(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
Chen Shou - Wikipedia

Chen Shou (Chinese: ちんひさし; 233–297[1]), courtesy name Chengzuo (うけたまわ), was a Chinese historian, politician, and writer who lived during the Three Kingdoms period and Jin dynasty of China. Chen Shou is best known for his most celebrated work, the Records of the Three Kingdoms (Sanguozhi), which records the history of the late Eastern Han dynasty and the Three Kingdoms period. Chen Shou wrote the Sanguozhi primarily in the form of biographies of notable persons of those eras. Today, Chen's Records of the Three Kingdoms is part of the Twenty-Four Histories canon of Chinese history.

Chen Shou
ちんひさし
BornFamily name: Chén (ひね)
Given name: Shòu (ことぶき)
Courtesy name: Chéngzuò (うけたまわ祚)

233[note 1]
Nanchong, Sichuan
Died297 (aged 64)[1]
Luoyang, Henan
OccupationHistorian, politician, writer
Notable works
  • Records of the Three Kingdoms
  • Memoirs of Zhuge Liang
  • Biographies of Famous People from Yi Province
  • Records of Ancient States
  • Dissertation on Bureaucracy
  • Explaining Taboos
  • Guang Guo Lun
Relatives
  • Chen Fu (nephew)
  • Chen Li (nephew)
  • Chen Jie (relative)
Chen Shou
Chinese name
Traditional Chineseちんひさし
Simplified Chinese陈寿
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinChén Shòu
Vietnamese name
VietnameseTrần Thọ
Korean name
Hangul진수
Hanjaちんひさし
Transcriptions
Revised RomanizationJin Su
Japanese name
Kanjiちんひさし
Hiraganaちん じゅ
Transcriptions
RomanizationChin Ju

Historical sources on Chen Shou's life

edit

There are two biographies of Chen Shou. The first one is in the Chronicles of Huayang, which was written by Chang Qu in the fourth century during the Eastern Jin dynasty. The second one is in the Book of Jin, which was written by Fang Xuanling and others in the seventh century during the Tang dynasty.

Life

edit

He started his career as an official in the state of Shu during the Three Kingdoms era but was demoted and sent out of the capital for his refusal to fawn on Huang Hao, an influential court eunuch in Shu in its twilight years. After the fall of Shu in 263, Chen Shou's career entered a period of stagnation before Zhang Hua recommended him to serve in the Jin government. He held mainly scribal and secretarial positions under the Jin government before dying from illness in 297. He had over 200 writings – about 30 of which he co-wrote with his relatives – attributed to him.[2]

Early life and career in Shu Han

edit

Chen Shou was from Anhan County (あんかんけん), Baxi Commandery (ともえ西郡にしごおり), which is in present-day Nanchong, Sichuan. He was known for being studious since he was young and was described as intelligent, insightful and knowledgeable. He was mentored by the Shu official Qiao Zhou, who was also from Baxi Commandery. Under Qiao Zhou's tutelage, he read the Classic of History and Three Commentaries on the Spring and Autumn Annals. He was very well versed in the Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han.[3]

According to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou served as a guange lingshi (かんかくれい; a clerk) in Shu. However, the Huayang Guozhi mentioned that he held the following appointments consecutively: Registrar (おも簿) of the General of the Guards (まもる將軍しょうぐん); donguan mishu lang (ひがしかん秘書ひしょろう; an official librarian); Gentleman of Scattered Cavalry (さむらいろう); and Gentleman of the Yellow Gate (黃門こうもんさむらいろう).[4] In the final years of Shu (c. 250s–260s), many officials fawned on Huang Hao, an influential court eunuch, in their bid to win his favour. Chen Shou's refusal to engage in such flattering and obsequious behaviour took a toll on his career: He was demoted on several occasions and sent out of the Shu capital, Chengdu.[5]

Career in Jin dynasty

edit

After the fall of Shu in 263, Chen Shou's career entered a period of stagnation until Zhang Hua recommended him to serve in the government of the Jin dynasty. Zhang Hua appreciated Chen Shou's talent and felt that even though Chen did not have an untarnished reputation, he did not deserve to be demoted and dismissed while he was in Shu. Chen Shou was recommended as a xiaolian (civil service candidate), and appointed as a zuo zhuzuo lang (著作ちょさくろう; an assistant scribe) and the acting Prefect (れい) of Yangping County (陽平ようへいけん). In 274, he collected and compiled the writings of Zhuge Liang, the first chancellor of Shu,[6] and submitted them to the Jin imperial court. He was promoted to zhuzuo lang (著作ちょさくろう; a scribe) and appointed as the zhongzheng (中正ちゅうせい) of Baxi Commandery.[7] The Huayang Guozhi mentioned that he also served as the Chancellor (そう) to the Marquis of Pingyang (ひらこう).[8]

When Zhang Hua recommended Chen Shou to serve as a Gentleman Palace Writer (中書ちゅうしょろう), the Ministry of Personnel appointed Chen Shou as the Administrator (太守たいしゅ) of Changguang Commandery (長廣ながひろぐん) instead on the recommendation of Xun Xu. The Jin Shu mentioned that Xun Xu detested Zhang Hua and disliked Chen Shou for his association with Zhang Hua, so he urged the Ministry of Personnel to reassign Chen Shou to another position. Chen Shou declined the appointment on the grounds that he had to look after his elderly mother.[9] The Huayang Guozhi gave a different account of Chen Shou's relationship with Xun Xu. It stated that Xun Xu and Zhang Hua were very pleased with Chen Shou's Sanguozhi and they remarked that Chen Shou surpassed Ban Gu and Sima Qian. However, later, Xun Xu was displeased by the Wei Shu – one of the three sections in the Sanguozhi – and did not want Chen Shou to work in the same office as him, so he had Chen Shou reassigned to be the Administrator of Changguang.[10]

In 278,[11] before the general Du Yu assumed his appointment as the commander of the Jin military forces in Jing Province, he recommended Chen Shou to Emperor Wu and stated that Chen Shou was capable of serving as a Gentleman of the Yellow Gate (黃門こうもんさむらいろう) or Gentleman of Scattered Cavalry (さむらいろう). Emperor Wu accepted Du Yu's suggestion and appointed Chen Shou as a yushi zhishu (しょ; an auditor).[12][13]

The Jin Shu mentioned that Chen Shou took a leave of absence when his mother died, and he fulfilled her dying wish to be buried in Luoyang. However, he ended up being castigated and demoted because his act of burying his mother in Luoyang – instead of in his hometown in Anhan County – was a violation of the proprieties of his time.[14] The Huayang Guozhi gave a varying account of the events: It was Chen Shou's stepmother (not his biological mother) who died. She did not want to be buried together with his father (in Anhan County),[15] so Chen Shou buried her in Luoyang.

Later years

edit

According to the Jin Shu, many years after his demotion, Chen Shou was appointed as a zhongshuzi (ちゅう庶子しょし; an aide) to the crown prince Sima Yu, but he did not assume his role.[16] He died of illness at the age of 65 (by East Asian age reckoning) in 297 during the reign of Emperor Hui.[1]

The Huayang Guozhi gave a different account of the events before Chen Shou's death. It stated that Chen Shou was appointed as a zhongshuzi to Sima Yu, but was reassigned to be a Regular Mounted Attendant (つねさむらい) again after the crown prince was deposed in 299.[17] Emperor Hui told Zhang Hua, "(Chen) Shou possesses genuine talent. He should not remain in his current appointment for long." Zhang Hua wanted to nominate Chen Shou to take up one of the posts of the Nine Ministers, but lost his life in 300 CE during the War of the Eight Princes.[17] Chen Shou died in Luoyang later. His talents and achievements were not reflected in his status at the time of his death and many people felt that it was an injustice to him.[18] The Huayang Guozhi account apparently suggests that Chen Shou died in 300 CE or after, which did not match his year of death mentioned in the Jin Shu account.

Sanguozhi

edit
 
A fragment of the biography of Bu Zhi from the Records of the Three Kingdoms, part of the Dunhuang manuscripts
 
Text of the Wei Zhi (こころざし, Records of Wei), which documents the history of Cao Wei, written circa 297

Sometime in the third century after 280,[19] Chen Shou wrote his magnum opus: the 65-volume Sanguozhi (Records of the Three Kingdoms), which records the history of the late Eastern Han dynasty and the Three Kingdoms period. The text was divided into three sections – Book of Wei (しょ), Book of Shu (しょくしょ) and Book of Wu (くれしょ) – and was composed of mainly biographies of notable persons in those eras.

Chen Shou received acclaim from his contemporaries for his work and was praised as an excellent historian. Around the time, another historian, Xiahou Zhan (なつほうじん), was writing his own Book of Wei (しょ; Wei Shu), which recorded the history of Wei in the Three Kingdoms era. He destroyed his work after reading Chen Shou's Sanguozhi. Zhang Hua was so deeply impressed with the Sanguozhi that he told Chen Shou, "We should entrust the responsibility of writing the Book of Jin to you." Chen Shou was highly regarded as such after he wrote the Sanguozhi.[20]

Controversies

edit

Despite his achievements, Chen Shou faced accusations and other controversies. The Jin Shu mentioned two controversies surrounding Chen Shou and his writing of the Sanguozhi, which his critics used to disparage him.[21] Tang Geng (からかのえ), a scholar from the Song dynasty, in his work called the Three Kingdoms Miscellaneous Cases (さんこく雜事ざつじ; Sanguo Zashi) also criticised Chen Shou as a historian for two reasons.

Extorting grain

edit

The first one was about Chen Shou attempting to extort 1,000 hu[note 2] of grain from the sons of Ding Yi (ちょうただし) and his younger brother Ding Yi (ちょう廙)[note 3] – two officials in Wei during the Three Kingdoms period. He promised them that he would write biographies for their fathers in the Sanguozhi if they gave him the grain, but they refused, so he did not write the biographies. However, the Jin Shu prefaced the anecdote with the term huoyun (あるうん), which meant "rumours".[22]

The Qing dynasty writer Pan Mei (はんまゆ) rebutted the Jin Shu's account about Chen Shou attempting to extort from the Dings and called it "uninformed". He disproved the claim that the Ding brothers were very famous officials in Wei by pointing out that they had neither held important appointments nor made any significant achievements. Pan also felt that a historian was clearly justified if he decided to not write biographies for the Ding brothers, because, in his opinion, the Dings had committed grievous sins – instigating sibling rivalry and causing instability in the Wei imperial clan[note 4] – which made them unworthy of having biographies in historical records. Pan further noted that there were also other notable persons in Wei (e.g. Chen Lin, Wu Zhi and Yang Xiu) who did not have biographies in the Sanguozhi, so being notable did not mean that a person should have a biography written for him. His concluding remarks on this issue were that the Jin Shu made a malicious claim (about Chen Shou).[23]

Bias

edit

The second one suggested that Chen Shou held personal grudges against the Shu chancellor Zhuge Liang and his son Zhuge Zhan, hence he wrote negative comments about them in the Sanguozhi. Chen Shou's father[note 5] was a military adviser to the Shu general Ma Su. When Ma Su was executed by Zhuge Liang after his failure at the Battle of Jieting in 228, Chen Shou's father was implicated and sentenced to kun (髡), a punishment involving the shaving of a person's head. Zhuge Zhan belittled Chen Shou before. When Chen Shou wrote the biographies of Zhuge Liang and Zhuge Zhan in the Sanguozhi, he commented on them as follows: Military leadership was not Zhuge Liang's forte, and he lacked the resourcefulness of a brilliant military leader; Zhuge Zhan excelled only in literary arts, and he had an exaggerated reputation.[24]

The Qing dynasty writer Zhao Yi refuted the Jin Shu claim that Chen Shou was prejudiced against Zhuge Liang in the Sanguozhi, and remarked that the claim was "an uninformed statement". He commented that military leadership did not necessarily have to be regarded as Zhuge Liang's forte because Zhuge also made outstanding achievements in other fields. Zhao also pointed out two pieces of evidence which contradict the Jin Shu claim: Chen Shou gave highly positive comments about Zhuge Liang's ability as a politician in the Zhuge Liang Collection and in his personal commentary at the end of Zhuge's biography in the Sanguozhi. Zhao Yi's concluding remarks on this issue were that Chen Shou had clearly identified Zhuge Liang's strengths and weaknesses in his appraisal of Zhuge Liang in the Sanguozhi.[25]

Claim that Shu Han lacked a Historical Bureau

edit

Chen Shou in the biography of Liu Shan wrote that the state of Shu Han did not have a historical bureau or department, justifying the pitiful condition of the biography of their officials.[26] Tang Geng cast doubt on this claim, remarking that although ancient texts advised to have one scribe write every word of his sovereign while another writes every action, those were merely hyperbolic terms. He provides past examples of people combining their role as historian alongside other function of the government. Furthermore, when the Rites of Zhou (pre-1st century BC) was written, even local warlords would have a historical bureau, so for Shu Han to suddenly lack one is suspect. Finally, he points out that Chen Shou contradicts the statement in the same biography when he wrote "the Historical Bureau (史官しかん) reported the sighting of a brilliant star,"[27] just three paragraphs later.[28]

Referring to Liu Bei and Liu Shan's state as Shu rather than Han

edit

Tang Geng commented that since the Records of the Grand Historian until his own time, every state in official history is referred to by the name they used no matter their circumstances as it was basic decency to do so. However, Chen Shou was the sole historian who made an exception for Shu Han. Throughout its existence, Liu Bei and Liu Shan always used the name "Han" for their state since they were positioning themselves as a continuation of the Han dynasty. While "Shu" was a geographical term for where their state was based in, it was also a derisive name used by the Wei and Jin dynasties to discredit their claim of continuing the Han. Chen Shou opted to use the name "Shu" in his works, which in Tang Geng's view, was a deliberate neglect of impartiality to appease his patrons and personal animosity.

To contrast, he brought up a similar situation during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, where the Southern Tang was called Wu and the Northern Han was called Jin in derogative manners. Yet, historical documents still refer to them by their respective self titles. Tang Geng then laments that recently, someone had used Chen Shou's works as an example to convince a historian to not record the events he considered minor.[29]

Other works

edit

According to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou collected and compiled the writings of Zhuge Liang during his early career under the Jin dynasty. The compiled text was called Shu Xiang Zhuge Liang Ji (しょくしょうしょかずらあきらしゅう; Collection of the Shu Chancellor Zhuge Liang).[30] The Huayang Guozhi mentioned that later on, Zhang Hua proposed to Emperor Wu to have the text reorganized and composed as a 24-volumes. At the time, Shou Liang was also doing his own research on Zhuge Liang's works, with his outcome quite different from Chen Shou's original version. In the end, the text was rewritten, and became the Zhuge Liang Gushi (しょかずらあきら故事こじ; Memoirs of Zhuge Liang).[31]

Since the end of the Jianwu era (25–56 CE) in the Eastern Han dynasty, writers such as Zheng Boyi (ていはく邑), Zhao Yanxin (ちょう彥信), Chen Shenbo (ひねさるはく), Zhu Yuanling (しゅくもとれい) and Wang Wenbiao (おうぶんひょう) had co-written the Bashu Qijiu Zhuan (ともえしょく耆舊でん; Biographies of Famous People from Bashu). Chen Shou felt that the Bashu Qijiu Zhuan was not comprehensive enough, so he expanded it to the 10-volume Yibu Qijiu Zhuan (えき耆舊でん; Biographies of Famous People from Yi Province).[note 6][32] His work was presented by the official Wen Li (ぶんりつ) to Emperor Wu, who praised it.[33]

Other writings by Chen Shou include: the 50-volume Gu Guo Zhi (いにしえこくこころざし; Records of Ancient States), which received high praise;[32][34] the 7-volume Guansi Lun (かんろん; Dissertation on Bureaucracy), which used historical examples to discuss reforms; Shi Yi (しゃくいみな; Explaining Taboos); Guang Guo Lun (こう國論こくろん);[35] Wei Mingchen Zou (めいしんそう; Memorials by Notable Officials of Cao Wei).[36]

Family and relatives

edit

Chen Fu (ひね), whose courtesy name was Changxin (長信ながのぶ), was the son of Chen Shou's elder brother. He was also known for his literary talent and he succeeded his uncle as an Assistant Gentleman of Writing. He also served as the Prefect (れい) of Shanglian County (うえれんけん).[37]

Chen Fu's younger brother, Chen Li (ひね蒞), whose courtesy name was Shudu (叔度), served as an Attendant Officer (べつ) in Liang Province and later under Sima You, the Prince of Qi (ひとしおう) and General of Agile Cavalry (驃騎將軍しょうぐん). He also died in Luoyang.[38]

Chen Li had a younger relative, Chen Jie (ひねかい), whose courtesy name was Dazhi (達之たつゆき). Chen Jie assumed the following appointments: Registrar (おも簿) of the governor of Yi Province; baozhongling (褒中れい); West Commandant (西部せいぶじょう) of Yongchang Commandery (永昌えいしょうぐん); Administrator (太守たいしゅ) of Jianning (たてやすし) and Xinggu (きょういにしえ) commanderies. Chen Jie was also well known for his literary talent.[39]

Chen Fu, Chen Li and Chen Jie each wrote more than 10 works out of the over 200 writings attributed to Chen Shou.[2]

Anecdotes

edit

Filial mourning period

edit

The Jin Shu mentioned that Chen Shou fell sick during the filial mourning period after his father's death. Some guests who visited his home expressed disapproval when they saw him being served medicine by his servants, because he was expected to lead an austere life during that period. His fellow townsfolk criticised him when they heard about it.[40]

Conflict with Li Xiang

edit

According to the Huayang Guozhi, Chen Shou was a close friend of Li Xiang, courtesy name was Shulong (叔龍), from Zitong Commandery (あずさ潼郡). Li Xiang was famous for his talent and capacity, his reputation was similar to Chen Shou. He was recommended as a xiucai (秀才しゅうさい) and served as a Gentleman of Writing (尚書しょうしょろう). He was reassigned to be the Administrator (太守たいしゅ) of Jianping Commandery (けんたいらぐん), but he declined the appointment and claimed that he was ill because he wanted to remain in his home province. He was then appointed as the Administrator of Guanghan Commandery (こうかんぐん around present-day Guanghan, Sichuan). Relations between Chen Shou and Li Xiang deteriorated and they started making false accusations against each other. Other officials scorned them for their petty quarrels.[41]

Qiao Zhou's advice to Chen Shou

edit

According to the Jin Shu, Chen Shou's mentor, Qiao Zhou, often told Chen, "You'll become famous for your talent. However, it might not be a misfortune if you encounter any setback. You should be more mindful about what you do." Fang Xuanling remarked that Chen Shou's experiences – being demoted and humiliated when he was in Shu, and again while he was serving under the Jin dynasty – fitted what Qiao Zhou said about him.[42]

Appraisal

edit

Chang Qu, who wrote Chen Shou's biography in the Chronicles of Huayang (Huayang Guo Zhi),[note 7] appraised Chen Shou as follows: "Learn from the past, promote and consolidate those reflections."[43]

Legacy

edit

After Chen Shou's death, the official Fan Jun (范頵) and others wrote a memorial to Emperor Hui: "In the past, Emperor Wu of Han issued an imperial decree: 'Sima Xiangru is critically ill. Retrieve his writings.' The emissary who collected Sima Xiangru's writings told Emperor Wu about the fengshan ceremonies, which were mentioned in Sima's writings. The emperor was very surprised. We, Your Majesty's subjects, propose: The late zhishu shi yushi Chen Shou wrote the Sanguozhi, which contains good advice and evaluates successes and failures. It is beneficial to promoting culture. Even though its writing style is not comparable to the works of (Sima) Xiangru, its message is simpler and clearer. We hope that it can be collected and reproduced." Emperor Hui approved and issued an imperial decree ordering the Intendant of Henan (河南かなんいん) and Prefect of Luoyang (洛陽らくようれい) to send scribes to Chen Shou's house and copy the Sanguozhi.[44]

In the fifth century, Emperor Wen of the Liu Song dynasty felt that Chen Shou's Sanguozhi was too short and not comprehensive enough, so he commissioned Pei Songzhi to annotate the Sanguozhi. Pei Songzhi completed his assignment in 429. He included new materials he collected through research, and added his personal commentary. Pei Songzhi's annotations increased the length of the Sanguozhi to nearly twice its original.

Wanjuanlou

edit

The Wanjuanlou (まんかんろう; まんかんろう; Wànjuànlóu; 'tower of 10', '000 volumes of writings') – a tourist attraction in the Xishan Scenic Spot, Shunqing District, Nanchong, Sichuan – is named the source of the culture of the Three Kingdoms period by the Sichuan provincial government. The tower was constructed in the early third century (222–237) during the Three Kingdoms era. It was also the place where Chen Shou studied in his early life. It was destroyed in the 1960s after years of neglect, but was rebuilt in 1990 by the Chinese government at a cost of four million yuan.

The present tower, which covers an area of 2,400 square metres, consists of three main attractions – the Reading Tower of Chen Shou, the Chen Shou Memorial Hall, and Collecting Books Tower.[45] The tower has on display a collection of writings, illustrations, objects and photographs related to Chen Shou's life, his works and his legacy.[46]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Chen Shou's biography in the Jin Shu mentioned that he died at the age of 65 (by East Asian age reckoning) in the 7th year of the Yuankang era (291–299) in the reign of Emperor Hui of Jin.[1] By calculation, Chen Shou's birth year should be around 233.
  2. ^ Hu (斛) was an ancient Chinese unit of measurement of weight. Depending on the historical era, it could be equivalent to 5 or 10 dou (). 1 dou was equivalent to 120 jin. 1 jin ranges from 500g to about 605g by modern standards.
  3. ^ The younger Ding Yi's name was erroneously recorded as "Ding Hao" (ちょう暠) in the Jin Shu.
  4. ^ The Ding brothers were close associates of Cao Zhi, a younger brother of Wei's founding emperor, Cao Pi. In the mid 210s, Cao Pi and Cao Zhi engaged in a power struggle over the succession to their father's place. The contention concluded in 217 with victory for Cao Pi, who executed the Dings after he ascended the throne in 220.
  5. ^ The identity of Chen Shou's father is unknown.
  6. ^ The book was called Yidu Qijiu Zhuan (えき耆舊でん; Biographies of Famous People from Yi Province's Capital) in the Jin Shu.
  7. ^ Chen Shou's biography is recorded in the eleventh volume of the Huayang Guo Zhi, titled Biographies of later worthies (賢志けんじ), covering the life of notable persons from the Sichuan region who lived during the Jin dynasty.

References

edit

Citations

edit
  1. ^ a b c d (元康もとやすななねんやまいそつねんろくじゅう。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  2. ^ a b (凡壽しょ述作じゅっさくひゃくへん、蒞、かいかくすうじゅうへん。二州先達及華夏文士多為作傳,だい較如此。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  3. ^ (しょう受學於散つねさむらい譙周,尚書しょうしょ》、《三傳さんでん》,するどしらげふみ》、《かん》。さとし警敏識,ぞくぶんとみ豔。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  4. ^ (はつおうしゅういのちまもる將軍しょうぐんぬし簿ひがしかん秘書ひしょろう黃門こうもんさむらいろう。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  5. ^ (ちんひさしうけたまわ祚,ともえ西安しーあんかんじん也。しょう好學こうがく師事しじどうぐん譙周,つかまつしょくためかんかくれい。宦人あきらせんろうけん大臣だいじんみなきょくことぶきどく不為ふためこごめゆかり屢被譴黜。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  6. ^ Roberts 1991, p. 946.
  7. ^ (及蜀ひらめすわ沈滯ちんたいしゃ累年るいねんつかさそらちょうはなあい其才,以壽雖不とおいやはらじょういたり貶廢,舉為こうれんじょ著作ちょさくろう陽平ようへいれいせんしょくしょうしょかずらあきらしゅう》,そうじょ著作ちょさくろうりょう本郡ほんぐ中正ちゅうせい。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  8. ^ (為平ためひらようこうしょう。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  9. ^ (ちょうはなはた舉壽ため中書ちゅうしょろう,荀勖はな而疾ことぶきとげ諷吏遷壽ため長廣ながひろ太守たいしゅははろう就。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  10. ^ (中書ちゅうしょかん荀勗、れいちょうはなふかしあいはんかたふみ不足ふそくかた也。 ... はなひょうれいけん中書ちゅうしょろう。而壽《こころざしゆうしつつとむつとむよく其處內,おもてため長廣ながひろ太守たいしゅ。)
  11. ^ Zizhi Tongjian vol. 80.
  12. ^ (もりあずか將之まさゆき鎮,ふくこも於帝,むべよし授御しょ。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  13. ^ (鎮南將軍しょうぐんもりあずかおもてためさむらいろうみことのり曰:「さく適用てきようしょく人壽じんじゅりょういん。且可以為さむらい。」) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  14. ^ (以母しょくはは遺言ゆいごんれいそう洛陽らくようことぶき遵其こころざしまたすわ以母そう,竟被貶議。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  15. ^ (繼母けいぼのこれいそう。以是そし。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  16. ^ (すうさいおこりため太子たいしちゅう庶子しょしはい。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  17. ^ a b Zizhi Tongjian vol. 83.
  18. ^ (すうさいじょ太子たいしちゅう庶子しょし太子たいしはいさいけんつねさむらいめぐみみかどいいそらちょうはな曰:「ことぶきざいよろし不足ふそく久兼ひさかね也。」はなひょうよくとうきゅうきょうかい受誅,ちゅうけんはい擯。ことぶきとげそつらくもちたかし其才,當時とうじ冤之。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  19. ^ (たいらことぶき鳩合きゅうごうさん國史こくししるしょくさんしょろくじゅうへんごう三國志さんごくし》 ... ) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  20. ^ (せんくれしょく三國志さんごくし》,凡ろくじゅうへん時人じじんしょう其善敘事,有良ありらざいなつほうじんちょしょ》,ことぶき所作しょさ便びん壞己しょ而罷。ちょうはなふか善之よしゆきいいことぶき曰:「とう以《すすむしょしょうづけみみ。」其為しょじゅう如此。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  21. ^ (しゃ以此しょうこれ。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  22. ^ (あるくもちょうただしちょう暠有盛名せいめい於魏,ことぶきいい其子曰:「覓千斛米見與,當為とうい尊公そんこうさくけいでん。」ちょうあずかこれ,竟不為ふためりつでん。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  23. ^ (誅丁ひのと
    すすむしょひねことぶきつたえくもちょう廙有盛名せいめい於魏。ことぶきいい其子曰:「覓千斛米見與,當為とうい尊公そんこうさくけいでん。」ちょうあずかこれ,竟不為ふためりつでん。按丁ひのと廙,かんみぎとげかんじょう及黃もんさむらいろうそと摧鋒せっこう,內無ますどうびょう勝之かつゆきこうとう於陳おもえおう,冀搖冢嗣,けい骨肉こつにくことすんでなりけい戮隨,斯實ちょう罪人ざいにんとくりつでんあきら矣。《すすむいいさくまいとく不為ふためりつでん,此最識之ごと同時どうじ如徐みきちん琳、阮瑀、おう瑒、おう璩、りゅう楨、ただし邯鄲かんたんあつししげる欽、みちいき、楊脩皆無かいむでんえきあししょうすすむ誣。) Sanguozhi Kaozheng vol. 5.
  24. ^ (ことぶきちちため馬謖ばしょくさんぐん,謖為しょかずらあきらしょ誅,ことぶきちちまたすわ髡,しょかずら瞻又けいことぶきことぶきためあきらたてつていいあきらしょうりゃくちょうおうてきざいげん瞻惟こうしょめい其實。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  25. ^ (ちんひさしろんしょかずらあきら
    ちんひさしでんすすむしょ)「ことぶきちちため馬謖ばしょくさんぐん,謖為しょかずらあきらしょ誅,ことぶきちちまた髡(刑罰けいばつ剃髮ていはつ也),ことぶきためあきらでんいいしょうりゃく所長しょちょう。」此真識之ろん也!
    あきらこれ不可ふか及處,はら必以用兵ようへい見長みなが
    かんことぶきこうていしょかずらしゅうひょうげんあきらきょういむあきら賞罰しょうばつ必信,無惡さかなし懲,ぜんあらわいたり於吏よう奸,にんなつけ勵。いたりこんはりえきみん,雖甘棠之えい召公,ていじん歌子うたこさん以過也。」
    またあきらでんひょう曰「あきらため也,ひらき誠心せいしんぬの公道こうどうぜんほろ而不しょうあく纖而貶。おわり於邦いき內,咸畏而愛けいせい雖峻而無怨者,以其用心ようじんひら勸戒かんかい明也あきや。」
    其頌孔明こうめいいいどくみる其大矣!) Ershi'er Shi Zhaji vol. 6.
  26. ^ (またくにおけ注記ちゅうき無官むかん行事ぎょうじのこわざわい靡書。) Sanguozhi vol. 33.
  27. ^ (史官しかんげんけい星見ほしみ,於是大赦たいしゃあらためねん。) Sanguozhi vol. 33.
  28. ^ (《れい记》人君じんくんげん则左书之,动则みぎ书之。《しゅうあやけんかん备矣,どく闻有しょ左右さゆうしゃ。虽有たいしか以注记为职。时诸こうみな有史ゆうし,岂天子あまこどく阙乎?春秋しゅんじゅう时,ぼくでんたくしゃうらないうんしゃみなたたえふとし,则太殆阴阳家りゅうしか书赵たてしゃ、书崔しゃまたたたえふとし,则太またてのひらちゅう记者。盖方时,学者がくしゃ通知つうちてんぼく,而卜兴废しゃまた甚用めどぎ龟。たいはく祝融しゅくゆうこう而推すわえこく必兴,ふとし赵以おそれしゅんとく而占陈氏ほろび。其论议证すえゆう绝人しゃ阴阳ちゅう记得けんてのひら。汉司马谈父子ふし为太れい,以论ちょ为己にん,而又てのひらてんかん,则兼てのひらこう于兹见。すすむ际,はじめしょ著作ちょさくろうたい职分而为孔明こうめい时未也。按后ぬしけい耀元ねん史官しかんそうけいぼし见,于是大赦たいしゃ改元かいげん,而曰しょくおけ,妄矣。) Three Kingdoms Miscellaneous Cases
  29. ^ (うえつかさ马迁《ふみ记》,しもいたりだい》,其间すうせんひゃくねんせい统偏霸与おっと僭窃らん贼,甚微いたりじゃくくにそといたり蛮夷ばんいえびす狄之くに史家しかゆう书其国号こくごうしゃ,而《三国志さんごくしどくしか。刘备父子ふししょう继四じゅう馀年,はじめ终号汉,尝一たたえしょく;其称しょく俗流ぞくりゅう语耳。陈寿黜其正号せいごう,从其俗称ぞくしょう,循魏すすむ私意しい,废史公法こうほう用意ようい如此,则其しょ书善恶褒贬予夺,なおしん乎!すすむこれせいしょう备为しょく,犹五代称李璟为吴,しょう刘崇为晋矣。いまだいさくみなみとう、东汉尝以吴、すすむしょうどく陈寿如此,はつ无义れいちょく徇好恶耳。往时おう阳文ちゅうおおやけさくだい》,おう荆公曰:‘五代之事无足采者,此何あし烦公;三国可喜事甚多,悉为陈寿しょ坏,さら为之。’公然こうぜん其言,竟不ひまさく也,惜哉!) Three Kingdoms Miscellaneous Cases
  30. ^ (せんしょくしょうしょかずらあきらしゅう》,そう。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  31. ^ (はなまたひょうれいじょうしょかずらあきら故事こじ》,しゅうためじゅうよんへんときことぶきりょうまたしゅう不同ふどうふくにゅうため著作ちょさく。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  32. ^ a b (ことぶきまたせんいにしえこくこころざしじゅうへん、《えき耆舊でんじゅうへん文章ぶんしょうでん於世。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  33. ^ (えきたてたけししょくぐんていはく邑、ふとしじょうちょう彥信,及漢中陳なかじんさるはくしゅくもとれいこうかんおうぶんひょうみな以博がくひろし聞,さくともえしょく耆舊でん》。ことぶき以為不足ふそくけいとお,乃並ともえかんせんためえき耆舊でんじゅうへんつねさむらいぶんりつひょうてい其《つて》,たけみかど善之よしゆき。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  34. ^ (... またちょいにしえこくこころざしじゅうへんひん典雅てんが。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  35. ^ (うえかんろんななへん依據いきょ典故てんこしょいんかわまたうえしゃくいみな》、《こう國論こくろん》。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  36. ^ Wei Zheng; et al., eds. (1973) [636]. "33: こころざしだい28 經籍けいせき". ずいしょ [Book of Sui]. Beijing: Zhonghua Publishing. p. 973.
  37. ^ (兄子せこ長信ながのぶまたゆう文才ぶんさいつぎことぶき著作ちょさくろううえれんれい。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  38. ^ (おとうと蒞,叔度,やなしゅうべつ,驃騎將軍しょうぐんひとしおう辟掾,そつらく。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  39. ^ (蒞從弟じゅうていかいたちしゅうぬし簿,察孝れん,褒中れい永昌えいしょう西部せいぶじょうたてやすしきょう太守たいしゅかいあきらつばらうららはせめい當世とうせい。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  40. ^ (遭父ゆうやまし使つかい婢丸やくきゃく往見鄉黨きょうとう以為貶議。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  41. ^ (ときあずさ潼李驤叔りゅうまた雋逸知名ちめい當世とうせい。舉秀才しゅうさい尚書しょうしょろうはいけんひら太守たいしゅ,以疾就,ざいしゅうさとじょこうかん太守たいしゅはつあずかことぶきひとしもちまたあい昵友。あずかことぶきじょうこう攜隙,かえあい誣攻。有識ゆうしき以是たん。) Huayang Guozhi vol. 11. 08.
  42. ^ (はつ,譙周嘗謂ことぶき曰:「きょう必以ざいがくなりめいとうそんおりまた幸也ゆきやむべふかまき。」ことぶきいたる此,さい致廢はずかしめみな如周ごと。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  43. ^ (太子たいしちゅう庶子しょしちんひさしうけたまわ祚:庶子しょし稽古けいこ,遷、かたなみごえ。) Huayang Guo Zhi vol. 11. 01.
  44. ^ (やなしゅう大中おおなかただし尚書しょうしょろう范頵とう上表じょうひょう曰:「むかしかんたけみかどみことのり曰:'司馬しばしょう如病甚,悉取其書。」使者ししゃとく其遺しょげんふうぜんごと天子てんし焉。しんとうあんしょさむらいちんひさしさく三國志さんごくし》,すすむ誡,あきら得失とくしつ有益ゆうえき風化ふうか,雖文豔不わかあい如,而質ちょくこれねがいたれ採錄さいろく。」於是みことのり河南かなんいん洛陽らくようれい,就家うつし其書。) Jin Shu vol. 82.
  45. ^ "Nanchong, Real Source of Culture of Three Kingdoms". Sichuan Provincial People's Government. General Office, Sichuan Provincial People's Government. Retrieved 20 June 2014.
  46. ^ "Wanjuan Tower". sichuan-tour-com. China Chengdu Greatway Tour Co., Ltd. Retrieved 20 June 2014.

Sources

edit
edit