| Article: Comparative evaluation of the indirect immunoperoxidase test for the serodiagnosis of rickettsial disease
|
Score: 2.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
121.219.61.73 00:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 6.5
|
- Nom+For. How can I say no to this? --121.219.61.73 00:17, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
 Fuck Yes! —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:19, 7 November 2010- For -- The Zombiebaron 04:41, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I've just recently realized, probably the last to do so, that Socky is a sick fuck, rivaling Maniac1075. This is a joyous discovery, and worth a yes vote by itself. Aleister 10:19 7 11
- For. --Chocorb 23:18, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- for --121.214.56.45 23:33, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. nice rant Poiz, look in my info? 17:44, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
- for --124.181.83.75 04:13, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. I don't know why, but that last picture has always really bothered me. The words on the breast aren't related to science or anything in the article, and it just feels strangely obscene to be tacked on like that. I'd probably vote "for" if it were replaced; the obscenity of the article is actually pretty funny, but that picture just bothers me for some reason.
 pillow talk 06:06, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
- The "joke" was basically that she was hiding subliminal messages in her "scientific" publications. If you have a suggestion for a better image to end the article with, I'm all ears. Also, if anyone has a problem with what the image supposedly illustrates, you only need to look at the image's history to see what it really is. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:01, 7 November 2010
- Against. It reminds me of that episode of Family Guy where two Mexicans are pretending to have American style conversation in a cafe. I just didn't enjoy reading it, it feels insincere (though that does not sound quite right) Sycamore (Talk) 21:44, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, no... I mean, it seems really promising at times, but just... no. ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101109 - 02:09 (UTC)
- Against. More crude than funny here for me.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:37, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. In spirit and content this article is also related to Scrub typhus: the geographic distribution of phenotypic and genotypic variants of Orientia tsutsugamushi RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:55, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
- If anyone has the sudden urge to tell me how I could improve this article, by all means, please do so. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:01, 9 November 2010
- Well, other than replacing that last picture, I think it's framed wrong. You've identified the narrator as the same man as the narrator of Scrub typhus, but it's just not quite written in the same universe. In the first article, DJ Kelly obviously doesn't exist - that's the joke. The guy is relying on his pathetic Google skills to misidentify Dr. Darryl Kelly as a young female radio DJ. In this article, not only does DJ Kelly exist, but she's his lover. I... don't really see any way to reconcile the articles with each other, but using the same narrator is just too much of a stretch for me, I think. pillow talk 18:24, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, one option would be that he's hallucinating everything, as I mention here. Also, it would be very helpful if you'd have a suggestion what to replace that particular image with. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:56, 9 November 2010
- Hmm. I'll see if I can drink on it tonight. pillow talk 19:08, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
