(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Talk:Krill - Wikipedia Jump to content

Talk:Krill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Former featured articleKrill is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 8, 2007.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
July 14, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
July 12, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Krill biomass comparison appears outdated

[edit]

The introduction to the article claims that one species of krill has "an estimated biomass of around 379,000,000 tonnes" and that this is "more than that of humans." I am not certain if this statement remains valid, as this wolfram calculation suggests (based on average human mass of 69kg) that humanity weighed almost that much in 1992, and likely crossed that mark later that year. The reference for the krill biomass appears to be based on samples taken between the years 1926-2004, by which time the human biomass had exceeded this value. It is possible that in the early '90s that species outweighed mankind, and perhaps krill populations have exploded since, but the current accuracy of this claim seems dubious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.50.111 (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the same thing and made a similar calculation, which accords with yours. I'm changing it.--Clevera (talk) 05:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many issues with the anatomy section

[edit]

The description is awkward is many places. This section needs rewriting by a carcinologist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.211.94.206 (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article needs a rewrite. Calling some of the tortured sentences awkward is charitable. They are all but incomprehensible. Toyokuni3 (talk) 22:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Krill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camarones

[edit]

This article claims krill is consumed in Spain and Philippines as camarones. I don't know about Philippines, but I'm a Spaniard and I know that we use caridean shrimp for that, not krill. Krill is used in fatty acid pills. Requesting permission to fix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.99.0.80 (talk) 07:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decapods?

[edit]

Multiple times in the "Anatomy and morphology" section in the article, krill are referred to as decapods. However, earlier in the article, the decapod order is listed as a separate order to the one containing krill. Can this discrepancy be corrected? Nebisan (talk) 21:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the link from "Amphionidacea" in the Taxonomy section goes to a rather confusing article about a single species and its confusing taxonomy. That species, whether it is a shrimp (Decapod) or not, seems to be an important krill species. The article could focus on important species of krill and their abundance and distribution. "Krill" is not really zoologically defined. It refers to pelagic crustaceans in general, including the larval stages of crabs and lobsters, as well as amphipods and copepods. It's a big subject. I think that this article should have less scientific content, explain what "krill" is, name the most important species and say why they are important, and link to the more scientific articles about the orders and species involved. Euphausiacea should have its own article, and not be subsumed under "krill". Wastrel Way (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC) Eric[reply]