Chen Shou (Chinese:
Chen Shou | |
---|---|
Born | Family name: Chén ( Given name: Shòu ( Courtesy name: Chéngzuò ( 233[note 1] Nanchong, Sichuan |
Died | 297 (aged 64)[1] Luoyang, Henan |
Occupation | Historian, politician, writer |
Notable works |
|
Relatives |
|
Chen Shou | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese name | |||||||
Traditional Chinese | |||||||
Simplified Chinese | 陈寿 | ||||||
| |||||||
Vietnamese name | |||||||
Vietnamese | Trần Thọ | ||||||
Korean name | |||||||
Hangul | 진수 | ||||||
Hanja | |||||||
| |||||||
Japanese name | |||||||
Kanji | |||||||
Hiragana | ちん じゅ | ||||||
|
Historical sources on Chen Shou's life
editThere are two biographies of Chen Shou. The first one is in the Chronicles of Huayang, which was written by Chang Qu in the fourth century during the Eastern Jin dynasty. The second one is in the Book of Jin, which was written by Fang Xuanling and others in the seventh century during the Tang dynasty.
Life
editHe started his career as an official in the state of Shu during the Three Kingdoms era but was demoted and sent out of the capital for his refusal to fawn on Huang Hao, an influential court eunuch in Shu in its twilight years. After the fall of Shu in 263, Chen Shou's career entered a period of stagnation before Zhang Hua recommended him to serve in the Jin government. He held mainly scribal and secretarial positions under the Jin government before dying from illness in 297. He had over 200 writings – about 30 of which he co-wrote with his relatives – attributed to him.[2]
Early life and career in Shu Han
editChen Shou was from Anhan County (
According to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou served as a guange lingshi (
Career in Jin dynasty
editAfter the fall of Shu in 263, Chen Shou's career entered a period of stagnation until Zhang Hua recommended him to serve in the government of the Jin dynasty. Zhang Hua appreciated Chen Shou's talent and felt that even though Chen did not have an untarnished reputation, he did not deserve to be demoted and dismissed while he was in Shu. Chen Shou was recommended as a xiaolian (civil service candidate), and appointed as a zuo zhuzuo lang (
When Zhang Hua recommended Chen Shou to serve as a Gentleman Palace Writer (
In 278,[11] before the general Du Yu assumed his appointment as the commander of the Jin military forces in Jing Province, he recommended Chen Shou to Emperor Wu and stated that Chen Shou was capable of serving as a Gentleman of the Yellow Gate (
The Jin Shu mentioned that Chen Shou took a leave of absence when his mother died, and he fulfilled her dying wish to be buried in Luoyang. However, he ended up being castigated and demoted because his act of burying his mother in Luoyang – instead of in his hometown in Anhan County – was a violation of the proprieties of his time.[14] The Huayang Guozhi gave a varying account of the events: It was Chen Shou's stepmother (not his biological mother) who died. She did not want to be buried together with his father (in Anhan County),[15] so Chen Shou buried her in Luoyang.
Later years
editAccording to the Jin Shu, many years after his demotion, Chen Shou was appointed as a zhongshuzi (
The Huayang Guozhi gave a different account of the events before Chen Shou's death. It stated that Chen Shou was appointed as a zhongshuzi to Sima Yu, but was reassigned to be a Regular Mounted Attendant (
Sanguozhi
editSometime in the third century after 280,[19] Chen Shou wrote his magnum opus: the 65-volume Sanguozhi (Records of the Three Kingdoms), which records the history of the late Eastern Han dynasty and the Three Kingdoms period. The text was divided into three sections – Book of Wei (
Chen Shou received acclaim from his contemporaries for his work and was praised as an excellent historian. Around the time, another historian, Xiahou Zhan (
Controversies
editDespite his achievements, Chen Shou faced accusations and other controversies. The Jin Shu mentioned two controversies surrounding Chen Shou and his writing of the Sanguozhi, which his critics used to disparage him.[21] Tang Geng (
Extorting grain
editThe first one was about Chen Shou attempting to extort 1,000 hu[note 2] of grain from the sons of Ding Yi (
The Qing dynasty writer Pan Mei (
Bias
editThe second one suggested that Chen Shou held personal grudges against the Shu chancellor Zhuge Liang and his son Zhuge Zhan, hence he wrote negative comments about them in the Sanguozhi. Chen Shou's father[note 5] was a military adviser to the Shu general Ma Su. When Ma Su was executed by Zhuge Liang after his failure at the Battle of Jieting in 228, Chen Shou's father was implicated and sentenced to kun (髡), a punishment involving the shaving of a person's head. Zhuge Zhan belittled Chen Shou before. When Chen Shou wrote the biographies of Zhuge Liang and Zhuge Zhan in the Sanguozhi, he commented on them as follows: Military leadership was not Zhuge Liang's forte, and he lacked the resourcefulness of a brilliant military leader; Zhuge Zhan excelled only in literary arts, and he had an exaggerated reputation.[24]
The Qing dynasty writer Zhao Yi refuted the Jin Shu claim that Chen Shou was prejudiced against Zhuge Liang in the Sanguozhi, and remarked that the claim was "an uninformed statement". He commented that military leadership did not necessarily have to be regarded as Zhuge Liang's forte because Zhuge also made outstanding achievements in other fields. Zhao also pointed out two pieces of evidence which contradict the Jin Shu claim: Chen Shou gave highly positive comments about Zhuge Liang's ability as a politician in the Zhuge Liang Collection and in his personal commentary at the end of Zhuge's biography in the Sanguozhi. Zhao Yi's concluding remarks on this issue were that Chen Shou had clearly identified Zhuge Liang's strengths and weaknesses in his appraisal of Zhuge Liang in the Sanguozhi.[25]
Claim that Shu Han lacked a Historical Bureau
editChen Shou in the biography of Liu Shan wrote that the state of Shu Han did not have a historical bureau or department, justifying the pitiful condition of the biography of their officials.[26] Tang Geng cast doubt on this claim, remarking that although ancient texts advised to have one scribe write every word of his sovereign while another writes every action, those were merely hyperbolic terms. He provides past examples of people combining their role as historian alongside other function of the government. Furthermore, when the Rites of Zhou (pre-1st century BC) was written, even local warlords would have a historical bureau, so for Shu Han to suddenly lack one is suspect. Finally, he points out that Chen Shou contradicts the statement in the same biography when he wrote "the Historical Bureau (
Referring to Liu Bei and Liu Shan's state as Shu rather than Han
editTang Geng commented that since the Records of the Grand Historian until his own time, every state in official history is referred to by the name they used no matter their circumstances as it was basic decency to do so. However, Chen Shou was the sole historian who made an exception for Shu Han. Throughout its existence, Liu Bei and Liu Shan always used the name "Han" for their state since they were positioning themselves as a continuation of the Han dynasty. While "Shu" was a geographical term for where their state was based in, it was also a derisive name used by the Wei and Jin dynasties to discredit their claim of continuing the Han. Chen Shou opted to use the name "Shu" in his works, which in Tang Geng's view, was a deliberate neglect of impartiality to appease his patrons and personal animosity.
To contrast, he brought up a similar situation during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, where the Southern Tang was called Wu and the Northern Han was called Jin in derogative manners. Yet, historical documents still refer to them by their respective self titles. Tang Geng then laments that recently, someone had used Chen Shou's works as an example to convince a historian to not record the events he considered minor.[29]
Other works
editAccording to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou collected and compiled the writings of Zhuge Liang during his early career under the Jin dynasty. The compiled text was called Shu Xiang Zhuge Liang Ji (
Since the end of the Jianwu era (25–56 CE) in the Eastern Han dynasty, writers such as Zheng Boyi (
Other writings by Chen Shou include: the 50-volume Gu Guo Zhi (
Family and relatives
editChen Fu (
Chen Fu's younger brother, Chen Li (
Chen Li had a younger relative, Chen Jie (
Chen Fu, Chen Li and Chen Jie each wrote more than 10 works out of the over 200 writings attributed to Chen Shou.[2]
Anecdotes
editFilial mourning period
editThe Jin Shu mentioned that Chen Shou fell sick during the filial mourning period after his father's death. Some guests who visited his home expressed disapproval when they saw him being served medicine by his servants, because he was expected to lead an austere life during that period. His fellow townsfolk criticised him when they heard about it.[40]
Conflict with Li Xiang
editAccording to the Huayang Guozhi, Chen Shou was a close friend of Li Xiang, courtesy name was Shulong (叔龍), from Zitong Commandery (
Qiao Zhou's advice to Chen Shou
editAccording to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou's mentor, Qiao Zhou, often told Chen, "You'll become famous for your talent. However, it might not be a misfortune if you encounter any setback. You should be more mindful about what you do." Fang Xuanling remarked that Chen Shou's experiences – being demoted and humiliated when he was in Shu, and again while he was serving under the Jin dynasty – fitted what Qiao Zhou said about him.[42]
Appraisal
editChang Qu, who wrote Chen Shou's biography in the Chronicles of Huayang (Huayang Guo Zhi),[note 7] appraised Chen Shou as follows: "Learn from the past, promote and consolidate those reflections."[43]
Legacy
editAfter Chen Shou's death, the official Fan Jun (范頵) and others wrote a memorial to Emperor Hui: "In the past, Emperor Wu of Han issued an imperial decree: 'Sima Xiangru is critically ill. Retrieve his writings.' The emissary who collected Sima Xiangru's writings told Emperor Wu about the fengshan ceremonies, which were mentioned in Sima's writings. The emperor was very surprised. We, Your Majesty's subjects, propose: The late zhishu shi yushi Chen Shou wrote the Sanguozhi, which contains good advice and evaluates successes and failures. It is beneficial to promoting culture. Even though its writing style is not comparable to the works of (Sima) Xiangru, its message is simpler and clearer. We hope that it can be collected and reproduced." Emperor Hui approved and issued an imperial decree ordering the Intendant of Henan (
In the fifth century, Emperor Wen of the Liu Song dynasty felt that Chen Shou's Sanguozhi was too short and not comprehensive enough, so he commissioned Pei Songzhi to annotate the Sanguozhi. Pei Songzhi completed his assignment in 429. He included new materials he collected through research, and added his personal commentary. Pei Songzhi's annotations increased the length of the Sanguozhi to nearly twice its original.
Wanjuanlou
editThe Wanjuanlou (
The present tower, which covers an area of 2,400 square metres, consists of three main attractions – the Reading Tower of Chen Shou, the Chen Shou Memorial Hall, and Collecting Books Tower.[45] The tower has on display a collection of writings, illustrations, objects and photographs related to Chen Shou's life, his works and his legacy.[46]
See also
editNotes
edit- ^ Chen Shou's biography in the Jin Shu mentioned that he died at the age of 65 (by East Asian age reckoning) in the 7th year of the Yuankang era (291–299) in the reign of Emperor Hui of Jin.[1] By calculation, Chen Shou's birth year should be around 233.
- ^ Hu (斛) was an ancient Chinese unit of measurement of weight. Depending on the historical era, it could be equivalent to 5 or 10 dou (
斗 ). 1 dou was equivalent to 120 jin. 1 jin ranges from 500g to about 605g by modern standards. - ^ The younger Ding Yi's name was erroneously recorded as "Ding Hao" (
丁 暠) in the Jin Shu. - ^ The Ding brothers were close associates of Cao Zhi, a younger brother of Wei's founding emperor, Cao Pi. In the mid 210s, Cao Pi and Cao Zhi engaged in a power struggle over the succession to their father's place. The contention concluded in 217 with victory for Cao Pi, who executed the Dings after he ascended the throne in 220.
- ^ The identity of Chen Shou's father is unknown.
- ^ The book was called Yidu Qijiu Zhuan (
益 都 耆舊傳 ; Biographies of Famous People from Yi Province's Capital) in the Jin Shu. - ^ Chen Shou's biography is recorded in the eleventh volume of the Huayang Guo Zhi, titled Biographies of later worthies (
後 賢志 ), covering the life of notable persons from the Sichuan region who lived during the Jin dynasty.
References
editCitations
edit- ^ a b c d (
元康 七 年 ,病 卒 ,時 年 六 十 五 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ a b (凡壽
所 述作 二 百 餘 篇 ,符 、蒞、階 各 數 十 篇 。二州先達及華夏文士多為作傳,大 較如此。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
少 受學於散騎 常 侍 譙周,治 《尚書 》、《三傳 》,銳 精 《史 》、《漢 》。聰 警敏識,屬 文 富 豔。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
初 應 州 命 ,衛 將軍 主 簿 ,東 觀 秘書 郎 ,散 騎 、黃門 侍 郎 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
陳 壽 ,字 承 祚,巴 西安 漢 人 也。少 好學 ,師事 同 郡 譙周,仕 蜀 為 觀 閣 令 史 。宦人黃 皓 專 弄 威 權 ,大臣 皆 曲 意 附 之 ,壽 獨 不為 之 屈 ,由 是 屢被譴黜。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ Roberts 1991, p. 946.
- ^ (及蜀
平 ,坐 是 沈滯 者 累年 。司 空 張 華 愛 其才,以壽雖不遠 嫌 ,原 情 不 至 貶廢,舉為孝 廉 ,除 佐 著作 郎 ,出 補 陽平 令 。撰 《蜀 相 諸 葛 亮 集 》,奏 之 。除 著作 郎 ,領 本郡 中正 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
出 為平 陽 侯 相 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
張 華 將 舉壽為 中書 郎 ,荀勖忌 華 而疾壽 ,遂 諷吏部 遷壽為 長廣 太守 。辭 母 老 不 就。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
中書 監 荀勗、令 張 華 深 愛 之 ,班 固 、史 遷不足 方 也。 ...華 表 令 兼 中書 郎 。而壽《魏 志 》有 失 勗 意 ,勗 不 欲 其處內,表 為 長廣 太守 。) - ^ Zizhi Tongjian vol. 80.
- ^ (
杜 預 將之 鎮,複 薦 之 於帝,宜 補 黃 散 。由 是 授御史 治 書 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (鎮南
將軍 杜 預 表 為 散 騎 侍 郎 ,詔 曰:「昨 適用 蜀 人壽 良 具 員 。且可以為侍 御 史 。」) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (以母
憂 去 職 。母 遺言 令 葬 洛陽 ,壽 遵其志 。又 坐 不 以母歸 葬 ,竟被貶議。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
繼母 遺 令 不 附 葬 。以是見 譏 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
後 數 歲 ,起 為 太子 中 庶子 ,未 拜 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ a b Zizhi Tongjian vol. 83.
- ^ (
數 歲 ,除 太子 中 庶子 。太子 廢 後 ,再 兼 散 騎 常 侍 。惠 帝 謂 司 空 張 華 曰:「壽 才 宜 真 ,不足 久兼 也。」華 表 欲 登 九 卿 ,會 受誅,忠 賢 排 擯。壽 遂 卒 洛 下 ,位 望 不 充 其才,當時 冤之。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
吳 平 後 ,壽 乃鳩合 三 國史 ,著 魏 、吳 、蜀 三 書 六 十 五 篇 ,號 《三國志 》 ... ) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
撰 魏 吳 蜀 《三國志 》,凡六 十 五 篇 。時人 稱 其善敘事,有良 史 之 才 。夏 侯 湛 時 著 《魏 書 》,見 壽 所作 ,便 壞己書 而罷。張 華 深 善之 ,謂 壽 曰:「當 以《晉 書 》相 付 耳 。」其為時 所 重 如此。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
議 者 以此少 之 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
或 雲 丁 儀 、丁 暠有盛名 於魏,壽 謂 其子曰:「可 覓千斛米見與,當為 尊公 作 佳 傳 。」丁 不 與 之 ,竟不為 立 傳 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (誅丁
儀 丁 廙
《晉 書 ‧陳 壽 傳 》雲 :丁 廙有盛名 於魏。壽 謂 其子曰:「可 覓千斛米見與,當為 尊公 作 佳 傳 。」丁 不 與 之 ,竟不為 立 傳 。按丁儀 ﹑丁 廙,官 不 過 右 刺 姦 掾 及黃門 侍 郎 ,外 無 摧鋒接 刃 之 功 ,內無升 堂 廟 勝之 效 ,黨 於陳思 王 ,冀搖冢嗣,啟 衅骨肉 ,事 既 不 成 ,刑 戮隨之 ,斯實魏 朝 罪人 ,不 得 立 傳 明 矣。《晉 史 》謂 索 米 不 得 不為 立 傳 ,此最無 識之言 。同時 如徐幹 、陳 琳、阮瑀、應 瑒、應 璩、劉 楨、吳 質 、邯鄲 淳 、繁 欽、路 粹 、楊脩皆無 傳 ,益 足 證 《晉 史 》之 誣。) Sanguozhi Kaozheng vol. 5. - ^ (
壽 父 為 馬謖 參 軍 ,謖為諸 葛 亮 所 誅,壽 父 亦 坐 被 髡,諸 葛 瞻又輕 壽 。壽 為 亮 立 傳 ,謂 亮 將 略 非 長 ,無 應 敵 之 才 ,言 瞻惟工 書 ,名 過 其實。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
陳 壽 論 諸 葛 亮 陳 壽 傳 (晉 書 )「壽 父 為 馬謖 參 軍 ,謖為諸 葛 亮 所 誅,壽 父 亦 被 髡(刑罰 ,剃髮 也),故 壽 為 亮 傳 ,謂 將 略 非 所長 。」此真無 識之論 也!亮 之 不可 及處,原 不 必以用兵 見長 。觀 壽 校 定 諸 葛 集 表 ,言 「亮 科 教 嚴 明 ,賞罰 必信,無惡 不 懲,無 善 不 顯 。至 於吏不 容 奸,人 懷 自 勵。至 今 梁 、益 之 民 ,雖甘棠之詠 召公,鄭 人 之 歌子 產 ,無 以過也。」又 亮 傳 後 評 曰「亮 之 為 治 也,開 誠心 ,布 公道 ,善 無 微 而不賞 ,惡 無 纖而不 貶。終 於邦域 之 內,咸畏而愛之 。刑 政 雖峻而無怨者,以其用心 平 而勸戒 明也 。」
其頌孔明 ,可 謂 獨 見 其大矣!) Ershi'er Shi Zhaji vol. 6. - ^ (
又 國 不 置 史 ,注記 無官 ,是 以行事 多 遺 ,災 異 靡書。) Sanguozhi vol. 33. - ^ (
史官 言 景 星見 ,於是大赦 ,改 年 。) Sanguozhi vol. 33. - ^ (《
礼 记》人君 言 则左史 书之,动则右 史 书之。《周 礼 》建 官 备矣,独 不 闻有所 谓左右 史 者 。虽有太 史 ,然 不 以注记为职。是 时诸侯 皆 有史 ,岂天子 独 阙乎?春秋 之 时,卜 田 宅 者 、占 云 日 者 ,皆 称 太 史 ,则太史 殆阴阳家流 。然 书赵盾 者 、书崔杼 者 ,亦 称 太 史 ,则太史 又 似 掌 注 记者。盖方是 时,学者 通知 天 卜 ,而卜兴废者 亦 不 甚用蓍 龟。太 史 伯 以祝融 之 功 而推楚 国 之 必兴,太 史 赵以虞 舜 之 德 而占陈氏之 未 亡 。其论议证据 有 绝人者 ,故 阴阳注 记得兼 掌 之 。汉司马谈父子 为太史 令 ,以论著 为己任 ,而又掌 天 官 ,则兼掌 之 效 于兹可 见。魏 晋 之 际,始 署 著作 郎 ,自 是 太 史 之 职分而为二 。孔明 之 时未也。按后主 景 耀元年 ,史官 奏 景 星 见,于是大赦 改元 ,而曰蜀 不 置 史 ,妄矣。) Three Kingdoms Miscellaneous Cases - ^ (
上 自 司 马迁《史 记》,下 至 《五 代 史 》,其间数 千 百 年 ,正 统偏霸与夫 僭窃乱 贼,甚微至 弱 之 国 ,外 至 蛮夷 戎 狄之邦 ,史家 未 有 不 书其国号 者 ,而《三国志 》独 不 然 。刘备父子 相 继四十 馀年,始 终号汉,未 尝一称 蜀 ;其称蜀 ,俗流 之 语耳。陈寿黜其正号 ,从其俗称 ,循魏晋 之 私意 ,废史家 之 公法 。用意 如此,则其所 书善恶褒贬予夺,尚 可 信 乎!魏 晋 之 世 ,称 备为蜀 ,犹五代称李璟为吴,称 刘崇为晋矣。今 《五 代 史 》作 南 唐 、东汉世 家 ,未 尝以吴、晋 称 之 ,独 陈寿如此,初 无义例 ,直 徇好恶耳。往时欧 阳文忠 公 作 《五 代 史 》,王 荆公曰:‘五代之事无足采者,此何足 烦公;三国可喜事甚多,悉为陈寿所 坏,可 更 为之。’公然 其言,竟不暇 作 也,惜哉!) Three Kingdoms Miscellaneous Cases - ^ (
撰 《蜀 相 諸 葛 亮 集 》,奏 之 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
華 又 表 令 次 定 《諸 葛 亮 故事 》,集 為 二 十 四 篇 。時 壽 良 亦 集 ,故 頗不同 。復 入 為 著作 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ a b (
壽 又 撰 《古 國 志 》五 十 篇 、《益 都 耆舊傳 》十 篇 ,余 文章 傳 於世。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
益 部 自 建 武 後 ,蜀 郡 鄭 伯 邑、太 尉 趙 彥信,及漢中陳 申 伯 、祝 元 靈 ,廣 漢 王 文 表 ,皆 以博學 洽 聞,作 《巴 蜀 耆舊傳 》。壽 以為不足 經 遠 ,乃並巴 漢 撰 為 《益 部 耆舊傳 》十 篇 。散 騎 常 侍 文 立 表 呈 其《傳 》,武 帝 善之 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (...
又 著 《古 國 志 》五 十 篇 ;品 藻 典雅 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
上 《官 司 論 》七 篇 ,依據 典故 ,議 所 因 革 。又 上 《釋 諱 》、《廣 國論 》。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ Wei Zheng; et al., eds. (1973) [636]. "33:
志 第 28經籍 二 ".隋 書 [Book of Sui]. Beijing: Zhonghua Publishing. p. 973. - ^ (
兄子 符 ,字 長信 ,亦 有 文才 ,繼 壽 著作 佐 郎 ,上 廉 令 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
符 弟 蒞,字 叔度,梁 州 別 駕 ,驃騎將軍 齊 王 辟掾,卒 洛 下 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (蒞
從弟 階 ,字 達 之 ,州 主 簿 ,察孝廉 ,褒中令 ,永昌 西部 都 尉 ,建 寧 、興 古 太守 。階 辭 章 粲 麗 ,馳 名 當世 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (遭父
喪 ,有 疾 ,使 婢丸藥 ,客 往見之 ,鄉黨 以為貶議。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
時 梓 潼李驤叔龍 ,亦 雋逸器 ,知名 當世 。舉秀才 ,尚書 郎 。拜 建 平 太守 ,以疾辭 不 就,意 在 州 里 。除 廣 漢 太守 。初 與 壽 齊 望 ,又 相 昵友。後 與 壽 情 好 攜隙,還 相 誣攻。有識 以是短 之 。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08. - ^ (
初 ,譙周嘗謂壽 曰:「卿 必以才 學 成 名 ,當 被 損 折 ,亦 非 不 幸也 。宜 深 慎 之 。」壽 至 此,再 致廢辱 ,皆 如周言 。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ (
太子 中 庶子 陳 壽 承 祚:庶子 稽古 ,遷、固 並 聲 。) Huayang Guo Zhi vol. 11. 01. - ^ (
梁 州 大中 正 、尚書 郎 范頵等 上表 曰:「昔 漢 武 帝 詔 曰:'司馬 相 如病甚,可 遣 悉取其書。」使者 得 其遺書 ,言 封 禪 事 ,天子 異 焉。臣 等 案 :故 治 書 侍 御 史 陳 壽 作 《三國志 》,辭 多 勸 誡,明 乎得失 ,有益 風化 ,雖文豔不若 相 如,而質直 過 之 ,願 垂 採錄 。」於是詔 下 河南 尹 、洛陽 令 ,就家寫 其書。) Jin Shu vol. 82. - ^ "Nanchong, Real Source of Culture of Three Kingdoms". Sichuan Provincial People's Government. General Office, Sichuan Provincial People's Government. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
- ^ "Wanjuan Tower". sichuan-tour-com. China Chengdu Greatway Tour Co., Ltd. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
Sources
edit- Chang, Qu (c. 4th century). Chronicles of Huayang (Huayang Guozhi).
- Fang, Xuanling (ed.) (648). Book of Jin (Jin Shu).
- Pan, Mei (c. 19th century). Sanguozhi Kaozheng (
三國志 考證 ; Research on the Records of the Three Kingdoms). - Luo, Guanzhong (2007). Three Kingdoms: A Historical Novel. Vol. IV. Translated by Roberts, Moss. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. ISBN 978-7-119-00590-4.
- Sima, Guang (1084). Zizhi Tongjian.
- Zhao, Yi (1795). Ershi'er Shi Zhaji (
二 十 二 史 劄記; Notes on the Twenty-Two Histories).