Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:Surgical Phone

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

UnBooks:Surgical Phone (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: UnBooks:Surgical Phone	Score: 19 expendable baboons
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
For: 19	Nom + For. Another gem from the site's most sadly underrated writer, Winstanley1. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For--Æ 00:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For--Bassguy 07:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For. Top notch. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Dig A few too many grammars and spellings mistakeses, but I'm not really one to talk on that subject. Great concept, very funny. --THINKER 15:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Absolute For Instant classic. -RAHB 20:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For Bizarre. --THE 21:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For I liked it. – Kip > Talk • Works •• 15:32, Jan. 4, 2008 For -- folksy Ape (burn) (Riot Porn) 20:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC) --L 05:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 03:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:38, Jan. 6, 2008 For   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 6 (15:10) For Cheered me up quite a bit. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 16:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC) 4. Some days I say everything that goes through my inner monologue. The nice men in the white coats don't let me use this computer on those days. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:44, Jan 6 Yum. I might have lost a couple brain cells, though. Or grown a couple. Who knows? --Vana 21:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)  For. This is an example of how to be hilariously bizarre. -- \o/ 02:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)  For. So very strange, so very funny! Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Wow. This is incredibly funny and well written. I went and read some of Winstanley1's other articles after this, and in my opinion they might be the closest thing to professional writing on this site. Maybe I'm late in noticing this. --So So 03:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	Good point Thinker. I've popped through and cleared up quite a few of them now. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC) As have I (and RAHB too, apparently). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Quite perceptive of you (is that the right word? Oh who cares). -RAHB 21:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---