User talk:Boomer/Archive2
Your talkpage's virginity is mine![ソースを編集 ]
Yeah, what that guy above said. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:51, Jan 24
- He always struck me as somewhat of an idiot... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
These are so much sexier[ソースを編集 ]
Nahmean? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
These are more annoying[ソースを編集 ]
For real. --Dexter111344 18:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Sooo...[ソースを編集 ]
You gonna vote? Or what? And might I suggest that MrN deserves it some distance ahead of Finnius, who is a decent sort, but hasn't done a single review since the 7th, while MrN has made many helpful contributions since then.
Er, not that I'd presume to tell you how to vote, Captain, sir. Particularly with your long and illustrious pee history!
Also: it's currently sunny outside my window, but my browser weather add-on clearly tells me it's cloudy. Who should I believe? I'm so confused... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:46, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, because I am Captain Catheter, I was trying to avoid having to vote. The only person I've ever voted for in RotM was OEJ, and that's because he single-handedly kept Pee Review afloat before any of us even joined. I'll look at the reviews today and tomorrow and base my vote on what I see.
- Also, it is clearly cloudy. If there's one thing that Wikipedia's taught me it's that the internet ALWAYS knows more than you do. Similar to how my browser says it's mostly cloudy when in fact it's a beautiful day outside. Well, beautiful by the standards of winter in Colorado. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- There's no surf in Colorado anyway. At least, so Bowling For Soup tell me, and who am I to argue? I've never been there - the closest I got was Nevada, which is, like, just around the corner by US standards, isn't it? It's only a state or two away (there's a song in there somewhere). And it's now bucketing rain and blowing a gale here, which my browser helpfully tells me is "overcast". Ah, the internets, what would I do without them?
- Also, Captain Catheter or not, a 3 way tie feels like a cop-out. Let's have a clear winner. Pure, sweet truth in a sea of contemptible lies! /me chants "Mis - Ter - N! Mis - Ter - N!" Hmm... Not the same with Cajek otherwise occupied, is it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry if I wasn't totally clear. I'm voting, but first I'm going to look at the reviews and base my decision on that. Actually, I better hurry and finish.
- Also, Captain Catheter or not, a 3 way tie feels like a cop-out. Let's have a clear winner. Pure, sweet truth in a sea of contemptible lies! /me chants "Mis - Ter - N! Mis - Ter - N!" Hmm... Not the same with Cajek otherwise occupied, is it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also, Bowling for Soup speaks the truth. There is no surf here, though there was snow yesterday. Currently by browser agrees with the real world in that it's partially cloudy. Also, Nevada may be (relatively) close to Colorado, but we're pretty different. For instance, I doubt that the desert got snow yesterday, or that it's 35 degrees outside. However, I can't be arsed to check my assertions so feel free to make me out to be a blathering idiot. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:45, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
/me bursts through Boomsta's monitor and throttles him.[ソースを編集 ]
YOU! LOOK WHAT YOU HAVE DONE! I OUGHTA THROTTLE YOU!!! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:41, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I would say I'm sorry, but I don't respond well to threats. In fact, I just soiled myself. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, you're supposed to be crying because your monitor's gone as per IRC. But shatting is also a healthy response. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Eh, I was never a big fan of moniters anyway. Now I can go back to my nice, reliable typewriter. Oh, how I missed you Betty... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, you're supposed to be crying because your monitor's gone as per IRC. But shatting is also a healthy response. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Uh, excuse me[ソースを編集 ]
It's me. • <-> Feb 6 (00:17)
- HOLY SHIT IT'S YOU! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. I was right here. All along.
- YOU GOT SOME KIND OF FUCKING PROBLEM DICKHEAD??:?????//?? ANGRY BOOMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 00:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. That was my evil twin, Cekaj. • <-> Feb 6 (00:56)
- Oh. Well, while you're still Cajek/before your twin returns/if your disorder is magically cured/spoon, there's a discussion about something here, and another one about something else here. Feel free to look at them, and maybe tell me what they're about if you have the time. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. That was my evil twin, Cekaj. • <-> Feb 6 (00:56)
Feb 6 (00:32) Do people still care about the pee list I made? That's cool. At least I made an impact! Unlike Boomer, who sucks. Flamewar.
- YOU GOT SOME KIND OF FUCKING PROBLEM DICKHEAD??:?????//?? ANGRY BOOMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 00:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. I was right here. All along.
Loads of thanks[ソースを編集 ]
Though your vote comment was "Eh. For somethingorother", I know in your heart you're just in love with me, so I'll let it slide. You, sir, are quite a helpful user on the site, and I would like to perhaps see you on VFS sometime in the future. It wasn't always like this. I remember, you used to be like most noobs, a noob. But you shaped up, and now I'm saying this to you.
In the meantime, just let my thank-you for your vote should suffice. So, er, yeah.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
TYATU[ソースを編集 ]
Hey, Boomsta, Finnius mentioned that you wanted to work on season 3 of TYATU. Want to work on it? I just finished season 2. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Whoa, I didn't know you had it in you![ソースを編集 ]
Naturally, I'll expect your vote after I fix it up a bit. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:51 Mar 26
- You'll have to tell me when it's on VFH first. Then you'll have to beg me to vote. Then you'll have to shine my shoes. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:29, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- /me appears You reviewed something? I hope you averaged in the miscellaneous column! • <-> Mar 26 (23:31)
- I did as far as you know! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- /me appears You reviewed something? I hope you averaged in the miscellaneous column! • <-> Mar 26 (23:31)
- I just self-nommed it after making a few changes. The begging and shoe shining will have to wait until I'm back in my own state and at my own computer, since the hotel people are kicking me off. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:34 Mar 26
- Fine, but now I expect cookies as well. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah[ソースを編集 ]
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh wows, shows I don't come around here often enough. Congrats! (Is all the cake gone?) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:55, Apr 3
Thanks![ソースを編集 ]
Thanks for the promotion Boomer! So, I suppose I don't need to go to med school anymore. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 03:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose not, though now I'm not ever letting you treat me. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
UnScripts:To'Romisha[ソースを編集 ]
I fixed the two jokes for which you expressed distaste. Is it better or worse? You reckon it's ready for VFH?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, it looks great. Both jokes fit in well the overall feel of the article, and I think it's perfectly ready for VFH. In fact, I really hope it's ready for VFH as it is now on VFH. Yays all around! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm just not comfortable with Boomer doing reviews. It's just not... Well.. I mean... You think you understand something, and that everything makes sense... and... Boomer is doing reviews??? /me shifts awkwardly in my seat.. I'm a little scared to be honest... MrN 22:03, Apr 3
- I'm so used to Boomer not doing anything that the very image of him sitting at his computer and actually deciding to contribute something is impossible to visualize. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:07 Apr 3
- The very image of Boomer is impossible to visualise. His kind cannot be recorded on film, you know. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:09, Apr 3
- Well, sure we could. It would just steal his soul. We just don't, because we don't want it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:11 Apr 3
- And that, my friends, is how to keep the witch doctors away. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, sure we could. It would just steal his soul. We just don't, because we don't want it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:11 Apr 3
- The very image of Boomer is impossible to visualise. His kind cannot be recorded on film, you know. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:09, Apr 3
- I'm so used to Boomer not doing anything that the very image of him sitting at his computer and actually deciding to contribute something is impossible to visualize. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:07 Apr 3
- I'm just not comfortable with Boomer doing reviews. It's just not... Well.. I mean... You think you understand something, and that everything makes sense... and... Boomer is doing reviews??? /me shifts awkwardly in my seat.. I'm a little scared to be honest... MrN 22:03, Apr 3
Re: Forum:Sig[ソースを編集 ]
What the fuck does that mean? --
- Nothing, really. You seem to more about coding than I do anyway. No worries, though! Somebody that can actually help you should pop up in the forums shortly. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandal[ソースを編集 ]
Help me rewrite UnBooks:Hospital before led comes back. Don't tell him we vandalized it. • <Apr 25, 2008 [4:39]>
- Dammit, I left right after I vandalized. I was too late :'(. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Heya Boomer[ソースを編集 ]
Thanks for the welcome! Your ideas intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. --Hyperbole 21:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I hope you can afford it. I'm starting to have to raise prices, with online price-per-letter rates going up and everything. Anyway, does that mean you would like to get adopted, or you just want someone to show you the ropes of the site? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the difference between those two things is, but yeah, I'd definitely like to know how things work around here... as in "Okay, I could make a million edits, but how do I know anyone would ever read them?" and "What do I completely need to stay away from?" Stuff like that. --Hyperbole 22:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if you want to stick around for a while, become a part of our happy little community, and get a few features while you're at it, adoption is the way to go. However, if you'd rather quietly edit on the site and not suddenly burst into the forefront of public attention, I could get you started on some aspects of our site and let you free to do what you will. Like a bird, if you will. Your choice on whichever one you would prefer. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe if you could both get me started on the basics and also explain what adoption is, that would be freaky awesome. Cheers --Hyperbole 22:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Adoption would be a more formal process, where the adopter officially adopts the adoptee (actually nothing more than sticking a template on each person's userpage) and the adopter gets the adoptee really acquainted with the aspects of the site. That would be preferable if you plan to hang stick around for more than a few days and really get used to the site, as adoptions usually last for quite a while. On the other hand, I could just show you some of the site's projects, give you a few minor details about how the site works, and then let you do whatever. The second option would be best if you'd rather just edit freely for a while and then just leave the site quietly after a few days without getting really involved. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Adoption sounds like it involves planning for the future, and I don't do that well. Perhaps, for now, you'd like to give me details and pointers? I would be eternally grateful. --Hyperbole 22:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the best places for you to start would definitely be HTBFANJS and The Beginner's Guide, as they're basically the two most important pages on this site for new users. Read them, know them, and be able to recite them from memory by tomorrow. Remember, this will be worth 60% of your grade. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Adoption sounds like it involves planning for the future, and I don't do that well. Perhaps, for now, you'd like to give me details and pointers? I would be eternally grateful. --Hyperbole 22:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Adoption would be a more formal process, where the adopter officially adopts the adoptee (actually nothing more than sticking a template on each person's userpage) and the adopter gets the adoptee really acquainted with the aspects of the site. That would be preferable if you plan to hang stick around for more than a few days and really get used to the site, as adoptions usually last for quite a while. On the other hand, I could just show you some of the site's projects, give you a few minor details about how the site works, and then let you do whatever. The second option would be best if you'd rather just edit freely for a while and then just leave the site quietly after a few days without getting really involved. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe if you could both get me started on the basics and also explain what adoption is, that would be freaky awesome. Cheers --Hyperbole 22:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if you want to stick around for a while, become a part of our happy little community, and get a few features while you're at it, adoption is the way to go. However, if you'd rather quietly edit on the site and not suddenly burst into the forefront of public attention, I could get you started on some aspects of our site and let you free to do what you will. Like a bird, if you will. Your choice on whichever one you would prefer. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what the difference between those two things is, but yeah, I'd definitely like to know how things work around here... as in "Okay, I could make a million edits, but how do I know anyone would ever read them?" and "What do I completely need to stay away from?" Stuff like that. --Hyperbole 22:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Welcome messages[ソースを編集 ]
There's nothing wrong with removing welcome messages. They're as good as automated and there's no obligation to have one. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:50, 05 May 2008
- Yea, but he wasn't removing his own welcome message. He replaced the one on somebody else's talk page. Isn't that a no-no? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:55, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh right, didn't see that. Maybe it is then. My bad! Hope everything is ok after you were sucked into Starnes' black hole anus. At least that's what we figured happened. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:58, 05 May 2008
- I love Firefox, but having my browser and Chatzilla close themselves periodically makes me seriously consider changing to Opera or Safari. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Boomer should seriously do a freaking review some time. :D • <May 05, 2008 [4:12]>
- -_- Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Boomer should seriously do a freaking review some time. :D • <May 05, 2008 [4:12]>
- I love Firefox, but having my browser and Chatzilla close themselves periodically makes me seriously consider changing to Opera or Safari. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh right, didn't see that. Maybe it is then. My bad! Hope everything is ok after you were sucked into Starnes' black hole anus. At least that's what we figured happened. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:58, 05 May 2008
HALP![ソースを編集 ]
Doctor Miles Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Skullthumper has awarded you a cat brain for being part of the largest HALP! chain on IRC, ever |
– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:31 May 06, 2008
CALM DOWN, SPAZ![ソースを編集 ]
First of all, congratulations on your first review! You should consider joining [[PEE- ...oh shit... uh, nevermind Boomer. • <May 07, 2008 [4:11]>
- FU CAJEK Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
C-C-C-C-C-COMBOOOO BREAKKEEERRRRRR!!![ソースを編集 ]
That is all. Carry on. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 21:14, May 22
JOKE AWARD![ソースを編集 ]
This is for the whole Orian for Attending thing. Although I really don't care at this point, you still have to be reprimanded somehow. And since Boomer-hating has become an international sport, I just had to because I'm losing points for every day I don't insult you. You smell weird. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:45 May 29
Peaceful Award![ソースを編集 ]
And this one is to make it clear that, while I started what turned out to be the drama on the Orian issue, I never intended it to be such. So let's put this behind us, and move on to much more important things, such as having fun and stuff. Now, isn't it time for your monthly review? ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:40, May 30
- Review? Ha! I'll see you in hell! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you OK sir?[ソースを編集 ]
I was just wondering. I thought I would pop in as you don't appear to be yourself. I could not help but notice that you have been reverting vandals using QVFD, ban patrol, voting, and generally being really useful all over the site. Should I call a doctor? Perhaps it's serious sir? Wait! What are you doing! Keep away from pee review! Put down that template! MrN 02:47, Jun 24
- No worries citizen. I may be helping with maintenance on the site, but your Pee Review remains safe. I may do one or two every once in a while, but I'm trying to focus on maintenance and writing right now. Plus, I'm still constantly on IRC, so I haven't changed that much. Maybe once I get more acquainted with the summer I'll start reviewing more as well. :D Ain't it awesome? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, wow, that post was uncharacteristically serious! Maybe there's something odd with me after all, I do feel mildly feverish... What if it's serious? What if I have to go to the hospital?? Who will watch my cats?!? I can't handle this! I gotta get out! Air!! AIR!!!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- I will watch your cats. =3
- We are talking about girls right? MrN 23:33, Jun 25
- ...Perhaps... *shifty eyes*
- I want you to watch my cats. I don't like where MrN is going with this. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
23:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- ...Perhaps... *shifty eyes*
23:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- We are talking about girls right? MrN 23:33, Jun 25
- I will watch your cats. =3
- Oh, wow, that post was uncharacteristically serious! Maybe there's something odd with me after all, I do feel mildly feverish... What if it's serious? What if I have to go to the hospital?? Who will watch my cats?!? I can't handle this! I gotta get out! Air!! AIR!!!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Riddle[ソースを編集 ]
Hey Boomer, noticed your tag. Uh... how do I make it less ugly? • <21:42, 27 Jun 2008>
- By having someone else write it! OOOOHHH!! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Really though, I'm joking. Go ahead and remove the tag. You ugly freak.
- FU BOOMER!!!!! YOU'RE A PENIS!!!! • <21:53, 27 Jun 2008>
- I wuv you too Cajek. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- FU BOOMER!!!!! YOU'RE A PENIS!!!! • <21:53, 27 Jun 2008>
fishy fishy[ソースを編集 ]
I see you wrote me a love note...I honestly haven't been coming around because i figured Pee had enough people doing it now...
- OMG FINNIUS. You could at least stop by once in a while, say hi, make urine- and fish-based puns, you know, like old times? Besides, IRC is getting rather lonely. Some of these new kids aren't too great. We could use another old codger like you to keep us relatively sanes ones company! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Withering Sarcasm[ソースを編集 ]
So yeah, about that thing in the forums the other day - I'm under stress at work and at home, and rapidly losing any sense of perspective I had. So just in case my intended-to-be-cartoonish-and-stoopid response to your comments in that forum about sarcasm and so forth didn't come across right, I thought I'd check: we cool? --UU - natter 08:59, Jul 30
- Considering that the forum in question had for no apparent reason degenerated into a random shit throwing attack on the most selfless, under valued, and under rewarded people on the site I think your comments were more than appropriate UU. Some people were just tossing in the 10 pence without having any idea what they were talking about. Such is the way with the VD. Always will be. If people offer opinions which insult others when they don't understand what's going on, they deserve a bit of sarcasm. No idea why Boomer made a "big deal" out of it. There was some sense in what Lj was talking about, I just think he worded it wrong. Many of the other posters were... Just wrong. When people start suggesting that we "need no guidelines" then they just don't understand the difference between us and ?pedia. MrN 09:10, Jul 30
- Thanks for that MrN - but issues of right and wrong aside, I just wanna make sure I'm cool with the Boomsta at the moment. As you know, I don't like getting on the wrong side of good folk for bad reasons! --UU - natter 09:15, Jul 30
- No, UU, I've hated you ever since you ate my pudding that one time. You bastard.
- In all seriousness, though, that forum's waaaay too hostile. The only reason I posted there in the first place was because I noticed Cajek and MrN getting rather impatient (to put it lightly) with most everybody else, and I didn't want you to end up making any enemies, being the talk page/forum whores that you are. People might also end up associating the hostility with PEEING, which I also wanted to avoid since most of the site still supports us. Still, the comment wasn't so much directed at you, UU, as it was at Cajek and MrN (dirty troublemakers). I meant it when I said that members should post as you did. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for that MrN - but issues of right and wrong aside, I just wanna make sure I'm cool with the Boomsta at the moment. As you know, I don't like getting on the wrong side of good folk for bad reasons! --UU - natter 09:15, Jul 30
Spy's sappin' mah sentry![ソースを編集 ]
Spy's sappin' mah dispenser!
Spy's sappin' mah teleporter!
Spy's sleepin' with mah wife! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 06:11 Oct 18, 2008
Judgery[ソースを編集 ]
Well, the Ball begins this Thursday, and writing will be halted on December 11th. And then the judging begins. I currently have you slated for judging the Aristocrats section of the competition, so here's the notice for that (along with likely another notice the week the judging will begin). Let me know if anything comes up so I can fill the spot. Cheers. -RAHB 08:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
why did u delete my you are dead video[ソースを編集 ]
it was funny 203.212.134.229 03:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Mainly because it replaced a picture that had been in place since the article was featured. You Are Dead was voted the best article of 2007, so I find less change to be best. However, this is a wiki, so if you wish to embed the video again feel free to do so, I just don't think it should replace the picture already there. If you wanted you could create another header for it, but it's up to you. Sorry about the confusion. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 14:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Generic TDB Message[ソースを編集 ]
This is a generic message, being sent out to you, because you are one of the judges that is to judge in this year's Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball judging. The instructions for judging, and the judging results posting, are to be found at this page. Your judging is to take place between the judging days of December 11th and December 21st, and to be posted to the judging page by the end of the judging span. If you are unable to judge the judging, please let me know on my talk page, in which case I will make my judgment of which user is the best prospective judge to judge. Have a good day, and happy judging! -RAHB 01:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
"Going into hibernation mode"[ソースを編集 ]
Do you ever actually come out of that? --UU - natter 15:09, Dec 18
- See, it's because of this kind of negativity that I went into hibernation in the first place. Who needs you! I'm my own man! Merry Christmas! Merry merry merry edits. PEEING 19:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- I need me. Without me, I'd be, er, him? --UU - natter 20:27, Dec 19
- I bet he'd probably be nicer, hypothetically. And cuter. Merry Christmas! Merry merry merry edits. PEEING 00:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
- I need me. Without me, I'd be, er, him? --UU - natter 20:27, Dec 19
Another generic TDB message[ソースを編集 ]
Just one (approximately) day left until the judging deadline, and you are one of three judges to have not yet turned in their final judgeries. This is just a reminder message that the deadline is coming up, and that we'd like to have winners announced and rewarded before the 22nd. The judgery page can be found here, so just go ahead and post up your results when you're finished with them. Cheers and happy judging. -RAHB 23:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy Hanukkah[ソースを編集 ]
if you're not Jewish, party anyway
Happy Hanukkah from Rabbi Techno
NOW START DRINKING
Merry Christmas[ソースを編集 ]
Bonner would like to wish you
a Merry Christgame |
A FESTIVUS FOR THE RESTOFUS![ソースを編集 ]
Happy Festivus, from The Led Balloon and Jerry Stiller. Put up your Festivus Pole, air your grievances, and prepare for the feats of strength, for festivus cannot continue until I am pinned! Oh, and merry Christmas if you're into that sort of thing. | |
It's a Festivus miracle! |
- P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:29, Dec 21
Happy Holidays from all of us at SysRq Waste Disposal and Grinder Co.[ソースを編集 ]
I thank thou...[ソースを編集 ]
... for thy vote for the Aristicats Christmas Time Special. It warms the heart to have been judged the best of an also worthy field. Yours, very fondly, Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Tis' The Season[ソースを編集 ]
Io, Saturnalia!- Eat, drink and treat your masters with disrespect!
Happy Hedonism from the Saturnalicius Princeps
NOW START DRINKING JAGERMEISTER WHILE WEARING UGLY SWEATERS AND SILLY HATS
Here's Your Christmas Tree[ソースを編集 ]
----Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 09:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Fuck this Season[ソースを編集 ]
Merry Christmas and Happy Festivus 2008 from Halsoft
Fuck Christmahaunika! Fuck Festihaunika!
Have a Good Whatever!
Santa is watching you shower, <insert name here>
Retirement Gift[ソースを編集 ]
For incepting PEEING, something that I honestly think has made a difference to this site. Don't be a stranger to the place now, y'hear? --UU - natter 09:58, Jan 7
Question about article[ソースを編集 ]
Hey how's it going. You were the one who tagged the article I created and I totally agree that it needs some fixing up. The problem is, for some reason the tool bar on top of the edit box is gone...(the one with the Bold, Italics, Images, etc). I was wondering if you knew how to restore it, or if it will come back. I find this rather strange. I also am a novice to this site, so maybe you could give me some tips on how to shape certain articles. Thank you. -Just89 02:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry too much about the ICU tag. Your article is already better than most of the stuff this site sees on a daily basis, it's just rather short. I'm not really sure what happened to your tool bar, as it shows up when I edit. If it remains absent for you, you may want to try clearing your cache (ctrl-refresh on most PC browsers, I believe). I'm not really sure what it does, but it seems to help these kinds of things. If nothing else, I already know all of that formatting so you could just ask me if you really need help. As for "article shaping", the general pages that new people are pointed to are HTBFANJS and the Beginner's Guide, though you may find some more helpful inspiration in Uncyclopedia:Best of. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:04, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Aw thanks![ソースを編集 ]
Shucks - thanks for the vote over at UotY, it's really appreciated. I genuinely feel good about finishing runner-up to the machine that is Mordillo. It's also good to see you still about the place and doing stuff, it just wouldn't be the same without you! Thanks again, UU out! --UU - natter 17:43, Feb 1
Okay, how f*cked in the head ARE you?[ソースを編集 ]
Okay, remember I can undo as much edits as I want to. Think about that next time. Oh yeah, and PS, DO NOT EDIT MAH USERPAGE! It's okay to do it to my Usertalk, but not my damn Userpage. Thank you for your pleasant time. SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 02:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have an idea: don't be a dick about it. If you have a serious issue here, take it to a sysop. Or, if you want to take it here, do so in a civilized manner. It's not a huge deal. He was kidding. Get the fuck over it. Oh yeah, and Boomer's been around a lot longer than you, don't try to tell him how a wiki works. Think about that next time. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Did he even edit his user page? Anyway, editing other users user pages is something which we allow if it's done between regular users who know each other. It's a kinda friendship thing. I remember Cajek once compared it to monkeys picking flees out of each others fur. On that note, I edited Cajek's user page today. He knows it's OK, and does not get upset because he knows I do it because I like him. That's why I don't edit SysRq's page. The Bastard. :P MrN 02:58, Feb 12
- Here's the edit in question. Notice the "<3" in the edit summary. Boomer's such a dick. Ban him. Nao. —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Is the <3 supposed to be a dick or is it supposed to show how much of an asshole he is? Just confused. SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 21:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- <3 is a heart. I didn't know it was possible not to know that. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- It can be translated however you want. I personally think it's a spade without that ugly thing growing out of the end. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- From 114 edits SPARTAN-984 has edited the main space um... 5 times? Now, I wonder what he came here to do... MrN 00:02, Feb 13
- Is the <3 supposed to be a dick or is it supposed to show how much of an asshole he is? Just confused. SPARTAN-984|Chat here|What I've Done 21:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Here's the edit in question. Notice the "<3" in the edit summary. Boomer's such a dick. Ban him. Nao. —Sir SysRq (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Did he even edit his user page? Anyway, editing other users user pages is something which we allow if it's done between regular users who know each other. It's a kinda friendship thing. I remember Cajek once compared it to monkeys picking flees out of each others fur. On that note, I edited Cajek's user page today. He knows it's OK, and does not get upset because he knows I do it because I like him. That's why I don't edit SysRq's page. The Bastard. :P MrN 02:58, Feb 12
Thankies[ソースを編集 ]
Going Down? Necropaxx would like to thank you profusely for reading his article and actually liking it enough to vote For. The picture on the right is exactly what you wouldn't see in an elevator. Sorry. :( |
• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:16, Feb 12
Thanks for voting[ソースを編集 ]
And now, a special message from the President *pff...hehe* of the United States
|
A Template of Thanks[ソースを編集 ]
Thank you for supporting my recently featured article
Your support is greatly appreciated.
Guildensternenstein
Thanks anyway![ソースを編集 ]
Neil thanks you for voting! Obviously by Neil I mean 'I' cos you know that people who refer to themselves in the third person like that actually tend to be kinda narcissistic and I'm not - well I mean I wouldn't say I was - so from now on I'll say 'I', I just had to say Neil so you knew that it was me and not somebody else. So I came here to say thanks for advertising my daily torment I hope that now more people will have a greater understanding of why I'm so dysfunctional. Thanks, did I say that? |
For voting for the first time it was nomminated, your support is still apreciated! Also how's retirement working out for you? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 12:53 26 March 2009
IC reminder[ソースを編集 ]
Hi Boomer, just dropping by to let you know that we haven't seen you at IC in a couple weeks. Maybe you've been busy, maybe you've been on a two week bender, but regardless of your excuse, we need you. Imperial Colonization is all about participation, and being a Colonizer requires an active commitment. If you're not up for it, there's nothing wrong with that. Just let us know. But if you do wish to continue calling yourself a Colonizer, get out there on the front lines, maggit! (If you do not participate in this coming week, we will be forced to remove you from the roster.) Cheers! 14:27, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you[ソースを編集 ]
For the review. It was very helpful. Nameable • mumble? 17:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Shit boomer did a review? I thought seeing Hv do one was something special but this is mind bending! :) Orian57 Talk 18:28 2 July 2009
- You better sit down, then, because I did another just this morning. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:29, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- You better sit down, then, because I did another just this morning. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Obama Review[ソースを編集 ]
For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.
Thank you very much for your informative review, it helped me see alot of flaws in the article, I have considered everything you said and made a few changes. I definitely Hyperbole'd it majorly lol...
Thanks again Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 06:15, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Anuther revue[ソースを編集 ]
Ewe deed are revue an me Literal Tinkling arty-cool ewe zed eye nut so god it spilling. Eye putt eat threw are spill cheque end eat calm et god. Eye doughnut no wear ewe gut yore eye-dears a-bit spilling. Ewe mast bee American.
Actually I appreciated your feedback, and I'll have to go over the sentence structure again on this before I put it to sleep. I was honestly expecting to have it torn apart somewhat as it's not a typical Uncyclopedia article. I realised that it was short and image low, but I was trying to keep it as close to the original in appearance/structure as possible. For my first original piece from concept to completion, I'm quite happy with the result.
Nominations for n00b of the month are appreciated. Pup
- You're here? And reviewing? Holy dancing clogs of Kathmandu, I need a lie down! Nice to see you Boomer... --UU - natter 17:00, Jul 4
- "Holy dancing clogs?", "Of Kathmandu?". Sounds a bit camp really. Orian57 Talk 17:03 4 July 2009
- Sounds interesting. Know where I could get a pair? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- "Holy dancing clogs?", "Of Kathmandu?". Sounds a bit camp really. Orian57 Talk 17:03 4 July 2009
Thanks[ソースを編集 ]
CHEERS!
Thanks for voting for this. Cat appreciates it too. Or I think she does, because she's chewing the carpet quite happily.
Hang on a second, that doesn't look like the carpet. No! She wouldn't! Not the cabbages...!!!
Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
=) Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 11:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
UnDead Thankings[ソースを編集 ]
Doug would like to thank you! For Helping him and little Emily get through the inconvenient zombie apocalypse! |
Orian57 Talk 15:02 14 July 2009
IOTL by Thomas Pynchon[ソースを編集 ]
Thanks for the review. I made a minor edit to the end of chapter 2 to make it seem less "soft core" and more "comedy" that I think works. In regards to your other criticisms, most of them have to do with me imitating/parodying the style of the author (who does basically just break off into non-English languages for no adequate reason because he can). In regards to the ending, it's a total reference to the end of Gravity's Rainbow, which ends in a very similar fashion. I revised accordingly, and nominated it for VFH. Thanks again for the review. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm Why?[ソースを編集 ]
Yeah, I see the template but as to why it has been placed I am unsure, I thought I was doing OK with the PEE reviews and I'm doing my best to avoid doing anything wrong. I think that if you disagree with me placing the Leeds article into VFD then you could have simply removed it and said that it shouldn't have been placed there. But that is your prerogative I suppose. Can I just have a quick rundown of why all my contributions are crap in your eyes? Thanks --ChiefjusticeDS 20:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Oh there is a chance I simply misunderstood your intent in which case I blame my upbringing for the above comment --ChiefjusticeDS 20:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Being ambiguous to make life more fun.™ Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup and captain initiative here saw straight through it obviously.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- You should put that acting skill to some use, I was certainly fooled. I bet you could totally make it into the next Broadway run of "Cats". Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I knew my skills were wasted on PEE review, behold the completely incorrect but righteous fury. I may put that into a template in case anybody else wrongs me. I don't think I will be able to reproduce that ever again.... shame I wasted it really. But yeah, sorry and that. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, no problem. It made for an entertaining last few minutes. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I knew my skills were wasted on PEE review, behold the completely incorrect but righteous fury. I may put that into a template in case anybody else wrongs me. I don't think I will be able to reproduce that ever again.... shame I wasted it really. But yeah, sorry and that. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- You should put that acting skill to some use, I was certainly fooled. I bet you could totally make it into the next Broadway run of "Cats". Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 20:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yup and captain initiative here saw straight through it obviously.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks[ソースを編集 ]
Thanks for reviewing 789 News I would expand on the humor, but I feel that it all lies within the concept, and i want to keep it short and sweet and not drag it out too much in any way to make it into a boring mathematical equation joke :P Well I spose the article's time has come and gone and I'm just gonna leave 9 in the Euclid book hehe.
Thanks once again though, much appreciated Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 10:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
But Repitition is funny[ソースを編集 ]
Hi, I'm Orian. Orian57 Talk 18:46 29 July 2009
- But it's so... tactless. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get it. Pup
But Repitition is funny[ソースを編集 ]
Hi, I'm Orian. Orian57 Talk 18:46 29 July 2009
- But it's so... tactless. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I don't get it. Pup
But Repitition is funny[ソースを編集 ]
Hi, I'm Orian. Orian57 Talk 18:46 29 July 2009
- Hi, I'm Boomer. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Now it makes sense. Pup
Hey![ソースを編集 ]
I was cleaning out my watchlist and I stumbled across something. Do you happen to remember this from a few years back? --EMC [TALK] 18:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, wow, I completely forgot about Review Week. I knew I had you to thank for helping establish RotM, but I had forgotten that you and Serq Fet were partially responsible for PEEING as well. Man, those were the good days. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks![ソースを編集 ]
Thank you for supporting my recently featured article
Your support is greatly appreciated.
—Guildensternenstein
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Subtitue Bus Drivers[ソースを編集 ]
Could you please redirect the page to a new one called "Substitute Bus Drivers"? I want it to be redirected because I made a spelling error.76.255.214.133 03:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, no problem. But please, work on making the article more substantial (more paragraphs and fewer lists). The users (and admins) on this site are very much opposed to lists, and as it stands your article is bound to be deleted. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)