「Uncyclopedia:VFH/Youth」を編集へんしゅう中ちゅう

{{Votevfh
|article=Youth
|nom={{User:The Woodburninator/sig}} 22:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
|scoretext= times by 1,000,000 = number of images in this article
|fornumber=3
|for=
#'''For''' Good one from {{U|DrStrange}}. Some people may have a problem with how the page looks and the amount of pictures, but I like the set up, and it made me laugh. Gets my vote. {{User:The Woodburninator/sig}} 22:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
#'''For'''.  I do have a problem with the images but still good enough. {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 07:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 
#'''For'''. As per Multi. [[User:RabbiTechno|RabbiTechno]] 10:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
|againstnumber=2
|against=#'''Against'''. It's too much of an image whore for VFH, in my opinion. Images are always awesome, giving a sight for sore eyes and relinquishes the overwhelming job of having to read a wall of text, maybe three or four for the average article, but you don't need '''twenty-eight''' of the darn things. Moreover, a multitude of images can easily encourage readers to just ignore the text and flip through the pictures instead. I know there are some committed readers who will willingly perform the heavenly delight that is, well, reading, but not all visitors to the site will; my first instinct upon seeing this article, despite my love for literature, was to just look at the pile of images instead. That, and the images lack captions and disrupt the text formation. --[[User:Nachlader|Nachlader]] 22:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
#'''Against.''' For the same basic reasons as Nachlader, but more concise-like. {{User:Necropaxx/sig}} <small><font color="darkred"><i>22:47, Dec 19</i></font></small>
|comments=
*'''Comment'''.  I guess the page could be cleaned up a bit. {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 07:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
*'''Not right now''' Formatting is appalling. It's somewhat funny but covering it in pictures really detracts... unless you make something like a photo album down the side... that could work... I'll do it! --{{User:DJ Irreverent/sig}} 08:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
* '''I'll reformat:'''  The formatting digresses from a Wickipedia mockery into an underground magazine, IMO. This one just came out of the oven, so give me this morning to do a little work. Smaller flanking columns of the pics on each side might work better. Is the row of three pics across thingy annoying?--[[User:DrStrange|DrStrange]][[image:Retro-groovy.gif‎|20px]] 10:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
*'''OK:''' I took out the hatchet and did some trimming. The top looks better now. I just can't force myself to change the female adolescent section despite the shotgun blast of pics.--[[User:DrStrange|DrStrange]][[image:Retro-groovy.gif‎|20px]] 12:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
*'''??:''' Frankly, the pictures used in "Youth" don't need to be tied to the story with captions, unlike the majority of articles here, which is probably a new experience for you. (You actually counted how many pics were used?) Do people '''not''' read comic books because they get distracted by all the flashy pictures? At least have enough faith in your criticisms to personalize them instead of using the hypothetical opinion of the masses. You've dangled this article like a dead rat for having too many pictures.....that's it.  If I had a buck for every pic in a "featured article" that disturbed section breaks and "normal" flow of type, I'd be fucking rich! Well, not really.....maybe by 2040. ('''I've been a printing press operator for over 20 years''', so this reads like a "style" complaint from the competition.....it looks TOO DAMN GOOD for your sensibilities) But seriously, I expect this. I have a history of being singled out as the guy who goes too far and will eventually destroy western civilization as we know it so you MUST be a barometer of the average person. I'll try to "box" the pics from now on with my pic editor for that sense of "boundary" we all crave--[[User:DrStrange|DrStrange]][[image:Retro-groovy.gif‎|20px]] 07:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 
*'''Comment'''.  You're right but for one thing: wrong image/text ratio for a comic. Text is good and it would be a pity for this to flop because of something trivial. Why not make the thumbs smaller and dropping of the least interesting ones? {{User:Multiliteralist/sig}} 11:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
}}