Talk:Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom: Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is under the stewardship of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom.

Untitled

Removed cleanup tag and upgraded to "C" DavidwinchUK (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added significant new content DavidwinchUK (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible article, too many red links, jibberish, etc.213.218.226.92 09:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The red links (jibberish) are all acts of Parliament dealing with confiscation of the proceeds of crime. The powers of the state became more draconian with the implementation of each act. Ron Barker 15:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does "£750,0000" really mean "£750,000" or "£7,500,000"? 86.155.175.70 (talk) 15:16, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It means £750,000 See: Operation Julie Ron Barker (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prominent controversy section needed!

This act is highly controversial. It was used by the MET police for a massive 6.700 deposit-box wrenching "fishing expedition" in 2009, under the disguise of ripping serious criminals of ther stashed profits and drugs. However, bobbies confiscated the "emergency money" of so many jewish people and institutions, that Israel threatened to hurt Britain via the US Capitol Hill, unless the juggernaut stops. A huge number of indian businessman immigrants also lost their cash savings and were told to sue it back, provided they'd been willing to invest 50k UKP up-front for court legal fees (because POCA puts the burden of proof on the citizen, not the gov't). After that infamous raid, circa 17bn UKP swiftly left Blighty for the swiss Alps. 82.131.210.163 (talk) 15:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]