User talk:Kailash29792

Naane Varuven

Hey could you also expand the article for the Dhanush starrier Tamil film Naane Varuven? Theoder2055 (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Varisu

@Kailash29792: I think so we don’t need to expand the article too much. But I don’t why do we need to expand this article too much. Some IP editor is adding so much of extra information but only the necessary information needs to be added right?

No such rule. If you feel the article is becoming too big, separate articles can be created.

வாழ்த்துக்கள்!

@Manick22: Never expected Aadi Thallupadi to become an article! DareshMohan (talk) 04:32, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you resurrect Draft:Billa Ranga (film)? The sourcing is similar to Chattaniki Kallu Levu [1]. DareshMohan (talk) 07:39, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

I would suggest you to stop submitting articles via AfC as the reviewers expect GA or FA level articles. That's why the article hasn't been accepted yet. Besides why were so many sources deleted? Anyway, I'm busy till 5pm, please be patient. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Sources were deleted because they were passing mentions. I understand your concern regarding AfC but you must realise that I edited that 5 months ago. I learned from my mistake and stopped doing AfC now. DareshMohan (talk) 08:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Lack of sources

I created two articles that were affected by the unreliablility of Indiaglitz and Filmibeat: Boys and Girls (2006 film) and Poojari. Should they exist? DareshMohan (talk) 02:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

DareshMohan, wait for Chennai Online's review archives to become available again. As for poojari, you may redirect it to pujari. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

I know for a fact that boys and girls did not get a Chennai Online review. It only had a The Hindu and Behindwoods production source. As for the second film, I am opposed to redirect, since the film's songs are popular and The New Indian Express article was published a year after release. DareshMohan (talk) 02:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

A film can generally be considered notable with 2 reviews from reliable sources (but even then, some users may say "only may be" over and over again, which is technically correct but obviously exaggeratedly demanding). But a film can be considered notable without them, by meeting general requirements and not the specific guideline, for example if coverage on production is significant and from reliable sources, or for other reasons (its music has received coverage can be one of them). Other criteria can apply (important culturally, important in the career of a major artist). Etc. So, even if the 2 or 3 reviews are challenged, I personally would leave the pages like that and leave the review on the page. The "consensus" on BehindWoods seems rather recent, for example, and I would tend to disagree there's even a consensus about it. Many sources that have been added are maybe not of the best quality but to list them as plainly unreliable is quite extreme and seems to be the decision of one user with links to rather short sections with few participants... At this rate, only huge Indian blockbusters will have a page and half of old films are going to be deleted. Very concerning to see the ITF shifting like this. Look at the recent page history.....or at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ha_Khel_Sawalyancha. I mentioned the issue on the page of the closer. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Mushy Yank, RangersRus is on a rampage deleting IndiaGlitz and Behindwoods even from pre-2010 South Indian film articles. While he isn't without merit, IndiaGlitz and Behindwoods are essential to preserving such films as they don't have many alternate sources. Sify was, but it's dead and they didn't save all their archives. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Just realized Nadigai is entirely sourced by unreliable sources. DareshMohan (talk) 09:30, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

No one is stopping you from prodding it. Or you could redirect it to Chechi (film). Kailash29792 (talk) 11:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Article request Muthal Paadal [2] (page 11). DareshMohan (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Please put it on my missing films page with additional sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1961 romance films

A tag has been placed on Category:1961 romance films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Erraneous central description

Can you change the central description from Telugu to Kannada film? [3] DareshMohan (talk) 19:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Remove all instances of IB Times from Velaiilla Pattadhari @RangersRus: DareshMohan (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Kai Niraya Kaasu

Hello Kailash29792. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Kai Niraya Kaasu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. Thank you. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

SafariScribe, how is it "plausible" and "useful"? Doesn't link to any mainspace article, and shouldn't. I never intended to start the article in the draftspace, and did so only because one cannot start a mainspace article half-baked. In fact, I would call it "quarter baked" when I started it. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:23, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

It isn't a reason to speedily delete the redirect. It should be rcat-ed with {{R to main namespace}}. I don't see an issue with the redirect or do you have anything perhaps contrary on mind? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Web archive

Wayback archive is showing "this site is not working" while opening any link. 16:05, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Srivin, #metoo. More info here. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Reema

User is clearly not here. Wanted to drop the link that was just reverted in case you want it for ANI. CNMall41 (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Kaththi cast

No need for GA, but it would be great to make the cast section sourced. 40 actors played elderly roles of which 10 are named. @Manick22: Do we know who played who? [4]

For credited cast members without sources, I can source the film itself and time the actor came. Anil Jai was listed for a very long time although his name is not in credits. DareshMohan (talk) 06:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

First of all we could start with cleaning the references and merging duplicates. I however don't have time today or tomorrow. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Request

It would be beneficial if I could access all of The Times of India articles from the early 2000s written by G S Kumar. When I do a search [5], it doesn't list all of them: [6]. I wish I could access all of the archives relating to Kannada cinema from 2000-2005 so that poorly sourced articles can be sourced. G S Kumar might have only written 10-15 articles maximum. DareshMohan (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)