(Translated by https://www.hiragana.jp/)
zongfa 宗法 (www.chinaknowledge.de)
ChinaKnowledge.de -
An Encyclopaedia on Chinese History, Literature and Art

zongfa 宗法しゅうほう, lineage system

Feb 24, 2019 © Ulrich Theobald

The lineage system (zongfa 宗法しゅうほう) served in ancient China to discern different lineages of a family cluster, and to rank them with respect to a common ancestor. The system is commonly believed to originate in the Western Zhou period 西にしあまね (11th cent.-770 BCE), yet there might have been precursors of it during the Shang period しょう (17th-11th cent. BCE) which discerned between a primary lineage and lateral lineages, as can be seen in expressions like dazong 大宗たいそう "grand lineage (head)", xiaozong しょうむね "lesser lineage (head)", Yin min liu zu いんみんろくぞく, or Yin min qi zu いんみんななぞく "the six/seven lineages of the Yin/Shang".

The Zhou-period lineage system is described in detail in the ritual Classics Yili 儀禮ぎれい and Liji れい, mainy the latter's chapters Dazhuan 大傳だいでん and Sangfu xiaoji 喪服もふくしょう. Yet references to the lineage system can be found in other texts as well, for instance, the ode Ban いた in the Shijing 詩經しきょう "Book of Songs", where it is said that "great families are buttresses [for the royal house]" (dazong wei han 大宗たいそう維翰), and "the king's younger relatives are like a wall" (zong zi wei cheng 宗子むねこ維城).

The lineage system of the Zhou, be it that of the Son of Heaven or that of the regional rulers, stipulated that the oldest son (or the son of the primary consort, di 嫡, dizhangzi長子ちょうし) succeeded his father, establishing a "grand lineage" (dazong 大宗たいそう, zongzi 宗子むねこ, "son of the [main] lineage"), while his younger brothers (biezi べつ "the separate sons", zhizi ささえ "sons of the sideline", shu 庶, shuzi 庶子しょし) venerated the same ancestor, but founded "lesser lineages" (xiaozong しょうむね). Members of the family cluster (zongzu 宗族そうぞく) were discerned by a different surname (shi , like an office or a place name, or different characters used to discern the generations, beifen やから份), while their family name was the same (Ji ひめ in case of the Zhou dynasty). An alternative mode of distinguishing generations or social ranks of brothers was the zhao-mu system あきらきよし.

The earliest study of the ancient lineage system is Cheng Yaotian's ほどよう (1725-1814) Zongfa xiaoji 宗法しゅうほうしょう.

Quotation 1. Description of the zongfa system 宗法しゅうほう in the Liji れい, ch. Dazhuan 大傳だいでん
庶子しょしまつりあきら其宗也。庶子しょしとくため長子ちょうしさんねんつぎ也。 Any son but the eldest, did not sacrifice to his grandfather, to show there was the Honoured Head (who should do so). Nor could he wear mourning for his eldest son for three years, because he was not the continuator of his grandfather.
べつためつぎべつためむねつぎ禰者ためしょうむね When any other son but the eldest became an ancestor of a line, he who succeeded him became the Honoured Head (of the branch); and his successor again became the smaller Head.
ゆうひゃくせい遷之むねゆうせいそく遷之むねひゃくせい遷者,べつこう也。 There was the (great) Honoured Head whose tablet was not removed for a hundred generations. There were the (smaller) Honoured Heads whose tablets were removed after five generations. He whose tablet was not removed for a hundred generations was the successor and representative of the other than the eldest son (who became an ancestor of a line);
そう其繼べつしゃ,百世不遷者也;むね其繼高祖こうそしゃ,五世則遷者也。みことけいむねけいむねみこと义也。 and he was so honoured (by the members of his line) because he continued the (High) ancestor from whom (both) he and they sprang; this was why his tablet was not removed for a hundred generations. He who honoured the continuator of the High ancestor was he whose tablet was removed after five generations. They honoured the Ancestor, and therefore they reverenced the Head. The reverence showed the significance of that honour.
ゆうしょうむね而無大宗たいそうしゃゆう大宗たいそう而無しょうむねしゃ有無うむむねまた莫之むねしゃ公子こうし是也これや公子こうしゆう宗道そうどう公子こうしおおやけため其士大夫たいふ庶者むね其士大夫たいふ適者てきしゃ公子こうしそう道也みちや There might be cases in which there was a smaller Honoured Head, and no Greater Head (of a branch family); cases in which there was a Greater Honoured Head, and no smaller Head; and cases in which there was an Honoured Head, with none to honour him. All these might exist in the instance of the son of the ruler of a state. The course to be adopted for the headship of such a son was this; that the ruler, himself the proper representative of former rulers, should for all his half-brothers who were officers and Great officers appoint a full brother, also an officer or a Great officer, to be the Honoured Head. Such was the regular course.
Translation according to Legge 1885.

The members and heads of the grand lineage had the right and obligation to "manage" all male persons of the lateral lineages. For this reason, a common saying called this type of large family cluster "a house that will not break apart in a hundred generations" (bai shi bu qian zhi zong ひゃくせい遷之むね). Members of the lesser or lateral lineages had to obey the head of the grand lineage, but were also subject to the elder members of their own lineage. The word zong refers to the lineage as well as to its present head.

The Duke of Zhou しゅうこうだん, for instance, was a younger son of King Wen しゅうぶんおう, while the oldest son of the primary consort, King Wu しゅうたけしおう, inherited the throne. The Duke of Zhou's son, Bo Qin はく禽, was invested as regional ruler of the secondary state of Lu 魯, and was thus the High Ancestor (shizu 始祖しそ, taizu ふとし) of the dukes of Lu. Even if being a lesser lineage head (xiaozong) from the perspective of the king of Zhou, he was the major lineage head (dazong) of the dukes of Zhou.

A younger son of a regional ruler, say, a duke (gongzi 公子こうし "ducal son"), had not the right to "succeed in the paternal temple" (xu mi つぎ禰) and even to venerate his father as an ancestor, but had to establish a lineage of its own (as biezi べつ; xiaozong from the viewpoint of his older brother, but dazong from the viewpoint of his own offspring). The oldest son of the new lineage founder would then "succeed in the respective paternal temple", and this mode would last for "a hundred generations". The younger sons of this lateral lineage (gongsun 公孫こうそん "ducal grandsons") had not the right to succeed in the lineage, but were allowed to venerate their father as the common lineage ancestor (dazong). While each of the younger sons of the following generations was a lesser lineage head (xiaozong), the person of first generation opening a "separated line" (biezi) was the major lineage head (dazong) of his descendants, and was venerated in their ancestral shrines as grandfather (zu ), great-grandfather (zengzu 曾祖そうそ), and great-great-grandfather (gaozu 高祖こうそ), but the fifth generation after him became commoners (shuren 庶人), in the words of the Sangfu xiaoji, there was a shift downward of the head of lesser lineages (qian zong 遷宗).

Figure 1. Beginning of Cheng Yaotian's ほどよう "Ancestral Lineage Chart" (Zongfabiao 宗法しゅうほうひょう)
The chart shows six generations, beginning with the ancestor (zu ), being a "separate [younger] son" (biezi べつ) of a duke (gongzi 公子こうし). He was in a minor position (bei 卑) than his older brother (the father duke's successor), who held a higher position (zun みこと). The separate son's oldest son (a ducal grandson, gongsun 公孫こうそん) succeeded his father and founded a new lineage as a major lineage head (dazong 大宗たいそう), ruling over all other sons. From Zongfa xiaoji 宗法しゅうほうしょう (Xuxiu siku quanshu ぞくおさむよん全書ぜんしょ edition). Click to enlarge.

The symbol of the power of the grand lineage head was the maintenance of an ancestral temple (zongmiao 宗廟そうびょう) for the whole lineage cluster, while the heads of the lesser lineages had temples of their own. All sacrifices in the temples had to be supervised by the lineage heads. Apart from sacrifices to the ancestors, the lineage heads regulated many aspects of daily life, for instance, the capping rites (guanli かんむりあや) celebrating the becoming of manhood of a young boy, weddings (hunli 婚禮こんれい), covenants between lineage members (mengshi めいちかい), or the celebration of higher birthdays. All these events took place in the ancestral temples, which therefore can be seen as a symbol for the coherence of the whole family cluster.

The lineage head, who more or less symbolized the High Ancestor of the whole lineage cluster, had the last word in all decisions, and even had superiority over family members being wealthy or having achieved high positions in the officialdom. He could direct, penalize, and grant protection (bihu 庇護ひご). When he died, lineage members had to wear sackcloth for three months (qi cui san yue ひとしおとろえ[=縗]さんがつ).

During the Zhou period, a lineage head even disposed of armed forces consisting of lineage members. This small "army" could be used as auxiliary unit supporting the royal troops (see Zhou military). During the battle of Yanling 鄢陵 in 575 BCE between the regional states of Chu すわえ and Jin すすむ, the latter was supported by the armies of the houses of Luan 欒, Fan 范, Zhonghang ちゅうゆき, and Xi 郤, all of them being lateral lineages of the ducal house of Jin. Alternatively, a regional ruler (being the head of the grand lineage) could order lateral houses to punish one of them, like in the state of Song そう, where Duke Wen そうぶんこう (r. 610-589) ordered the houses of Dai 戴, Zhuang そう, and Huan 桓 to punish the lateral lineage of Wu .

The jurisdictional power of the head of the grand lineage can be see in the case of Zhao Yang ちょう鞅 (Zhao Jianzi ちょう簡子), who forced Zhao Wu ちょううま to cede 500 families (and the revenue from their households), and later killed him because of "negligence". Zhi Ying 罃 (Xun Ying 荀罃), being captured by the army of Chu and set free after having paid a ransom, expressed his willingness to receive punishment for his military failure. Zhao Ying ちょう嬰 was once exiled to Qi ひとし because of illicit relationships with a married woman.

When executing punishment, regional rulers used to ask for confirmation by a lineage head, as can be seen in the case of You Chu ゆうすわえ, whose sending into exile was first to be reconfirmed by Da Shu だい叔, the head of his lineage. The lineage heads could thus be used by the state to perform administrative and jurisdictional functions. One consequence of this constellation was that lineage members paid sometimes greater loyalty to their "family" than to the state or its representative, the duke.

The households of lineage heads were of considerable size and had to be managed by stewards (shilao しつおい, zonglao そうろう, zongren 宗人むねと), who oversaw all matters of the household and the estates of the family. They were heads of a staff including caretakers for the household (jiazai いえおさむ) and the estates (yizai 邑宰), and managers for land and revenue (situ つかさ), horses and arms (sima 司馬しば) or such for construction work (gongshi こう).

The autonomy of lineages ended where the state began. As most members of lateral lineages took over state offices as ministers (qing きょう), grand masters (dafu 大夫たいふ), or servicemen (shi ), they were tied to the grand lineage by two means, namely the genealogical one, and the political one, and of those two, the latter had a greater weight. Nonetheless, certain state ceremonies (banquets, covenants, funerals) required that members of closer lineages had ceremonial preference over those of distant lineages. At least in theory, the Son of Heaven was the head of the grand lineage, and the regional rulers those of lateral lineages.

A common image is that the oldest son of the primary consort of the king of Zhou succeded to him, while younger sons were made regional rulers. The oldest sons of them succeeded as regional rulers, while younger sons were made ministers or grand masters. The oldest sons of them inherited the office of minister or grand master, while their younger sons were made servicemen, and the younger sons of the generation below had the fate of being made commoners (Zhou et al. 1998). Yet this image is not correct. In practice, the system was applied to the descendants of regional rulers who were in the administration of the regional states appointed grand masters and servicemen. Even if many of the early regional rulers were indeed sons and descendants of the kings of Zhou, the zongfa system did not apply to the king or the regional rulers, as there was a difference between the succession of rule (juntong きみみつる) and that of ancestral veneration (zongtong そうみつる), and a matter of political rights (zhengquan 政權せいけん) vs. lineage rights (zuquan ぞくけん) (Jin 1956: 205).

The importance of the lineages of the nobility declined during the Warring States period 戰國せんごく (5th cent.-221 BCE), but basic patterns remained and were gradually adopted by the common people.

Sources:
Li Bingzhong 秉忠, Wei Canlin まもる燦金, Lin Conglong りんしたがえりゅう, ed. (1990). Jianming wenshi zhishi cidian 簡明かんめいぶん知識ちしきてん (Xi'an: Shaanxi renmin chubanshe), 98, 222.
Jia Chongji 賈崇きち, Yang Zhiwu 楊致たけ, ed. (1992). Zhonghua lunli daode cidian 中華ちゅうか倫理りんり道德どうとく辭典じてん (Xi'an: Shaanxi renmin chubanshe), 342.
Jiang Xijin 蔣錫きん, ed. (1990). Wen-shi-zhe xuexi cidian ぶんあきら學習がくしゅう辭典じてん (Changchun: Jilin wenshi chubanshe), 419.
Jin Jingfang きんけいよし (1956). "Lun zongfa zhidu ろん宗法しゅうほう制度せいど", Dongbei renmin daxue renwen kexue xuebao 東北とうほく人民じんみん大學だいがく人文じんぶん科學かがくがくむくい, 1956/2: 203-222.
Peng Jinghua 彭景はな (1997). "Zongfa zhi 宗法しゅうほうせい", in Men Kui もん巋, Zhang Yanjin ちょうつばめ瑾, ed. Zhonghua guocui da cidian 中華ちゅうか國粹こくすいだい辭典じてん (Xianggang: Guoji wenhua chuban gongsi), 41.
Wang Songling おうまつよわい, ed. (1991). Shiyong Zhongguo lishi zhishi cidian 實用じつよう中國ちゅうごく歷史れきし知識ちしき辭典じてん (Changchun: Jilin wenshi chubanshe), 259.
Wu Shuchen たけいつきしん, ed. (1996). Zhongguo chuantong falü wenhua cidian 中國ちゅうごく傳統でんとう法律ほうりつ文化ぶんか辭典じてん (Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe), 396.
Xie Weiyang しゃ維揚 (1992). "Zongfa 宗法しゅうほう", in Zhongguo da baike quanshu 中國ちゅうごくだい百科全書ひゃっかぜんしょ, Zhongguo lishi 中國ちゅうごく歷史れきし (Beijing/Shanghai: Zhongguo da baike quanshu chubanshe), Vol. 3, 1621.
Xu Xinghai じょおきかい, Liu Jianli りゅうたてうらら, ed. (2000). Rujia wenhua cidian 儒家じゅか文化ぶんか辭典じてん (Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe), 326.
Zang Zhen 臧振 (1988). "Zongfa 宗法しゅうほう", in Zhao Jihui ちょうよしめぐみ, Guo Hou'an かくあつしやす, ed. Zhongguo ruxue cidian 中國ちゅうごく儒學じゅがく辭典じてん (Shenyang: Liaoning renmin chubanshe), 748.
Zhongguo baike da cidian bianweihui 《中國ちゅうごく百科ひゃっかだい辭典じてんへんかい, ed. (1990). Zhongguo baike da cidian 中國ちゅうごく百科ひゃっかだい辭典じてん (Beijing: Huaxia chubanshe), 634.
Zhou Fazeng しゅうはつぞう, Chen Longtao ちんたかし濤, Qi Jixiang ひとし吉祥きっしょう, ed. (1998). Zhongguo gudai zhengzhi zhidu shi cidian 中國ちゅうごく古代こだい政治せいじ制度せいど辭典じてん (Beijing: Shoudu shifan daxue chubanshe),71.