ペンローズ方式
ペンローズ
この
この
ペンローズ
欧州 連合 理事 会 での提案 [編集 ]
( |
ニース | ペンローズ[3] | ||||
![]() |
82.54 | 16.5% | 29 | 8.4% | 9.55% | |
![]() |
59.64 | 12.9% | 29 | 8.4% | 8.11% | |
![]() |
59.33 | 12.4% | 29 | 8.4% | 8.09% | |
![]() |
57.32 | 12.0% | 29 | 8.4% | 7.95% | |
![]() |
41.55 | 9.0% | 27 | 7.8% | 6.78% | |
![]() |
38.22 | 7.6% | 27 | 7.8% | 6.49% | |
![]() |
21.77 | 4.3% | 14 | 4.1% | 4.91% | |
![]() |
16.19 | 3.3% | 13 | 3.8% | 4.22% | |
![]() |
11.01 | 2.2% | 12 | 3.5% | 3.49% | |
![]() |
10.41 | 2.1% | 12 | 3.5% | 3.39% | |
![]() |
10.36 | 2.1% | 12 | 3.5% | 3.38% | |
![]() |
10.20 | 2.1% | 12 | 3.5% | 3.35% | |
![]() |
10.14 | 2.0% | 12 | 3.5% | 3.34% | |
![]() |
8.94 | 1.9% | 10 | 2.9% | 3.14% | |
![]() |
8.08 | 1.7% | 10 | 2.9% | 2.98% | |
![]() |
7.85 | 1.5% | 10 | 2.9% | 2.94% | |
![]() |
5.38 | 1.1% | 7 | 2.0% | 2.44% | |
![]() |
5.38 | 1.1% | 7 | 2.0% | 2.44% | |
![]() |
5.21 | 1.1% | 7 | 2.0% | 2.39% | |
![]() |
3.96 | 0.9% | 7 | 2.0% | 2.09% | |
![]() |
3.46 | 0.7% | 7 | 2.0% | 1.95% | |
![]() |
2.33 | 0.5% | 4 | 1.2% | 1.61% | |
![]() |
2.00 | 0.4% | 4 | 1.2% | 1.48% | |
![]() |
1.36 | 0.3% | 4 | 1.2% | 1.23% | |
![]() |
0.72 | 0.2% | 4 | 1.2% | 0.89% | |
![]() |
0.45 | 0.1% | 4 | 1.2% | 0.70% | |
![]() |
0.40 | 0.1% | 3 | 0.9% | 0.66% | |
![]() |
484.20 | 100% | 345 | 100% | 100% |
2003
批判 [編集 ]
ペンローズ
脚注 [編集 ]
- ^ a b L.S. Penrose (1946). “The elementary statistics of majority voting”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 109: 53–57. doi:10.2307/2981392 .
- ^ “Proposal for a United Nations Second Assembly”. International Network for a UN Second Assembly (1987
年 ). 2010年 4月 27日 閲覧 。 - ^ a b c W. Slomczynski, K. Zyczkowski (2006). “Penrose Voting System and Optimal Quota” (pdf). Acta Physica Polonica B 37 (11): 3133–3143 .
- ^ “Maths tweak required for EU voting”. BBC news (2004
年 7月 7日 ). 2011年 4月 27日 閲覧 。 - ^ François-Carlos Bovagnet (2004). “First results of the demographic data collection for 2003 in Europe”. Statistics in focus: Population and social conditions: 13/2004 (Joint demographic data collection the Council of Europe and Eurostat) 2011
年 4月 28日 閲覧 。. - ^ K. Zyczkowski, W. Slomczynski. "Square root voting system, optimal threshold and
π ". arXiv:1104.5213。 - ^ Gelman, Andrew (2007
年 10月 9日 ). “Why the square-root rule for vote allocation is a bad idea”. Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science. Columbia University website. 2011年 4月 30日 閲覧 。 - ^ a b c Gelman, Katz and Bafumi (2004). “Standard Voting Power Indexes Do Not Work: An Empirical Analysis”. British Journal of Political Science 34: 657–674. doi:10.1017/s0007123404000237 .
- ^ On the "Jagiellonian compromise"
外部 リンク[編集 ]
- The Double Majority Voting Rule of the EU Reform Treaty as a Democratic Ideal for an Enlarging Union : an Appraisal Using Voting Power Analysis, D. Leech and H. Aziz, University of Warwick (2007).
- Many more references at the web page of American Mathematical Society here.