red Flag magazine to publish an editorial now known as the "Two Whatevers". Hua claimed that they would honor Mao's policy and his instruction to the full extent. On the other hand, on July 21, 1977, during the 3rd Plenary Session of the CCP's 10th Central Committee, Deng Xiaoping resumed his positions as Prime Minister of the State Council and Vice-Chairman of the CCP.[5] After Deng came back to work, he started to fix some political decisions of Mao's era. During the spring of 1978, 130,000 victims of the Anti-Rightist Movement who had been removed from their positions in 1957, recovered their social statuses. Deng continued to challenge Hua's legitimacy and fight for the domination in ideological field.[6] For example, Deng wrote an essay on May 24, 1977 titled "The 'Two Whatever' Policy Does Not Accord With Marxism".[7] Under the support of Deng Xiaoping, Hu Yaobang indicated a party journal, Theoretical Trends to publish the article "Pragmatism is the Only Standard in Measuring Truth" on May 10, 1978, which marked the key difference between Deng and Hua.[8] This article was re-published in Guangming Daily, People's Daily, and People's Liberation Army Daily and soon caused a huge discussion movement in China, which was called The Discussion on Criteria of Truth .
Ideologies
[edit]The Democracy Wall movement framed the key issue as the elimination of bureaucratism and the bureaucratic class.[9] However, the movement lacked ideological cohesion.[10] It involved many individuals and small groups with diverse political views and areas of concern.[11] "From an organizational standpoint, there was no single movement"[11] and ideological views were often sharply-divided.[12] While Democracy Wall participants agreed that "democracy" was the means to resolve the conflict between the bureaucratic class and the people, the nature of the proposed democratic institutions was a major source of disagreement.[9] A majority of participants in the movement viewed the movement as part of a struggle between correct and incorrect notions of Marxism.[13] Many participants advocated classical Marxist views that drew on the Paris Commune for inspiration.[14] The Democracy Wall movement also included non-Marxists and anti-Marxists, although these participants were a minority.[15]
Thus, demands for "democracy" were frequent but without an agreed-upon meaning.[11] Participants in the movement variously associated the concept of democracy with socialism, communism, liberal democracy, capitalism, and Christianity.[11] They drew on a diverse range of intellectual resources "ranging from classical Marxist and socialist traditions to Enlightenment philosophers, [socialist] experiments in Yugoslavia, and Western liberal democracy."[12]
Unofficial "people's journals" published by activists were the ideological core of the movement.[16] These journals likewise discussed a wide range of topics and ideological stances, including commentaries on socialism, democracy, Marxism, civil rights, and morality, socioeconomic conditions (including wage reform, inequality, and consumer and housing shortages) as well as artistic and literary matters.[16]
Criticism of Mao Zedong and the Cultural Revolution were the most common complaint by movement participants.[11] Some participants, however, revived the Cultural Revolution-era “ultra-left” argument against China’s “bureaucratic class.”[17]
Wall posters
[edit]Under the influence of the official discussion, the general public also started to put up big character posters to cause a debate. On August 18, 1977, the 11th National Congress of the CCP recommended adding the "Four Freedoms" (Chinese:
The beginning of the Democracy Wall
[edit]On October 1, 1978, the words "to liberate thought, to provide the best service to the people are the duties of CCP members", a theme for the CCP Party, was posted on the Xidan Wall in Beijing by civilians. Since then, people were allowed to post their opinions and free-style literature on street walls throughout the country. On November 23, Lü Pu (Chinese: 吕朴) posted his writings on the Democracy Wall in Xidan. He critiqued Mao Zedong and pointed out that the real reasons behind the April 5 Movement were a backward economy, rigid thought control, and the poor living conditions of the people. This poster was called the "Fire Lighter of Democracy Wall". On November 25, 1978, the Democracy Assembly Group was formed by Ren Wanding and eight other youths. Two days later they gathered at Xidan Democracy Wall and led a public march to Tiananmen Square. Over 10,000 participants demanded democracy and human rights for China. This date marks the beginning of the Democracy Wall.[18]
Deng's attitudes at the beginning
[edit]Until this period, most of the big character posters were criticizing the Gang of Four, Mao Zedong, and Hua Guofeng, rather than Deng Xiaoping. So, Deng was still supporting the Democracy Wall movement, during this time, as he remarked to several leaders.[19] On November 26, he told the Japanese delegates of the Democratic Socialist Party that, according to the Constitution, the Democracy Wall activities were legal. However, he noted that some party comrades did not want to criticize Mao, and he agreed. Deng's attitude caused more and more people gathering in Democracy Wall and put up poster to express their opinions and support Deng.[citation needed]
"The Fifth Modernization"
[edit]However, besides the pro-Deng group, there was also anti-Deng voice. On December 5, 1978, the most famous poster of the Democracy Wall, "The Fifth Modernization: Democracy and Others" written by writer and activist Wei Jingsheng, was posted on Democracy Wall. This long article strongly criticized the undemocratic practice of Mao and Deng. It also emphasized that (1) the history of Germany, Russia and China proved that anti-democracy was the cause of the poor living conditions of the people; and (2) the political system of Yugoslavia would be a good model for bringing economic wellbeing to the people.[20][21]
Petitioners' wall poster
[edit]Besides the big character posters, that talk about the democracy, freedom, and human rights, there were also many posters written by petitioners detailing the suffering and persecution endured during the Cultural Revolution and bureaucratic corruption of local officials. They put up their posters on the same walls and tried to draw attention from the central government to solve their individual cases. However, because this kind of posters were written by less educated people[citation needed], except for some articles which were re-published in unofficial journals, most of the petitioner's posters were torn off afterwards.[citation needed]
Unofficial journals
[edit]Academic Liu Sheng-chi writes that the journals of the Democracy Wall movement fall into three categories: (1) the radical left, (2) moderates, and (3) the radical right.[9] The first two categories of journals strayed within the political tradition of Marxism, while the third challenged it. [9]
Original journals
[edit]Another format of the debate and demonstration was also rapidly developing in China: the "unofficial journals", also known as "people's journals,"[16] "independent journals," or "underground journals" (Chinese:
Throughout late 1978 and early 1979, crowds would gather to buy or exchange issues of these people's journals.[16]
Lists of unofficial journals
[edit]From the winter of 1978 to spring 1981, over 50 unofficial journals appeared in Beijing alone. The following list includes some famous journals during the movement:[16]
| Journal (English name) | Journal (Chinese name) | Editors (Romanized names) | Editors (Chinese names) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April Fifth Forum | 《 |
Xu Wenli, Liu Qing, Zhao Nan | ||
| Beijing Spring | 《 |
Chen Ziming, Zhou Weimin, Wang Juntao | 陈子 | |
| Chinese Alliance of Human Rights | 《 |
Ren Wanding | ||
| Democracy and Law | ||||
| Enlightenment | 《启蒙》 | |||
| Explorations | 《 |
Wei Jingsheng, Liu Jingsheng, Lu Lin, Yang Guang | ||
| Fertile Soil | 《 |
Hu Ping, Jiang Hong | ||
| Harvest | 《 |
|||
| Jintian (Today) | 《 |
Bei Dao, Mang Ke, Liu Nianchun, Xu Xiao, Chen Maiping | ||
| Masses' Reference Forum | ||||
| People's Forum | ||||
| Science | ||||
| Seeking Truth Newspaper | 《 |
|||
| Voice of the People |
Organizations
[edit]Since early 1979, unofficial journals became the backbone of the Democracy Wall Movement.[22] The activities were also seeking to organize together to form a stronger concentrated structure. On January 15, 1979, six leading unofficial journals announced their intention to fight for the basic constitutional rights: freedom of speech and freedom of the press without retaliation. These freedoms were never realized. On January 28, the members of seven unofficial journals in Beijing organized a joint conference to counter the criticism against their literature on Democracy Wall. These members then met weekly to discuss recent public issues.[20] However, this was still a very loose organization and their opinions varied to the point of not achieving their objectives.
Impact of the unofficial journals
[edit]The wall posters and the underground journals' connections were intimately linked. It was a common practice to print posters in the journals, as well as to post the printed pages on the Xidan Wall. The editors also sold their journals near the Democracy Wall. Printing and publishing journals was not an easy task due to the lack of technicians and funding. So, the journals' circulation was relatively small, usually from 200 to 500 copies per issue. As, for example, the editors of People's Reference News (Chinese:
See also
[edit]- History of the People's Republic of China (1976–1989)
- Beijing Spring
- The Democracy Wall of City University of Hong Kong
Notes
[edit]- ^ "The Chinese democracy movement of 1978-1981". pekinger-fruehling.univie.ac.at. Retrieved 2023-08-09.
- ^ "Advance Through Retreat: The Li Yi Zhe Manifesto". MCLC Resource Center. 2015-02-13. Archived from the original on 2016-09-15. Retrieved 2016-06-12.
- ^ a b I, Mu (1986). Unofficial Documents of the Democracy Movement in Communist China 1978-1981. Stanford, California: East Asian Collection, Hoover Institution. p. 11.
- ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 602, 610. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
- ^ a b I, Mu (1986). Unofficial Documents of the Democracy Movement in Communist China 1978-1981. Stanford, California: East Asian Collection, Hoover Institution. p. 12.
- ^ ""
民主 墙运动"及其历史地位 ". www.modernchinastudies.org. Archived from the original on 2016-08-09. Retrieved 2016-06-12. - ^ "The "Two-Whatever" Policy Does Not Accord With Marxism -- Beijing Review". www.bjreview.com.cn. Archived from the original on 2016-06-24. Retrieved 2016-06-12.
- ^ "实践
是 检验真理 的 唯 一 标准 --中国 共 产党新 闻--中国 共 产党新 闻网". cpc.people.com.cn. Archived from the original on 2016-10-07. Retrieved 2016-06-12. - ^ a b c d Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 611. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
- ^ Wu, Yiching (2014). The cultural revolution at the margins : Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 213–214. ISBN 978-0-674-41985-8. OCLC 881183403.
- ^ a b c d e Wu, Yiching (2014). The cultural revolution at the margins : Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-674-41985-8. OCLC 881183403.
- ^ a b Wu, Yiching (2014). The cultural revolution at the margins : Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-674-41985-8. OCLC 881183403.
- ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 623. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
- ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 611. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
- ^ Paltemaa, Lauri (2007). "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy". Journal of Contemporary China. 16 (53): 620. doi:10.1080/10670560701562325. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 143933209.
- ^ a b c d e Wu, Yiching (2014). The cultural revolution at the margins : Chinese socialism in crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-0-674-41985-8. OCLC 881183403.
- ^ Meisner, Maurice J. (1999). Mao's China and after : a history of the People's Republic. Maurice J. Meisner (3rd ed.). New York. p. 436. ISBN 0-02-920870-X. OCLC 13270932.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b I, Mu (1986). Unofficial Documents of the Democracy Movement in Communist China 1978-1981. Stanford, California: East Asian Collection, Hoover Institution. p. 13.
- ^ Opletal, Helmut (2021-12-30). "The 1978-1981 Democracy Wall Movement and the Reformists in the Communist Party Leadership after Mao's Death". The Journal of the European Association for Chinese Studies. 2: 151–154. doi:10.25365/jeacs.2021.2.127-167. ISSN 2709-9946.
- ^ a b I, Mu (1986). Unofficial Documents of the Democracy Movement in Communist China 1978-1981. Stanford, California: East Asian Collection, Hoover Institution. p. 15.
- ^ De Bary, Theodore (1999). Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 Through the Twentieth Century (Vol 2). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 497–500. ISBN 0-231-11271-8.
- ^ a b Paltemaa, Lauri (2005). In the Vanguard of History. Turku: Turun Yliopisto. p. 89.
References
[edit]- Opletal, Helmut (2021-12-30). "The 1978-1981 Democracy Wall Movement and the Reformists in the Communist Party Leadership after Mao's Death". The Journal of the European Association for Chinese Studies. 2: 151–154. doi:10.25365/jeacs.2021.2.127-167. ISSN 2709-9946.
- Wei Jingsheng (1999-09-27). "Visions of China: Democracy Wall". www.time.com. Archived from the original on January 29, 2001. Retrieved 2008-01-06.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain. Country Studies. Federal Research Division. [1]
