Israel attacks Iran: What we know so far via Aljazeera

13 Jun 2025

Israel has attacked several Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites, and carried out assassinations of top military officials and nuclear scientists. An initial wave of strikes was carried out on Friday morning. A second, separate attack on the city of Tabriz, northwest Iran, was reported by local media later on Friday.

On Friday afternoon, the semi-official state media group, the Iranian Fars news agency reported “unofficial statistics” showing that more than 70 people had been killed and more than 320 were injured in Israel’s attacks.

[…]

What is the danger of hitting nuclear facilities?

Attacking nuclear facilities can cause several consequences of unpredictable scope, including radioactive leaks, explosions and long-term contamination.

Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), says the UN body is closely monitoring the situation in Iran.

He said that the IAEA can confirm that the Natanz site was among the targets hit by Israel.

“The Agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country.”[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Israel attacks Iran: What we know so far via Aljazeera

かくごみ施設しせつれゼロ 全国ぜんこく47知事ちじアンケートvia YAHOO!JAPANニュース (共同きょうどう

原発げんぱつからこうレベル放射ほうしゃせい廃棄はいきぶつかくのごみ)の最終さいしゅう処分しょぶんじょうかんする共同通信社きょうどうつうしんしゃの47都道府県とどうふけん知事ちじアンケートで、福島ふくしま島根しまね鹿児島かごしまなどの13にん知事ちじが、最終さいしゅう処分しょぶんじょうれや3段階だんかい選定せんてい調査ちょうさに「どちらも反対はんたい」との回答かいとうえらんだことが12にちかった。のこる34にんはいずれの選択肢せんたくしえらばず、処分しょぶんじょうれや調査ちょうさに「賛成さんせい」はゼロだった。  調査ちょうさだい1段階だんかいである文献ぶんけん調査ちょうさ北海道ほっかいどうの2町村ちょうそんつづ昨年さくねん5がつ佐賀さがけん玄海げんかいまちれたが、つづ自治体じちたいはない。だい2段階だんかい概要がいよう調査ちょうさすすむには知事ちじ同意どうい不可欠ふかけつで、かくのごみのさき見通みとおせないまま、原発げんぱつ活用かつようすす矛盾むじゅんあらためて裏付うらづけられたかたちだ。  アンケートは玄海げんかいまちでの文献ぶんけん調査ちょうさ開始かいしから6がつで1ねんになるのにわせて4がつ上旬じょうじゅん送付そうふし、5がつ中旬ちゅうじゅんまでに回答かいとうた。調査ちょうさ処分しょぶんじょうについて「どちらも賛成さんせい」「調査ちょうさには賛成さんせいするが処分しょぶんじょうれは反対はんたい」「どちらも反対はんたい」などいつつの選択肢せんたくしから回答かいとうもとめた。必要ひつようおうじて追加ついか取材しゅざいした。

原文げんぶん

Posted in *日本語にほんご | Tagged | Comments Off on かくごみ施設しせつれゼロ 全国ぜんこく47知事ちじアンケートvia YAHOO!JAPANニュース (共同きょうどう

Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts via Nuclear Energy Information Service Illinois

PRESS RELEASE

For Immediate Use:  Thursday, May 28, 2025

Contact:  David Kraft,  (773)342-7650 (o); (630)506-2864 (c);  neis@neis.org

Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts

CHICAGO—At a time when the Illinois Legislature and Governor Pritzker are contemplating the repeal of the Illinois nuclear power moratorium, recent real-world events argue strongly against that move, a local safe-energy advocacy organization argues.

On Friday, May 23, President Trump signed Executive Orders (E/Os) which effectively gut the regulatory power of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to fulfill its mandate to protect the public health, safety and environment.

On the same day it was learned that the aged Quad Cities nuclear reactor station in Illinois had experienced a manual emergency shutdown on May 19, and fire on May 22; and further, that a serious nuclear incident that occurred in March 2023 had been covered up by both the utility and the NRC.

Many experts – including two former Chairs of the NRC — have savaged Trump’s ill-advised weakening of nuclear power regulation. (see attached statement list below).  NEIS points out that the Administration’s desire to expand nuclear while slashing regulation of both aging reactors and experimental, unproven new reactors is a recipe for disaster.  The Boeing plane disasters, the East Palestine train derailment, even the Fukushima reactor disaster – all had their root cause in either de-regulation, self-regulation by industry, or government-industry collusion.

“These events show beyond a doubt that while current regulation is clearly suspect, gutting it further at a time when some Illinois legislators and officials want to expand nuclear power is an outright threat to Illinois,” maintains David Kraft, director of the 43-year old Chicago-based safe-energy advocacy/anti-nuclear organization Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS). “Now is simply NOT the time to repeal the nuclear moratorium,” he asserts.

Legislation SB1527 and HB3604 call for the repeal of the 1987 nuclear construction moratorium, which simply states that no new reactors will be built in Illinois until the Federal Government demonstrates that it has an operational facility to dispose of – not merely store – high-level radioactive waste (HLRW).  The U.S. has failed to build such a facility; and all HLRW remains in storage at reactor sites.  Illinois – with 11 operating and 3 shuttered/decommissioned reactors – currently stores 11,000+ tons of HLRW, more than any other state.

Illinois is powerless to enact protective legislation to compensate for the regulatory safety void created by the Trump E/Os.  The NRC retains preemptive authority on all matters pertaining to safety and security at nuclear power plants.  No state can enact regulations stricter than those created and administered by the NRC, no matter how well-intentioned or protective.  Therefore, neither Governor Pritzker nor the Legislature can enact anything that will provide additional safeguards.

The Quad Cities reactors are owned by Constellation Energy are older and the same design as those which melted down and exploded during the Fukushima disaster.  A manual “scram” – an emergency shutdown – occurred on May 19, followed by a fire on May 22.  But just before these incidents, it was revealed that according to the NRC a serious accident that involved contaminating workers with radioactive water had occurred in March 2023, but was initially covered up by the plant staff.  Three years after the fact, the NRC has still not brought any corrective action or fines to bear.

As if to punctuate this sorry operational and regulatory performance, on Tuesday May 27 the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released a report titled, The Terrible 13: The Worst Safety and Security Violators in the US Nuclear Power Fleet.” The Quad Cities reactors are listed in this Report.

“Governor Pritzker is reported to have said that he wants to, ‘expand the options for nuclear in the state of Illinois….But it has to be done in the right way.’” Kraft notes.

“Under these conditions, there is no ‘right way.’  The questionable level of current regulation, and now the further erosion of even that via the E/Os are not the conditions calling for more nuclear power,” Kraft states.

“Current reactors are showing signs of aging. New reactors would require greater oversight during start-up phase.  With reduced regulatory oversight, neither will be safe.  Now is clearly not the time to bring more nuclear power to Illinois,” Kraft maintains.

“One bad day at the nuclear office will reduce Illinois to becoming the Belarus of North America,” he concludes, referring to the country most heavily impacted by the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

–30–

Nuclear Energy Information Service (NEIS) was formed in 1981 to watchdog the nuclear power industry, and to promote a renewable, non-nuclear energy future.

Numerous competent nuclear experts have decried the Trump Administration’s irresponsible nuclear deregulation action:

Statements by Dr. Ed Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists:

“This push by the Trump administration to usurp much of the agency’s autonomy as they seek to fast-track the construction of nuclear plants will weaken critical, independent oversight of the U.S. nuclear industry and poses significant safety and security risks to the public,” UCS added.

Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the UCS, said, “Simply put, the U.S. nuclear industry will fail if safety is not made a priority.”

“By fatally compromising the independence and integrity of the NRC, and by encouraging pathways for nuclear deployment that bypass the regulator entirely, the Trump administration is virtually guaranteeing that this country will see a serious accident or other radiological release that will affect the health, safety, and livelihoods of millions,” Lyman added. “Such a disaster will destroy public trust in nuclear power and cause other nations to reject U.S. nuclear technology for decades to come.”

Statements by Dr. Alison Macfarlane, former Chairwoman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

“An independent regulator is one who is free from industry and political influence…Once you insert the White House into the process, you don’t have an independent regulator anymore.”

“If you aren’t independent of political and industry influence, then you are at risk of an accident,” Macfarlane warned.

Statement by Dr. Gregory Jaczko, former Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

Gregory Jaczko, who led the NRC under President Obama, said Trump’s executive orders look like someone asked an AI chatbot, “How do we make the nuclear industry worse in this country?”

He called the orders a “guillotine to the nation’s nuclear safety system” that will make the country less safe, the industry less reliable and the climate crisis more severe.

Statement by Joseph Romm, a senior research fellow at the University of Pennsylvania’s Center for Science, Sustainability and the Media:

…any reduction in capacity at the NRC would be ill-timed with the administration’s proposed ramp-up of nuclear projects.

“This is not the time to be weakening oversight,” said Romm, who was a senior official at the Department of Energy in the 1990s. “It’s very dangerous to be weakening and undermining and politicizing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s oversight at a time when it’s not going to be having to do less work.”

Speeding up the permitting process while accepting proposals for new reactor designs would be “ridiculous and very dangerous,” he added.

Statement by Johanna Neumann, Environment America Research & Policy Center’s senior director of the Campaign for 100% Renewable Energy:

“Do we really want to create more radioactive waste to power the often dubious and questionable uses of AI?”

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Trump Administration Gutting Regulatory Agency, Recent Nuclear Incidents, Coverup: No Time to Open Illinois for More Nuclear Power, Nuclear Watchdog Group Asserts via Nuclear Energy Information Service Illinois

Fukushima soil headed to Japan PM’s flower beds to allay nuclear safety fears via The Guardian

Slightly radioactive soil from near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant will be transported to Tokyo and used in flower beds in the prime minister’s garden, in an attempt to prove to a skeptical public that the material is safe.

The decision comes 14 years after the plant suffered a triple meltdown in the world’s worst nuclear accident since Chornobyl.

The sample will be taken from 14 million cubic metres of soil – enough to fill 10 baseball stadiums – that has been removed from near the plant during work to make local neighbourhoods fit for the return of evacuated residents.

The soil is in temporary storage at a vast site near the plant, but authorities have struggled to make progress on a legal obligation to find permanent homes for the material outside Fukushima by 2045.

The government has suggested the material, which it describes as low risk, could be used to build roads and other infrastructure in other parts of Japan. It would be used as foundation material and covered with topsoil thick enough to keep radiation at negligible levels.

[…]

“The government will take the lead in setting an example, and we will do so at the prime minister’s office,” the chief cabinet secretary, Yoshimasa Hayashi, said at a meeting held to discuss the issue.

The Fukushima Daiichi plant released large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere after it was struck by a powerful earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. The disaster knocked out the facility’s backup power supply, sending three of its reactors into meltdown.

Although most of neighbourhoods that were evacuated after the disaster have been declared safe, many residents are reluctant to return. Some are concerned about the potential health effects – particularly on children – of living in former no-go zones, while others have built new lives elsewhere.

Work to remove 880 tonnes of highly dangerous damaged fuel from reactor containment vessels has barely begun. So far, specially designed devices have successfully retrieved two tiny samples of fuel, but removing all of it is expected to take decades and cost trillions of yen.

The plant’s operator, Tokyo Electric Power, has also had to contend with huge quantities of water that becomes contaminated when it is used to cool the damaged reactors. In 2023, the utility started pumping treated water – with all but one radioactive element removed – into the Pacific Ocean, triggering an angry response from China and South Korea.

The removal of topsoil, trees and other debris from near homes, schools, medical facilities and other public buildings created a stockpile of contaminated waste that now fills a site straddling the towns of Futaba and Okuma, located close to the plant. The material does not include any debris from inside Fukushima Daiichi.

In its final report on the recycling and disposal of the soil last year, the International Atomic Energy Agency said the work had been consistent with its safety standards.

But the public is yet to be convinced. Last month, local opposition forced the environment ministry to abandon a pilot project to use some of the Fukushima soil as landfill for flower beds and lawns at public parks in and around Tokyo.

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Fukushima soil headed to Japan PM’s flower beds to allay nuclear safety fears via The Guardian

US East Coast faces rising seas as crucial Atlantic current slows via New Scientist

The weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is boosting the sea level along the New England coast on top of sea level rise from melting ice, adding to flooding

By James Dinneen

16 May 2025

The slowdown of a major current in the Atlantic Ocean is boosting the sea level and associated flooding in the Northeast US, on top of the already-rising sea level due to climate change. A total collapse of this Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) as the planet warms could raise the sea level even further.

“If the AMOC collapsed, this would dramatically increase the flood frequency along the US coast, even in the absence of strong storms,” says Liping Zhang at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in New Jersey. “Even partial weakening [of the current] can already have substantial impacts.”

Melting ice sheets and warmer water due to human-caused climate change are leading to a rise in average sea level, but the rate of sea-level rise isn’t the same everywhere. For instance, some coastal land is sinking, speeding the relative rate of sea-level rise in those areas. Local sea level is also shaped by how heat, water and salt circulate in the ocean, with warmer and fresher water taking up more space than colder, saltier water.

The US north-east coast has seen sea levels rising faster than the global average in recent decades. In addition to sinking land, a slowdown in the AMOC – which transports warm water from lower latitudes to the North Atlantic, where it cools, gets saltier and sinks – has long been proposed as a possible driver for this. When this overturning circulation weakens, deep water along the path of the current is expected to warm and expand, sloshing more water onto the shallow continental shelf.

The AMOC naturally varies in strength on different timescales, and climate change has contributed to a slowdown in recent decades as melting ice freshens the North Atlantic and its waters warm. But it wasn’t clear whether this slowdown was making a big difference to sea level.

Zhang and her colleagues used tide gauge measurements along the New England coast to reconstruct the local sea level stretching back more than a century. On top of a steady rise due to climate change, they found a marked pattern of fluctuation between low and high sea levels every few decades. Years with a high sea level aligned closely with years when the AMOC was weak, and these years also had more frequent coastal flooding.

The researchers then used two different ocean models to quantify how much fluctuations in the AMOC’s strength influenced the local sea level. While the main driver of changes was the steady rise due to climate change, they found the weakening AMOC substantially boosted the sea level and associated flooding. In different parts of the coast, they found that a slowdown in the AMOC was behind 20 to 50 per cent of flooding since 2005.

Because the natural cycles in the AMOC’s strength are largely predictable, the findings could enable researchers to forecast which years will see lots of flooding up to three years in advance, says Zhang. This could help make long-term decisions about infrastructure and emergency preparedness.

“It demonstrates that the AMOC really does matter to [sea level rise],” says Chris Hughes at the University of Liverpool, UK, who wasn’t involved in the research. “It’s not just there in models or theory, it’s actually there in the real world.”

It isn’t clear how much of the recent weakening of the AMOC is due to climate change and how much is due to natural variations. […]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , | Comments Off on US East Coast faces rising seas as crucial Atlantic current slows via New Scientist

過酷かこく事故じこないとえるなら、原発げんぱつ首都しゅとけんでも…新潟にいがたけん発表はっぴょうのシミュレーションけ、長岡ながおか市長しちょう見解けんかいvia新潟にいがた日報にっぽう

 けん公表こうひょうした東京電力とうきょうでんりょく柏崎かしわざき刈羽かりわ原発げんぱつ事故じこばく線量せんりょうシミュレーションが、福島ふくしまだい1原発げんぱつ事故じこみの過酷かこく事故じこ想定そうていしていないことに関連かんれんし、長岡ながおか磯田いそだいたるしん市長しちょうは22にち記者きしゃ会見かいけんで「くに東電とうでん福島ふくしまのような過酷かこく事故じこがありないと断言だんげんできるなら、あえて柏崎かしわざき刈羽かりわ原発げんぱつつく必要ひつようはなくなる。首都しゅとけんでもよいのではないか」とべた。

 会見かいけん発言はつげん趣旨しゅしについて新潟日報社にいがたにっぽうしゃ取材しゅざいに、「今後こんご柏崎かしわざき刈羽かりわ原発げんぱつのリプレース(え)の議論ぎろん当然とうぜんてくる。そのとき関東かんとうけんちかところつくれば送電そうでんロスもなく合理ごうりてきだ」とし、柏崎かしわざき刈羽かりわ原発げんぱつ耐用たいよう年数ねんすうまえた論点ろんてんひとつだと説明せつめい。「新潟にいがたけん原発げんぱつゼロが実現じつげんできれば、県民けんみん市民しみんにとってわるはなしではない」ともかたった。  会見かいけんでは、けんのシミュレーション結果けっかについて「安全あんぜんせいかんする情報じょうほうすべ開示かいじしたほうがよい。万一まんいちでも福島ふくしま事故じこみの過酷かこく事故じこきる可能かのうせいがあるのなら、それも想定そうていしただい2段階だんかいのシミュレーションとして公表こうひょうされるべきだとおもう」との認識にんしきしめした。

原文げんぶん

Posted in *日本語にほんご | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 過酷かこく事故じこないとえるなら、原発げんぱつ首都しゅとけんでも…新潟にいがたけん発表はっぴょうのシミュレーションけ、長岡ながおか市長しちょう見解けんかいvia新潟にいがた日報にっぽう

Pacific

20 May 2025

Japan’s Fukushima nuclear wastewater ‘pose major environmental, human rights risks’ – UN experts via RNZ

[…]

In August 2023, Japan began discharging wastewaster from about 1000 storage tanks of contaminated water collected after the earthquake and tsunami in 2011 that caused the meltdown of its Fukushima nuclear plant.

In the formal communication, available publicly, UN Human Rights Council special rappoteurs addressed the the management of Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS)-treated wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (NPS) by the Japan government and TEPCO (Tokio Electric Power), and the ongoing discharge of such waters into the Pacific Ocean.

They said “we are alarmed that the implementation of contaminated water release operations of into the ocean may pose major environmental and human rights risks, exposing people, especially children, to threats of further contamination in Japan and beyond.”

“We wish to raise our concern about the allegations of the failure to assess the consequences on health of the release of wastewater against the best available scientific evidence,” the special rappoteurs write.

“Against this backdrop, we would like to highlight that the threats to the enjoyment of the right to adequate food do not concern only local people within the borders of Japan.

“Given the migratory nature of fish, their contamination represents a risk also for people living beyond the Japanese borders, including Indigenous Peoples across the Pacific Ocean which, according to their culture and traditions, mainly rely on seafood as their primary livelihood.”

The letter follows a complaint submitted by Ocean Vision Legal in August 2023 on behalf of the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG) and endorsed by over 50 civil society groups in the Pacific and beyond.

In a statement on Tuesday, PANG hailed it as “a landmark move for ocean justice and human rights”.

The organisation said that the destructive legacy of nuclear contamination through nuclear testing is still strongly felt across the region.

It said this legacy is marked by severe health impacts across generations and the ongoing failure to properly clean up test sites, which continue to contaminate the islands and waterways that Pacific peoples depend on.

“As Pacific groups, we remain disappointed in the Japanese Government and TEPCO’s shameless disregard of the calls by numerous Pacific leaders and civil society groups to hold off on any further release,” PANG’s coordinator Joey Tau said.

“Their ignorance constitutes a brazen threat to Pacific peoples’ livelihoods, safety, health and well-being, and the sovereignty of Pacific nations,” he added.

Japan has consistently maintained that the release is safe.

The UN human rights experts have asked for further information from Japan, including on the allegations raised, and on how the Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment has been conducted according to the best available scientific evidence.

This communication sends a clear message: Ocean issues must be understood as human rights issues, requiring precautionary and informed action aligned with international environmental law to safeguard both people and the marine environment.

Ocean Vision Legal founder and CEO Anna von Rebay said while the communication is not legally binding, it is a crucial milestone.

“It informs the interpretation of human rights and environmental law in response to contemporary threats, contributing to the development of customary international law and strengthens accountability for any actor harming the Ocean,” she said.

“Ultimately, it paves the way towards a future where the Ocean’s health is fully recognised as fundamental to human dignity, justice, and intergenerational equity.”

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Pacific

A new study from the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability finds that construction costs run over budget for more than 60% of energy infrastructure projects worldwide via BU Institute for Global Sustainabililty

By Laura Hurley

Between now and 2050, the International Energy Agency projects that more than $100 trillion will be spent on building net-zero energy infrastructure globally. Yet every single one of these projects runs the risk of higher-than-expected construction costs or time delays. Newer technologies introduced in the past decade, such as hydrogen or geothermal energy, are even more difficult to evaluate as government agencies, energy developers, utilities, investors, and other stakeholders decide which sustainable energy systems are best for future projects.

In a new state-of-the-art study, published in the journal Energy Research & Social Science, researchers at the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability (IGS) found that runaway construction costs and delayed timelines stymie many energy projects. In fact, the average project costs 40% more than expected for construction and takes almost two years longer than planned, as the study showed.

Nuclear power plants are the worst offenders, with an average construction cost overrun typically twice as much as expected or more, and the most extreme time delays. To be exact, the average nuclear power plant has a construction cost overrun of 102.5% and ends up costing $1.56 billion more than expected.

Looking at newer net-zero options reveals higher risk as well. Hydrogen infrastructure and carbon capture and storage both exhibit significant average time and cost overruns for construction, along with thermal power plants relying on natural gas, calling into question whether these can be scaled up quickly to meet emission reduction goals for climate mitigation.

“Worryingly, these findings raise a legitimate red flag concerning efforts to substantially push forward a hydrogen economy,” says Benjamin Sovacool, lead and first author of the study, director of IGS, and professor of earth and environment.

By contrast, solar energy and electricity grid transmission projects have the best construction track record and are often completed ahead of schedule or below expected cost. Wind farms also performed favorably in the financial risk assessment.

For Sovacool, the evidence is clear: “Low-carbon sources of energy such as wind and solar not only have huge climatic and energy security benefits, but also financial advantages related to less construction risk and less chance of delays,” he says. “It’s further evidence that such technologies have an array of underrated and underappreciated social and economic value.”

Using an original dataset significantly larger and more comprehensive than existing sources, the study provides the most rigorous comparative analysis of construction cost overrun risks and time delays for energy infrastructure projects globally.

[…]

Read more.

Posted in *English | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A new study from the Boston University Institute for Global Sustainability finds that construction costs run over budget for more than 60% of energy infrastructure projects worldwide via BU Institute for Global Sustainabililty

Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster/チェルノブイリ原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ事故じこ39周年しゅうねんかんする声明せいめいvia Ecohome (Belarus) /エコホーム(ベラルーシ)

Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster

On April 26, 2025, we mark 39 years since the largest man-made disaster of the 20th century — the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. This tragedy cast a dark shadow over Ukraine, Lithuania, Poland, and many other European countries.

Belarus became the country with the most contaminated territory (23%) and, as a result, the gravest long-term consequences. For our country, Chernobyl is not just a technological disaster — it is a national wound: poisoned land, water, and air; the nation’s compromised health; sick children — all of this has become part of Belarusian reality. This catastrophe will remain with us for hundreds of thousands of years — until all toxic radionuclides decay.

On this dark day, Belarusians around the world hold mourning marches known as the “Chernobyl Way” to honor the memory of the disaster’s victims. For many years, civil society in Minsk carried this event forward, defying the constraints of a totalitarian regime.

The totalitarian USSR enabled the conditions that made the Chernobyl catastrophe possible. The dictatorship of Lukashenka continues to exacerbate its consequences by:

·       silencing facts and downplaying risks,

·       putting contaminated land back into economic use,

·       depriving Chernobyl victims and affected people of social benefits,

·       repressing scientists, activists, and organizations speaking the truth about Chernobyl, many of whom have been imprisoned or are currently behind bars,

·       promoting dangerous Russian nuclear technologies in Belarus, at the doorstep of neighboring countries: both nuclear weapons and the Astravets NPP, which had been erected with violations of European safety standards and national legislation, in a non-transparent and undemocratic way,

·       discussing the construction of a second NPP while the first is underutilized for half of its operational time and the energy system has no need for its electricity.

Nuclear disasters do not occur only in authoritarian countries — democracies are not immune either. We learned this from the example of Fukushima. Moreover, even democratic nations can exhibit authoritarian tendencies, as we have seen in the past decade.

Democratic countries with nuclear plants may become targets of nuclear terrorism and military aggression, as demonstrated by Russia’s attacks on Ukraine and on Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhya NPP in 2022 and 2025.

At the same time, the international democratic community and the IAEA have proven incapable of effectively addressing the problems of nuclear blackmail, military attacks on nuclear facilities, or dealing with the consequences of nuclear disasters.

Sadly, the lessons of Chernobyl remain unlearned. Countries are not abandoning nuclear energy — instead, they present it as climate-friendly and conditionally “green,” using calculations that ignore technological realities and associated risks, as well as the full nuclear fuel cycle. The issue of spent nuclear fuel, which remains toxic for up to a million years (according to the IAEA), remains unresolved.

The world’s fleet of operating nuclear power plants is aging. Yet instead of transitioning to cheaper, more accessible energy generation technologies — including renewables — many countries are extending the life of existing plants and attempting to restart shut-down reactors, creating significant safety risks.

Nuclear materials continue to spread globally, and the threat of nuclear conflict is growing.

On this day, we address the authorities of Belarus with the following demands:

·       Immediately shut down and decommission the Astravets NPP, which is unsafe and unnecessary.

·       Return Belarus to its nuclear-free and neutral status.

·       Remove Chernobyl-contaminated areas from economic use.

·       Restore social support for people affected by the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster.

·       Resume scientific research on the consequences of the Chernobyl accident and reestablish cooperation with the global scientific community for this purpose.

·       Release environmental activists and all other political prisoners, including participants in the anti-nuclear movement.

·       Support Belarus’ transition to a sustainable energy system based primarily on renewable and decentralized sources.

We call on the international community to:

·       Consider the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus as a violation of the principles of collective security.

·       Strip nuclear energy from green agendas (such as ESG frameworks and climate finance mechanisms).

·       Prioritize conventional deterrence means and strategies over nuclear weapons.

·       Ban the trade of uranium and nuclear technologies with aggressor states (such as the Russian Federation).

·       Prevent the militarization of nuclear facilities by strengthening international legal frameworks and undertaking coordinated action within the global community.

·       Honor the memory of the victims of the Chernobyl disaster and continue supporting liquidators and those affected.

·       Express solidarity with the people of Ukraine, who faced nuclear threats during acts of military aggression.

We also appeal to the member states of the IAEA with a proposal to reconsider the organization’s core priorities and put human safety above profits and the ambitions of individual states. We call on the IAEA to take the risks associated with nuclear technology use and proliferation seriously. To that end, we urge the IAEA to revise its guarantees, protocols, and mechanisms in such a way that the organization, which is promoting a so-called “nuclear renaissance,” bears legal and financial responsibility for the consequences of nuclear accidents and nuclear terrorism.

The resolution was adopted by NGO Ecohome, Green Network, Belarusian National Platform of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, Dapamoga, Solidarity Movement “Together,” Narodnaya Hramada, the United Civic Party, Our House, and the RE:Belarus Association of Belarusian Political Prisoners, Association of Belarusian Political Prisoners “Da Voli,” and supported by the United Transitional Cabinet of Belarus, the Office of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya.

チェルノブイリ原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ事故じこ39周年しゅうねんかんする声明せいめい

2025ねん4がつ26にちわたしたちは20世紀せいき最大さいだい人為じんいてき災害さいがい—チェルノブイリ原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ事故じこ—から39ねんむかえます。この悲劇ひげきはウクライナ、リトアニア、ポーランド、そしておおくのほかのヨーロッパ諸国しょこくくらかげとしました。

ベラルーシはもっと汚染おせんされた領土りょうど(23%)をくにとなり、その結果けっかもっと深刻しんこく長期ちょうきてき影響えいきょうけることになりました。わたしたちのくににとって、チェルノブイリはたんなる技術ぎじゅつてき災害さいがいではなく—国民こくみんきず汚染おせんされた土地とちみず空気くうき国民こくみん健康けんこう被害ひがい病気びょうきどもたち—これらすべてがベラルーシの現実げんじつ一部いちぶとなりました。このだい惨事さんじは、すべての有毒ゆうどく放射ほうしゃせい核種かくしゅ崩壊ほうかいするまで、なんじゅうまんねんものあいだわたしたちとともにありつづけるでしょう。

このくらに、世界中せかいじゅうのベラルーシじんは「チェルノブイリのみち」としてられる追悼ついとう行進こうしんおこない、災害さいがい犠牲ぎせいしゃ記憶きおくとなえます。長年ながねんにわたり、ミンスクの市民しみん社会しゃかい全体ぜんたい主義しゅぎ体制たいせい制約せいやくかいながら、この行事ぎょうじ前進ぜんしんさせてきました。

全体ぜんたい主義しゅぎてきなソビエト連邦れんぽうは、チェルノブイリのだい惨事さんじ可能かのうにした条件じょうけんつくしました。ルカシェンコの独裁どくさい政権せいけんは、以下いかのようにその結果けっかをさらに悪化あっかさせつづけています:

事実じじつやみほうむり、リスクを過小かしょう評価ひょうかする

汚染おせんされた土地とち経済けいざい利用りようもど

•チェルノブイリの被害ひがいしゃ影響えいきょうけた人々ひとびとから社会しゃかいてき恩恵おんけいうば

•チェルノブイリについて真実しんじつかた科学かがくしゃ活動かつどう組織そしき弾圧だんあつし、そのおおくが投獄とうごくされ、現在げんざい刑務所けいむしょにいる

隣国りんごく玄関げんかんこう危険きけんなロシアのかく技術ぎじゅつをベラルーシで推進すいしん核兵器かくへいきとアストラヴェツ原発げんぱつ両方りょうほうを、欧州おうしゅう安全あんぜん基準きじゅん国内こくないほう違反いはんして、透明とうめいかつ民主みんしゅてき方法ほうほう建設けんせつ

いち号機ごうき運転うんてん時間じかん半分はんぶん稼働かどうしておらず、エネルギーシステムがその電力でんりょく必要ひつようとしていないにもかかわらず、号機ごうき建設けんせつについて議論ぎろんしている。

かく災害さいがい権威けんい主義しゅぎこくだけでこるわけではありません—民主みんしゅ主義しゅぎこくまぬかれないことを福島ふくしまれいからまなびました。さらに、民主みんしゅ主義しゅぎこくでさえ、過去かこ10年間ねんかんられたように、権威けんい主義しゅぎてき傾向けいこうしめすことがあります。

原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ民主みんしゅ主義しゅぎこくは、2022ねんと2025ねんのロシアによるウクライナやチェルノブイリ、ザポリージャ原発げんぱつへの攻撃こうげきしめすように、かくテロや軍事ぐんじてき侵略しんりゃく標的ひょうてきになる可能かのうせいがあります。

同時どうじに、国際こくさい民主みんしゅ主義しゅぎコミュニティとIAEAは、かくによる脅迫きょうはくかく施設しせつへの軍事ぐんじ攻撃こうげき、またはかく災害さいがい結果けっか効果こうかてき対処たいしょする能力のうりょくがないことが証明しょうめいされています。

残念ざんねんながら、チェルノブイリの教訓きょうくんまなばれていません。各国かっこく原子力げんしりょく発電はつでん放棄ほうきするどころか、技術ぎじゅつてき現実げんじつ関連かんれんリスク、さらにはかく燃料ねんりょうサイクル全体ぜんたい無視むしした計算けいさんもちいて、気候きこうやさしく条件じょうけんきで「グリーン」であるとして提示ていじしています。IAEAによれば最大さいだい100まん年間ねんかん有毒ゆうどくでありつづける使用しようかく燃料ねんりょう問題もんだい解決かいけつのままです。

世界せかい稼働かどうちゅう原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ老朽ろうきゅうしています。しかし、より安価あんかで、より利用りようしやすいエネルギー生産せいさん技術ぎじゅつ再生さいせい可能かのうエネルギーをふくむ—への移行いこうわりに、おおくの国々くにぐに既存きそん発電はつでんしょ寿命じゅみょう延長えんちょうし、閉鎖へいさされた原子げんしさい稼働かどうさせようとして、重大じゅうだい安全あんぜんリスクをしています。

かく物質ぶっしつ世界中せかいじゅうひろがりつづけ、かく紛争ふんそう脅威きょういたかまっています。

このわたしたちはベラルーシ当局とうきょく以下いか要求ようきゅう提出ていしゅつします:

安全あんぜんでなく、必要ひつようなアストラヴェツ原発げんぱつただちに停止ていしし、はいにすること。

•ベラルーシを非核ひかく中立ちゅうりつ地位ちいもどすこと。

•チェルノブイリ汚染おせん地域ちいき経済けいざい利用りようから除外じょがいすること。

•チェルノブイリ災害さいがい影響えいきょうけた人々ひとびとへの社会しゃかいてき支援しえん回復かいふくすること。

• チェルノブイリ事故じこ影響えいきょうかんする科学かがくてき研究けんきゅう再開さいかいし、この目的もくてきのためにグローバルな科学かがくコミュニティとの協力きょうりょくさい確立かくりつすること。

環境かんきょう活動かつどうおよびはん原発げんぱつ運動うんどう参加さんかしゃふくむすべての政治せいじしゅう解放かいほうすること。

 • ぬし再生さいせい可能かのう分散ぶんさんがたのエネルギーげんもとづく持続じぞく可能かのうなエネルギーシステムへのベラルーシの移行いこう支援しえんすること。

わたしたちは国際こくさい社会しゃかい以下いかびかけます:

• ベラルーシにおける核兵器かくへいき配備はいび集団しゅうだん安全あんぜん保障ほしょう原則げんそく違反いはんとみなすこと。

かくエネルギーをグリーンアジェンダ(ESGフレームワークや気候きこう金融きんゆうメカニズムなど)から除外じょがいすること。

核兵器かくへいきよりも従来じゅうらいがた抑止よくし手段しゅだん戦略せんりゃく優先ゆうせんすること。

侵略しんりゃくこく(ロシア連邦れんぽうなど)とのウランやかく技術ぎじゅつ取引とりひき禁止きんしすること。

国際こくさいてき法的ほうてき枠組わくぐみを強化きょうかし、グローバルコミュニティないでの協調きょうちょう行動こうどうつうじて、かく施設しせつ軍事ぐんじ防止ぼうしすること。

• チェルノブイリ災害さいがい犠牲ぎせいしゃ記憶きおくとなえ、除染じょせん作業さぎょうしゃ被害ひがいしゃへの支援しえん継続けいぞくすること。

軍事ぐんじ侵略しんりゃくあいだかく脅威きょうい直面ちょくめんしたウクライナの人々ひとびととの連帯れんたい表明ひょうめいすること。

また、IAEA加盟かめいこくたいしても組織そしき中核ちゅうかくてき優先ゆうせん事項じこう再考さいこうし、個別こべつ国家こっか利益りえき野心やしんより人間にんげん安全あんぜん優先ゆうせんするよう提案ていあんします。わたしたちはIAEAにたいし、かく技術ぎじゅつ使用しよう拡散かくさん関連かんれんするリスクを真剣しんけんめるようもとめます。そのために、いわゆる「原子力げんしりょくルネサンス」を推進すいしんしている組織そしきが、原子力げんしりょく事故じこかくテロの影響えいきょうたいして法的ほうてきおよび財政ざいせいてき責任せきにんうよう、その保証ほしょう議定ぎていしょ、メカニズムを改訂かいていするよううながします。

この決議けつぎは、NGOエコホーム、グリーンネットワーク、東方とうほうパートナーシップ市民しみん社会しゃかいフォーラムのベラルーシ国家こっかプラットフォーム、ダパモーガ、連帯れんたい運動うんどう「トゥギャザー」、ナロードナヤ・フラマダ、統一とういつ市民しみんとう、アワー・ハウス、RE:ベラルーシ政治せいじしゅう協会きょうかい、ベラルーシ政治せいじしゅう協会きょうかい「ダ・ヴォーリ」によって採択さいたくされ、ベラルーシ統一とういつ暫定ざんていないかくスヴャトラーナ・ツィハノウスカヤ事務所じむしょによって支持しじされました。

Posted in *English, *日本語にほんご | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Statement on the 39th Anniversary of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster/チェルノブイリ原子力げんしりょく発電はつでんしょ事故じこ39周年しゅうねんかんする声明せいめいvia Ecohome (Belarus) /エコホーム(ベラルーシ)

もと東大とうだい全共闘ぜんきょうとう代表だいひょう山本やまもと義隆よしたかさんが都内とない講演こうえん 「はん核兵器かくへいき運動うんどうはん原発げんぱつ運動うんどうべつのものじゃなくて一緒いっしょかんがえなきゃいけない」via YAHOO!ニュースJAPAN

きょう、1960年代ねんだい学生がくせい運動うんどうで「東大とうだい全共闘ぜんきょうとう」の代表だいひょうだった山本やまもと義隆よしたかさんが都内とない講演こうえんし、日本にっぽん原発げんぱつ政策せいさく批判ひはんしました。 きょう、都内とないで、はん原発げんぱつ運動うんどうつづける市民しみん団体だんたい主催しゅさいする講演こうえんかいおこなわれました。講演こうえんは「かく発電はつでん根本こんぽん問題もんだい」をテーマに、1960年代ねんだい学生がくせい運動うんどうで「東大とうだい全共闘ぜんきょうとう」の代表だいひょうだった、科学かがく史家しか山本やまもと義隆よしたかさんがおこないました。 山本やまもとさんは、戦前せんぜん戦中せんちゅう日本にっぽんがエネルギーをどのように戦争せんそう利用りようしようとしてきたかを解説かいせつ戦後せんご中曽根なかそね康弘やすひろもと総理そうり原発げんぱつ導入どうにゅうした理由りゆうはエネルギーではなく、将来しょうらいてきな「軍事ぐんじ利用りよう」のためではないかと批判ひはんしました。 そのうえで、山本やまもとさんは「はん核兵器かくへいき運動うんどうはん原発げんぱつ運動うんどうべつのものじゃなくて、一緒いっしょかんがえなきゃいけない」とうったえました。

原文げんぶん

Posted in *日本語にほんご | Tagged , , | Comments Off on もと東大とうだい全共闘ぜんきょうとう代表だいひょう山本やまもと義隆よしたかさんが都内とない講演こうえん 「はん核兵器かくへいき運動うんどうはん原発げんぱつ運動うんどうべつのものじゃなくて一緒いっしょかんがえなきゃいけない」via YAHOO!ニュースJAPAN