羅 傑 ·潘 洛 斯
![]() Roger Penrose | |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | 1931|
![]() ![]() | |
![]() | |
伦敦 剑桥 | |
扭量 彭罗斯-霍金 | |
奖项 | 沃爾 狄拉 诺贝尔物 |
受影响自 | |
早期 生活 和 教育
编辑
研究
编辑
1955
1958
1967
1983
後來 的 活動
编辑
2004
物理 与 意 识
编辑
2014
宗教 信仰
编辑
“
我 认为宇宙 是 有 目的 的 ,它的出 现不可能 是 机 缘巧合 ……有 些人认为宇宙 就是会 存在 ,而且就是会 运转——有 点 类似某 种计算 过程,然 后 我 们不知道 怎么的 ,就意外出 现在宇宙 中 。但 是 我 认为在 看 待 宇宙 的 问题上 ,这些看 法 并不具有 建 设意义,我 认为关于宇宙 一定有什么更深刻的东西。”[19]
獲 獎
编辑
著作
编辑
- Penrose. Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics. 1972. ISBN 978-0-89871-005-2. (rare)
- Penrose, Roger; Rindler, Wolfgang. Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 1, Two-Spinor Calculus and Relativistic Fields. Cambridge University Press. 1987 (reprint). ISBN 978-0-521-33707-6. (paperback)
- Penrose, Roger; Rindler, Wolfgang. Spinors and Space-Time: Volume 2, Spinor and Twistor Methods in Space-Time Geometry. Cambridge University Press. 1988 (reprint). ISBN 978-0-521-34786-0. (paperback)
- Penrose. The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics. Oxford University Press. 1989. ISBN 978-0-14-014534-2. (paperback)
- Penrose. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press. 1994. ISBN 978-0-19-853978-0. (hardback)
- Hawking, Stehpen; Penrose, Roger. The Nature of Space and Time. Princeton University Press. 1996. ISBN 978-0-691-03791-2. (hardback) ISBN 978-0-691-05084-3 (paperback).
- Penrose, Roger; Shimony, Abner; Cartwright, Nancy; Hawking, Stephen. The Large, the Small, and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press. 1997. ISBN 978-0-521-56330-7. (hardback), ISBN 978-0-521-65538-5 (paperback), Canto edition: ISBN 978-0-521-78572-3.
- Penrose. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. London: Jonathan Cape. 2004. ISBN 978-0-224-04447-9. (hardcover), ISBN 978-0-09-944068-0 (paperback).
相關 條目
编辑
注 释
编辑
- ^
原文 是 “for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity”。
參考 文獻
编辑
- ^ 1.0 1.1 NobelPrize.org. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2020. THE NOBEL PRIZE. Nobel Media AB 2020. 2020-10-06 [2020-10-06]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2021-04-24) (英 语).one half awarded to Roger Penrose "for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity"
- ^ Ogilvie, Megan. Just Visiting: Sir Roger Penrose. Toronto Star. 2009-03-23 [2020-10-09]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2021-01-07). - ^ Penrose, Roger. A Generalized Inverse for Matrices. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1955, 51 (3): 406–413.
- ^ Ferguson, Kitty. Stephen Hawking: Quest For A Theory of Everything. Franklin Watts. 1991: 66. ISBN 978-0-553-29895-6.
- ^ Roger Penrose at Rice, 1983–87. Rice History Corner. 2013-05-22 [2020-10-12]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2016-06-17). - ^ Dr. Roger Penrose at Penn State University. [2007-07-09]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2008-04-16). - ^ Criticism of the Lucas/Penrose argument that intelligence can not be entirely algorithmic:
- MindPapers: 6.1b. Godelian arguments (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆) - References for Criticisms of the Gödelian Argument (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆)* - Boolos, George, et al. 1990. An Open Peer Commentary on The Emperor's New Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4) 655.
- Davis, Martin 1993. How subtle is Gödel's theorem? More on Roger Penrose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 611-612. Online version at Davis' faculty page at http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/davism/ (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆) - Feferman, Solomon 1996. Penrose's Gödelian argument (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆). PSYCHE 2, 21–32. - Krajewski, Stanislaw 2007. On Gödel's Theorem and Mechanism: Inconsistency or Unsoundness is Unavoidable in any Attempt to 'Out-Gödel' the Mechanist. Fundamenta Informaticae 81, 173–181. Reprinted in Topics in Logic, Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics and Computer Science:In Recognition of Professor Andrzej Grzegorczyk (2008), p. 173 (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆) - LaForte, Geoffrey, Patrick J. Hayes, and Kenneth M. Ford 1998. Why Gödel's Theorem Cannot Refute Computationalism (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆). Artificial Intelligence, 104:265–286. - Lewis, David K. 1969. Lucas against mechanism (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆). Philosophy 44 231–233. - Putnam, Hilary 1995. Review of Shadows of the Mind. In Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 32, 370–373(also see Putnam's less technical criticisms in his New York Times review (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆))
- Bringsford, S. and Xiao, H. 2000. A Refutation of Penrose's Gödelian Case Against Artificial Intelligence (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆). Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12: 307–329. The authors write that it is "generally agreed" that Penrose "failed to destroy the computational conception of mind." - In an article at
存 档副本 . [2010-10-22]. (原始 内容 存 档于2001-01-25). L.J. Landau at the Mathematics Department of King's College London writes that "Penrose's argument, its basis and implications, is rejected by experts in the fields which it touches."
- Princeton Philosophy professor John Burgess writes in On the Outside Looking In: A Caution about Conservativeness (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆) (published in Kurt Gödel: Essays for his Centennial, with the following comments found on pp. 131–132 (页面存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆)) that "the consensus view of logicians today seems to be that the Lucas–Penrose argument is fallacious, though as I have said elsewhere, there is at least this much to be said for Lucas and Penrose, that logicians are not unanimously agreed as to where precisely the fallacy in their argument lies. There are at least three points at which the argument may be attacked." - Dershowitz, Nachum 2005. The Four Sons of Penrose (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆), in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Logic Programming for Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning(LPAR; Jamaica), G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3835, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 125–138.
- MindPapers: 6.1b. Godelian arguments (页面
- ^ Marvin Minsky. "Conscious Machines." Machinery of Consciousness, Proceedings, National Research Council of Canada, 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society, June 1991.
- ^ Tegmark, Max. 2000. "The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes". Physical Review E. vol 61. pp. 4194–4206.
- ^ Tetlow, Philip. The Web's Awake: An Introduction to the Field of Web Science and the Concept of Web Life. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2007: 166. ISBN 978-0-470-13794-9.
- ^ Hagan, S., Hameroff, S., and Tuszyński, J. Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? Decoherence and Biological Feasibility. Physical Review E. 2002, 65: 061901. Bibcode:2002PhRvE..65f1901H. arXiv:quant-ph/0005025 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061901.
- ^
存 档副本 . [2012-07-07]. (原始 内容 存 档于2020-12-28). - ^
存 档副本 . [2012-08-13]. (原始 内容 存 档于2012-06-16). - ^ Anirban Bandyopadhyay. ResearchGate. [2014-02-22]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2015-02-20). - ^ Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' inside brain neurons supports controversial theory of consciousness. ScienceDaily. [2014-02-22]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2015-12-17). - ^ S. Hameroff; R. Penrose. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory. Physics of Life Reviews. 2014, 11 (1): 39–78 [2014-03-29]. Bibcode:2014PhLRv..11...39H. PMID 24070914. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002. (
原始 内容 存 档于2014-07-29). - ^ Harris, Sam. Letter to A Christian Nation. SamHarrisOrg. [2020-06-05]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2010-12-29). Quoting Penrose's blurb for Harris's book Letter to a Christian Nation. - ^ Big Bang follows Big Bang follows Big Bang. BBC News. 2010-09-25 [2010-12-01]. (
原始 内容 存 档于2010-11-30).. - ^ See A Brief History of Time 互联网档
案 馆的 存 檔,存 档日期 2012-02-25., quote starts at about 1:12:43 in the video.
延伸 阅读
编辑
- Ferguson, Kitty. Stephen Hawking: Quest For A Theory of Everything. Franklin Watts. 1991. ISBN 978-0-553-29895-6.
- Misner, Charles; Thorne, Kip S. & Wheeler, John Archibald. Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. 1973. ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0.; see Box 34.2.
外部 連結
编辑
- Two theories for the formation of quasicrystals resembling
潘 洛 斯鋪磚法 - Tegmark, Max. 2000. "
腦 部 程 序 中 量子 脫 散 的 重要 性 (页面存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆)". Physical Review E. vol 61. pp. 4194-4206. - Hagan, Hameroff, Tuszynski:
量子 脫 散 的 爭 論 - "Biological feasibility of quantum states in the brain" - Tegmarks's rejoinder to Hagan et al (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆) - Toilet Paper Plagiarism (页面
存 档备份,存 于互联网档案 馆)