(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Commutative algebra: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia Jump to content

Commutative algebra: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: references removed
fixed typo
 
(35 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Branch of algebra that studies commutative rings}}
{{About|a branch of algebra|algebras that are commutative|Commutative algebra (structure)}}
{{More footnotes|date=June 2019}}
{{More footnotes|date=June 2019}}
{{Ring theory sidebar}}
{{about|the branch of algebra that studies commutative rings|algebras that are commutative|Commutative algebra (structure)}}


[[File:Emmy noether postcard 1915.jpg|thumb|A 1915 postcard from one of the pioneers of commutative algebra, [[Emmy Noether]], to E. Fischer, discussing her work in commutative algebra.]]
[[File:Emmy noether postcard 1915.jpg|thumb|A 1915 postcard from one of the pioneers of commutative algebra, [[Emmy Noether]], to E. Fischer, discussing her work in commutative algebra.]]


'''Commutative algebra''' is the branch of [[algebra]] that studies [[commutative ring]]s, their [[ideal (ring theory)|ideals]], and [[module (mathematics)|modules]] over such rings. Both [[algebraic geometry]] and [[algebraic number theory]] build on commutative algebra. Prominent examples of commutative rings include [[polynomial ring]]s; rings of [[algebraic integer]]s, including the ordinary [[integer]]s <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>; and [[p-adic number|''p''-adic integer]]s.<ref>Atiyah and Macdonald, 1969, Chapter 1</ref>
'''Commutative algebra''', first known as [[ideal theory]], is the branch of [[algebra]] that studies [[commutative ring]]s, their [[ideal (ring theory)|ideals]], and [[module (mathematics)|modules]] over such rings. Both [[algebraic geometry]] and [[algebraic number theory]] build on commutative algebra. Prominent examples of commutative rings include [[polynomial ring]]s; rings of [[algebraic integer]]s, including the ordinary [[integer]]s <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>; and [[p-adic number|''p''-adic integer]]s.<ref>Atiyah and Macdonald, 1969, Chapter 1</ref>


Commutative algebra is the main technical tool in the local study of [[scheme (mathematics)|schemes]].
Commutative algebra is the main technical tool of [[algebraic geometry]], and many results and concepts of commutative algebra are strongly related with geometrical concepts.


The study of rings that are not necessarily commutative is known as [[noncommutative algebra]]; it includes [[ring theory]], [[representation theory]], and the theory of [[Banach algebra]]s.
The study of rings that are not necessarily commutative is known as [[noncommutative algebra]]; it includes [[ring theory]], [[representation theory]], and the theory of [[Banach algebra]]s.
Line 13: Line 15:
Commutative algebra is essentially the study of the rings occurring in [[algebraic number theory]] and [[algebraic geometry]].
Commutative algebra is essentially the study of the rings occurring in [[algebraic number theory]] and [[algebraic geometry]].


In algebraic number theory, the rings of [[algebraic integer]]s are [[Dedekind ring]]s, which constitute therefore an important class of commutative rings. Considerations related to [[modular arithmetic]] have led to the notion of a [[valuation ring]]. The restriction of [[algebraic field extension]]s to subrings has led to the notions of [[integral extension]]s and [[integrally closed domain]]s as well as the notion of [[Ramification (mathematics)|ramification]] of an extension of valuation rings.
Several concepts of commutative algebras have been developed in relation with algebraic number theory, such as [[Dedekind ring]]s (the main class of commutative rings occurring in algebraic number theory), [[integral extension]]s, and [[valuation ring]]s.


[[Polynomial ring]]s in several indeterminates over a [[field (mathematics)|field]] are examples of commutative rings. Since algebraic geometry is fundamentally the study of the common [[zero of a function|zeros]] of these rings, many results and concepts of algebraic geometry have counterparts in commutative algebra, and their names recall often their geometric origin; for example "[[Krull dimension]]", "[[localization of a ring]]", "[[local ring]]", "[[regular ring]]".
The notion of [[localization of a ring]] (in particular the localization with respect to a [[prime ideal]], the localization consisting in inverting a single element and the [[total quotient ring]]) is one of the main differences between commutative algebra and the theory of non-commutative rings. It leads to an important class of commutative rings, the [[local ring]]s that have only one [[maximal ideal]]. The set of the prime ideals of a commutative ring is naturally equipped with a [[topological space|topology]], the [[Zariski topology]]. All these notions are widely used in algebraic geometry and are the basic technical tools for the definition of [[scheme theory]], a generalization of algebraic geometry introduced by [[Grothendieck]].


An [[affine algebraic variety]] corresponds to a [[prime ideal]] in a polynomial ring, and the points of such an affine variety correspond to the [[maximal ideal]]s that contain this prime ideal. The [[Zariski topology]], originally defined on an algebraic variety, has been extended to the sets of the prime ideals of any commutative ring; for this topology, the [[closed set]]s are the sets of prime ideals that contain a given ideal.
Many other notions of commutative algebra are counterparts of geometrical notions occurring in algebraic geometry. This is the case of [[Krull dimension]], [[primary decomposition]], [[regular ring]]s, [[Cohen–Macaulay ring]]s, [[Gorenstein ring]]s and many other notions.

The [[spectrum of a ring]] is a [[ringed space]] formed by the prime ideals equipped with the Zariski topology, and the localizations of the ring at the [[open set]]s of a [[basis (topology)|basis]] of this topology. This is the starting point of [[scheme theory]], a generalization of algebraic geometry introduced by [[Grothendieck]], which is strongly based on commutative algebra, and has induced, in turns, many developments of commutative algebra.


== History ==
== History ==
Line 30: Line 34:
===Noetherian rings===
===Noetherian rings===
{{Main|Noetherian ring}}
{{Main|Noetherian ring}}
In [[mathematics]], more specifically in the area of [[Abstract algebra|modern algebra]] known as [[Ring (mathematics)|ring theory]], a '''Noetherian ring''', named after [[Emmy Noether]], is a ring in which every non-empty set of [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]]s has a maximal element. Equivalently, a ring is Noetherian if it satisfies the [[ascending chain condition]] on ideals; that is, given any chain:
A '''Noetherian ring''', named after [[Emmy Noether]], is a ring in which every [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] is [[finitely generated ideal|finitely generated]]; that is, all elements of any ideal can be written as a [[linear combination]]s of a finite set of elements, with coefficients in the ring.


Many commonly considered commutative rings are Noetherian, in particular, every [[field (mathematics)|field]], the ring of the [[integer]], and every [[polynomial ring]] in one or several indeterminates over them. The fact that polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian is called [[Hilbert's basis theorem]].
:<math>I_1\subseteq\cdots I_{k-1}\subseteq I_{k}\subseteq I_{k+1}\subseteq\cdots</math>


Moreover, many ring constructions preserve the Noetherian property. In particular, if a commutative ring {{math|R}} is Noetherian, the same is true for every polynomial ring over it, and for every [[quotient ring]], [[localization (commutative algebra)|localization]], or [[completion of a ring|completion]] of the ring.
there exists an ''n'' such that:


The importance of the Noetherian property lies in its ubiquity and also in the fact that many important theorems of commutative algebra require that the involved rings are Noetherian, This is the case, in particular of [[Lasker–Noether theorem]], the [[Krull intersection theorem]], and [[Nakayama's lemma]].
:<math>I_{n}=I_{n+1}=\cdots</math>


For a commutative ring to be Noetherian it suffices that every prime ideal of the ring is finitely generated. (The result is due to [[I. S. Cohen]].)
Furthermore, if a ring is Noetherian, then it satisfies the [[descending chain condition]] on [[prime ideal]]s, which implies that every Noetherian [[local ring]] has a finite [[Krull dimension]].

The notion of a Noetherian ring is of fundamental importance in both commutative and noncommutative ring theory, due to the role it plays in simplifying the ideal structure of a ring. For instance, the ring of [[integer]]s and the [[polynomial ring]] over a [[Field (mathematics)|field]] are both Noetherian rings, and consequently, such theorems as the [[Lasker–Noether theorem]], the [[Krull intersection theorem]], and the [[Hilbert's basis theorem]] hold for them. Furthermore, if a ring is Noetherian, then it satisfies the [[descending chain condition]] on ''[[prime ideal]]s''. This property suggests a deep theory of dimension for Noetherian rings beginning with the notion of the [[Krull dimension]].

===Hilbert's basis theorem===
{{Main|Hilbert's basis theorem}}
<blockquote>'''Theorem.''' If ''R'' is a left (resp. right) [[Noetherian ring]], then the [[polynomial ring]] ''R''[''X''] is also a left (resp. right) Noetherian ring.</blockquote>

Hilbert's basis theorem has some immediate corollaries:

#By induction we see that <math>R[X_0,\dotsc,X_{n-1}]</math> will also be Noetherian.
#Since any [[affine variety]] over <math>R^n</math> (i.e. a locus-set of a collection of polynomials) may be written as the locus of an ideal <math>\mathfrak a\subset R[X_0, \dotsc, X_{n-1}]</math> and further as the locus of its generators, it follows that every affine variety is the locus of finitely many polynomials — i.e. the intersection of finitely many [[hypersurface]]s.
#If <math>A</math> is a finitely-generated <math>R</math>-algebra, then we know that <math>A \simeq R[X_0, \dotsc, X_{n-1}] / \mathfrak a</math>, where <math>\mathfrak a</math> is an ideal. The basis theorem implies that <math>\mathfrak a</math> must be finitely generated, say <math>\mathfrak a = (p_0,\dotsc, p_{N-1})</math>, i.e. <math>A</math> is [[Glossary_of_ring_theory#Finitely_presented_algebra|finitely presented]].


===Primary decomposition===
===Primary decomposition===
Line 58: Line 50:
The ''[[Lasker–Noether theorem]]'', given here, may be seen as a certain generalization of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic:
The ''[[Lasker–Noether theorem]]'', given here, may be seen as a certain generalization of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic:


{{math theorem|name=Lasker-Noether Theorem
<blockquote>'''Lasker-Noether Theorem.''' Let ''R'' be a commutative Noetherian ring and let ''I'' be an ideal of ''R''. Then ''I'' may be written as the intersection of finitely many primary ideals with distinct [[Radical of an ideal|radicals]]; that is:
|math_statement=Let ''R'' be a commutative Noetherian ring and let ''I'' be an ideal of ''R''. Then ''I'' may be written as the intersection of finitely many primary ideals with distinct [[Radical of an ideal|radicals]]; that is:


: <math>I=\bigcap_{i=1}^t Q_i</math>
: <math>I=\bigcap_{i=1}^t Q_i</math>
Line 66: Line 59:
: <math>I=\bigcap_{i=1}^k P_i</math>
: <math>I=\bigcap_{i=1}^k P_i</math>


is decomposition of ''I'' with Rad(''P<sub>i</sub>'') ≠ Rad(''P<sub>j</sub>'') for ''i'' ≠ ''j'', and both decompositions of ''I'' are ''irredundant'' (meaning that no proper subset of either {''Q''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''Q<sub>t</sub>''} or {''P''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''P<sub>k</sub>''} yields an intersection equal to ''I''), ''t'' = ''k'' and (after possibly renumbering the ''Q<sub>i</sub>'') Rad(''Q<sub>i</sub>'') = Rad(''P<sub>i</sub>'') for all ''i''.</blockquote>
is decomposition of ''I'' with Rad(''P<sub>i</sub>'') ≠ Rad(''P<sub>j</sub>'') for ''i'' ≠ ''j'', and both decompositions of ''I'' are ''irredundant'' (meaning that no proper subset of either {''Q''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''Q<sub>t</sub>''} or {''P''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''P<sub>k</sub>''} yields an intersection equal to ''I''), ''t'' = ''k'' and (after possibly renumbering the ''Q<sub>i</sub>'') Rad(''Q<sub>i</sub>'') = Rad(''P<sub>i</sub>'') for all ''i''.}}


For any primary decomposition of ''I'', the set of all radicals, that is, the set {Rad(''Q''<sub>1</sub>), ..., Rad(''Q<sub>t</sub>'')} remains the same by the Lasker–Noether theorem. In fact, it turns out that (for a Noetherian ring) the set is precisely the [[associated prime|assassinator]] of the module ''R''/''I''; that is, the set of all [[annihilator (ring theory)|annihilators]] of ''R''/''I'' (viewed as a module over ''R'') that are prime.
For any primary decomposition of ''I'', the set of all radicals, that is, the set {Rad(''Q''<sub>1</sub>), ..., Rad(''Q<sub>t</sub>'')} remains the same by the Lasker–Noether theorem. In fact, it turns out that (for a Noetherian ring) the set is precisely the [[associated prime|assassinator]] of the module ''R''/''I''; that is, the set of all [[annihilator (ring theory)|annihilators]] of ''R''/''I'' (viewed as a module over ''R'') that are prime.


===Localization===
===Localization===
{{main|Localization (algebra)}}
{{Main|Localization (algebra)}}


The [[localization (algebra)|localization]] is a formal way to introduce the "denominators" to a given ring or a module. That is, it introduces a new ring/module out of an existing one so that it consists of [[algebraic fraction|fractions]]
The [[localization (algebra)|localization]] is a formal way to introduce the "denominators" to a given ring or a module. That is, it introduces a new ring/module out of an existing one so that it consists of [[algebraic fraction|fractions]]
Line 78: Line 71:


===Completion===
===Completion===
{{main|Completion (ring theory)}}
{{Main|Completion (ring theory)}}
A [[completion (ring theory)|completion]] is any of several related [[functor]]s on [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]s and [[module (mathematics)|modules]] that result in complete [[topological ring]]s and modules. Completion is similar to [[localization of a ring|localization]], and together they are among the most basic tools in analysing [[commutative ring]]s. Complete commutative rings have simpler structure than the general ones and [[Hensel's lemma]] applies to them.
A [[completion (ring theory)|completion]] is any of several related [[functor]]s on [[ring (mathematics)|ring]]s and [[module (mathematics)|modules]] that result in complete [[topological ring]]s and modules. Completion is similar to [[localization of a ring|localization]], and together they are among the most basic tools in analysing [[commutative ring]]s. Complete commutative rings have simpler structure than the general ones and [[Hensel's lemma]] applies to them.


===Zariski topology on prime ideals===
===Zariski topology on prime ideals===
{{main|Zariski topology}}
{{Main|Zariski topology}}
The [[Zariski topology]] defines a [[topological space|topology]] on the [[spectrum of a ring]] (the set of prime ideals).<ref>{{cite book
The [[Zariski topology]] defines a [[topological space|topology]] on the [[spectrum of a ring]] (the set of prime ideals).<ref>{{cite book
| last1 = Dummit
| last1 = Dummit
Line 89: Line 82:
| first2 = R.
| first2 = R.
| title = Abstract Algebra
| title = Abstract Algebra
| url = https://archive.org/details/abstractalgebra00dumm_304
| url-access = limited
| publisher = Wiley
| publisher = Wiley
| pages = [https://archive.org/details/abstractalgebra00dumm_304/page/n84 71]–72
| pages = 71–72
| year = 2004
| year = 2004
| edition = 3
| edition = 3
Line 98: Line 93:
:<math>V(I) = \{P \in \operatorname{Spec}\,(A) \mid I \subseteq P\}</math>
:<math>V(I) = \{P \in \operatorname{Spec}\,(A) \mid I \subseteq P\}</math>


where ''A'' is a fixed commutative ring and ''I'' is an ideal. This is defined in analogy with the classical Zariski topology, where closed sets in affine space are those defined by polynomial equations . To see the connection with the classical picture, note that for any set ''S'' of polynomials (over an algebraically closed field), it follows from [[Hilbert's Nullstellensatz]] that the points of ''V''(''S'') (in the old sense) are exactly the tuples (''a<sub>1</sub>'', ..., ''a<sub>n</sub>'') such that (''x<sub>1</sub>'' - ''a<sub>1</sub>'', ..., ''x<sub>n</sub>'' - ''a<sub>n</sub>'') contains ''S''; moreover, these are maximal ideals and by the "weak" Nullstellensatz, an ideal of any affine coordinate ring is maximal if and only if it is of this form. Thus, ''V''(''S'') is "the same as" the maximal ideals containing ''S''. Grothendieck's innovation in defining Spec was to replace maximal ideals with all prime ideals; in this formulation it is natural to simply generalize this observation to the definition of a closed set in the spectrum of a ring.
where ''A'' is a fixed commutative ring and ''I'' is an ideal. This is defined in analogy with the classical Zariski topology, where closed sets in affine space are those defined by polynomial equations . To see the connection with the classical picture, note that for any set ''S'' of polynomials (over an algebraically closed field), it follows from [[Hilbert's Nullstellensatz]] that the points of ''V''(''S'') (in the old sense) are exactly the tuples (''a<sub>1</sub>'', ..., ''a<sub>n</sub>'') such that the ideal (''x<sub>1</sub>'' - ''a<sub>1</sub>'', ..., ''x<sub>n</sub>'' - ''a<sub>n</sub>'') contains ''S''; moreover, these are maximal ideals and by the "weak" Nullstellensatz, an ideal of any affine coordinate ring is maximal if and only if it is of this form. Thus, ''V''(''S'') is "the same as" the maximal ideals containing ''S''. Grothendieck's innovation in defining Spec was to replace maximal ideals with all prime ideals; in this formulation it is natural to simply generalize this observation to the definition of a closed set in the spectrum of a ring.

==Examples==

The fundamental example in commutative algebra is the ring of integers <math>\mathbb{Z}</math>. The existence of primes and
the unique factorization theorem laid the foundations for concepts such as [[Noetherian ring]]s and the [[primary decomposition]].

Other important examples are:
*[[Polynomial ring]]s <math>R[x_1,...,x_n]</math>
*The [[p-adic integer]]s
*Rings of [[algebraic integer]]s.


==Connections with algebraic geometry==
==Connections with algebraic geometry==
Commutative algebra (in the form of [[polynomial ring]]s and their quotients, used in the definition of [[algebraic varieties]]) has always been a part of [[algebraic geometry]]. However, in the late 1950s, algebraic varieties were subsumed into [[Alexander Grothendieck]]'s concept of a [[scheme (mathematics)|scheme]]. Their local objects are affine schemes or prime spectra, which are locally ringed spaces, which form a category that is antiequivalent (dual) to the category of commutative unital rings, extending the [[duality (category theory)|duality]] between the category of affine algebraic varieties over a field ''k'', and the category of finitely generated reduced ''k''-algebras. The gluing is along the Zariski topology; one can glue within the category of locally ringed spaces, but also, using the Yoneda embedding, within the more abstract category of presheaves of sets over the category of affine schemes. The Zariski topology in the set-theoretic sense is then replaced by a Zariski topology in the sense of [[Grothendieck topology]]. Grothendieck introduced Grothendieck topologies having in mind more exotic but geometrically finer and more sensitive examples than the crude Zariski topology, namely the [[étale topology]], and the two flat Grothendieck topologies: fppf and fpqc. Nowadays some other examples have become prominent, including the [[Nisnevich topology]]. Sheaves can be furthermore generalized to stacks in the sense of Grothendieck, usually with some additional representability conditions, leading to Artin stacks and, even finer, [[Deligne-Mumford stack]]s, both often called algebraic stacks.
Commutative algebra (in the form of [[polynomial ring]]s and their quotients, used in the definition of [[algebraic varieties]]) has always been a part of [[algebraic geometry]]. However, in the late 1950s, algebraic varieties were subsumed into [[Alexander Grothendieck]]'s concept of a [[scheme (mathematics)|scheme]]. Their local objects are affine schemes or prime spectra, which are locally ringed spaces, which form a category that is antiequivalent (dual) to the category of commutative unital rings, extending the [[duality (category theory)|duality]] between the category of affine algebraic varieties over a field ''k'', and the category of finitely generated reduced ''k''-algebras. The gluing is along the Zariski topology; one can glue within the category of locally ringed spaces, but also, using the Yoneda embedding, within the more abstract category of presheaves of sets over the category of affine schemes. The Zariski topology in the set-theoretic sense is then replaced by a Zariski topology in the sense of [[Grothendieck topology]]. Grothendieck introduced Grothendieck topologies having in mind more exotic but geometrically finer and more sensitive examples than the crude Zariski topology, namely the [[étale topology]], and the two flat Grothendieck topologies: fppf and fpqc. Nowadays some other examples have become prominent, including the [[Nisnevich topology]]. Sheaves can be furthermore generalized to stacks in the sense of Grothendieck, usually with some additional representability conditions, leading to Artin stacks and, even finer, [[Deligne–Mumford stack]]s, both often called algebraic stacks.


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 120: Line 105:
* [[Gröbner basis]]
* [[Gröbner basis]]
* [[Homological algebra]]
* [[Homological algebra]]

== Notes ==
{{Reflist}}


== References ==
== References ==
*{{cite book |first1=Michael |last1=Atiyah |author1-link=Michael Atiyah |first2=Ian G. |last2=Macdonald |author2-link=Ian G. Macdonald |title=Introduction to Commutative Algebra |title-link=Introduction to Commutative Algebra |publisher=CRC Press |date=2018 |isbn=978-0-429-96218-9 |orig-year=1969 }}
{{reflist}}
*{{cite book |author-link=Nicolas Bourbaki |first=Nicolas |last=Bourbaki |chapter=Chapters 1–7 |title=Commutative algebra |publisher=Springer |series=Elements of Mathematics |date=1998 |isbn=3-540-64239-0 |orig-year=1989 }}
* [[Michael Atiyah]] & [[Ian G. Macdonald]], ''[[Introduction to Commutative Algebra]]'', Massachusetts : Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1969.
*{{cite book |author-link=Nicolas Bourbaki |first=Nicolas |last=Bourbaki |chapter=Chapitres 8 et 9 |title=Algèbre commutative |publisher=Springer |series=Éléments de mathématique |date=2006 |isbn=978-3-540-33942-7 |orig-year=1983 }}
* [[Nicolas Bourbaki|Bourbaki, Nicolas]], ''Commutative algebra. Chapters 1--7''. Translated from the French. Reprint of the 1989 English translation. Elements of Mathematics (Berlin). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. xxiv+625 pp. {{ISBN|3-540-64239-0}}
*{{cite book | author=Eisenbud, David |author-link=David Eisenbud| title=Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry | location=New York | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]] | volume=150 | year=1995 | mr=1322960 | isbn=0-387-94268-8 | no-pp=true | page=xvi+785}}
* [[Nicolas Bourbaki|Bourbaki, Nicolas]], ''Éléments de mathématique. Algèbre commutative. Chapitres 8 et 9''. (Elements of mathematics. Commutative algebra. Chapters 8 and 9) Reprint of the 1983 original. Springer, Berlin, 2006. ii+200 pp. {{ISBN|978-3-540-33942-7}}
*{{cite book |first=Rémi |last=Goblot |title=Algèbre commutative, cours et exercices corrigés |publisher=Dunod |date=2001 |isbn=2-10-005779-0 |edition=2e }}
*{{cite book | author=Eisenbud, David |authorlink=David Eisenbud| title=Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry | location=New York | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | series=[[Graduate Texts in Mathematics]] | volume=150 | year=1995 | mr=1322960 | isbn=0-387-94268-8 | nopp=true | page=xvi+785}}{{cite journal|author=Green, Mark|title=Review: ''Commutative algebra with a view toward algebraic geometry'', by David Eisenbud|journal=Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)|year=1996|volume=33|issue=3|pages=367–370|url=http://www.ams.org/journals/bull/1996-33-03/S0273-0979-96-00662-3/S0273-0979-96-00662-3.pdf|doi=10.1090/s0273-0979-96-00662-3}}
*{{cite book |first=Ernst |last=Kunz |title=Introduction to Commutative algebra and algebraic geometry |publisher=Birkhauser |date=1985 |isbn=0-8176-3065-1 }}
* Rémi Goblot, "Algèbre commutative, cours et exercices corrigés", 2e édition, Dunod 2001, {{ISBN|2-10-005779-0}}
*{{cite book |first=Hideyuki |last=Matsumura |title=Commutative algebra |publisher=Benjamin/Cummings |edition=2nd |series=Mathematics Lecture Note Series |volume=56 |date=1980 |isbn=0-8053-7026-9 }}
* Ernst Kunz, "Introduction to Commutative algebra and algebraic geometry", Birkhauser 1985, {{ISBN|0-8176-3065-1}}
*{{cite book |first=Hideyuki |last=Matsumura |title=Commutative Ring Theory |edition=2nd |publisher=Cambridge University Press |series=Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics |date=1989 |isbn=0-521-36764-6 }}
* Matsumura, Hideyuki, ''Commutative algebra''. Second edition. Mathematics Lecture Note Series, 56. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Mass., 1980. xv+313 pp. {{ISBN|0-8053-7026-9}}
*{{cite book |author1-link=Masayoshi Nagata |first=Masayoshi |last=Nagata |title=Local rings |publisher=Interscience |series=Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics |volume=13 |date=1975 |isbn=978-0-88275-228-0 |orig-year=1962 |url=http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1137934.html |oclc=1137934}}
* Matsumura, Hideyuki, ''Commutative Ring Theory''. Second edition. Translated from the Japanese. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1989. {{ISBN|0-521-36764-6}}
*{{cite book |first=Miles |last=Reid |title=Undergraduate Commutative Algebra |publisher=Cambridge University Press |series=London Mathematical Society Student Texts |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-521-45889-4 |url={{GBurl|mUL1us0mRrAC|p=10}}}}
* [[Masayoshi Nagata|Nagata, Masayoshi]], ''Local rings''. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 13. Interscience Publishers a division of John Wiley and Sons, New York-London 1962 xiii+234 pp.
*{{cite book |author1-link=Jean-Pierre Serre |first=Jean-Pierre |last=Serre |title=Local algebra |translator-first=CheeWhye |translator-last=Chin |publisher=Springer |series=Springer Monographs in Mathematics |date=2000 |isbn=3-540-66641-9 }}
* Miles Reid, ''[[Undergraduate Commutative Algebra]] (London Mathematical Society Student Texts)'', Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1996.
*{{cite book |first=R.Y. |last=Sharp |title=Steps in commutative algebra |edition=2nd |publisher=Cambridge University Press |series=London Mathematical Society Student Texts |volume=51 |date=2000 |isbn=0-521-64623-5 |pages=2000 }}
* [[Jean-Pierre Serre]], ''Local algebra''. Translated from the French by CheeWhye Chin and revised by the author. (Original title: ''Algèbre locale, multiplicités'') Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000. xiv+128 pp. {{ISBN|3-540-66641-9}}
*{{cite book |author1-link=Oscar Zariski |last1=Zariski |first1=Oscar |author2-link=Pierre Samuel |last2=Samuel |first2=Pierre |title=Commutative algebra |publisher=Springer |series=Graduate Texts in Mathematics |volume=28 |date=1975 |isbn=978-0-387-90171-8 |pages= |url=https://link.springer.com/book/9780387901718}} {{cite book |title=Vol II |date=1975 |isbn=978-0-387-90089-6 |volume=29 |url=https://link.springer.com/book/9780387900896}}
* Sharp, R. Y., ''Steps in commutative algebra''. Second edition. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 51. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. xii+355 pp. {{ISBN|0-521-64623-5}}

* [[Oscar Zariski|Zariski, Oscar]]; [[Pierre Samuel|Samuel, Pierre]], ''Commutative algebra''. Vol. 1, 2. With the cooperation of I. S. Cohen. Corrected reprinting of the 1958, 1960 edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, No. 28, 29. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg-Berlin, 1975.
{{Areas of mathematics}}
* {{Citation | last1=Zeidler | first1=A. Bernhard | title=Abstract Algebra | origyear=2019 | url=https://my.cloudme.com/v1/ws2/:zeidlerweb/:Mathematics/algebra.pdf | publisher=Web-Book published under Open Public License, 646 pages, Work in Progess.}}
{{Authority control}}


[[Category:Commutative algebra| ]]
[[Category:Commutative algebra| ]]

Latest revision as of 15:41, 6 May 2024

A 1915 postcard from one of the pioneers of commutative algebra, Emmy Noether, to E. Fischer, discussing her work in commutative algebra.

Commutative algebra, first known as ideal theory, is the branch of algebra that studies commutative rings, their ideals, and modules over such rings. Both algebraic geometry and algebraic number theory build on commutative algebra. Prominent examples of commutative rings include polynomial rings; rings of algebraic integers, including the ordinary integers ; and p-adic integers.[1]

Commutative algebra is the main technical tool of algebraic geometry, and many results and concepts of commutative algebra are strongly related with geometrical concepts.

The study of rings that are not necessarily commutative is known as noncommutative algebra; it includes ring theory, representation theory, and the theory of Banach algebras.

Overview[edit]

Commutative algebra is essentially the study of the rings occurring in algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry.

Several concepts of commutative algebras have been developed in relation with algebraic number theory, such as Dedekind rings (the main class of commutative rings occurring in algebraic number theory), integral extensions, and valuation rings.

Polynomial rings in several indeterminates over a field are examples of commutative rings. Since algebraic geometry is fundamentally the study of the common zeros of these rings, many results and concepts of algebraic geometry have counterparts in commutative algebra, and their names recall often their geometric origin; for example "Krull dimension", "localization of a ring", "local ring", "regular ring".

An affine algebraic variety corresponds to a prime ideal in a polynomial ring, and the points of such an affine variety correspond to the maximal ideals that contain this prime ideal. The Zariski topology, originally defined on an algebraic variety, has been extended to the sets of the prime ideals of any commutative ring; for this topology, the closed sets are the sets of prime ideals that contain a given ideal.

The spectrum of a ring is a ringed space formed by the prime ideals equipped with the Zariski topology, and the localizations of the ring at the open sets of a basis of this topology. This is the starting point of scheme theory, a generalization of algebraic geometry introduced by Grothendieck, which is strongly based on commutative algebra, and has induced, in turns, many developments of commutative algebra.

History[edit]

The subject, first known as ideal theory, began with Richard Dedekind's work on ideals, itself based on the earlier work of Ernst Kummer and Leopold Kronecker. Later, David Hilbert introduced the term ring to generalize the earlier term number ring. Hilbert introduced a more abstract approach to replace the more concrete and computationally oriented methods grounded in such things as complex analysis and classical invariant theory. In turn, Hilbert strongly influenced Emmy Noether, who recast many earlier results in terms of an ascending chain condition, now known as the Noetherian condition. Another important milestone was the work of Hilbert's student Emanuel Lasker, who introduced primary ideals and proved the first version of the Lasker–Noether theorem.

The main figure responsible for the birth of commutative algebra as a mature subject was Wolfgang Krull, who introduced the fundamental notions of localization and completion of a ring, as well as that of regular local rings. He established the concept of the Krull dimension of a ring, first for Noetherian rings before moving on to expand his theory to cover general valuation rings and Krull rings. To this day, Krull's principal ideal theorem is widely considered the single most important foundational theorem in commutative algebra. These results paved the way for the introduction of commutative algebra into algebraic geometry, an idea which would revolutionize the latter subject.

Much of the modern development of commutative algebra emphasizes modules. Both ideals of a ring R and R-algebras are special cases of R-modules, so module theory encompasses both ideal theory and the theory of ring extensions. Though it was already incipient in Kronecker's work, the modern approach to commutative algebra using module theory is usually credited to Krull and Noether.

Main tools and results[edit]

Noetherian rings[edit]

A Noetherian ring, named after Emmy Noether, is a ring in which every ideal is finitely generated; that is, all elements of any ideal can be written as a linear combinations of a finite set of elements, with coefficients in the ring.

Many commonly considered commutative rings are Noetherian, in particular, every field, the ring of the integer, and every polynomial ring in one or several indeterminates over them. The fact that polynomial rings over a field are Noetherian is called Hilbert's basis theorem.

Moreover, many ring constructions preserve the Noetherian property. In particular, if a commutative ring R is Noetherian, the same is true for every polynomial ring over it, and for every quotient ring, localization, or completion of the ring.

The importance of the Noetherian property lies in its ubiquity and also in the fact that many important theorems of commutative algebra require that the involved rings are Noetherian, This is the case, in particular of Lasker–Noether theorem, the Krull intersection theorem, and Nakayama's lemma.

Furthermore, if a ring is Noetherian, then it satisfies the descending chain condition on prime ideals, which implies that every Noetherian local ring has a finite Krull dimension.

Primary decomposition[edit]

An ideal Q of a ring is said to be primary if Q is proper and whenever xyQ, either xQ or ynQ for some positive integer n. In Z, the primary ideals are precisely the ideals of the form (pe) where p is prime and e is a positive integer. Thus, a primary decomposition of (n) corresponds to representing (n) as the intersection of finitely many primary ideals.

The Lasker–Noether theorem, given here, may be seen as a certain generalization of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic:

Lasker-Noether Theorem — Let R be a commutative Noetherian ring and let I be an ideal of R. Then I may be written as the intersection of finitely many primary ideals with distinct radicals; that is:

with Qi primary for all i and Rad(Qi) ≠ Rad(Qj) for ij. Furthermore, if:

is decomposition of I with Rad(Pi) ≠ Rad(Pj) for ij, and both decompositions of I are irredundant (meaning that no proper subset of either {Q1, ..., Qt} or {P1, ..., Pk} yields an intersection equal to I), t = k and (after possibly renumbering the Qi) Rad(Qi) = Rad(Pi) for all i.

For any primary decomposition of I, the set of all radicals, that is, the set {Rad(Q1), ..., Rad(Qt)} remains the same by the Lasker–Noether theorem. In fact, it turns out that (for a Noetherian ring) the set is precisely the assassinator of the module R/I; that is, the set of all annihilators of R/I (viewed as a module over R) that are prime.

Localization[edit]

The localization is a formal way to introduce the "denominators" to a given ring or a module. That is, it introduces a new ring/module out of an existing one so that it consists of fractions

.

where the denominators s range in a given subset S of R. The archetypal example is the construction of the ring Q of rational numbers from the ring Z of integers.

Completion[edit]

A completion is any of several related functors on rings and modules that result in complete topological rings and modules. Completion is similar to localization, and together they are among the most basic tools in analysing commutative rings. Complete commutative rings have simpler structure than the general ones and Hensel's lemma applies to them.

Zariski topology on prime ideals[edit]

The Zariski topology defines a topology on the spectrum of a ring (the set of prime ideals).[2] In this formulation, the Zariski-closed sets are taken to be the sets

where A is a fixed commutative ring and I is an ideal. This is defined in analogy with the classical Zariski topology, where closed sets in affine space are those defined by polynomial equations . To see the connection with the classical picture, note that for any set S of polynomials (over an algebraically closed field), it follows from Hilbert's Nullstellensatz that the points of V(S) (in the old sense) are exactly the tuples (a1, ..., an) such that the ideal (x1 - a1, ..., xn - an) contains S; moreover, these are maximal ideals and by the "weak" Nullstellensatz, an ideal of any affine coordinate ring is maximal if and only if it is of this form. Thus, V(S) is "the same as" the maximal ideals containing S. Grothendieck's innovation in defining Spec was to replace maximal ideals with all prime ideals; in this formulation it is natural to simply generalize this observation to the definition of a closed set in the spectrum of a ring.

Connections with algebraic geometry[edit]

Commutative algebra (in the form of polynomial rings and their quotients, used in the definition of algebraic varieties) has always been a part of algebraic geometry. However, in the late 1950s, algebraic varieties were subsumed into Alexander Grothendieck's concept of a scheme. Their local objects are affine schemes or prime spectra, which are locally ringed spaces, which form a category that is antiequivalent (dual) to the category of commutative unital rings, extending the duality between the category of affine algebraic varieties over a field k, and the category of finitely generated reduced k-algebras. The gluing is along the Zariski topology; one can glue within the category of locally ringed spaces, but also, using the Yoneda embedding, within the more abstract category of presheaves of sets over the category of affine schemes. The Zariski topology in the set-theoretic sense is then replaced by a Zariski topology in the sense of Grothendieck topology. Grothendieck introduced Grothendieck topologies having in mind more exotic but geometrically finer and more sensitive examples than the crude Zariski topology, namely the étale topology, and the two flat Grothendieck topologies: fppf and fpqc. Nowadays some other examples have become prominent, including the Nisnevich topology. Sheaves can be furthermore generalized to stacks in the sense of Grothendieck, usually with some additional representability conditions, leading to Artin stacks and, even finer, Deligne–Mumford stacks, both often called algebraic stacks.

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Atiyah and Macdonald, 1969, Chapter 1
  2. ^ Dummit, D. S.; Foote, R. (2004). Abstract Algebra (3 ed.). Wiley. pp. 71–72. ISBN 9780471433347.

References[edit]