Beijing Mandarin (division of Mandarin)
Beijing Mandarin | |
---|---|
Beijingese | |
Běijīng Guānhuà | |
Pronunciation | Beijing dialect: [pèɪtɕíŋ kwánxwâ] |
Region | Beijing, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning and Tianjin |
Native speakers | 27 million (2004)[1] |
Dialects | |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | – |
ISO 639-6 | bjgh |
cmn-bei | |
Glottolog | beij1235 Beijingic |
Linguasphere | 79-AAA-bb |
![]() |
In Chinese dialectology, Beijing Mandarin (simplified Chinese:
Classification
[edit]Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin were proposed by Chinese linguist Li Rong as two separate branches of Mandarin in the 1980s.[2] In Li's 1985 paper, he suggested using tonal reflexes of Middle Chinese checked tone characters as the criterion for classifying Mandarin dialects.[3] In this paper, he used the term "Beijing Mandarin" (
He subsequently proposed a split of Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin in 1987, listing the following as reasons:[5][6]
- Checked-tone characters with voiceless initials in Middle Chinese are far more commonly distributed into the rising tone category in Northeastern Mandarin than in Beijing Mandarin;
- The tonal value of the dark level tone is lower in Northeastern Mandarin than that in Beijing Mandarin;
- Generally, the
日 initial of Middle Chinese developed into a modern non-null initial in Beijing Mandarin and a modern null initial in Northeastern Mandarin.
The 2012 edition of Language Atlas of China added one more method for distinguishing Beijing Mandarin from Northeastern Mandarin:[7]
- The modern pronunciations of the
精 ,知 ,莊 and章 initials of Middle Chinese are two sets of sibilants—dental and retroflex—and these two sets are not merged or confused in Beijing Mandarin.
Meanwhile, there are some scholars who regard Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin as a single division of Mandarin. Lin (1987) noticed the phonological similarity between Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin.[8] Zhang (2010) suggested that the criteria for the division of Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin as top-level Mandarin groups are inconsistent with the criterion for the division of other top-level Mandarin groups.[9]
Subdivisions
[edit]Beijing Mandarin is classified into the following subdivisions in the 2012 edition of Language Atlas of China:[10]
- Jīng–Chéng (
京 承 ) - Cháo–Fēng (
朝 峰 ), an area between the Huái–Chéng cluster and the Northeastern Mandarin, covering the cities of Chaoyang and Chifeng. This subgroup has characteristics intermediate of those of Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin.[11]
Per the 2012 edition of Atlas, these subgroups are distinguished by the following features:[1]
- Jīng–Chéng subgroup has a high dark level tone, and the Cháo–Fēng subgroup a relatively low one;
- Within the Jīng–Chéng subgroup, dialects in the Huái–Chéng cluster append an /n/ or /ŋ/ initial to kaikou hu characters with
影 ,疑 ,云 and 以 initials in Middle Chinese, while an initial is absent in the Jīngshī cluster.
Compared with the first edition (1987), the second edition (2012) of the Atlas demoted Jīngshī and Huái–Chéng subgroups to clusters of a new Jīng–Chéng subgroup. Shí–Kè (
Phonological features
[edit]Initials
[edit]With regard to initials, the reflexes of kaikou hu syllables with any of the
Initial in Middle Chinese ► | *ŋ | *ŋ | *ʔ | *ʔ | *ʔ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subdivision | Location | 鹅 | 爱 | 矮 | 袄 | |
Jingshi | Beijing | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ | ∅ |
Huai–Cheng | Chengde[14] | n | n | n | n | n |
Chao–Feng | Chifeng[15] (old-style) |
ŋ | ∅ | ∅ | ŋ | n |
Dental and retroflex sibilants are distinct phonemes in Beijing Mandarin.[5] This is contrary to Northeastern Mandarin, in which the two categories are either in free variation or merged into a single type of sibilants.[5]
Tones
[edit]In both Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin, the checked tone of Middle Chinese has completely dissolved and is distributed irregularly[16] among the remaining tones.[17] However, Beijing Mandarin has significantly fewer rising-tone characters with a checked-tone origin, compared with Northeastern Mandarin.[18]
Subdivision | Location | 戳 | 质 [19] | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Beijing Mandarin | Beijing | dark level | light level | departing |
Northeastern Mandarin | Harbin | rising | rising | rising |
The Cháo–Fēng subgroup generally has a lower tonal value for the dark level tone.[1]
Subdivision | Location | Dark level | Light level | Rising | Departing | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jingshi | Beijing | ˥ (55) | ˧˥ (35) | ˨˩˦ (214) | ˥˩ (51) | [20] |
Huai–Cheng | Chengde | ˥ (55) | ˧˥ (35) | ˨˩˦ (214) | ˥˩ (51) | [20] |
Chao–Feng | Chifeng | ˦ (44) | ˧˧˥ (335) | ˨˩˧ (213) | ˥˧ (53) | [21] |
Xingcheng | ˦ (44) | ˧˥ (35) | ˨˩˧ (213) | ˥˩ (51) | [21] | |
Taiwanese | Taipei | ˦ (44) | ˧˨˧ (323) | ˧˩˨ (312) | ˥˨ (52) | [22] |
Taichung | ˦ (33) | ˧˨˨ (322) | ˧˩ (31) | ˦˨ (32) | [23] |
Lexical features
[edit]The Cháo–Fēng subgroup has more words in common with that of Northeastern Mandarin.[11]
this place | to envy | to deceive | to show off; to brag |
dirty | to do | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSC | 这 |
嫉妒 | 骗人 | 炫耀 | 脏 | 搞 |
Chao–Feng | 这圪垯 |
The intensifier
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 42.
- ^ Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 41.
- ^ a b Li (1985), p. 3, 4.
- ^ Li (1989), p. 247.
- ^ a b c Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 40.
- ^ Li (1989), p. 246.
- ^ Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 35, 40, 41.
- ^ Lin (1987), p. 166–167.
- ^ Zhang (2010), p. 45.
- ^ Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 42 - 43.
- ^ a b c Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 37.
- ^ Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), p. 11.
- ^ Hou (2002), p. 18.
- ^ There are also other ways to pronounce such initials in this dialect. (Zhang 2010, p. 79)
- ^ There are also other ways to pronounce such initials in this dialect. (Zhang 2010, p. 79)
- ^ Zhang (2010), p. 180.
- ^ Hou (2002), p. 17.
- ^ Hou (2002), p. 19.
- ^ Referring to its checked-toned pronunciation, as in 质量.
- ^ a b Hou (2002), p. 38.
- ^ a b Zhang (2010), p. 33.
- ^ Multiple sources:
- Fon, Yee-Jean (1999). "What Does Chao Have to Say about Tones? A Case Study of Taiwan Mandarin". AH.
石 ,鋒 ; 鄧,丹 (2006). "普通 話 與 台灣 國語 的 語 音 對比 " (PDF).山高 水 長 :丁 邦 新 先生 七 秩壽慶 論 文集 : 371–393. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-09-19. Retrieved 2021-12-11.- Sanders, Robert (2008). "Tonetic Sound Change in Taiwan Mandarin: The Case of Tone 2 and Tone 3 Citation Contours" (PDF). Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20). 1: 87–107.
- ^
慧 如(Khoo, Hui-lu)許 (2020). "「台 中 腔」-台灣 中部 華 語 的 聲調 特徵 及其成因 初 探 ". Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. 18 (1): 115–157. doi:10.6519/TJL.202001_18(1).0004. ISSN 1729-4649.
References
[edit]- Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2012), Zhōngguó Yǔyán Dìtú Jí
中国 语言地 图集 [Language Atlas of China], vol. Hànyǔ Fāngyán Juàn 汉语方言 卷 [Chinese dialects volume] (2nd ed.), Beijing: Commercial Press, ISBN 9787100070546
- Hou, Jingyi (2002), Xiàndài Hànyǔ Fāngyán Gàilùn 现代汉语
方言 概 论, Shanghai Educational Publishing House, ISBN 7-5320-8084-6
- Zhang, Shifang (2010), Běijīng Guānhuà Yǔyīn Yánjiū
北京 官 话语音 研究 , Beijing Language and Culture University Press, ISBN 978-7-5619-2775-5